T PD 1402839 Bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Anderson, L.R. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2010). A taxonomi forlearning, teaching and
assessing. A revision of Bloom’staxonomi of educational objective.
Longman.
Amir, T. (2009). Inovasi pendidikan melalui problem based learning. Jakarta:
Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Amiripour, P. dkk. (2012). Scaffolding as effective method for mathematical
learning. Indian Journal of Science and Techonolgy, 5(9), hlm. 33283331.
Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Vol. 9, hlm. 33-52.
Arends. (2007). Learning to teach (Terjemahan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Manajemen penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Awbi, dkk. (2015). Scaffolding, the zone of proximal development, and novice
programmers. Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology,
19(1), hlm. 1-5.
Baker, A. dkk. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics
education introduction and review. ZDM Mathematics Education:
Springer Publishing, 10(47), hlm. 1047-1065.
Bell, A.R. (2005). A portrait of new teacher learning in an induction program:
processes contributing to movement through zones of proximal
development. University of Northern Colorado: ProQuest Dissertations
Publishing.
Bodrova, E. & Leong, D.J. (1996). Tools of the mind. the vygotsky approach to.
early chilhood education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bodrova, E. & Leong, D.J. (1998). Scaffolding emergent writing in the zone of
proximal development. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3(2), hlm. 1-18.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
97
98
Burns, A. (2014). Calculus students’ understanding of the derivative in relation to
the vertex of a quadratic function. Georgia State University: ProQuest
Dissertations Publishing.
Bundu, P.(2006). Penilaian keterampilan proses dan sikap ilmiah dalam
pembelajaran sains. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Cahyono, N.A. (2010). Vygotskian perspective: proses scaffolding untuk
mencapai zone of proximal development (zpd) peserta didik dalam
pembelajaran matematika. UNY: Seminar Nasional Matematika dan
Pendidikan Matematika.
Calik, dkk. (2007). Enhancing pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptual
understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. Taiwan:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in vygotsky’s analysis of
learning and instruction. Dalam A. Kozulin, dkk. (Penyunting), Vygotsky’s
Educational Theory and Practice in Cultural Context. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Christmas, D., dkk. (2013). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development theory:
what are its implications for mathematical teaching?. Greener Journal of
Social Sciences, 3(7), hlm. 371-377.
Creswell, J.W. (2010). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan
mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Dahar, R.W. (2003). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Davin, K.J. (2011). Group dynamic assessment in an early foreign language
learning program: tracking movement through the zone of proximal
development. University of Pittsburgh: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Depdiknas. (2006). Permendiknas No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi. Jakarta:
Depdiknas.
Dhunpy, B.C. & Dunphy, S.L. (2003). Assisted performance and the zone of
proximal development (zpd); a potential framework for providing surgical
education. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental
Psychology, 3(3), hlm. 48-58.
Doolittle, P.E. (1997). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a theoretical
foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on excellence in college
teaching, 8(1), hlm. 82-102.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
99
Engin, M. (2011). Research diary: a tool for scaffolding. International Journal of
Qualitative Methods, 10(3), hlm. 296-306.
Eskilsson, O. & Helldèn, G. (2003). A longitudinal study on 10-12-year-olds
conceptions of the transformations of matter. Kristianstad University,
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences: Chemistry Education
Research and Practice, 4(3), hlm. 291-304.
Fani, T. & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of vygotsky’s zone of proximal
development(zpd) in teacher education: zptd and self-scaffolding.Procedia
- Social and Behavioral Sciences. International Conference on Education
and Educational Psychology.
Fernandez, M. dkk. (2001). Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of
proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative
learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2).
Ferrara, E. (2011). The effect of special education student participation and
engagement in mathematics on student achievement. Walden University:
ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Finkelstein, A. (2010). Science is golden: a problem-solving approach to doing
science with children. Hongkong: Michigan State University Press.
Gusriana, dkk. (2014). Pengaruh sikap ilmiah siswa terhadap penguasaan konsep
menggunakan inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Unila, 5(8),
hlm. 95-106.
