Abstract setting Multilevel decompositions

Wavelets on the interval 125 Moreover, for s ≥ 0, 1 p, q +∞, let B s pq,00  = n v ∈ B s pq : supp v ⊆  o ; 3 then, if s − 1 p ∈ ✁ , B s pq,00  = B s pq,0  . 4 For these spaces, we have the real interpolation result: L p , B s 1 pq,0  s 2 s 1 , p = B s 2 pq,00  , 5 where 1 p, q +∞ and 0 s 2 s 1 . In particular, if 1 p +∞, 0 s 2 s 1 , we have L p , W s 1 , p  s 2 s 1 , p =      W s 2 , p 00  if s 2 − 1 p ∈ ✁ , B s 2 pq,0  if s 2 ∈ ✁ , W s 2 , p  if s 2 , s 2 − 1 p ∈ ✁ , 6 where W s, p  , W s, p 00  are defined similarly to the Besov spaces 2 and 3. We will also consider negative values of s. For s 0, 1 p, q +∞, let us denote by p ′ and q ′ the conjugate index of p and q respectively i.e. 1 p + 1 p ′ = 1 q + 1 q ′ = 1. Then, we set B s pq  = B −s p ′ q ′ ,  ′ .

2. Multilevel decompositions

We will recall how to define an abstract multilevel decomposition of a separable Banach space V , with norm denoted by k·k, and how to obtain, using Jackson- and Bernstein-type inequalities, characterization of subspaces of V . For more details and proofs we refer, among the others, to [5, 6, 15].

2.1. Abstract setting

Let {V j } j ∈ ✁ = ✂ or ✁ = { j ∈ ✂ : j ≥ j ∈ ✂ } be a family of closed subspaces of V such that V j ⊂ V j +1 , ∀ j ∈ ✁ . For all j ∈ ✁ , let P j : V → V j be a continuous linear operator satisfying the following properties: kP j k ✄ V ,V j ≤ C independent of j , 7 P j v = v , ∀v ∈ V j , 8 P j ◦ P j +1 = P j . 9 Observe that 7 and 8 imply kv − P j v k ≤ C inf u∈V j kv − uk , ∀v ∈ V , where C is a constant independent of j . Through P j , we define another set of operators Q j : V → V j +1 by Q j v = P j +1 v − P j v , ∀v ∈ V , ∀ j ∈ ✁ , 126 L. Levaggi – A. Tabacco and the detail spaces W j : = Im Q j , ∀ j ∈ ✁ . If ✁ is bounded from below, it will be convenient to set P j −1 = 0 and V j −1 = {0}; thus, Q j −1 = P j and W j −1 = V j . In this case, let us also set = ✁ ∪ { j − 1}, otherwise = ✁ . Thanks to the assumptions 7-8-9, every Q j is a continuous linear projection on W j , the sequence {Q j } j ∈ is uniformly bounded in ✁ V , V j +1 and each space W j is a complement space of V j in V j +1 , i.e., V j +1 = V j ⊕ W j . 10 By iterating the decomposition 10, we get for any two integers j 1 , j 2 ∈ such that j 1 j 2 V j 2 = V j 1 ⊕   j 2 −1 M j = j 1 W j   , 11 so that every element in V j 2 can be viewed as a rough approximation of itself on a coarse level plus a sum of refinement details. Making some more assumptions on the operators P j , we obtain a similar result for any v ∈ V . In fact, if P j v → v as j → +∞ , 12 and P j −1 = 0 if ✁ = { j ∈ ✂ : j ≥ j ∈ ✂ }, P j v → 0 as j → −∞ if ✁ = ✂ , 13 then V = +∞ M j =inf ✂ W j , 14 and v = X j ≥inf ✂ Q j v , ∀v ∈ V . 15 The decomposition 15 is said to be q-stable, 1 q ∞, if kvk ≍   X j ≥inf ✂ kQ j v k q   1q , ∀v ∈ V . 16 For each j ∈ ✁ , let us fix a basis for the subspaces V j 8 j = n ϕ j k : k ∈ ˘ ✄ j o , 17 and for the subspaces W j 9 j = n ψ j k : k ∈ ˆ ✄ j o , 18 with ˘ ✄ j and ˆ ✄ j suitable sets of indices. Wavelets on the interval 127 We can represent the operators P j and Q j in the form P j v = X k∈ ˘ j ˘v j k ϕ j k , Q j v = X k∈ ˆ j ˆv j k ψ j k , ∀v ∈ V . 19 Thus, if 12 and 13 hold, 15 can be rewritten as v = X j ≥inf ✂ X k∈ ˆ j ˆv j k ψ j k , ∀v ∈ V . 20 The bases chosen for the spaces V j and W j are called uniformly p-stable if, for a certain 1 p ∞, V j = X k∈ ˘ j α k ϕ j k : {α k } k∈ ˘ j ∈ ℓ p and X k∈ ˘ j α k ϕ j k ≍ {α k } k∈ ˘ j ℓ p , ∀ {α k } ∈ ℓ p , the constants involved in the definition of ≍ being independent of j. If the multilevel decomposition is q-stable, the bases 18 of each W j are uniformly p- stable, 12 and 13 hold, we can further transform 16 as kvk ≍     X j ≥inf ✂    X k∈ ˆ j | ˆv j k | p    q p     1q , ∀v ∈ V .

2.2. Characterization of intermediate spaces