46
26 40
65 65
27 50
65 75
28 50
65 70
29 60
65 75
30 70
75 80
31 60
70 85
Mean:
_
∑x X = ──
N
54.96 64.67
73.38
: the student who passed the KKM 70 The table above showed the result of the students’ score before and after
implementing Classroom Action Research CAR. To know whether the implementation of C
AR can improve the students’ score in understanding the passive form of the Present Continuous Tense, the writer makes the comparison
between each cycle and also calculates the students’ improvement score from pretest to post test 1 and 2 into percentage.
To analyze the data of pretest, the writer calculate the mean score of the class. It is calculated as follow:
X =
∑x n
X =
1704 31
X =
54.96
From that calculation, the mean score of the class in pretest is 54.96. It means that the students’ score of passive form of the Present Continuous Tense
test before implementing pattern drill method to teach the material is 54.96.
47
The next step is to know the percentage of the students who passed the criterion of minimum completeness KKM that is 70 in pretest. It is calculated as
following.
P =
F N
P =
4 x 100
31 P
= 12.5
The computation above shows that the percentage of the students who passed the KKM in the pretest is 12.5. It means that, there are only 4 students
who pass the KKM and there are 28 students are still below the KKM. The next calculation is to know the mean of post test 1 in cycle 1, the
percentage of improvement from pretest to posttest 1 and the percentage of the students’ who pass the KKM. The first is calculating the mean of the class in the
post test 1, here the calculation as follows.
X =
∑x n
X =
2005 31
X =
64.67
The calculation above shows the students’ mean score in post test 1 is 64.67. The score indicates there is an improvement from the pretest mean score. It
is proved that the pretest mean score is 54.96 and the mean of post test 1 is 64.67. So, from pretest to post test improves 9.71 64.67
– 54.96. The second is calculating the
percentage of the students’ score improvement from pretest to post test. The computation is as following.
y1 - y P =
─── X 100
48
y 64.67
– 54.96 P =
───────── X 100 54.96
9.71 P =
──── X 100 54.96
P = 17.67
The computation above shows that the percentage of students’ improvement score from pretest to posttest is 17.67. It means the score in cycle
1 has improved 17.67 from the pretest score. The third computation is to calculate the students who pass the KKM in
posttest 1. The calculation by using as follow:
P =
F N
P =
9 x 100
31 P
= 29.03
The calculation above shows that the students’ score which pass the KKM
is 29.03. it means that, after implementing the Classroom Action Research CAR there are 9 students who passed the KKM and there are 22 students who
still below the KKM. The percentage a lso shows the students’ improvement from
pretest 12.5 to posttest score 29.03. It proves 16.53 improvement 29.03
– 12.5. However, it could not be said that the cycle is completed because it is still not reach the target of success Classroom Action Research
CAR that is 75 improvement. So, it must be continue to the next cycle. Same as the previous computation, here in the cycle 2 the writer also
calculates the mean of posttest 2, the percentage of improvement from pretest to
49
posttest 2 and the percentage of the students’ who pass the KKM. The first is
calculating the mean score of posttest 2. The computation is as following.
X =
∑x n
X =
2275 31
X =
73.38
From that calculation, the mean of posttest 2 is 73.38. It means that there are the improvement score 8.71 from the mean score of posttest 1 to the mean of
post test 2 73.38 - 64.67. The next is calculating the percentage of students’ improvement score.
The writer computes by using the formula:
y1 - y P =
─── X 100 y
73.38 – 54.96
P = ───────── X 100
54.96 9.71
P = ──── X 100
54.96 P = 33.51
The calculation above show that there is the posttest improves 33.51 from the pretest. It also can be said that there is higher improvement from the
posttest 1 17.67. The last computation is to calculate the improvement of the class
percentage, which is calculating the students who pass the KKM in cycle 2. It uses calculation as following:
50
P =
F N
P =
26 x 100
31 X
= 83.87
From that calculation, the class percentage is 83.87. It means that in cycle 2 there are 26 students who passed the KKM and there are only 5 students
who still below the KKM 70. The class percentage of posttest 2 shows some improvements fro the previous tests; the improvement is 71.37 from the pretest or
54.84 from the posttest 1. From whole computation above, the interpretation of the data result among
the pretest, posttest 1 and posttest 2 are as following: In the pretest, the mean score before implementing the Classroom Action
Research CAR is 54.96. It means that the students’ mean score of passive form of the Present Continuous Tense test before implementing pattern drill method is
54.96. The students who pass the KKM is only 4 students which the percentage of calculation is 12.5 and the other 27 students are still below the KKM 70.
The cycle 1, the mean score of the posttest of cycle 1 is 64.67. It means that there are some students’ improvement score fro the pretest that is 9.71 64.67
– 54.96 or 17.67. Meanwhile, the percentage of students who pass the KKM in
cycle 1 is 29.03. It shows that there are 9 students who successfully achieve the KKM and there are still 22 students who cannot reach the KKM. Even though
there is an improvement score from pretest to posttest 1, there still needed more improvement, because the target of the success CAR that is 75 or at least 23
students is not achieved yet. So, the cycle must be continued to cycle 2. The last is the computation in cycle 2, the mean score of the posttest in
cycle 2 is 73.78. It shows the students’ improvement score 8.87 73.38 – 64.67
from the posttest 1 or 33.51 students’ improvement in the score percentage from
pretest. Meanwhile, the class percentage which passes the KKM is 83.87. it means there are 26 students who pass the KKM and only 5 students who fail to
51
reach the KKM. This percentage shows some improvements 71.37 from the pretest 83.87 - 12.5 or 54.84 from the posttest 1 83.87 - 29.03. The
percentage of students’ improvement posttest score who pass the KKM of the cycle 2 has fulfilled the target of success Classroom Action Research CAR that
is above 75 students could pass the KKM. Automatically, it can be said that the Classroom Action Research CAR is success and the cycle is stopped.
52
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
After completing the whole steps in implementing Classroom Action Research CAR study that has been explained in the previous chapters, in this
chapter the writer gives his contribution by giving the conclusion and some suggestions. Firstly, the writer would like to sum up his study about implementing
The Pattern Drill method to teach The Passive form of the Present Continuous Tense.
This study uses the Classroom Action Research CAR method in which to identify the p
roblem on students’ understanding in learning The Passive form of The Present Continuous Tense, it is initiated through the interview the teacher and
through the observation in the X grade Accountancy of SMK Bina Insani Tangerang which is considered as the class whose grammar test score are very
low. The amount of students of that class is 31. In this study, the writer implements the Kurt Lewin’s design which consists of four phases. Those are
planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Meanwhile, the data is derived among
from the test, interview and observation; it could be summed up as: First, related to the test result, there was 33.51
improvement of students’ mean score from pretest to the posttest of the second cycle. In the pretest, there were four students
who passed the KKM. Then in the result of posttest in cycle 1, there were nine or 29.03 students in the class who passed the KKM considering their mean score
of the test is 64.67. Next in the result of posttest in the cycle 2, there is 26 or 83.87 students who passed the KKM in which their mean score of the test
derived 73.38. Second, the observation result showed that the students were more active and interested in learning grammar activity in the classroom.
A. Conclusion
Based on the research conducted in the X grade Accountancy of SMK Bina Insani Tangerang academic year 20112012, it can be concluded that the
students could improve their understanding in learning the passive form of the
Kategori