Hailikari, T. (2009). Assesing university students’ prior knowledge. Implication
for theory and practice. Finland: Helsinki University Print.
Hanifah, dkk. (2016). The development of problem based learning to improve the
students’metacognition. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35(1).
Harlen, W. & Qualter, A. (2004). The teaching of science in primary schools.
fourth edition. London: David Fulton Publisher.
Hasan, M. I. (2002). Pokok-pokok materi metodologi penelitian dan aplikasinya.
Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hedeegard, M. (2003). An introduction to vygotsky. London: Routledge.
Holbrook, J. and Rannikmae, M. (2010). Contextualisation, de-contextualisation,
re-contextualisation – a science teaching approach to enhance meaningful
learning for scientific literacy. University of Tartu, Estonia.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
100
Hung, D.W.L. (2001). Learning through video-based narratives within the cultural
zone of proximal development. International Journal of Instruction
Media, 28(4), hlm. 415-430.
Ibrahim, M. & Nur, M. (2000). Pengajaran berdasarkan masalah. Surabaya:
Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Ipek, H. (2009). Comparing and contrasting first and second language acquisition:
implications for language teachers. CCSE English Language Teaching
Journals, 2(2), hlm. 155-163.
Jacobsen, dkk. (2009). Method for teaching. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Kermani, H. & Brenner, M. E. (2010). Maternal scaffolding in the child’s zone of
proximal development across tasks: cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of
Research in Childhood Education: ProQuest Professional Education,
15(1), hlm. 30-52.
Khusniati, M. (2014). Model pembelajaran sains berbasis kearifan lokal dalam
menumbuhkan karakter konservasi. Indonesian Journal of Conservation,
3(1), hlm. 67-74.
Lecusay, R. (2014). Building zones of proximal development with computer
games in a uc links after-school program. International Journal for
Research on Extended Education, 2(2), hlm. 13-26.
Levikh, M.G. (2008). The affective establihment and maintenance of vygotky’s
zone of proximal development. Educational Theory: Proquest Publishing,
58(1), hlm. 83-101.
Lui, A. (2012). Teaching in the zone an introduction to working within the zone of
proximal development (zpd) to drive effective early childhood instruction.
Children’s Progress.
Lyons, B.G. (1984). Defining a child's zone of proximal development: evaluation
process for treatment planning. The American Journal of Occupational
Theory, 38(7), hlm. 446-451.
Maknun, J. (2015). The implementation of generative learning model on physics
lesson to increase mastery concepts and generic science skills of
vocational students. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), hlm.
742-748.
Maulana. (2009). Memahami hakikat, variabel, dan instrumen penelitian
pendidikan dengan benar: panduan sederhana bagi mahasiswa dan guru
calon peneliti. Bandung: Learn2Live n Live2Learn.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
101
McNeill, K.L., dkk. (2004). Supporting students’ construction of scientific
explanations using scaffolded curriculum materials and assessments. San
Diego: American Educational Research Association.
Mc.Millan, J.H. & Schumacher, S. (2000). Research in education: a conceptual
introduction. (Penelitian dalam pendidikan: pengantar konsep). New
York & London: Longman.
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Muslichah, Asy’ari. (2006). Penerapan pendekatan sains teknologi masyarakat
dalam pembelajaran sains di sd. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
National Research Council. (2004). How people learn: bridging research and
practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ozkan, G. & Selcuk, G.Z. (2015). Effect of technology enhanced conceptual
change texts on students’ understanding of buoyant force. Universal
Journal of Educational Research, 13(12), hlm. 981-988.
PIRLS. (2011). International report: performance at the pirls 2011. International
Benchmarks TIMMS & PIRL Report International Studi Center (IEA):
Lynch School Boston College.
Prabowo, E. (2012). Populasi dan sampel. Jakarta: Gramedia Putaka Utama.
Prima & Kaniawati. (2011). Penerapan model pembelajaran problem based
learning dengan pendekatan inkuiri untuk meningkatkan keterampilan
proses sains dan penguasaan konsep elastisitas pada siswa sma. Jurnal
Pengajaran MIPA, 16(1), hlm. 179-184.
