Difficulty Level Discriminating Power Reliability of the Reliability refers to the stability or the c

35 35

3.8.2.1 Difficulty Level

The index of difficulty or the facility value of an item simply shows how easy or difficult the particular item proved in the test. It is calculated by using the formula: where: P = the facility value index of difficulty B = the number of students who answered correctly JS = the total number of the students Criteria Interval Criteria 0.0 P 0.30 0.30 P 0.70 0.70 P ≤ 1.00 Difficult Medium Easy Arikunto as quoted by Sudadi, 2005: p.25

3.8.2.2 Discriminating Power

According to Heaton, the discrimination index of an item indicates the extent to which the item discriminates between testers, separating the more able testers from the less able Heaton, 1975: 173. It is calculated using the formula: = 36 36 where: D = the discrimination index BA = the number of students in upper group who answered the item correctly JA = the number of students in lower group who answered the item correctly BB = the number of students in upper group JB = the number of students in lower group Criteria Interval Criteria D ≤ 0.20 0.20 D ≤ 0.40 0.40 D ≤ 0.70 0.70 D ≤1.00 Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent Arikunto as quoted by Sudadi, 2005: p.25

3.7.2.3 Reliability of the Reliability refers to the stability or the c

The correlation of the variables to show the reliability of the test used this formula: = x ½½ D = − 37 37 where: The computation of the correlation of the variables of the reliability of the test is presented in the next chapter. ½½ = N ∑ X Y – ∑ X ∑ Y {N ∑ X − ∑ X }{ N ∑ Y − ∑ Y } 38

CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS

In this chapter present the analysis of the data. The process of the analysis can be seen in the explanation below.

4.1 Reliability of the Test

Tuckman 1978: 160 states that test reliability means that a test is consistent. The computation of the correlation of the variables showing the reliability of the test was : r 2 1 2 1 = [ ] [ ][ ] [ ] [ ] { } [ ] [ ] { } 2 2 451 5339 40 415 4663 40 451 415 4898 40 − − − = { }{ } 203401 213560 172225 186520 187165 195920 − − − = { }{ } 10159 14295 8755 = 847 . 12050 8755 = 0.727 r 11 = 727 . 1 727 . 2 + x r 11 = 727 . 1 453 . 1

Dokumen yang terkait

A Descriptive Study Of Vocabulary Achievement Through Pictures Of The Fifth Year Student Of SDN Gempolan Gurah Kediri In The 2003\2004 Academic Year.

0 5 62

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH PICTURES OF THE FIFTH YEAR STUDENTS OF SDN GEMPOLAN GURAH KEDIRI IN THE 2003/2004 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 7 13

The Effectiveness Of Using Pictures For Teaching Vocabulary : pre experimental at the fourth grade of SDN Pamulang Permai - Pamulang

0 4 58

The effectiveness of the technique of teaching vocabulary using dialogues to the fifth grade of elementary school.

0 0 127

(ABSTRAK) THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PICTURES TO TEACH VOCABULARY ABOUT OBJECTS AROUND SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT (A Case of Fifth Graders of SDN Manyaran 03 Semarang In the Academic Year of 2008).

0 0 2

STORYTELLING AS A TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING LISTENING AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (A Case of Fifth Year Students of SDN Wonosekar in the Academic Year of 2008/2009).

0 1 119

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PICTURES IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL (A Case Study at the Eight Grade of SMP Negeri 26 Semarang in the Academic Year of 2008-2009).

0 2 111

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING VOCABULARY BY USING PUPPET AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS (The Case study of the Fourth Graders of SDN Leteh II Rembang in the Academic Year of 2007/2008).

0 1 89

DEVELOPING ENGLISH MATERIALS USING ENGLISH-INDONESIAN MIXED SONG LYRICS TO TEACH VOCABULARY The Case of the Fifth Graders of Hj. Isriati Baiturrahman 2 Elementary School Semarang -

0 0 32

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PAPER PUPPET TO TEACH CONVERSATION IN AN ENGLISH CLASSROOM (A Case of theFourth Graders of SD IT MuhammadiyahTrukoin the Academic Year of 2016/2017) - Unissula Repository

0 0 49