A CASE STUDY ON INTERCULTURAL PROCESS IN LIMITED SETTING | Trihastutie | Jurnal Sastra dan Budaya Dinamika 331 1570 1 PB
A CASE STUDY ON INTERCULTURAL PROCESS IN LIMITED SETTING
Nopita Trihastutie
Widya Kartika University, Surabaya
Abstract
In a global world, living in other country is no longer unusual thing. Thus, the encounter with
other culture is unavoidable. Progressing from ethnocentrism to ethno-relativism is vital for
the success of someone living out of his/her mother country. This progress occurs through an
intercultural process. A study on the intercultural process utilizes short self-reports and
surveys to conduct the assessments of individuals’ attitude, personalities, and values.
Conducted in an informal school with a boarding system, this study examines how the
intercultural process of foreign teachers and whether this process gives influence to the local
students’ cross cultural understanding. An informal school with a boarding system is a
limited setting for an intercultural process. However, the interaction is still considered natural
for two reasons: firstly, no certain particular cultural obligation for personal and social
conduct there; secondly, cultural “take and give” occurs. The process occurs to both foreign
teachers and local students. To some extent, the intercultural process of one party contributes
the other party’s cross cultural understanding.
Key Words: Intercultural Process, Cross Cultural Understanding
Among
Introduction
In present global world, living with
many
reasons,
people
decide to leave their mother country for
differences both at home and abroad is
jobs. Working abroad plays a unique role
becoming more important. Differences
in offering individuals the opportunity to
such as values, attitudes, culture, ethnicity,
develop their intercultural competencies.
social practices, political beliefs, sexuality
Intercultural competence marks a complex
and religion clearly direct people all
of abilities needed to perform effectively
around the world to take various meanings
and appropriately when interacting with
from their surroundings which must be
others who are linguistically and culturally
fully respected and integrated into life
different from oneself (Fantini, 2006).
according to their individual attitudes
Working in different cultures needs a good
(Tesoriero, 2006).
understanding of the norms of that culture.
584
The acquisition of such competencies is
This study works mainly under two
important not only for the foreigners, but
theories
also the local individuals who have
competence theory (Bennett in Paige,
interaction with the foreigners in the
1993) to exemine the foreign teachers’
working environment. The interaction
intercultural
between foreign and local people gives
interaction theory (Blumer, 1969) to
influence to both parties.
exermine the influence of foreign teachers’
need
to
develop
include
process
intercultural
and
symbolic
intercultural process to students’ cross
In a multicultural working place,
individuals
which
their
cultural understanding.
intercultural competence based on their
own situations and needs.
Different
Methodology
norms, rules and customs lead to different
This study exercices a case study as
expectation from different cultures. A
a method which underlines a “bounded
study was conducted in an international
system” over through detailed, in-depth
school
on
data collection involving multiple sources
from
of information rich in context. This
‘Ethnocentrism’ to ‘Ethnorelativism’ of
“bounded system” is bounded by time and
foreign teachers, exclussively those are
place, it is the case being studied -
from English speaking countries. It makes
programs,
a clear depiction of the contradiction
individuals (Creswell, 1998). In figuring
between West and East values and customs
out the intercultural process and finding
in which both involve in the intercultural
out the intercultural competence resulted
competence process.
The scope of the
from the process, this study needs multiple
intercultural process was limited to the
sources of information which include
foreign
intercultural
observation, interview, documents, and
communicative competence and cross
audio visual material. This study situates
cultural adaptation with the local students,
the intercultural process within a limited
their intercultural sensitivity toward the
physical
local cultural values and customs, and the
intercultural process of the individuals and
influence of foreign teachers’ intercultural
the intercultural competence resulted are
program
examining
process
which
the
process
teachers’
to
understanding
students’
of
focused
West
cross
cultural
values
events,
and
social
activities,
setting.
and
The
observed through their natural activities,
and
programs, and events.
customs.
Direct assessment of intercultural
competence which include performance
585
assessment,
portfolio
and
undergoes a reversal
interviews were applied. The data showed
phase, during which
the elicitation of an individual’s ability to
the worldview shifts
display intercultural competence through
from
his or her behavior, whether in real-time
culture to the other
situations (performance assessment), in
culture, and the own
reflections
culture is subject to
and
assessment
collections
of
work
(portfolio assessment), or in one-on-one
conversations
with
own
disparagement.
interlocutors
3.
Minimization The
(interviews).
To
one’s
individual
acknowledges
observe
the
intercultural
cultural
differences
process, the data were analyzed based on
on the surface but
six stages of Bennett’s DMIS.
considers all cultures
No
as
1.
Stage
Denial
Description
The individual denies
the
difference
existence
of
similar.
or
4.
Acceptance
other
cultures by erecting
cultural
psychological
with
or
individual
differences
regard
to
behavior and values.
the forms of isolation
Defense
The
accepts and respects
physical barriers in
2.
fundamentally
5.