Priyatno. (2011). Analisis statistik data. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Putra, R.A., dkk. (2014). The analysis of concepts mastery and critical thinking
skills on invertebrate zoology course. International Journal of Science and
Research (IJSR), 3(3), hlm. 498-502.
Putra, R.A. & Sudargo, F. (2014). The effect of program laboratory inquiry
practicum based (ppzi-bil) to mastering invertebrate zoology concept.
Journal of Education and Practice, 5(36), hlm. 121-125.
Purwadarminta, WJS. (2006). Kamus besar bahasa indonesia. Jakarta: Balai
Pustaka.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
102
Purwanto. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif untuk psikologi dan
pendidikan.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rezaee, A.A., & Azizi, A. (2012). The role of zone of proximal development in
the students’ learning of english adverbs. Journal of Language Teaching
and Research, 3(2), hlm. 51-57.
Riyanto, Y. (2010). Paradigma baru pembelajaran (sebagai referensi bagi
pendidikan dalam implementasi pembelajaran yang efektif). Jakarta:
Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Rusman. (2010). Model-model pembelajaran mengembangkan profesionalisme
guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Rustaman. (2005). Pengembangan konsep. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Samatowa, U. (2010). Pembelajaran ipa sd. Jakarta: Indeks.
Santrock, J. W. (2009). Educational psychology (4th Ed). NewYork: McGraw-Hill
companies.
Shabani, dkk. (2010). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: instructional
implications and teachers' professional development. English Language
Teaching: ProQuest Publishing.
Shaman, S. (2014). Scaffolding: re-framing the construct in its original context.
Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 2(1), hlm. 132-139.
Sidek, H.M. (2011). Zpd, scaffolding, and syntax development. International
Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(6), hlm. 163-176.
Siyepu, S. (2013). The zone of proximal development in the learning
ofmathematics. South African Journal of Education,33(2), hlm. 1-13.
Slavin, R.E. (1994). Educational psychology theori into practices fourt edition.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publishers.
Smagorinsky, P. (1995). The social construction of data: methodological problems
of investigating learning in the zone of proximal development. Review of
Educational Research, 65(3), hlm. 191-212.
Smit, J., dkk. (2012). A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British
Educational Research Journal, 12(1), hlm. 1-18.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
103
Solovieva, Y. & Quintanar, L. (2015). The role of zone of proximate development
in interactive assessment of intellectual development. British Journal of
Education, Society &Behavioural Science, 14(1), hlm. 1-11.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sulistyanto, H., dkk. (2008). Ilmu pengetahuan alam. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan
Depdiknas.
Sukmadinata, N.S. (2012). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Sulistyorini, S. (2007). Model pembelajaran ipa sekolah dasar dan penerapannya
dalam ktsp. Semarang: Tiara Wacana.
Syafi’i, dkk. (2011). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan penguasaan konsep siswa
melalui model problem based learning (pbl) dalam pembelajaran biologi
kelas XI IPA SMAN 2 pekanbaru tahun ajaran 2010/2011. Jurnal
Biogenesis, 8(1).
Tappan, M.B. 1998. Moral education in the zone of proximal development.
Journal of Moral Education, 27(2), hlm. 141-160.
Teaching & Learning Research Program (TLRP). (2006). Science education in
schools issues, evidence and proposals. The Association for Science
Education.
Thomson, I. (2013). The mediation of learning in the zone of proximal
development through a co-constructed writing activity. Research in the
Teaching of English, 47(3), hlm. 247-276.
Toharudin, U., dkk. (2011). Membangun literasi sains peserta didik. Bandung:
Humaniora.
Trianto. (2007). Model-model pembelajaran inovatifberorientasi konstruktivistik.
Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.
Trianto. (2010). Pengantar penelitian bagi pengembangan profesi pendidikan dan
tenaga kependidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Ultay, N., dkk. (2014). Evaluation of the effectiveness of conceptual change texts
in reactstrategy. Giresun University Scientific Research Projects Unit:
Chemistry Education Research and Practice.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
104
Veeramuthu, A., dkk. (2011). The effect of scaffolding technique in journal
writing among the second language learners. Journal of Language
Teaching and Research, 2(4), hlm. 934-940..
