Research Procedure Comparison Of Taxis And Logical Semantic Systems In Indonesian And Malaysian Newspapers About Airasia Qz8501 Accident

34 Table.4. Labeling of Articles Source Data Label TopicTitle New Straits Times, January 5, 2015 A Indonesia Naval Captain Says May Have Located Missing Plane’s Tail Section The Jakarta Post, January 8, 2015 B AirAsia Tail Section Located, Blackbox Still Missing b Each sentence is numbered for each ranking clause, for example, A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, etc. c Some items are excluded from the analysis of the data. They are: the titles, sub- titles, reviews, images, captions of images, diagrams, timeline, authors’ name and source description. d Each clause in each sentence is displayed in a table to ensure both clauses and clause complexes. Embedded clauses are put in double square brackets. e Verbal elements or processes are underlined. f The interdependence relation is identified in each clause complex. g Both markers and logical semantic relation of each clause complex is identified. The markers are typed in bold. h After precisely occupying its position, a symbol of each category such as “2 paratactic locution, = elaboration, xβ hypotactic enhancement, etc is given to each clause complex. i All the classification is served in a table. j Each category is calculated in percentage. k The result of analysis is interpreted to obtain the findings. 35 4. Making Conclusions and Suggestions The conclusion is made by summarizing the discussion and the findings. It presents a final result, an implication and answers to the problems. Furthermore, the research gives the suggestion regarding to this research on what may have been neglected. 36 CHAPTER IV DESCRIPTION AND FINDINGS 4.1. Data Description 4.1.1. Taxis Table.5. Distribution of Interdependence Relation Interdependence Text A Text B Parataxis 14 10 Hypotaxis 31 24 In text A, 14 clause relations are paratactic while 31 clause relations are hypotactic. Single parataxis links occur in 3 clause complexes while single hypotactic links occur in 12 clause complexes. 3 multi clause complexes contain more than one paratactic link whereas 7 multi clause complexes make more than one hypotactic link. Meanwhile, 7 multi clause complexes occur both paratactic and hypotactic links. Six clauses are not credited as having either interdependence or logical semantic relation because they are single clauses and with an embedded clauses. Text B presents 10 paratactic relation and 24 hypotactic relation. 3 clause complexes show single paratactic links while 5 clause complexes show single hypotactic links. 2 multi clauses complexes show multiple paratactic links while 7 multi clause complexes show multiple hypotactic links. Furthermore, 5 multi clause complexes contain both paratactic and hypotactic links. Beside that, 13 clauses are not counted as having either interdependence or logical semantic relation because they are either definitely single clauses or single clauses with an embedded clauses. 37

4.1.2. Logical Semantic Relation

Table.6. Distribution of Logical Semantic Relation Logical Relation Type Text A Text B Elaboration 8 9 Extension 10 9 Enhancement 9 6 Locution 18 9 Idea - 1 Total 45 34 Text A does not contain any idea relation but many locution relations. They are showed through 16 of 24 clause complexes. The number of elaboration, extension, and enhancement is closely equal. The elaboration relation makes 8 links, extension relation makes 10 links and enhancement relation makes 9 links. Single logical semantic relations of either expansion or projection also make 11 links of the entire clause complexes. Text B contains the whole element of logical semantic relation. It has idea relation which is indicated from 1 clause complex. The number of locution relation is equal to elaboration or extension relation. They make each 9 links. Enhancement relation makes 6 links. Single clausal relation occurs in 8 clause complexes.