NPar Test Kruskal-Wallis Test
Uji signifikansi seluruh kelompok perlakuan
Ranks
kelompok N
Mean Rank coronal
1 10
11.60 2
10 12.50
3 10
22.40 Total
30 middle
1 10
11.00 2
10 12.20
3 10
23.30 Total
30 apical
1 10
13.00 2
10 13.00
3 10
20.50 Total
30
Test Statistics
a,b
coronal middle
apical Chi-square
10.106 18.127
11.508 df
2 2
2 Asymp. Sig.
.006 .000
.003
a. Kruskal Wallis Test b. Grouping Variable: kelompok
p=0.006 p=0.000 p0.05
p=0.003 Hal ini menunjukkan ada perbedaan yang signifikan diantara ketiga kelompok
perlakuan.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
NPar Test Mann-Whitney Test
Uji signifikansi antar kelompok perlakuan Kelompok 1 dan Kelompok 2
Ranks
kelompok N
Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
coronal 1
10 10.20
102.00 2
10 10.80
108.00 Total
20 middle
1 10
10.00 100.00
2 10
11.00 110.00
Total 20
apical 1
10 10.50
105.00 2
10 10.50
105.00 Total
20
Test Statistics
b
coronal middle
apical Mann-Whitney U
47.000 45.000
50.000 Wilcoxon W
102.000 100.000
105.000 Z
-.247 -1.000
.000 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed
.805 .317
1.000
Exact Sig. [21-tailed Sig.] .853
a
.739
a
1.000
a
a. Not corrected for ties. b. Grouping Variable: kelompok
p=0.805 p=0.317 p0.05
p=1.000 Hal ini menunjukkan tidak ada pengaruh signifikan antara kelompok 1 dengan
kelompok 2.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
NPar Test Mann-Whitney Test
Uji signifikansi antar kelompok perlakuan Kelompok 1 dan Kelompok 3
Ranks
kelompok N
Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
coronal 1
10 6.90
69.00 3
10 14.10
141.00 Total
20 middle
1 10
6.50 65.00
3 10
14.50 145.00
Total 20
apical 1
10 8.00
80.00 3
10 13.00
130.00 Total
20
Test Statistics
b
coronal middle
apical Mann-Whitney U
14.000 10.000
25.000 Wilcoxon W
69.000 65.000
80.000 Z
-2.823 -3.428
-2.492 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed
.005 .001
.013
Exact Sig. [21-tailed Sig.] .005
a
.002
a
.063
a
a. Not corrected for ties. b. Grouping Variable: kelompok
p=0.005 p=0.001 p0.05
p=0.013 Hal ini menunjukkan ada pengaruh signifikan antara kelompok 1 dengan kelompok 3.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
NPar Test Mann-Whitney Test
Uji signifikansi antar kelompok perlakuan Kelompok 2 dan Kelompok 3
Ranks
kelompok N
Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
coronal 2
10 7.20
72.00 3
10 13.80
138.00 Total
20 middle
2 10
6.70 67.00
3 10
14.30 143.00
Total 20
apical 2
10 8.00
80.00 3
10 13.00
130.00 Total
20
Test Statistics
b
coronal middle
apical Mann-Whitney U
17.000 12.000
25.000 Wilcoxon W
72.000 67.000
80.000 Z
-2.594 -3.161
-2.492 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed
.009 .002
.013
Exact Sig. [21-tailed Sig.] .011
a
.003
a
.063
a
a. Not corrected for ties. b. Grouping Variable: kelompok
p=0.009 p=0.002 p0.05
p=0.013 Hal ini menunjukkan ada pengaruh signifikan antara kelompok 2 dengan kelompok 3.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 5
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN 6
Universitas Sumatera Utara
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Terry DA. Design principles for the direct fiber-reinforced composite resin post-
and-core system.Institute Of Esthetic And Restorative Dentistry Houston, Texas. 2003: 22-32.
2. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth: post,
core and the final restoration. JADA. 2005; 136: 611-9. 3.
Erkut S, Gulsahi K, Caglar A, Imirzalioglu P, Karbhari VM, Ozmen I. Microleakage in overflared root canals restored with different fiber reinforced
dowels. Operative Dentistry. 2008; 33: 92-101. 4.
La Bell-Ronnlof AM. Fiber-reinforced composites as root canal posts. Thesis. Finland, Turku: Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials Science
University of Turku. 2007: 10-37. 5.
Monticelli F, Osorio R, Albaladejo A et al. Effects of adhesive system and luting agents on bonding of fiber post to root canal dentin. Wiley Interscience. 2005:
195-200. 6.
Mendoca L, Mello A, Fernanda M, Batista PM, Ricardo VC, Ceceilia M. Influence of different adhesive systems on the pull-out bond strength of glass
fiber posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 163: 232-3. 7.
Ferrari M, Breschi L, Mazzoni A. Fiber post and endodontically treated teeth: A compendium of scientific and clinical perspective. 1
st
ed. South Afrika: Modern Dentistry Media, 2008: 16-25.
8. O’Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 4
th
ed., Canada: Quintessence Books, 2008: 114-23.
9. Grande da Cruz FZ, Grande CZ, Roderjan DA, Arrais CA, Samra APB, Calixto
AL. Effect of etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems on hardness uniformity of resin cements after glass fiber post cementation. Eur J Dent. 2012;
63: 248-54. 10.
Monticelli F, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Cement system and surface treatment selection for fiber post luting.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.2008;133:E214-21.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
11. Rathke A, Balz U, Muche R, Haller B. Effects of self-curing activator and curing
protocol on the bond strength of composite core buildups. J Adhes Dent. 2012; 14 1: 39-46.
12. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang S, Feng Li. Factors contributing to
the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesive and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003; 52:
91-105. 13.
Farie-e-Silva AL, Reis AF, Martins LR. The effect of luting techniques on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Braz J Oral Sci 2008: 727: 1653-6.
14. Cavalcanti SCSXB, Olievera MT, Arais CAG, Giannini M. The effect of the
presence and presentation mode of co-initiators on the microtensile bond strength of dual-cured adhesive systems used in indirect restorations. Op Dent 2008;
336: 682-9. 15.
Arrais CAG, Glannini M, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of sodium sulfinate salts on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems exposed to
attenuated light-activation. J Dent 2009; 37: 219-26. 16.
Hashimoto M, dkk. Fluid movement across the resin-dentin interface during and after bonding. J of Dental Research. 2004; 83: 843-8.
17. Malyk Y, Kaaden C, Hickel R, Ilie N. Analysis of resin tags formation in root
canal dentine: a cross sectional study. Int J Endodont 2010; 43: 47-55. 18.
Putignano A, Poderi G, Cerutti A et al. An in vitro study on the adhesion of quartz fiber posts to radicular dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 463-7.
19. Garoushi S, Vallittu P. Fiber-reinforced composites in fixed partial dentures.
Libyan J Med. 2006; 1: 73-82. 20.
Kim M, Jung W, OH S, Hattori M, Yoshinara M, Kawada E et al. Flexural properties of three kinds of experimental fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent
Mater J 2010; 301: 38. 21.
Ayna B, Celenk S, Atakul F, Uysal E. Three-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with a polyethylene fiber-reinforced
composite. Aus Dent J 2009; 54: 136-7.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
22. Gluskin AH, Ahmad I, Harrera DB. The aesthetic post and core: unifying
radicular form and structure. PractProcedAesthet Dent. 2002; 144: 313-21. 23.
Belli S, Eskitascioglu G. Biomechanical properties and clinical use of a polyethylene fibre post-core material. IDSA; 83: 20-6.
24. Ganesh M, Tandon S. Versality of ribbond in contemporary dental practice.
Trends Biometer. 2006; 201: 53-8. 25.
Studervant’s, Theodore M, Robenson, eds. Art and science of operative dentistry 5
th
ed. India: Elsevier. 2006: 186-252. 26.
Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ferrari M. Adhesion to intraradicular dentin: a review. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2009; 23: 1053-83.
27. Power JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 12
th
ed., Missouri: MOSBY An Imprint of Elsevier, 2009: 150-3.
28. Pashley DH. The evolution of dentin bonding from no- etch to total-etch to self-
etch. Kuraray Dental. 2002: 1-8. 29.
Amussen E. Peutzfeldt A. Bonding of dual-curing resin cements to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 299-04.
30. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblock in root canals – a hypothetical or tangible goal.
J Endod 2007; 334: 391-8. 31.
Dentsply. Self-Cure Activator. http:wwwdentsply.esDFUengSelf-
Cure20Activator_emg.pdf 32.
Landuyt K, Snauwaert J, Munck JD, Peumans M, Yoshida Y et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. J
Biomaterials. 2007; 2826: 3757-85. 33.
Suh BI, Feng Li, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically cured or dual-cured
composites.Part III.Effect of acidic resin monomers.J Adhes Dent 2003;5:267-82. 34.
Kim YK, Chun JN. Kwon PC, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Polymerization kinetics of dual-curing adhesive systems when used solely or in conjunction with
chemically-cured resin cement. J Adhes Dent 2013; 155: 453-59.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
35. Hanafiah KA. Rancangan percobaan: teori dan aplikasi. Edisi 3. Jakarta: PT
Rajagrafindo Persada. 2003. 36.
Simmonetti M, dkk. Sealing ability and microscopis aspects of a self-adhesive resin cement used for fiber post luting into root canals. International Dentistry
SA. 2008; 85: 24-30. 37.
Asgar S, Ali A, Somoro S, Rashid S. Antimicrobial solutions used for root canal disinfection. Pakistan oral dental jurnal 2013; 331: 165-8.
38. Krejci I, Stavridakis M. New perspectives on dentin adhesion-differing methods
of bonding. PPAD. 2000; 128: 727-32. 39.
Diansari V, Eriwati YK, Indrani DJ. Kebocoran mikro pada restorasi komposit resin dengan sistem total-etch dan self-etch pada berbagai jarak penyinaran.
Indonesian Journal of Dentistry. 2008; 152: 121-30. 40.
Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior
acid-etching. Journal of Dentistry. 2006; 34: 77-85 41.
De Moraez AP, Cenci MD, Ratto de Moraes R, Pereira-Cenci T. Current concept on the use and adhesive bonding of glass-fiber post in dentistry: a review. Applied
Adhesion Science 2013; 14: 1-7. 42.
Cardoso MV, Neves A. Mine A et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Australian Dent J 2011; 561: 31-44.
43. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically
treated teeth: A Literature review. J Endodont 2004; 305: 289-97. 44.
Faria-e-Silva AL, Casselli DS, Lima GS, Ogliari FA, Piva E, Martin LR. Kinetics of conversion of two dual-cured adhesive systems. J Endod 2008; 349: 1115.
abstrak. 45.
Choi SK. Yum JW. Kim HC. Hur B. Park JK. Effect an intermediate bonding resin and flowable resin on the compatibility of two-step total etching adhesives
with a self-curing composite resin. 2009; 345: 397-403.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
BAB 3 KERANGKA KONSEP DAN HIPOTESIS PENELITIAN
3.1 Kerangka Konsep
