Data Analysis Technique The effectiveness of pixton to improve students' narrative writing ability at MTs Sabilul Muttaqin Pungging Mojokerto.

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 38 a Pretest of Control Class Data Table 4.1 : The Pretest Score of Control Class No Students Pretest of Control Class Total of Score C O V LU M 1 A1 20 10 9 17 4 60 2 A2 21 13 13 13 4 64 3 A3 20 11 10 10 4 55 4 A4 15 12 12 16 4 59 5 A5 16 13 13 16 4 62 6 A6 19 10 11 12 3 55 7 A7 15 13 12 12 3 55 8 A8 23 14 11 16 4 68 9 A9 15 11 14 13 4 57 10 A10 21 10 12 12 3 58 11 A11 19 14 13 15 3 64 12 A12 17 9 12 15 3 56 13 A13 16 11 11 16 3 57 14 A14 21 14 13 11 3 62 15 A15 20 12 11 10 3 56 16 A16 15 12 14 15 4 60 17 A17 17 14 12 11 4 58 18 A18 21 10 11 14 3 59 19 A19 21 13 13 15 3 65 20 A20 16 12 10 12 3 53 21 A21 18 9 14 10 3 54 digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 39 The table above showed the pre-test results in the control class. There were 5 components that assessed content, organization, vacbulary, language use and mechanic. Each component has a different value, such as max value of content was 30 and min value 13, organization value max 20 and min value was 7, vocabulary value max 20 and min value was 7, language use max value 25 and min value was 5 and last was a mechanic value of max 5 and min value was 2. Complete value could be seen in table 2.1 the writings scoring profile adapted from Jacobs et.al in chapter 2. b Data Pretest of Experimental Class Table 4.2 : The Pretest Score of Experimental Class 18 A22 17 11 10 10 3 51 23 A23 17 10 11 17 4 59 24 A24 16 11 11 16 4 58 25 A25 20 9 13 13 3 58 No Students Pretest of Experimental Class Total of Score C O V LU M 1 A1 16 13 10 15 3 57 2 A2 17 13 12 11 3 56 3 A3 17 14 9 13 3 56 4 A4 19 10 13 15 3 60 5 A5 16 10 14 10 3 53 digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 40 6 A6 19 10 9 12 3 53 7 A7 16 12 9 10 3 50 8 A8 17 13 9 12 3 54 9 A9 17 9 11 10 3 50 10 A10 19 13 9 17 3 61 11 A11 19 11 9 17 3 59 12 A12 16 10 14 17 3 60 13 A13 21 10 10 11 3 55 14 A14 18 11 9 18 3 59 15 A15 18 11 12 10 3 54 16 A16 19 10 10 15 3 57 17 A17 17 13 14 14 3 61 18 A18 21 12 13 14 3 63 19 A19 15 10 11 10 3 49 20 A20 15 12 11 15 3 56 21 A21 19 12 10 12 3 56 18 A22 16 11 13 12 3 55 23 A23 21 13 11 11 3 59 24 A24 21 14 14 12 3 64 25 A25 19 10 12 16 3 60 digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 41 The table above showed the pre-test value of the experimental class. This test hold to know the ability between control class and experimental class, whether it had same ability or not in writing narrative text. To seen the mean, sum, and median values, seen the table below. c Data Descriptive statistic of Control Class and Experimental Class Table 4.3 : The Descriptive Statistic of Control Class and Experimental Class Descriptive Statistics Control Experim ental N Valid 25 25 Missing Mean 58.52 56.68 Median 58 56 Std. Deviation 4.00125 3.96569 Minimum 51 49 Maximum 68 64 Sum 1463 1417 The result would be described through the following figure.