Adaptation
The
individual
and separation from
develops the ability
other cultures.
to shift his frame of
The individual reacts
reference
against the threat of
culturally
diverse
other
worldviews
through
cultures
by
denigrating the other
empathy
cultures
pluralism.
(negative
stereotyping)
and
promoting
the
6.
Integration
The
to
other
and
individual
expands
and
superiority of one’s
incorporates other
own culture. In some
worldviews into his
cases, the individual
own worldview.
586
acknowledge
These
six
stages
comprise
that
institution like
a
living
boarding
school
has
change
their
significant
to most culturally competent and illustrate
perception and interaction during their
a
social relationships. In a boarding school
way
of
modeling
the
and
a total
continuum from least culturally competent
dynamic
impact
in
with “international setting”, the changes
development of intercultural competence.
To observe the local students’ cross
which the students experience is often not
cultural understanding as the outcome of
in the manner that the boarding school
their
foreign
defines itself or claims to inculcate, instead
teachers, the aspects being observed were
the changes that come about is chiefly due
as follows:
to the students’ constant interaction with
interaction
No
1.
2.
with
Apect
their
other students, and even with teacher from
Description
Substantive
The individual has a
Knowledge
firm, important,
Perceptual
different culture.
The existance of boarding school
meaningful
with an “international setting” in a certain
awareness or
country, however, does not eliminate the
consciousness or
influence of local culture in both students
familiarity of certain
and teachers’ daily lives. Thus, in such
culture gained by
place, an intercultural contact between
experience during
foreign and local party is intense. Though
interaction.
it is limited and not free from the influence
The individual has
of local culture at any intensity, the
Understanding the
interpretation
“naturalness” of this setting which refers to
right
the
of
absence
of
particular
cultural
certain culture s/he
obligation for personal and social conduct
encounteres during
guarantees that the intercultural interaction
interaction.
between
foreign
teachers
and
local
students occurs naturally as well.
When two people from different
cultures meet in a boarding school with
Analysis
“international setting”, cultural “give and
Boarding school can be seen as
centre of socialization where students
take”
plays
important
role
in
the
mingle with others. Teachers and students
interaction. In such a place, “international”
does not refer to the connotation of the
587
superiority of the West, rather that during
To see further the intercultural
the interaction between West and East
process, this study works under Bennett’s
there is a party whose culture is neither
Developmental Model of Intercultural
considered as superior nor inferior. Each
Sensitivity (DMIS) theory (Bennett in
party of the interaction at the same time
Paige,
gives and takes cultural influence in an
intercultural process of an acquaintance of
equal position. Therefore, the intercultural
two different cultures at the first place.
process which is marked by the cultural
DMIS includes six stages on this path of
“take” and “”give” during the interaction
intercultural process which is respectively
happens
(local
characterized by certain perceptions and
students) and non-Indonesian (foreign
behaviors towards the “own” and the
teachers).
“other” culture. It refers to a shifting from
to
both
Indonesian
1993).
It
is
based
on
the
To some extent, the occurance of
the understanding of foreigner teachers’
cultural “take” and “give” during the
own culture as being superior to the
intercultural process also contributes cross
understanding of their own culture as equal
cultural
in value and complexity to any other
understanding
to
both
local
students and foreign teachers. Thus, two
cultures.
ways correlation happens in that situation.
The end goal of DMIS stages is an
In such a limited “international setting”,
competence in an intercultural process.
focusing merely on one way correlation
The term competence, according to Brian
that is the influence of non-Indonesian’s
H. Spitzberg and Gabrielle Changnon (in
intercultural process towards Indonesian’s
Deardoff, 2009, p.6) has been equated with
cross cultural understanding marks two
understanding, relationship developement,
significant things: firstly, for the foreign
adaptation, and a set of abilities or skills
teachers,
from
and at other times a subjective evaluated
‘Ethnocentrism’ to ‘Ethno-relativism’ as
impression. Applying the DMIS stages as
vital for the success of living in out of
the guideline for making the interpretation
mother
local
of the intercultural process, this study
from
notes
progressing
country.
students,
Secondly,
progressing
for
that
those
stages
comprise
a
‘Ethnocentrism’ to ‘Ethno relativism’
continuum
from
means the “absence” of comfort zone in
competent
to
mother country where the “international
competent. The stages illustrate a dynamic
feeling” exists.
way of modeling the development of
the
the
intercultural competence.
