Review of Related Studies

E.M Forster divides character into two terms, flat character and round character. Flat character is build around ‘single idea or quality’ and is presented without much individualizing detail, and therefore can be fairly adequately described in a single phrase or sentence. Round character is complex in temperament and motivation and is presented with subtle particularity Abrams, 1981: 20. Koesnosoebroto divided character into two kinds, major or main character and minor character. Main character is the most important character in the story. Minor character is character of less important than those the main. The main character needs other character to make the story more convincing an lifelike Koesnosoebroto, 1988: 67 Characterization is the process by which an author or a playwright creates a character. Characterization in literature is the presentation of the attitudes and behaviors of imaginary persons in order to make them credible to the author’s audience. According to Encyclopedia Americana: International Edition, Vol: 6, characterization is a unique feature of such fictional forms as the short story, novel, drama, and narrative poetry Library of Congress Cataloging Data, 1995: 291. Oscar Bracket states that characterization can be found in four levels: physical, social, psychological, and moral. Physical is concerned with such basic facts as sex, age, size, and color. Social is included the character’s economic status, profession or trade, religion, family relationship. All those factors are that place him in his environment. Psychological reveals the character’s habitual responses, attitudes, desire, motivations, like and dislikes, the inner working of mind, both emotional and intellectual, which precede action. Moral decision differentiates characters because the choices they make when facing moral crises show whether they are selfish, hypocritical, or person of integrity Bracket, 1974: 39-40 Hugh Holman and William Harmon in A Handbook to Literature state that characterization is divided into three fundamental ways. The first is the explicit presentation by the author of the character through direct exposition, either in an introduction or more often throughout the development of the story that is illustrated by actions. The second is the presentation of the character in action with little or no explicit comment by the author, in the expectation that the reader will be able to reduce the attributes of the actor from action. The third is the presentation from within a character, without comment on the character by the author, of the impact of actions and emotions on the character’s inner self, with the expectations that the reader will come to a clear understanding of the attributes of the characters. The three fundamental methods are the basic terms for the author to give characterization toward the characters in the story to be understood by the reader Holman and Harmon, 1986: 81-83. According to Yelland, Jones, and Easton, characterization is the creation of imaginary persons. The writer can reveal certain qualities of its own nature and the writer also can try to keep himself in the background and presents the characters of real people or of imaginary people. Through characterization, the readers will understand why the character does the thing and can be emotionally involved in the story Yelland, Jones, and Easton, 1950: 30. Characterization will always be a part of character. Characterization as the part of character is the way an author characterize his or her work. From the theories on character and characterization the writer could conclude that character is a person presented in literary works that has his or her own personalities.

2. Theories of Modern Tragedy

There are many concepts that try to explain the definition or the meaning of tragedy. A tragedy is an unhappy and painful situation which involves death Kernan 1963: 163. Kernan states that a tragic hero is a person in the rest of his life denies the world around him, but he knows he has to achieve in order to fulfill himself, and he persists in his search while more ordinary men giving in. He commits himself to some curse, which creates conflict with forces whose existence he has not suspected. Therefore, he stumbles forward into his suffering, and at the end he usually achieves something of value by his struggle. Aristotle said that a tragedy is an imitation of an action that is serious and also, as having magnitude, complete itself, in language with pleasurable accessories, each kind brought in separately in the parts of the work; in dramatic form; with incident arousing ‘pity and fear’ wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of such emotion. The “language with pleasurable accessories” means that with rhythm and harmony or song superadded. Tragedy is essentially an imitation of action and life, of happiness and misery. All human happiness or misery takes the form of action Levin, 1960: 134-151.