o’clock for yellow paper. She gave to each student one by one. Then she instructed them to change the hour. If the student got the right hour the teacher
gave 10 point then if the student got the wrong hour the teacher gave “zoonkkkk” to her or him such as rubbish or trace of pencil or paper. The
students felt satisfied with the games. After did the game, the teacher explained briefly about Schedule then she gave to students hand out “Kevin’s
Activity” the hand out could be seen below: Let me tell you about Kevin’s school activities on Monday. First,
at 7.00 until 7.45 he studies Religion with Mr. M. Saleh. Then at 7.45 – 8.30, Mr. Simanjuntak will teach him Geography. After that Miss Susanti will teach
him History. After break for 30 minutes, he will studies English with Mr. Arifin at 9.30 – 10.15. Mr. Suharto will teach Mathematics after that untill
11.00. The second break will last for 15 minutes. Kevin will start to study Biology with Mrs. Tini at 11.15 . Finally, at 12 o’clock Mr. Abdurahman will
come to his class to teach Economics untill 12.15.
To sum up, Kevinn has seven subjects to study on Monday. After the students and the teacher identified the hand out, then the
teacher asked some question related to topic using cartoon, the teacher only opened the carton with 10 second for every question and the students had to
find out the answer as soon as possible. When the teacher said “time is over” the students had to stop to look for the answer. The teacher gave 20 point for
every student could answer correctly but for the students could not answer correctly, the teacher gave “zoonnkk”. Next, based on the text that given by
teacher, the students were instructed by the teacher to complete the table to summarize how many subject Kevin will study on Monday. The teacher gave
15 minutes for filling the table and the first student could do the task correctly the teacher gave pencil for reward.
2.3 Observing
In this phase, after the teacher did the action and implementation of the technique. The observer observed the situation of classroom activity
included the teacher’s activity, students’ activity and teaching learning process. The observation was done to obtain the data from the students’
achievement and the teacher and it was expected the result in cycle II would be better than what had been achieved in cycle I. The observer concluded that
the teaching learning was done effective and the students’ more active. The observer said that the teacher applied the technique successfully and her
monitoring in the class was good enough, the teacher walked around when she explained the topic then checked the students who did not pay attention to her.
The teacher’s explanation was not too fast in this cycle and students looked more active when the teacher asked some question to them. So, after the
observer analyzed whole of the activities, the teacher was held the post-test II to know whether the students’ achievement in cycle II was improved or not.
Based on the result of post-test II, it showed the students who passed the KKM in cycle II were 26 students or 83. 87. It concluded there were
improvements in their reading skill when the technique was conducted by the teacher.
The students also felt enthusiasm when the teacher asked some question then the teacher gave point and “zoonnkk” to students who did the
task well and they did not well the exercises.
2.4 Reflecting
This reflection evaluated about the teacher’s technique, the students’ achievement during reading activity and also about the improvement
the student’s score. First, the teacher and the observer discussed about the teacher’s
technique, they felt satisfied with the technique. It could be seen from the result of the observation and field note after the implementation. The goal of
lesson plan also had been achieved when the teacher applied it in the classroom. Second, the students were more active when the teacher gave
praise and punishment; they had encouragement to do the exercise and the task correctly and carefully. It could be seen from the field note and students’
score.
Third, the observer and the teacher discussed about the improvement of the students’ score from pre-test, post-test I and post-test II. it
is proven from pre-test students who passed the KKM were 9 student or 29. 03, in cycle II were 19 students or 61. 29, then in cycle II were 26 students
or 83. 87. Then the teacher and the observer concluded the implementation of this cycle was successful and they decided to stop continued the next cycle.
C. The Result of the Data After Classroom Action Research
After conducting the action research, the writer gained three data; those were the result of post test, post interview and post observation. In this
case, the writer gave the report concerning the data analyzing according to post interview and the result of post-test.
1. The Result of Pre-Test, Post-Test I and Post Test II
To see whether the technique of giving rewards and punishment is influence and successful in reading or not and whether the score was increased
or not to students of VII Grade SMP Dua Mei Ciputat, the writer described and analyzed clearly the result of pre-test, post-test I, and post-test II. Before
the students did the test, the writer had done the reasonable the test using difficulty item and discriminating power to identify the test was used or not in
the pre-test, post-tests I and post-test II. Here, the writer used quantitative descriptive technique to analyze the data.
The writer described the students’ reading score in pre-test, post- test I and post-test I in the table below:
Table 4.1 The Students’ Reading Score of Pre-Test, Post-Test I, Post-Test II
The Result of Readings Score Students Name
Pre-Test Post-Test I
Cycle I Post-Test II
Cycle II
X1 60
75 90
X2 70
65 75
X3 70
75 85
X4 65
70 75
X5 55
60 65
X6 60
60 65
X7 70
70 90
X8 60
75 80
X9 60
70 85
X10 65
70 75
X11 65
75 85
X12 75
80 85
X13 65
70 75
X14
70 75
80
X15 65
75 75
X16 60
70 85
X17 55
70 80
X18 60
60 80
X19 65
70 85
X20 50
55 80
X21 60
65 80
X22 60
60 90
X23 70
80 90
X24 55
60 65
X25 60
60 85
X26 55
60 65
X27 70
65 90
X28
75 75
85
X29 40
55 55
X30 70
75 85
X31 60
70 85
Mean: x
X = n
62.58 68.23
79.68
