Data Analysis Technique The effectiveness of pixton to improve students' narrative writing ability at MTs Sabilul Muttaqin Pungging Mojokerto.
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 38
a Pretest of Control Class Data Table 4.1
: The Pretest Score of Control Class
No Students
Pretest of Control Class Total
of Score
C O
V LU
M 1
A1 20
10 9
17 4
60 2
A2 21
13 13
13 4
64 3
A3 20
11 10
10 4
55 4
A4 15
12 12
16 4
59 5
A5 16
13 13
16 4
62 6
A6 19
10 11
12 3
55 7
A7 15
13 12
12 3
55 8
A8 23
14 11
16 4
68 9
A9 15
11 14
13 4
57 10
A10 21
10 12
12 3
58 11
A11 19
14 13
15 3
64 12
A12 17
9 12
15 3
56 13
A13 16
11 11
16 3
57 14
A14 21
14 13
11 3
62 15
A15 20
12 11
10 3
56 16
A16 15
12 14
15 4
60 17
A17 17
14 12
11 4
58 18
A18 21
10 11
14 3
59 19
A19 21
13 13
15 3
65 20
A20 16
12 10
12 3
53 21
A21 18
9 14
10 3
54
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 39
The table above showed the pre-test results in the control class. There were 5 components that
assessed content, organization, vacbulary, language use and mechanic. Each component has a different
value, such as max value of content was 30 and min value 13, organization value max 20 and min
value was 7, vocabulary value max 20 and min value was 7, language use max value 25 and min
value was 5 and last was a mechanic value of max 5 and min value was 2. Complete value could be
seen in table 2.1 the writings scoring profile adapted from Jacobs et.al in chapter 2.
b Data Pretest of Experimental Class Table 4.2
: The Pretest Score of Experimental Class
18 A22
17 11
10 10
3 51
23 A23
17 10
11 17
4 59
24 A24
16 11
11 16
4 58
25 A25
20 9
13 13
3 58
No Students
Pretest of Experimental Class Total
of Score
C O
V LU
M 1
A1 16
13 10
15 3
57 2
A2 17
13 12
11 3
56 3
A3 17
14 9
13 3
56 4
A4 19
10 13
15 3
60 5
A5 16
10 14
10 3
53
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 40
6 A6
19 10
9 12
3 53
7 A7
16 12
9 10
3 50
8 A8
17 13
9 12
3 54
9 A9
17 9
11 10
3 50
10 A10
19 13
9 17
3 61
11 A11
19 11
9 17
3 59
12 A12
16 10
14 17
3 60
13 A13
21 10
10 11
3 55
14 A14
18 11
9 18
3 59
15 A15
18 11
12 10
3 54
16 A16
19 10
10 15
3 57
17 A17
17 13
14 14
3 61
18 A18
21 12
13 14
3 63
19 A19
15 10
11 10
3 49
20 A20
15 12
11 15
3 56
21 A21
19 12
10 12
3 56
18 A22
16 11
13 12
3 55
23 A23
21 13
11 11
3 59
24 A24
21 14
14 12
3 64
25 A25
19 10
12 16
3 60
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 41
The table above showed the pre-test value of the experimental class. This test hold to know the
ability between control class and experimental class, whether it had same ability or not in writing
narrative text. To seen the mean, sum, and median values, seen the table below.
c Data Descriptive statistic of Control Class and Experimental Class
Table 4.3 :
The Descriptive Statistic of Control Class and Experimental Class
Descriptive Statistics Control
Experim ental
N Valid
25 25
Missing Mean
58.52 56.68
Median 58
56 Std. Deviation
4.00125 3.96569
Minimum 51
49 Maximum
68 64
Sum 1463
1417 The result would be described through the
following figure.