588
least
culturally
most
culturally
Regarding
the
stages,
hold the same value of respect. Respect
culture shock as the initial issue of the
works as a glue for the interactions during
intercultural
something
the culture shock periods. The foreign
envitable experienced by the foreign
teachers do not either deny the difference
teachers. This culture shock, as noted by
or existence of the local cultures by
Oberg (1960), is precipated by the anxiety
erecting psychological or physical barriers
that result from losing all their familiar
in the forms of isolation and separation
signs, cues, symbols, custom and norms of
from the local cultures nor react against
social intercourse. The customs include the
the threat of local cultures by denigrating
ways in which the foreign teachers orient
the local cultures or by promoting the
themselves to the situation of daily life:
superiority of their own culture. In this
communication style. This feeling shock
case, they undergo not only the absence of
refers to the first three stages of Bennett’s
stereotyping toward their local students,
DMIS: the stage of denial, defense, and
but also a reversal phase in which their
minimization. However, this study shows
worldview shifts from their West culture to
something different in case of this culture
the local culture.
process
DMIS
is
shock. The foreign teachers experience
The foreign teachers’ worldview
culture shock at minimum level during the
which shifts from West to local culture
initial interactions with their local students
includes
while they live together in their boarding.
different values and behavior acceptance
This experience is at DMIS stage of
are needed and of which the most notable
minimization. It is a stage when both
relates to the communication style. In this
parties minimize any cultural differences
acceptance stage, the common shared
by correcting people to match their
value of maturity plays a very important
expectations. It means that the two
role during the interactions. Maturity
previous DMIS stages – denial and defense
encompasses awareness of the correct time
– is likely “absent” during their initial
and place to behave and understanding
interactions.
when
certain
to
act,
circumtances
according
where
to
the
The shock feeling is merely a
circumstances and the culture of the
minor psychological barrier for both
society they live in. When each party has
parties to build harmonious interactions.
what Dilts (1996) defines as “social
This study shows that what make possible
maturity”, there is no doubt that a climate
for the harmonious interactions during the
of trust, harmony, active co-operation and
culture shock periods is that both parties
589
peaceful coexistence are produced in a
differences. According to Penbek, et all
boarding school.
(2009) personal attitudes like empathy and
Besides common shared values of
flexibility
are
also
two
important
respect and maturity, the role of someone
components of adaptive capacity. It is
“standing in the gap” or an “intercessor”
noted that during the intercultural process,
during the intercultural process is an
communication is also an important thing.
important thing needed by the foreign
According to Sinicrope, et. all (2007),
teachers in the early adaptation stage.
communication
However, after building a long interaction
strategy in the development of intercultural
with the local students, the role of
sensitivity,
“intercessor” is no longer needed. This
relative stages. Participants who move out
study shows that after long term of living
of acceptance are eager to apply their
and working in a boarding school, the
knowledge of cultural differences to actual
foreign
change
face-to-face communication. Through this
communication style when they interact
communication, sharing information to
with their local students’ culture. Further,
reach a common understanding occurs
this study also shows that after a year, the
during the interaction of individuals.
teachers
instinctively
is
a
developmental
particularly in
the
ethno
foreign teachers acquire a capacity to
This study also shows that to some
change their knowledge, attitudes, and
extent there is the changing of foreign
behaviors so that they are open and
teachers’
flexible to the local students’ cultures.
experience two senses of adaptation: micro
Taylor (1994) states that such capacity is a
and macro. In a micro sense, they are
transformative
the
influenced by the actions of the local
capacity,
students’ culture; and at macro sense, they
altering their perspective to effectively
experience assimilation. According to
understand and accommodate the demands
Deardorff (2009, p.6), adaptation at the
of the host culture.
micro
foreigners
process
develop
whereby
adaptive
The foreign teachers who have the
communication
level
is
interdependence
style.
concerned
and
They
with
the
alternation
of
adaptive capacity can not only develop
behavior in the episodes of interaction,
relational competence with local students’
such that the actions of one interactant
cultures, but
influence
also manage
to solve
the
actions
of
the
other
complicated conflicts by moving around
interactant(s) in the context. While at a
the alternatives (e.g. the intercessor’s role)
more macro level tends to the meaning that
which arise as the result of cultural
the sorjouners are adapt at making
590
assimilation to host culture across the
they never ridicule, shout at or offend their
episodes and contexts of interaction within
local students. Since the imperfections
that culture. In the perspective of DMIS
should always be hidden and addressed
stages, this macro adaptation refers to the
privately, the foreign teachers never blame
integration stage. It is a stage when the
never their local students publicly or
sourjoners
their
personally. In Indonesian culture, the
communication style when interacting with
manifestation of the concept of face or
local cultures.
shame is that people communicate quite
instinctively
change
This study shows that relating to
indirectly. They will never wish to cause
communication style, the foreign teachers’
anyone feel shame by giving them a
minimization and acceptance stages during
negative answer so that they phrase it a
their intial interaction with the local
way and expect what they truly want to say
students refer to the phase of half cultural
is understood. As the foreign teachers
originality loss, while after a longer
adapt themselve to that concept, they
interaction, the adaptation and integration
practice Indonesian way of saying “Yes”
stages refer to their phase of total cultural
when the actual meaning is “No”. This
originality
particular
seems to be a paradox to the value of
circumtances of which the phase of
openness, outspokeness, and directness in
cultural originality loss is related to the
communication and problem solving style
Indonesian concepts of ‘face’ and etiquette
in their western culture.
loss.
The
in communication.
Hierarcy also plays a great role in
Indonesian concepts of ‘face’ and
Indonesian
culture.
Hierarchical
etiquette in communication are important
relationships are respected, emphasised
concepts which the foreign teachers need
and maintained. Respesct is usually shown
to understand. These concepts are due to
to those with status, power, position, and
the need to maintain group harmony. In
age.
