3.5 Instrument for Collecting the Data
In  collecting  the  data,  the  researcher  needed  instruments.  As  stated  in  Koshy 2005:87, when planning the data collection, all researchers should think in mind
that; 1
there  are  many  ways  of  gathering  data;  the  researchers  have  to  choose  the most suitable method for the task in hand;
2 it is the quality of the data you collect that is more important than the number
of ways the researchers collect data. In this case, the researcher used three instruments to collect the data. They
were tests, observation sheet, and questionnaire.
3.5.1 Test Pre-test and Post-test
According  to  Brown  2004:3,  test  is  a  method to  measure  a  person‟s  ability,
knowledge,  or  performance  in  a  given  domain.  In  this  case,  the  researcher measured their skill in writing recount text. There were two kinds of tests used in
this  study.  They  were  pre-test  and  post-test.  Pre-test  is  a  kind  of  test  which  is carried out before the researcher  gives the treatments to the students. The aim of
delivering  pre- test to the students was to know and measure the students‟ basic
writing skill of recount text before they got the treatments. Meanwhile, post-test is a kind of test which is conducted after the students
get  the  treatments.  The  purpose  of  giving  them  the  post-test  was  to  measure  the students‟ skill in writing recount text after being taught using PWIM strategy. The
result of both  tests was  compared  to  know whether the students‟ writing skill of
recount text improved or not.
3.5.2 Observation sheet
As  stated  in  Burns  2010:62,  observation  sheet  is  used  in  what  is  sometimes called  systematic  or  structured  observation.  It  uses  a  coding  system  or  checklist
prepared  before  the  lesson  begins.  The  purpose  of  doing  observation  was  to collect the data as many as possible about the whole teaching and learning process
which  was  done  by  the  researcher  in  the  classroom.  The  observation  sheet consisted of two
students‟ categories, there were students‟ with positive behaviour and  students  with  negative  behaviour.  Each  category  had  some  indicators  as
described below:
Table 3.1 Categories of Students’ Learning Behaviour
Students with positive behavior Students with negative behaviour
a. Student  is  paying  attention  and
giving  response  to  the  teacher enthusiastically.  asking,  giving
response, making notes
b. Student  is  participating  actively
in identifying the pictures. c.
Student  is  giving  positive response
happy, interested
towards  Picture  Word  Inductive Model PWIM strategy.
d. Student  can  produce  recount
text well. a.
Student is NOT paying attention to  the  teacher  and  doing
unimportant things talking with friends, dillydallying, etc
b. Student  is  NOT  participating
actively in
identifying the
pictures. c.
Student  is  giving  NEGATIVE response
indifferent, not
interested towards
Picture Word  Inductive  Model  PWIM
strategy. d.
Student cannot produce recount text well.
3.5.3 Questionnaire