A method to teach the design process.
8.2 Concept Evaluation Information
215 If the horse is dead, get off. meet. The results of evaluation give the information necessary to make concept decisions . Be ready during concept evaluation to abandon your favorite idea, if you cannot defend it in a rational way. Also, abandon if necessary “the way things have always been done around here.” Reflect on the above aphorism and, if it applies, use it. Before we get into the details of this chapter, it is worth reflecting on the basic decision-making process introduced in Chap. 4 where we were selecting a project. In Fig. 8.2 a reprint of Fig. 4.19, the issue is “Select a concepts to develop.” We have spent considerable time generating alternatives and criteria. Now we must focus on the remaining steps and decide what to do next. First, we will discuss the types of evaluation information we have available to us, and then we will address different traditional methods for decision making. The criteria importance step 4 will not really surface until Section 8.5. The traditional decision-making methods do not do a good job of helping you manage risk and uncertainty. This will be addressed in Section 8.6, and a robust decision-making method, designed for managing uncertainty will be introduced in Section 8.7. Finally, the documentation and communication needs of conceptual design will be detailed. 8.2 CONCEPT EVALUATION INFORMATION In order to be compared, alternatives and criteria must be in the same language and they must exist at the same level of abstraction. Consider, for example, the spatial requirement that a product fit in a slot 2.000 ±0.005 in. long. An unrefined concept for this product may be described as “short.” It is impossible to compare “2.000 ± 0.005 in.” to “short” because the concepts are in different languages— a number versus a word—and they are at different levels of abstraction—very concrete versus very abstract. It is simply not possible to make a comparison between the “short” concept and the requirement of fitting a 2.000 ± 0.005 in. slot. Either the requirement will have to be abstracted or work must be done on the concept to make “short” less abstract or both. An additional problem in concept evaluation is that abstract concepts are uncertain; as they are refined, their behavior can differ from that initially antic- ipated. The greater the knowledge, the less the uncertainty about a concept and the fewer the surprises as it is refined. However, even in a well-known area, as the concept is refined to the product, unanticipated factors arise. Richard Feynman, the Nobel winning physicist said: “If you thought that science was certain— well that is just an error on your part.” A major factor is to manage the uncertain information on which most decisions are based; there is uncertainty in everything.Parts
» Mechanical engineering design process
» Introduction Measuring the Design Process with Product
» The History of the Design Process The Life of a Product
» The Many Solutions for Design The Basic Actions of Problem Solving
» Summary Mechanical Design Languages
» Different Types of Mechanical Constraints, Goals, and
» Product Decomposition Summary Introduction
» The Individual Designer: A Model of Human Mental Processes That Occur
» Characteristics of Creators The Structure of Design Teams
» Building Design Team Performance Overview of the Design Process
» Designing Quality into Products Product Discovery
» Choosing a Project Summary Sources Exercises On the Web
» Product, Project, and Decision Risk
» In engineering design, the designer uses three types of knowledge: knowl-
» A design process that results in a quality product can be learned, provided
» Improved material on project planning.
» Insist on rights of humanity and nature to coexist
» Recognize interdependence. On the Web
» Accept responsibility for the consequences of design
» Create safe objects of long-term value.
» Eliminate the concept of waste.
» Rely on natural energy flows.
» Understand the limitations of design.
» Seek constant improvement by the sharing of knowledge.
» Respect relationships between spirit and matter.
» Engineering Changes Patent Applications Design for End of Life Sources Placing a piece in a puzzle
» Decompose a simple system such as a home appliance, bicycle, or toy into its assemblies,
» For the device decomposed, list all the important features of one component.
» Select a fastener from a catalog that meets these requirements:
» Sketch at least five ways to configure two passengers in a new four-wheeled commuter
» You are a designer of diving boards. A simple model of your product is a cantilever beam.
» Find five examples of mature designs. Also, find one mature design that has been recently
» Teams develop decisions by consensus rather than by authority. This leads to
» Beneficial team behaviors. Well-defined decision process.
» Use of sound generationevaluation approach.
» Standardizes, organizes, and controls operations.
» Provides for consistent dissemination of information.
» Encourages improvement. Team nam
» Generate alternatives Team nam
» Identify criteria importance Team nam
» Based on the evaluation results, decide what to do next. This decision will
» “What I want for myself out of this.” Refine criteria.
» Refine evaluation—work to gain consensus and reduce uncertainty.
» Choose an alternative—you’ve made a decision, document it and address
» Develop a list of original design problems that you would like to do at least 3. Choose
» Make a list of features you don’t like about products you use. One way to develop this
» Executive summary: Team Members:
» Gantt chart: All diagrams, figures, and tables should be accurately and clearly labeled
» References: Appendices: All diagrams, figures, and tables should be accurately and clearly labeled
» For the features of the redesign problem Exercise 4.2 develop a plan as in Exercise 5.1.
