related to the application of the methods. The scope of the information which was noted is the way how the teachers apply the methods and the problems.
The research was conducted four times in order to get the data for the analysis. The sequence can be seen as follows:
1. October 1
st
, 2015 : The interview with Ni Luh Made Suryati, S.S. in order
to obtain the general information about her teaching process. 2.
October 15
th
, 2015 : The interview with Drs. I Made Rai Mukiatna in order
to obtain the general information about his teaching process. Fortunately, the data from this interview was complete enough to be analyzed.
3. October 29
th
, 2015 : The interview with Ni Luh Made Suryati, S.S. in order
to obtain the specific information about her teaching process including the problems she mostly faced.
4. November 19
th
, 2015: The observation in two classes of each teacher to directly see the classroom activities generally.
1.5.3 Method and Technique of Analyzing Data
The data was analyzed by using qualitative method. It was analyzed descriptively. After gathering the data from the informants, the data which is about
the methods of the teachers was classified according to the characteristics of language teaching methods proposed by Richards and Rodgers 1986 on the book
“Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching”. Then, the data which is related to the problems that are faced by the teachers was also analyzed based on the theory in
the book “Methodology in Language Teaching An Anthology of Current Practice”
edited by Richards and Renandya 2002. Besides, this study is also supported by the theory from Larsen-Freeman 2000 on her book entitled
“Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching”.
This study also uses triangulation technique in analyzing the data. This technique was conducted regarding to time, which mean the technique was done at
three different times to conduct check, re-check, and cross check. First, the data which was obtained from the informant was checked. In the second meeting, it was
re-checked to make sure the data which has been collected in the first meeting is not mistaken. Afterwards, the last meeting of this technique is cross check by conducting
the observation of both teachers in order to cross check the data; therefore, in the end there would be no mistake in the analyzed data.
1.5.4 Method and Technique of Presenting the Analysis
According to Sudaryanto 1993:145, there are two kinds of methods in presenting the analysis; they are informal and formal methods. Informal method
refers to the method of presenting the analysis by using words, while the formal method uses symbols, diagrams, figures, and tables in presenting the analysis.
