The solution on the boundary Behaviour of the flux

Diffusion limits 217 14 Z  | u 3 | 2 p + |v 3 | 2 p d x 12 p ≤ 4M2L 12 p t. Finally, letting p → +∞, it is possible to show that, for any finite time, the solution of Problem 5.3 is essentially bounded. In conclusion, considering our global problem, by linearity we have proved the following theorem. T HEOREM 5.1. Let u ε x, 0 = u x, v ε x, 0 = v x ∈ L ∞  and u ε − L , t = ϕ − t , v ε + L , t = ϕ + t ∈ W 1,∞ 0, T , for all T 0. Then u ε x, t , v ε x, t ∈ L ∞  for all t ∈ [0, T ], uniformly in ε.

3. The solution on the boundary

This section is devoted to the study of the limiting behaviour of u ε + L , t and v ε − L , t on the boundary. If 1 ≤ p ∞, equation 8 shows that d dt Z  u 2 p 1 + v 2 p 1 d x + 1 ε h u 2 p 1 L , t + v 2 p 1 − L , t i ≤ and so, by Theorem 5.1 1 ε Z T h u 2 p 1 L , t + v 2 p 1 − L , t i dt ≤ ku k 2 p 2 p + kv k 2 p 2 p = E , where E ∈ R + . Then we have lim ε→ k u 1 L , t k L p 0,T = 0, lim ε→ kv 1 − L , t k L p 0,T = 0. Furthermore, by Lemma 5.2, we have that lim ε→ u 2 L , t = ϕ + t lim ε→ v 2 − L , t = ϕ − t almost everywhere. Finally, if we choose 1 ≤ p ∞, system 6 also implies that d dt Z  | u 3 | 2 p + |v 3 | 2 p d x + 1 ε h u 2 p 3 L , t + v 2 p 3 − L , t i ≤ 2 pM Z  | u 3 | 2 p−1 + |v 3 | 2 p−1 d x. By integration over 0, T we have 218 F. Salvarani 1 ε Z T h u 2 p 3 L , t + v 2 p 3 − L , t i dt ≤ 2 pM Z T Z  | u 3 | 2 p−1 + |v 3 | 2 p−1 d xdt + + Z  | u 3 x, 0| 2 p + |v 3 x, 0| 2 p − | u 3 x, T | 2 p − |v 3 x, T | 2 p d x. By inequality 14, we know that the L p  -norms of u 3 and v 3 are bounded by a linear function of the time, and therefore all the integrals on the right-hand side of the above inequality are bounded, provided that 1 ≤ p ∞, for all T 0. Also in this case, we then have lim ε→ k u 3 L , t k L p 0,T = 0, lim ε→ kv 3 − L , t k L p 0,T = 0. Therefore, since ρ ε = 3 X i=1 u i + v i , by using the properties of the norm we have proved the following theorem. T HEOREM 5.2. Let ρ ε = u ε + v ε the macroscopic density of system 2 and ε 0. Then, on the boundary, lim ε→ ρ ε − L , t = 2ϕ − , lim ε→ ρ ε + L , t = 2ϕ + strongly in L p 0, T , provided that 1 ≤ p ∞.

4. Behaviour of the flux

In this section we show that the flux is bounded in L 2  × 0, T . We repeat the splitting of system 1 and study separately the behaviour of the three fluxes: j 1 , j 2 and j 3 respectively; by using the classical inequality 15 a + b + c 2 ≤ 3a 2 + b 2 + c 2 , a, b, c, ∈ R we will then derive a bound for the total flux j ε x, t . We can indeed multiply the two equations of system 4 by 2u 1 and 2v 1 respectively. Then we add and integrate on , obtaining: d dt Z  u 2 1 + v 2 1 d x + 1 ε h u 2 1 L , t + v 2 1 − L , t i = − 2 Z  u 1 − v 1 ε 2 d x, and so Z  | j 1 | 2 d x ≤ − 1 2 d dt Z  u 2 1 + v 2 1 d x Diffusion limits 219 16 Z T Z  | j 1 | 2 d xdt ≤ 1 2 Z  [u 2 + v 2 − u 2 1 x, T − v 2 1 x, T ]d x ≤ 1 2 k u k 2 2 + kv k 2 2 . Then, we must consider Problem 5.2: as usual, we use the explicit solution in Lemma 5.2 in order to show that j 2 = 1 ε ϕ − t − ϕ − t − ϕ + t ε + 2L x + L − ϕ + t + ϕ − t − ϕ + t ε + 2L x − L = 1 ε + 2L [ϕ − t − ϕ + t ]. 17 Finally, we multiply the two equations of system 6 for 2u 3 and 2v 3 respectively. Then we add and integrate on , obtaining: d dt Z  u 2 3 + v 2 3 d x + 1 ε h u 2 3 L , t + v 2 3 − L , t i = = − 2 Z  u 3 − v 3 ε 2 d x + 2 Z  f ε u 3 + g ε v 3 d x, that is, by the maximum principle for Problem 5.3 and using the properties of f ε and g ε : Z  | j 3 | 2 d x ≤ − 1 2 d dt Z  u 2 3 + v 2 3 d x + 2K t, where K is a positive constant. This means that 18 Z T Z  | j 3 | 2 d xdt ≤ K T 2 . Inequality 15, together with 16, 17 and 18, shows that j ε = j 1 + j 2 + j 3 is bounded in L 2  × 0, T . T HEOREM 5.3. Let u ε x, t , v ε x, t be the unique solution of the initial-boundary prob- lem 1. Then, for all T 0 there exists D ∈ R + such that: Z T Z  | j ε | 2 d xdt ≤ D, uniformly in ε.

5. The hydrodynamical limit