Vosniadou, S. & Skopeliti, I. (2014). Conceptual change from the framework
theory side of the fence. SpringerPublishing, 23(7).
Vygotsky. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological
processes. London: Harvard University Press.
Wahyudin. (2006). Evaluasi pembelajaran sd. UPI Press.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for english language learners: a
conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education
and Bilingualism, 9(2), hlm. 159-180.
Wambugu, P.W. & Changeiywo, J.M. (2007). Effects of mastery learning
approach on secondary school students’ physics achievement. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), hlm. 293302.
Wilson, K. & Devereuk, L. (2014). Scaffolding theory: high challenge, high
support in academic language and learning (all) contexts. Journal of
Academic Language & Learning, 8(3), hlm. 91-100.
Yulianti. (2010). Penerapan model poe (predict-observe-explain) untuk
meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa
pada sub konsep pencemaran air. (Tesis). Bandung: SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia.
Zeuli, J.S. (1986). The use of zone of proximal development in everyday and
school contexts: a vygotskian critique. The Institute for Research on
Teaching 252 Erickson Hall Michigan State University, Michigan.
Zuckerman, G. (2007). Child–adult interaction that creates a zone of proximal
development. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 45(3),
hlm. 43-69.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Anderson, L.R. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2010). A taxonomi forlearning, teaching and
assessing. A revision of Bloom’staxonomi of educational objective.
Longman.
Amir, T. (2009). Inovasi pendidikan melalui problem based learning. Jakarta:
Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Amiripour, P. dkk. (2012). Scaffolding as effective method for mathematical
learning. Indian Journal of Science and Techonolgy, 5(9), hlm. 33283331.
Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Vol. 9, hlm. 33-52.
Arends. (2007). Learning to teach (Terjemahan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Manajemen penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Awbi, dkk. (2015). Scaffolding, the zone of proximal development, and novice
programmers. Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology,
19(1), hlm. 1-5.
Baker, A. dkk. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics
education introduction and review. ZDM Mathematics Education:
Springer Publishing, 10(47), hlm. 1047-1065.
Bell, A.R. (2005). A portrait of new teacher learning in an induction program:
processes contributing to movement through zones of proximal
development. University of Northern Colorado: ProQuest Dissertations
Publishing.
Bodrova, E. & Leong, D.J. (1996). Tools of the mind. the vygotsky approach to.
early chilhood education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bodrova, E. & Leong, D.J. (1998). Scaffolding emergent writing in the zone of
proximal development. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3(2), hlm. 1-18.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
97
98
Burns, A. (2014). Calculus students’ understanding of the derivative in relation to
the vertex of a quadratic function. Georgia State University: ProQuest
Dissertations Publishing.
Bundu, P.(2006). Penilaian keterampilan proses dan sikap ilmiah dalam
pembelajaran sains. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Cahyono, N.A. (2010). Vygotskian perspective: proses scaffolding untuk
mencapai zone of proximal development (zpd) peserta didik dalam
pembelajaran matematika. UNY: Seminar Nasional Matematika dan
Pendidikan Matematika.
Calik, dkk. (2007). Enhancing pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptual
understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. Taiwan:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in vygotsky’s analysis of
learning and instruction. Dalam A. Kozulin, dkk. (Penyunting), Vygotsky’s
Educational Theory and Practice in Cultural Context. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Christmas, D., dkk. (2013). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development theory:
what are its implications for mathematical teaching?. Greener Journal of
Social Sciences, 3(7), hlm. 371-377.
Creswell, J.W. (2010). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan
mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Dahar, R.W. (2003). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Davin, K.J. (2011). Group dynamic assessment in an early foreign language
learning program: tracking movement through the zone of proximal
development. University of Pittsburgh: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Depdiknas. (2006). Permendiknas No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi. Jakarta:
Depdiknas.
Dhunpy, B.C. & Dunphy, S.L. (2003). Assisted performance and the zone of
proximal development (zpd); a potential framework for providing surgical
education. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental
Psychology, 3(3), hlm. 48-58.