Indonesia,
these
etiquette,
avoiding
the
concepts
are
about
In
Indonesian
superiors
are
communication
often
called
shame.
“bapak” or “ibu” and followed by their
Consequently, people are very careful how
first name. These means the equivalent of
they interact and speak. Although the
“sir” or “madam” in English, however in
foreign teachers cannot be expected to
Western formal situation it is followed by
understand the complete nuances of the
last name instead of first name. The
concepts, they keep an eye on their
concept of Indonesian addressing system
behavior. Following to these concepts,
does not merely refer to the necessity of
cause
of
591
formality. This ties back to the idea of
originality loss in which refers to the
maintaining strong group cohesivess and
paradox as in these adaptation and
harmonious relationships. To the foreign
integration
teachers,
the
“conflict”, even in a very tiny scale and
Indonesian addressing system is, to some
implicitly, is not avoidable. The existence
extent, contrary to the concept of formality
of conflict marks the beginning of cross
in Western culture.
cultural awareness to the local students.
To
the
concept
some
behind
presence
of
This can be seen in term of non verbal
teachers’ phase of cultural originality loss
communication. To some extent, the
provides cross cultural understanding to
interpretation of nonverbal communication
the local students which includes two
can also cause conflicts. The point of
aspects, fistly cross cultural knowledge
conflict concerns on which expressions are
and secondly, cross cultural awareness.
acceptable to show and by whom. The
The first aspect refers to the initial level of
foreign teachers do not use nonverbal
understanding. This aspect relates to the
communication as often as the local
phase of half cultural originality loss in
students. In the local students’ culture,
which the local students still see certain
these nonverbal gestures are also a very
part of foreign teachers’s culture. In this
important part of communication. Wrong
case, the local students can see two things:
interpretation of the gestures can lead to a
the
direct
conflict. for example, facial expression
of
that will be recognized around the world as
maintaining face for their foreign teachers
conveying happiness may actually express
is preserving their image for other people
anger or mask sadness.
of
communication.
face
The
the
the
foreign
concept
extent,
phase,
and
meaning
and themselves. To do this, their foreign
teachers can negotiate, debate, discuss
Conclusion
Based on this study, it can be
differences and most of all defending their
own opinion directly.
The difference
concluded that an informal school where
between direct and indirect communication
foreign teachers and local students live
can play a big part in misunderstanding.
under the same boarding provide a limited
They speak openly with honesty and are
“international setting” for the intercultural
always to the point.
process.
This limited
“international
The second aspect refers to the
setting” changes both foreign teachers and
higher level of the understanding. This
local students’ perception and interaction
aspect relates to the phase of total cultural
during their social relationships. On the
592
foreign teachers’ side, the intercultural
Retrieved on March 30, 2012 from
process is marked by the minimum level of
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117
culture shock which means the absence of
7/009182966000700405
denial and defense phase during their
Paige, R. M.
(Ed.). (1993)
initial interactions. The foreign teachers’
Education
social maturity enables them to achieve the
Experience. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural
intercultural competence. While on the
Press.
for
the
Intercultural
local students’ side, their cross cultural
Penbek, Sebnem, Dicle Yurdakul,
understanding happens during their foreign
and A. Güldem Cerit. (2009). Intercultural
teachers’ process of cultural originality
Communication Competence : A Study
loss which concerns on the concept of face
About the Intercultural Sensitivity of
and direct communication. During this
University
process, conflict, though, at a small scale is
Education and International Experiences.
not avoidable.
European and Mediterranean Conference
Students
Based
on
Their
on Information Systems: Izmir. Retrieved
References
March
Blumer,
(1969) Symbolic
H.
30,
2012
from
http://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/ab
Interactionism; Perspective and Method.
s/10.1504/IJLSM.2012.045425
Sinicrope, C., Norris, J.M., and
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(1998).
Watanabe, Y. (2007). Understanding and
Qualitative Inquiry and Study Design:
Assessing Intercultural Competence: A
Choosing
Summary
Creswell,
Among
John
Five
W.
Tradition.
of
Theory,
Research,
and
Practice. Honolulu, HI: Technical report
California: Sage Publication. Inc.
for
Deardorff, D. K. (Ed). (2009).
Intercultural Competence. USA: Sage
the
Foreign
Language
Program
Evaluation Project.
Taylor,
Publication.
E,
(1994).’Intercultural
Fantini, A. E. (2006). Exploring
Competency: A Transformative Learning
and Assessing Intercultural Competence.
Process’ in Adult Education Quarterly, 44.
Retrieved
Retrieved
March
30,
2012,
from
March
30,
2012
from
http://www.sit.edu/publications/docs/feil_
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117
research _report.pdf
7/074171369404400303
Tesoriero,F.
Oberg, K. (1960). Cultural Shock:
(2006).
‘Personal
Adjustment to New Culture Environment
Growth Towards Intercultural Competence
in Practical Anthropology 7: 177-182.
