Finding FINDING AND DISCUSSION

3

3. FINDING AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Finding

In this part the researcher founds four major aspects of research finding, namely, the types of error, frequency of error, dominant type of error and sources of errors. The researcher found the type of errors based on the data, they are lexical, grammatical and discourse. The lexical level which is divided into three, namely, wrong spelling consist of 12 errors or 3,61, code switching consists of 8 errors or 2,40 and false friend consists of 35 errors or 10,54. Next, the type of errors in the grammatical level divided into eight types. First, the use of verb tense which is divided into four, they are: Omission ses for 3rd person singular consist of 14 errors or 4,2, omission of hashave consist of 6 errors or 1,80, misselection of verb consist of 5 errors or 1,50 and misuses of verb in simple present tense consist of 13 errors or 3,91 . Second, the use of noun which is divided into t wo, they are: omission of ‘s in possessive form consist of 16 errors or 4,81 and omission of -s of plural marker consist of 5 errors or 1,50. Third, Be which is divided into three, they are: addition of Be in the present tense consists of 5 errors or 150, omission of Be as predicate consist of 27 errors 8,13 and misuses of Be consist of 21 errors or 6,32. Fourth, pronoun which is divided into three, they are: misuses of subjective pronoun consist 8 errors or 2,40, misuses of objective pronoun consist 9 errors or 2,71 and misuses of possessive adjective pronoun consist 11 errors or 3,31. Fifth is misordering noun phrase, there is 29 errors or 6,92. Sixth, article which is divided ito two, they are: omission of article consist of 10 errors or 3,01 and addition of article consist of 6 errors or 1,80. Seventh, omission of preposition consist of 7 errors or 2,10. Eighth, omission of conjunction consist of 12 errors or 3,61. The discourse level the researcher found three types of errors they are: generic structure is 9 errors or 2,71, language feature is 9 errors or 2,71 and reference is 11 errors or 3,31. Below the table of type of errors and the dominant type of errors found on the data. No The Types of Errors Number Percentage 1 Grammatical: a. The Use of Verb Tense: a Omission ses for 3rd person singular b Omission of HasHave c Misselection of verb d Misuses of verb in simple present tense 268 38 14 6 5 13 80,72 b. The Use of Noun a Omission of ‘s in possessive form b Omission of -s of plural marker 21 16 5 c. BE a Addition of BE in the present tense b Omission of BE as predicate c Misuses of BE 53 5 27 21 d. Pronoun a Misuses of subjective pronoun b Misuses of objective pronoun c Misuses of possessive adjective pronoun 28 8 9 11 e. Phrase a Misordering noun phrase 29 29 f. Article a Omission of article b Addition of article 16 10 6 g. Preposition a Omission of preposition 7 7 h. Conjunction a Omission of conjunction 12 12 4 2 Discourse: a. Generic Structure b. Languange Feature c. Reference 29 9 9 11 8,73 3 Lexical: a. Wrong Spelling b. The use of Indonesian word c. False Friend 35 12 8 35 10,54 The total of errors 332 100 Based on the table, the researcher finds that the total number of errors are 332 errors and can divided into 23 types of errors. The total percentage of each types in linguistic level are: 1 the lexical errors level is 35 errors 10,54, 2 the grammatical errors level is 268 errors 80,72, and 3 the discourse errors level is 29 errors 8,75. The highest errors that the learners made is in misordering noun phrase with the total errors is 29 errors 8,73. Based on the table of frequency of errors and dominant type of errors, the researcher finds two sources of errors, they are interlingual transfer and intralingual transfer. Interlingual transfer is caused by interference of the learner’s mother tongue. Learner transfers items from their native language to the foreign language learning. Intralingual transfer belongs to language being learned of the native language. The foreign language can be caused of errors because the learners transfer some rules in the foreign language as the native language.

3.2 Discussion

Dokumen yang terkait

INTRODUCTION An Error Analysis on Descriptive Texts of Eleventh Grade Students at SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 2 6

AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS OF ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 2 SURAKARTA An Error Analysis on Descriptive Texts of Eleventh Grade Students at SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 3 12

AN ERROR ANALYSIS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT MADE BY THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 1 SURAKARTA IN An Error Analysis In Writing Descriptive Text Made By The Tenth Grade Students Of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 6 11

AN ERROR ANALYSIS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT MADE BY THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK An Error Analysis In Writing Descriptive Text Made By The Tenth Grade Students Of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 3 13

INTRODUCTION An Error Analysis In Writing Descriptive Text Made By The Tenth Grade Students Of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

0 3 5

ERROR ANALYSIS ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS MADE BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMP N 2 COLOMADU Error Analysis Of Descriptive Texts Made By The Eighth Grade Students At SMP N 2 Colomadu In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

0 2 15

ERROR ANALYSIS ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS MADE BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMP N 2 COLOMADU Error Analysis Of Descriptive Texts Made By The Eighth Grade Students At SMP N 2 Colomadu In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

0 2 12

AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT An Error Analysis On Descriptive Text Made By Eighth Grade Students Of SMP N 2 Banyudono In 2013/2014 Academic Year.

0 1 13

AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS COMPOSED BY THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 1 SUKOHARJO IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 20162017

0 0 15

THESIS GRAMMATICAL ERROR ANALYSIS OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS WRITTEN BY THE FIRST GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK PANCASILA SURAKARTA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 20172018

0 0 17