» Develop a plan for making a breakfast consisting of toast, coffee, a fried egg, and juice. Be
» Developing the specifications or goals for the product
» Finding out how the specifications measure the customers’ desires
» Determining how well the competition meets the goals
» Developing numerical targets to work toward
» The QFD method can be applied to the entire problem and any subprob-
» Both competitors have good lifting position when transferring the passenger
» Both products have poor stability. Clearly, this is a market opportunity.
» The Colub is easy to move and Delton is not, need to determine why and do
» For most of adjustment requirements, neither of the competitors score above 3,
» Each specification should measure at least one customers’ requirement at
» Each specification should be measurable. Every specification should be writ-
» The first specification “seat width relative to frame width” is not clear. What
» Two points about specifications that are in terms of “number of steps”:
» For a design problem Exercise 4.1, develop a house of quality and supporting informa-
» The interface to the jam plate. Energy flows between the trigger and the jam
» Articulate the conflicting positions or functions. Identify the needs forcing the two positions.
» Articulate the conflicting positions
» Identify the issue, the objective of the needs
» Articulate injections that can relieve the conflict while meeting the objective.
» Many of the problems that engineers face contain elements that have already
» There are predictable patterns of technological change that can be applied to
» Increase degree of an object’s segmentation
» Arrange objects so they can go into action without time loss
» Stating the overall function.
» Decomposing the overall function into subfunctions. If assumptions are needed to
» Identifying all the objects nouns used and defending their inclusion in the functional
» For the redesign problem Exercise 4.2, apply items a–c from Exercise 7.1 and also study
» Which subfunctions must remain unchanged during redesign?
» Which subfunctions if any must be changed to meet new requirements?
» Which subfunctions may cease to exist?
» For the functional decomposition developed in Exercise 7.1,
» A perpetual motion machine. In recent times the patent office has refused to consider
» Use brainstorming to develop at least 25 ideas for
» A way to fasten together loose sheets of paper.
» A device to keep water off a mountain-bike rider.
» A way to convert human energy to power a boat.
» A method to teach the design process.
» Use brainwriting to develop at least 25 ideas for
» A device to leap tall buildings in a single bound.
» Are the critical parameters identified?
» Are the safe operating latitude and sensitivity of the parameters known?
» Have the failure modes been identified?
» Does hardware exist that demonstrates positive answers to the preceding four
» Is the technology controllable throughout the product’s life cycle?
» The source of the component.
» Wheel and chain must clear frame for all deflections. Wheel should move straight up and down.
» Your body while holding a 5-kg weight straight out in front of you with your
» Maximum acceleration on a standard street
» Maximum acceleration on a 5-cm standard pothole
» Identify the critical parameters and interfaces for evaluation.
» Develop a P-diagram for each.
» Choose whether to build physical models for testing or run an analytical experiment
» Perform the experiments or analysis and develop the most robust product.
» For the redesign problem Exercise 4.2, repeat the steps in Exercise 10.1.
» You have just designed a tennis-ball serving machine. You take it out to the court, turn it
» Does your machine have an accuracy or a variation problem?
» Itemize some of the potential causes of each type of error. Consider the types of
» A new, spring-powered can opener
» A diving board for your new swimming pool
» An art nouveau shelf bracket
» From what material is the component to be machined?
» The overall dimensions are 9.46 cm 3.72 in. by 4.52 cm 77 in. in the
» The wall thickness is 3.2 mm 0.125 in..
» The number of components to be manufactured is 1 million.
» The labor hourly rate is 35.
» Find the Theoretical Minimum Number of Components. Examine each
» hr R Mechanical engineering design process
» For the product developed in response to the design problem begun in Exercise 4.1,
» For the redesign problem begun in Exercise 4.2, estimate the changes in selling price
» Estimate the manufacturing cost for a plastic injection-molded component:
» Compare the costs for manufacturing volumes of 100, 1000, 10,000, and 100,000.
» Compare the cost for a change in tolerance.
» Why does changing the material have virtually no effect on cost at low plastic
» Perform a design-for-assembly evaluation for one of these devices. Based on the results
» A simple toy fewer than 10 parts
» Read as many similar instruction manuals as you can. Many companies post
» Organize instructions into sections to make it easy to find answers. Do not
» Recruit members of the user community not familiar with the product to test
» Know your goals and your vendor’s goals. Building a strong vendor relation-
» Involve vendors early. When dealing with vendors, you cannot afford delays
» Establish relationships. It is important to have vendor partners who under-
» Communicate. Put everything in writing—responsibilities, expected sales
» Stay professional. Things go wrong in life. When they go wrong in a relation-
Show more