1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Vertical differentiation of school systems

Vertical differentiation of school systems

Table IV.3.1 Results based on students’ self-reports

Percentage of students at:

Percentage of students enrolled in:

Grades below

Grade above

Lower secondary Upper secondary

the modal grade

The modal grade

the modal grade

education (ISCED 2) education (ISCED 3)

S.E. % S.E. Australia

OECD Austria

Czech Republic

0.0 c 0.0 c 100.0 (0.0)

New Zealand

Slovak Republic

United Kingdom

United States

OECD average

P artners Azerbaijan

Dubai (UAE)

Hong Kong-China

Russian Federation

Chinese Taipei

Trinidad and Tobago

1  2   http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932343285

202 © OECD 2010 PISA 2009 ReSultS: WhAt MAkeS A School SucceSSful? – VoluMe IV

Results foR countRies and economies: annex B1

[ Part 1/1 ]

Table IV.3.2a Horizontal differentiation of school systems

Number of school types or distinct educational programmes

available to 15-year-old students

First age of selection in the education system

Australia a 1 16.0

OECD a Austria

4 10.0 Belgium a 4 12.0 Canada a 1 16.0 Chile a 1 16.0 Czech Republic a 5 11.0 Denmark a 1 16.0 Estonia a 1 15.0 Finland a 1 16.0

France

w Germany a 4 10.0 Greece a 2 15.0 Hungary a 3 11.0 Iceland a 1 16.0 Ireland a 4 15.0 Israel a 2 15.0 Italy a 3 14.0 Japan a 2 15.0 Korea a 3 14.0 Luxembourg a 4 13.0 Mexico a 3 15.0 Netherlands a 7 12.0 New Zealand a 1 16.0 Norway a 1 16.0 Poland a 1 16.0 Portugal a 3 15.0 Slovak Republic a 5 11.0 Slovenia a 3 14.0 Spain a 1 16.0 Sweden a 1 16.0 Switzerland a 4 12.0 Turkey a 3 11.0 United Kingdom a 1 16.0 United States a 1 16.0

OECD average

Albania

m Argentina b 3 15.0 P artners Azerbaijan a 2 15.0 Brazil a 1 17.0 Bulgaria b 3 13.0 Colombia b 2 15.0

Croatia b 5 14-15 Dubai (UAE) b 3 15.0 Hong Kong-China b 2 15.0 Indonesia a 1 15.0 Jordan a 1 16.0

Kazakhstan

m Kyrgyzstan b 4 14-15 Latvia b 1 16.0 Liechtenstein a 3 11.0

Lithuania b 2 14-15 Macao-China b 1 16.0 Montenegro b 3 15.0

Panama b m

15-16

Peru

m Qatar b 4 15.0 Romania a 3 14.0 Russian Federation a 3 14.5

Serbia

m Shanghai-China b 4 14.0 Singapore b 4 12.0 Chinese Taipei b 3 15.0 Thailand b 2 15.0 Trinidad and Tobago b 4 11.0 Tunisia a 1 16.0 Uruguay a 1 12.0

Sources: a. PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World (oecD, 2007).

b. PISA system-level data collection in 2010.

1  2   http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932343285

© OECD 2010 20 3

PISA 2009 ReSultS: WhAt MAkeS A School SucceSSful? – VoluMe IV

ANNEX B1 : Results foR countRies and economies

[ Part 1/3 ]

school admittance policies

Table IV.3.2b Results based on school principals’ reports

Percentage of students in schools where the principal reported the following factors to be ”never”, ”sometimes” or ”always” considered for admittance at school

Residence in a particular area

Students' records of academic performance

Recommendations of feeder schools

Never Sometimes Always

S.E. % S.E. % S.E. Australia

OECD Austria

Czech Republic

New Zealand

Slovak Republic

United Kingdom

United States

OECD average

artners P Azerbaijan

Dubai (UAE)

Hong Kong-China

Russian Federation

Chinese Taipei

Trinidad and Tobago

1  2   http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932343285

204 © OECD 2010 PISA 2009 ReSultS: WhAt MAkeS A School SucceSSful? – VoluMe IV

Results foR countRies and economies: annex B1

[ Part 2/3 ]

school admittance policies

Table IV.3.2b Results based on school principals’ reports

Percentage of students in schools where the principal reported the following factors to be ”never”, ”sometimes” or ”always” considered for admittance at school

Parents’ endorsement of the instructional

Preference given to family members or religious philosophy of the school

Whether the student requires or is interested

of current or former students Never

in a special programme

Sometimes Always %

% S.E. % S.E. Australia

OECD Austria

Czech Republic

New Zealand

Slovak Republic

a a a a a a 36.7 (3.9)

United Kingdom

United States

OECD average

artners P Azerbaijan

Dubai (UAE)

Hong Kong-China

Russian Federation

Chinese Taipei

Trinidad and Tobago

1  2   http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932343285

© OECD 2010 205

PISA 2009 ReSultS: WhAt MAkeS A School SucceSSful? – VoluMe IV

ANNEX B1 : Results foR countRies and economies

[ Part 3/3 ]

school admittance policies

Table IV.3.2b Results based on school principals’ reports

Dokumen yang terkait

ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PISA KONTEN SHAPE AND SPACE BERDASARKAN MODEL RASCH

69 778 11

Analisis Komparasi Internet Financial Local Government Reporting Pada Website Resmi Kabupaten dan Kota di Jawa Timur The Comparison Analysis of Internet Financial Local Government Reporting on Official Website of Regency and City in East Java

19 819 7

Docking Studies on Flavonoid Anticancer Agents with DNA Methyl Transferase Receptor

0 55 1

Improving the Eighth Year Students' Tense Achievement and Active Participation by Giving Positive Reinforcement at SMPN 1 Silo in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

7 202 3

The Correlation between students vocabulary master and reading comprehension

16 145 49

Improping student's reading comprehension of descriptive text through textual teaching and learning (CTL)

8 140 133

Teaching speaking through the role play (an experiment study at the second grade of MTS al-Sa'adah Pd. Aren)

6 122 55

The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Language Learning in Teaching Past Tense to the Tenth Grade Students of SMAN 5 Tangerang Selatan

4 116 138

The correlation between listening skill and pronunciation accuracy : a case study in the firt year of smk vocation higt school pupita bangsa ciputat school year 2005-2006

9 128 37

Pengaruh kualitas aktiva produktif dan non performing financing terhadap return on asset perbankan syariah (Studi Pada 3 Bank Umum Syariah Tahun 2011 – 2014)

6 101 0