suit  2013  Curriculum.  The  modification  in  presentation  aspect  was  done  by adding some criteria which represent scientific approach as the core of 2013
Curriculum.  The  lacks  in  language  and  content  aspect  were  overcome  by adding some criteria from the EFL experts such as Ur 2009, Cunningsworth
in Richards 2001 and Nation and Macalister 2010. There  were  three  aspects  of  the  textbooks  to  be  evaluated  in  this
research namely content aspect, language aspect, and presentation aspect. The complete  checklists  for  evaluating  the  textbooks  were  attached  in  the
appendices.
1. Content Aspect
The  content  aspect  had  three  sub  aspects  namely  the  relevance  of materials  to  the  curriculum,  material  accuracy,  and  supporting  learning
materials. The sub aspect of relevance of materials to the curriculum had three
areas with twelve items. The areas to be evaluated in these sub aspects were material  completeness,  material  depth,  and  material  organization.  The  items
for  material  completeness  and  material  depth  were  taken  from  the  textbook evaluation  criteria  formulated  by  Pusbuk  200;  the  items  for  material
organization were adapted from the ones formulated by Nation and Macalister 2010 and Penny Ur 2009.   The material completeness was also modified
by adding criteria on presentational texts and character building as the core of 2013 Curriculum.
The sub aspect of material accuracy had three areas with seven items. The areas to be evaluated in these sub aspects were social functions, generic
structure,  and  linguistic  features.  The  items  for  all  of  the  areas  were  taken from the textbook evaluation criteria formulated by Pusbuk 200.
The sub aspect of supporting learning materials had three areas with ten items. The areas to be evaluated in these sub aspects were the up-to-date
nature of the material, life skill development, and development of insight on diversity.  The  items  for  all  of  the  areas  were  taken  from  the  textbook
evaluation criteria formulated by Pusbuk 200.
2. Language Aspect
The  language  aspect  had  one  sub  aspect  namely  language appropriateness.
The sub aspect of language appropriateness had three areas with eight items. The areas to be evaluated in this sub aspect were the relevance of the
language  towards  learners’  development,  communicativeness  and  the coherence  and  unity  of  ideas  of  which  were  taken  from  the  textbook
evaluation  criteria  formulated  by  Pusbuk  200  and  language  content  the items of which were adapted from the textbook evaluation criteria formulated
by Cunningsworth 1995.
3. Presentation Aspect
The  presentation  aspect  had  three  sub  aspects  namely  presentation technique, teaching and learning technique, and presentation coverage.
The  sub  aspect  of  presentation  technique  had  two  areas  with  three items. The areas to be evaluated in these sub aspects were systematization and
balance  among  units.  The  items  for  all  of  the  areas  were  taken  from  the textbook evaluation criteria formulated by Pusbuk 200.
The sub aspect of teaching and learning technique had six areas with sixteen  items.  The  areas  to  be  evaluated  in  this  sub  aspect  were  learner-
centeredness,  development  of  learners’  initiative,  creativity,  and  critical thinking, development of autonomous learning, development of reflection and
self-evaluation  ability,  genre-based  approach,  and  scientific  approach.  The items  for  the  area  of  learner-centeredness  were  adapted  from  the  textbook
evaluation criteria formulated by Pusbuk 200 and the ones formulated by Nation  and  Macalister  2010.  The  items  for  the  areas  of  development  of
learners’  initiative,  creativity,  and  critical  thinking,  development  of autonomous  learning,  and  development  of  reflection  and  self-evaluation
ability were taken from the textbook evaluation criteria formulated by Pusbuk 200. The items for genre-based approach were adapted from the stages of
genre-based  approach  outlined  by  Feez  and  Joyce  2002.  In  addition,  the items  for  scientific  approach  were  adapted  from  Recommendation  for  2013
Curriculum outlined by TEFLIN Association 2013. The sub aspect of presentation coverage had three areas with ten items.
The  areas  to  be  evaluated  in  this  sub  aspect  were  opening,  content,  and