Through an International Field Education
593
Programme’ in Australian Social Work.
Retrieved
March
30,
2012
from
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.10
80/03124070600651853
594
Nopita Trihastutie
Widya Kartika University, Surabaya
Abstract
In a global world, living in other country is no longer unusual thing. Thus, the encounter with
other culture is unavoidable. Progressing from ethnocentrism to ethno-relativism is vital for
the success of someone living out of his/her mother country. This progress occurs through an
intercultural process. A study on the intercultural process utilizes short self-reports and
surveys to conduct the assessments of individuals’ attitude, personalities, and values.
Conducted in an informal school with a boarding system, this study examines how the
intercultural process of foreign teachers and whether this process gives influence to the local
students’ cross cultural understanding. An informal school with a boarding system is a
limited setting for an intercultural process. However, the interaction is still considered natural
for two reasons: firstly, no certain particular cultural obligation for personal and social
conduct there; secondly, cultural “take and give” occurs. The process occurs to both foreign
teachers and local students. To some extent, the intercultural process of one party contributes
the other party’s cross cultural understanding.
Key Words: Intercultural Process, Cross Cultural Understanding
Among
Introduction
In present global world, living with
many
reasons,
people
decide to leave their mother country for
differences both at home and abroad is
jobs. Working abroad plays a unique role
becoming more important. Differences
in offering individuals the opportunity to
such as values, attitudes, culture, ethnicity,
develop their intercultural competencies.
social practices, political beliefs, sexuality
Intercultural competence marks a complex
and religion clearly direct people all
of abilities needed to perform effectively
around the world to take various meanings
and appropriately when interacting with
from their surroundings which must be
others who are linguistically and culturally
fully respected and integrated into life
different from oneself (Fantini, 2006).
according to their individual attitudes
Working in different cultures needs a good
(Tesoriero, 2006).
understanding of the norms of that culture.
584
The acquisition of such competencies is
This study works mainly under two
important not only for the foreigners, but
theories
also the local individuals who have
competence theory (Bennett in Paige,
interaction with the foreigners in the
1993) to exemine the foreign teachers’
working environment. The interaction
intercultural
between foreign and local people gives
interaction theory (Blumer, 1969) to
influence to both parties.
exermine the influence of foreign teachers’
need
to
develop
include
process
intercultural
and
symbolic
intercultural process to students’ cross
In a multicultural working place,
individuals
which
their
cultural understanding.
intercultural competence based on their
own situations and needs.
Different
Methodology
norms, rules and customs lead to different
This study exercices a case study as
expectation from different cultures. A
a method which underlines a “bounded
study was conducted in an international
system” over through detailed, in-depth
school
on
data collection involving multiple sources
from
of information rich in context. This
‘Ethnocentrism’ to ‘Ethnorelativism’ of
“bounded system” is bounded by time and
foreign teachers, exclussively those are
place, it is the case being studied -
from English speaking countries. It makes
programs,
a clear depiction of the contradiction
individuals (Creswell, 1998). In figuring
between West and East values and customs
out the intercultural process and finding
in which both involve in the intercultural
out the intercultural competence resulted
competence process.
The scope of the
from the process, this study needs multiple
intercultural process was limited to the
sources of information which include
foreign
intercultural
observation, interview, documents, and
communicative competence and cross
audio visual material. This study situates
cultural adaptation with the local students,
the intercultural process within a limited
their intercultural sensitivity toward the
physical
local cultural values and customs, and the
intercultural process of the individuals and
influence of foreign teachers’ intercultural
the intercultural competence resulted are
program
examining
process
which
the
process
teachers’
to
understanding
students’
of
focused
West
cross
cultural
values
events,
and
social
activities,
setting.
and
The
observed through their natural activities,
and
programs, and events.
customs.
Direct assessment of intercultural
competence which include performance
585
assessment,
portfolio
and
undergoes a reversal
interviews were applied. The data showed
phase, during which
the elicitation of an individual’s ability to
the worldview shifts
display intercultural competence through
from
his or her behavior, whether in real-time
culture to the other
situations (performance assessment), in
culture, and the own
reflections
culture is subject to
and
assessment
collections
of
work
(portfolio assessment), or in one-on-one
conversations
with
own
disparagement.
interlocutors
3.
Minimization The
(interviews).
To
one’s
individual
acknowledges
observe
the
intercultural
cultural
differences
process, the data were analyzed based on
on the surface but
six stages of Bennett’s DMIS.
considers all cultures
No
as
1.
Stage
Denial
Description
The individual denies
the
difference
existence
of
similar.
or
4.
Acceptance
other
cultures by erecting
cultural
psychological
with
or
individual
differences
regard
to
behavior and values.
the forms of isolation
Defense
The
accepts and respects
physical barriers in
2.
fundamentally
5.
Adaptation
The
individual
and separation from
develops the ability
other cultures.
to shift his frame of
The individual reacts
reference
against the threat of
culturally
diverse
other
worldviews
through
cultures
by
denigrating the other
empathy
cultures
pluralism.
