Data Presentation The Errors in the English Questions

32

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter consists of both the presentation and the discussion of the research findings. There are three sections presented in this chapter. The first section A, which is the answer to the first research question, concerns itself with the errors found in the English question formations that the participants made. The second section B discusses the causes why the participants made the errors, which also answers the second research question. As the answer to the third research question, the last section C deals with possible recommendations in order to improve the production of grammatical English questions.

A. The Errors in the English Questions

1. Data Presentation

As an attempt to obtain errors in forming English questions, the writer analyzed the transcripts of the video recordings of 40 participants while they practiced teaching in Microteaching class. The questions analyzed were only the questions asked by the participants who were performing as teachers. Hence, although some other participants made errors when they were pretending as students, the writer did not analyze them since there was a possibility that the participants intentionally made errors to test their teachers whether they were aware or not of the errors. 32 33 In addition, the writer excluded questions in phrase forms, e.g. Another answers?, Amplaz what kind of?, into the analysis. The writer merely focused the analysis on the questions containing subject and verb to make it clearer to see the rules violated in forming the questions. They were then classified into four categories based on surface strategy taxonomy, which are 1 omission, 2 addition, which covers double marking, regularization and simple addition, 3 misformation, which consists of regularization, archi-form, and alternating form, and 4 misordering. Yet, the writer did not find errors which fell into regularization subcategory of both addition and misformation category. Moreover, as stated in Theoretical Framework, the writer did not differentiate between archi- form and alternating form. The writer also classified questions which were the results of uninverted form of questions into other errors. There were 305 errors found in the formations of English questions. It should be recognized that the number of errors is not the same as the number of the erroneous questions since one question may contain more than one error. For example, an erroneous question When the expressions of sympathy you use?, whose correction should be When do you use the expressions of sympathy?, contains two errors falling under two different categories, which are omission of ‘do’ and misordering. The errors and the examples as well as the number and the percentage of each category are presented in Table 4.1 overleaf. 34 Table 4.1 The Classifications of Errors and Their Examples No Category of Errors Subcategory of Errors Example of Errors Number of Errors Percentage Auxiliary ‘do’ What word you say to express happiness? Singular marker Who get the answer? ‘Be’ What repetitive procedures usually called? Perfect tense marker ‘-ed’ Have you complete with the answer? Gerund marker ‘-ing’ Have you finished tell your friends about the story? Plural marker What are the expression of giving compliments? Infinitive marker ‘to’ Who wants answer this question? Genitive marker ‘-’s’ Is Lia answer correct? 1. Omission Article ‘a’ Who wants to be volunteer? 94 30.8 Double marking Past tense marker Did you ever heard this story before? Present tense marker Do you know what does family stands for? Object How do you spell it it? Subject Anyone volunteer to say something about the purpose of this procedure text? Simple addition Plural marker Where is the imperatives? 2 Addition ‘-s’ in non- finite verb Who can helps Pita? 29 9.5 Continued to page 35 35 Continued from page 34 No Category of Errors Subcategory of Errors Example of Errors Number of Errors Percentage Archialternat- ing form Overgeneraliza- tion of auxiliary ‘do’ in perfect tense Do you have read a narrative, right? Use of infinitive marker ‘to’ instead of gerund Would you mind to read it using skimming technique the main ideas? Overgeneraliza- tion of auxiliary ‘does’ in a sentence with modal Does anyone can tell the summary? Inconsistent application of tense marker Do you ever ask your mother or your father when you were child before you sleep to tell you a story? Overgeneraliza- tion of ‘be’ Are you agree, guys? Incorrect use of verb form Do you ever heard the story about Cinderella? Incorrect application of perfect tense Who still remember what we have learned last week? Incorrect application of word class You know the write of describe? Misformation Incorrect form of ‘be’ What are important information that you get there? 3. Incorrect form of non-finite verb What is the moral value you can got from the story? 37 12.1 Continued to page 36 36 Continued from page 35 No Category of Errors Subcategory of Errors Example of Errors Number of Errors Percentage Auxiliary ‘have’ as operator What we have learned today? Do you know what is that? Verb in an embedded question Can you explain what is identification? Modal auxiliary as operator What kind of expression you should use? 4. Misordering ‘Be’ as operator Why we are not allowed to use them too often? 80 26.2 You like to read a magazine? After orientation we have what? It is sad ending or happy ending? Being a mother is difficult? Everybody got one? 5. Other Errors Uninverted forms Usually it uses what kind or types of tense? 65 21.3 Total number of errors 305

2. Discussion

Dokumen yang terkait

ERROR ANALYSIS IN ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS Error Analysis In Oral Production Made By English Department Students In Microteaching Class At Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 15

ERROR ANALYSIS IN ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS Error Analysis In Oral Production Made By English Department Students In Microteaching Class At Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 13

SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS MADE BY STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 5 21

INTRODUCTION Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 4 5

SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS MADE BY STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 14

ERRORS IN SPOKEN PRODUCTION MADE BY STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH Errors in Spoken Production Made by Students in Microteaching Class of Department of English Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta in 2013/2014 Acade

0 5 15

ERRORS IN SPOKEN PRODUCTION MADE BY STUDENTS INMICROTEACHING CLASS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION Errors in Spoken Production Made by Students in Microteaching Class of Department of English Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta in 2013/20

0 2 12

ERROR ANALYSIS OF ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISHDEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS Error Analysis Of Oral Production Made By English Department Students In Microteaching Class at Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 5 17

ERRORS MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS ERRORS MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS.

0 2 12

ERRORS IN THE ENGLISH QUESTION FORMATIONS MADE BY MICROTEACHING CLASS STUDENTS A THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education

0 1 120