(negative
stereotyping)
and
promoting
the
6.
Integration
The
to
other
and
individual
expands
and
superiority of one’s
incorporates other
own culture. In some
worldviews into his
cases, the individual
own worldview.
586
acknowledge
These
six
stages
comprise
that
institution like
a
living
boarding
school
has
change
their
significant
to most culturally competent and illustrate
perception and interaction during their
a
social relationships. In a boarding school
way
of
modeling
the
and
a total
continuum from least culturally competent
dynamic
impact
in
with “international setting”, the changes
development of intercultural competence.
To observe the local students’ cross
which the students experience is often not
cultural understanding as the outcome of
in the manner that the boarding school
their
foreign
defines itself or claims to inculcate, instead
teachers, the aspects being observed were
the changes that come about is chiefly due
as follows:
to the students’ constant interaction with
interaction
No
1.
2.
with
Apect
their
other students, and even with teacher from
Description
Substantive
The individual has a
Knowledge
firm, important,
Perceptual
different culture.
The existance of boarding school
meaningful
with an “international setting” in a certain
awareness or
country, however, does not eliminate the
consciousness or
influence of local culture in both students
familiarity of certain
and teachers’ daily lives. Thus, in such
culture gained by
place, an intercultural contact between
experience during
foreign and local party is intense. Though
interaction.
it is limited and not free from the influence
The individual has
of local culture at any intensity, the
Understanding the
interpretation
“naturalness” of this setting which refers to
right
the
of
absence
of
particular
cultural
certain culture s/he
obligation for personal and social conduct
encounteres during
guarantees that the intercultural interaction
interaction.
between
foreign
teachers
and
local
students occurs naturally as well.
When two people from different
cultures meet in a boarding school with
Analysis
“international setting”, cultural “give and
Boarding school can be seen as
centre of socialization where students
take”
plays
important
role
in
the
mingle with others. Teachers and students
interaction. In such a place, “international”
does not refer to the connotation of the
587
superiority of the West, rather that during
To see further the intercultural
the interaction between West and East
process, this study works under Bennett’s
there is a party whose culture is neither
Developmental Model of Intercultural
considered as superior nor inferior. Each
Sensitivity (DMIS) theory (Bennett in
party of the interaction at the same time
Paige,
gives and takes cultural influence in an
intercultural process of an acquaintance of
equal position. Therefore, the intercultural
two different cultures at the first place.
process which is marked by the cultural
DMIS includes six stages on this path of
“take” and “”give” during the interaction
intercultural process which is respectively
happens
(local
characterized by certain perceptions and
students) and non-Indonesian (foreign
behaviors towards the “own” and the
teachers).
“other” culture. It refers to a shifting from
to
both
Indonesian
1993).
It
is
based
on
the
To some extent, the occurance of
the understanding of foreigner teachers’
cultural “take” and “give” during the
own culture as being superior to the
intercultural process also contributes cross
understanding of their own culture as equal
cultural
in value and complexity to any other
understanding
to
both
local
students and foreign teachers. Thus, two
cultures.
ways correlation happens in that situation.
The end goal of DMIS stages is an
In such a limited “international setting”,
competence in an intercultural process.
focusing merely on one way correlation
The term competence, according to Brian
that is the influence of non-Indonesian’s
H. Spitzberg and Gabrielle Changnon (in
intercultural process towards Indonesian’s
Deardoff, 2009, p.6) has been equated with
cross cultural understanding marks two
understanding, relationship developement,
significant things: firstly, for the foreign
adaptation, and a set of abilities or skills
teachers,
from
and at other times a subjective evaluated
‘Ethnocentrism’ to ‘Ethno-relativism’ as
impression. Applying the DMIS stages as
vital for the success of living in out of
the guideline for making the interpretation
mother
local
of the intercultural process, this study
from
notes
progressing
country.
students,
Secondly,
progressing
for
that
those
stages
comprise
a
‘Ethnocentrism’ to ‘Ethno relativism’
continuum
from
means the “absence” of comfort zone in
competent
to
mother country where the “international
competent. The stages illustrate a dynamic
feeling” exists.
way of modeling the development of
the
the
intercultural competence.
588
least
culturally
most
culturally
Regarding
the
stages,
hold the same value of respect. Respect
culture shock as the initial issue of the
works as a glue for the interactions during
intercultural
something
the culture shock periods. The foreign
envitable experienced by the foreign
teachers do not either deny the difference
teachers. This culture shock, as noted by
or existence of the local cultures by
Oberg (1960), is precipated by the anxiety
erecting psychological or physical barriers
that result from losing all their familiar
in the forms of isolation and separation
signs, cues, symbols, custom and norms of
from the local cultures nor react against
social intercourse. The customs include the
the threat of local cultures by denigrating
ways in which the foreign teachers orient
the local cultures or by promoting the
themselves to the situation of daily life:
superiority of their own culture. In this
communication style. This feeling shock
case, they undergo not only the absence of
refers to the first three stages of Bennett’s
stereotyping toward their local students,
DMIS: the stage of denial, defense, and
but also a reversal phase in which their
minimization. However, this study shows
worldview shifts from their West culture to
something different in case of this culture
the local culture.
process
DMIS
is
shock. The foreign teachers experience
The foreign teachers’ worldview
culture shock at minimum level during the
which shifts from West to local culture
initial interactions with their local students
includes
while they live together in their boarding.
different values and behavior acceptance
This experience is at DMIS stage of
are needed and of which the most notable
minimization. It is a stage when both
relates to the communication style. In this
parties minimize any cultural differences
acceptance stage, the common shared
by correcting people to match their
value of maturity plays a very important
expectations. It means that the two
role during the interactions. Maturity
previous DMIS stages – denial and defense
encompasses awareness of the correct time
– is likely “absent” during their initial
and place to behave and understanding
interactions.
when
certain
to
act,
circumtances
according
where
to
the
The shock feeling is merely a
circumstances and the culture of the
minor psychological barrier for both
society they live in. When each party has
parties to build harmonious interactions.
what Dilts (1996) defines as “social
This study shows that what make possible
maturity”, there is no doubt that a climate
for the harmonious interactions during the
of trust, harmony, active co-operation and
culture shock periods is that both parties
589
peaceful coexistence are produced in a
differences. According to Penbek, et all
boarding school.
(2009) personal attitudes like empathy and
Besides common shared values of
flexibility
are
also
two
important
respect and maturity, the role of someone
components of adaptive capacity. It is
“standing in the gap” or an “intercessor”
noted that during the intercultural process,
during the intercultural process is an
communication is also an important thing.
important thing needed by the foreign
According to Sinicrope, et. all (2007),
teachers in the early adaptation stage.
communication
However, after building a long interaction
strategy in the development of intercultural
with the local students, the role of
sensitivity,
“intercessor” is no longer needed. This
relative stages. Participants who move out
study shows that after long term of living
of acceptance are eager to apply their
and working in a boarding school, the
knowledge of cultural differences to actual
foreign
change
face-to-face communication. Through this
communication style when they interact
communication, sharing information to
with their local students’ culture. Further,
reach a common understanding occurs
this study also shows that after a year, the
during the interaction of individuals.
teachers
instinctively
is
a
developmental
particularly in
the
ethno
foreign teachers acquire a capacity to
This study also shows that to some
change their knowledge, attitudes, and
extent there is the changing of foreign
behaviors so that they are open and
teachers’
flexible to the local students’ cultures.
experience two senses of adaptation: micro
Taylor (1994) states that such capacity is a
and macro. In a micro sense, they are
transformative
the
influenced by the actions of the local
capacity,
students’ culture; and at macro sense, they
altering their perspective to effectively
experience assimilation. According to
understand and accommodate the demands
Deardorff (2009, p.6), adaptation at the
of the host culture.
micro
foreigners
process
develop
whereby
adaptive
The foreign teachers who have the
communication
level
is
interdependence
style.
concerned
and
They
with
the
alternation
of
adaptive capacity can not only develop
behavior in the episodes of interaction,
relational competence with local students’
such that the actions of one interactant
cultures, but
influence
also manage
to solve
the
actions
of
the
other
complicated conflicts by moving around
interactant(s) in the context. While at a
the alternatives (e.g. the intercessor’s role)
more macro level tends to the meaning that
which arise as the result of cultural
the sorjouners are adapt at making
590
assimilation to host culture across the
they never ridicule, shout at or offend their
episodes and contexts of interaction within
local students. Since the imperfections
that culture. In the perspective of DMIS
should always be hidden and addressed
stages, this macro adaptation refers to the
privately, the foreign teachers never blame
integration stage. It is a stage when the
never their local students publicly or
sourjoners
their
personally. In Indonesian culture, the
communication style when interacting with
manifestation of the concept of face or
local cultures.
shame is that people communicate quite
instinctively
change
This study shows that relating to
indirectly. They will never wish to cause
communication style, the foreign teachers’
anyone feel shame by giving them a
minimization and acceptance stages during
negative answer so that they phrase it a
their intial interaction with the local
way and expect what they truly want to say
students refer to the phase of half cultural
is understood. As the foreign teachers
originality loss, while after a longer
adapt themselve to that concept, they
interaction, the adaptation and integration
practice Indonesian way of saying “Yes”
stages refer to their phase of total cultural
when the actual meaning is “No”. This
originality
particular
seems to be a paradox to the value of
circumtances of which the phase of
openness, outspokeness, and directness in
cultural originality loss is related to the
communication and problem solving style
Indonesian concepts of ‘face’ and etiquette
in their western culture.
loss.
The
in communication.
Hierarcy also plays a great role in
Indonesian concepts of ‘face’ and
Indonesian
culture.
Hierarchical
etiquette in communication are important
relationships are respected, emphasised
concepts which the foreign teachers need
and maintained. Respesct is usually shown
to understand. These concepts are due to
to those with status, power, position, and
the need to maintain group harmony. In
age.
Indonesia,
these
etiquette,
avoiding
the
concepts
are
about
In
Indonesian
superiors
are
communication
often
called
shame.
“bapak” or “ibu” and followed by their
Consequently, people are very careful how
first name. These means the equivalent of
they interact and speak. Although the
“sir” or “madam” in English, however in
foreign teachers cannot be expected to
Western formal situation it is followed by
understand the complete nuances of the
last name instead of first name. The
concepts, they keep an eye on their
concept of Indonesian addressing system
behavior. Following to these concepts,
does not merely refer to the necessity of
cause
of
591
formality. This ties back to the idea of
originality loss in which refers to the
maintaining strong group cohesivess and
paradox as in these adaptation and
harmonious relationships. To the foreign
integration
teachers,
the
“conflict”, even in a very tiny scale and
Indonesian addressing system is, to some
implicitly, is not avoidable. The existence
extent, contrary to the concept of formality
of conflict marks the beginning of cross
in Western culture.
cultural awareness to the local students.
To
the
concept
some
behind
presence
of
This can be seen in term of non verbal
teachers’ phase of cultural originality loss
communication. To some extent, the
provides cross cultural understanding to
interpretation of nonverbal communication
the local students which includes two
can also cause conflicts. The point of
aspects, fistly cross cultural knowledge
conflict concerns on which expressions are
and secondly, cross cultural awareness.
acceptable to show and by whom. The
The first aspect refers to the initial level of
foreign teachers do not use nonverbal
understanding. This aspect relates to the
communication as often as the local
phase of half cultural originality loss in
students. In the local students’ culture,
which the local students still see certain
these nonverbal gestures are also a very
part of foreign teachers’s culture. In this
important part of communication. Wrong
case, the local students can see two things:
interpretation of the gestures can lead to a
the
direct
conflict. for example, facial expression
of
that will be recognized around the world as
maintaining face for their foreign teachers
conveying happiness may actually express
is preserving their image for other people
anger or mask sadness.
of
communication.
face
The
the
the
foreign
concept
extent,
phase,
and
meaning
and themselves. To do this, their foreign
teachers can negotiate, debate, discuss
Conclusion
Based on this study, it can be
differences and most of all defending their
own opinion directly.
The difference
concluded that an informal school where
between direct and indirect communication
foreign teachers and local students live
can play a big part in misunderstanding.
under the same boarding provide a limited
They speak openly with honesty and are
“international setting” for the intercultural
always to the point.
process.
This limited
“international
The second aspect refers to the
setting” changes both foreign teachers and
higher level of the understanding. This
local students’ perception and interaction
aspect relates to the phase of total cultural
during their social relationships. On the
592
foreign teachers’ side, the intercultural
Retrieved on March 30, 2012 from
process is marked by the minimum level of
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117
culture shock which means the absence of
7/009182966000700405
denial and defense phase during their
Paige, R. M.
(Ed.). (1993)
initial interactions. The foreign teachers’
Education
social maturity enables them to achieve the
Experience. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural
intercultural competence. While on the
Press.
for
the
Intercultural
local students’ side, their cross cultural
Penbek, Sebnem, Dicle Yurdakul,
understanding happens during their foreign
and A. Güldem Cerit. (2009). Intercultural
teachers’ process of cultural originality
Communication Competence : A Study
loss which concerns on the concept of face
About the Intercultural Sensitivity of
and direct communication. During this
University
process, conflict, though, at a small scale is
Education and International Experiences.
not avoidable.
European and Mediterranean Conference
Students
Based
on
Their
on Information Systems: Izmir. Retrieved
References
March
Blumer,
(1969) Symbolic
H.
30,
2012
from
http://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/ab
Interactionism; Perspective and Method.
s/10.1504/IJLSM.2012.045425
Sinicrope, C., Norris, J.M., and
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(1998).
Watanabe, Y. (2007). Understanding and
Qualitative Inquiry and Study Design:
Assessing Intercultural Competence: A
Choosing
Summary
Creswell,
Among
John
Five
W.
Tradition.
of
Theory,
Research,
and
Practice. Honolulu, HI: Technical report
California: Sage Publication. Inc.
for
Deardorff, D. K. (Ed). (2009).
Intercultural Competence. USA: Sage
the
Foreign
Language
Program
Evaluation Project.
Taylor,
Publication.
E,
(1994).’Intercultural
Fantini, A. E. (2006). Exploring
Competency: A Transformative Learning
and Assessing Intercultural Competence.
Process’ in Adult Education Quarterly, 44.
Retrieved
Retrieved
March
30,
2012,
from
March
30,
2012
from
http://www.sit.edu/publications/docs/feil_
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117
research _report.pdf
7/074171369404400303
Tesoriero,F.
Oberg, K. (1960). Cultural Shock:
(2006).
‘Personal
Adjustment to New Culture Environment
Growth Towards Intercultural Competence
in Practical Anthropology 7: 177-182.
Through an International Field Education
593
Programme’ in Australian Social Work.
Retrieved
March
30,
2012
from
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.10
80/03124070600651853
594