Doolittle, P.E. (1997). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a theoretical
foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on excellence in college
teaching, 8(1), hlm. 82-102.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
99
Engin, M. (2011). Research diary: a tool for scaffolding. International Journal of
Qualitative Methods, 10(3), hlm. 296-306.
Eskilsson, O. & Helldèn, G. (2003). A longitudinal study on 10-12-year-olds
conceptions of the transformations of matter. Kristianstad University,
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences: Chemistry Education
Research and Practice, 4(3), hlm. 291-304.
Fani, T. & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of vygotsky’s zone of proximal
development(zpd) in teacher education: zptd and self-scaffolding.Procedia
- Social and Behavioral Sciences. International Conference on Education
and Educational Psychology.
Fernandez, M. dkk. (2001). Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of
proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative
learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2).
Ferrara, E. (2011). The effect of special education student participation and
engagement in mathematics on student achievement. Walden University:
ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Finkelstein, A. (2010). Science is golden: a problem-solving approach to doing
science with children. Hongkong: Michigan State University Press.
Gusriana, dkk. (2014). Pengaruh sikap ilmiah siswa terhadap penguasaan konsep
menggunakan inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Unila, 5(8),
hlm. 95-106.
Hailikari, T. (2009). Assesing university students’ prior knowledge. Implication
for theory and practice. Finland: Helsinki University Print.
Hanifah, dkk. (2016). The development of problem based learning to improve the
students’metacognition. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35(1).
Harlen, W. & Qualter, A. (2004). The teaching of science in primary schools.
fourth edition. London: David Fulton Publisher.
Hasan, M. I. (2002). Pokok-pokok materi metodologi penelitian dan aplikasinya.
Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hedeegard, M. (2003). An introduction to vygotsky. London: Routledge.
Holbrook, J. and Rannikmae, M. (2010). Contextualisation, de-contextualisation,
re-contextualisation – a science teaching approach to enhance meaningful
learning for scientific literacy. University of Tartu, Estonia.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
100
Hung, D.W.L. (2001). Learning through video-based narratives within the cultural
zone of proximal development. International Journal of Instruction
Media, 28(4), hlm. 415-430.
Ibrahim, M. & Nur, M. (2000). Pengajaran berdasarkan masalah. Surabaya:
Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Ipek, H. (2009). Comparing and contrasting first and second language acquisition:
implications for language teachers. CCSE English Language Teaching
Journals, 2(2), hlm. 155-163.
Jacobsen, dkk. (2009). Method for teaching. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Kermani, H. & Brenner, M. E. (2010). Maternal scaffolding in the child’s zone of
proximal development across tasks: cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of
Research in Childhood Education: ProQuest Professional Education,
15(1), hlm. 30-52.
Khusniati, M. (2014). Model pembelajaran sains berbasis kearifan lokal dalam
menumbuhkan karakter konservasi. Indonesian Journal of Conservation,
3(1), hlm. 67-74.
Lecusay, R. (2014). Building zones of proximal development with computer
games in a uc links after-school program. International Journal for
Research on Extended Education, 2(2), hlm. 13-26.
Levikh, M.G. (2008). The affective establihment and maintenance of vygotky’s
zone of proximal development. Educational Theory: Proquest Publishing,
58(1), hlm. 83-101.
Lui, A. (2012). Teaching in the zone an introduction to working within the zone of
proximal development (zpd) to drive effective early childhood instruction.
Children’s Progress.
Lyons, B.G. (1984). Defining a child's zone of proximal development: evaluation
process for treatment planning. The American Journal of Occupational
Theory, 38(7), hlm. 446-451.
Maknun, J. (2015). The implementation of generative learning model on physics
lesson to increase mastery concepts and generic science skills of
vocational students. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), hlm.
742-748.
Maulana. (2009). Memahami hakikat, variabel, dan instrumen penelitian
pendidikan dengan benar: panduan sederhana bagi mahasiswa dan guru
calon peneliti. Bandung: Learn2Live n Live2Learn.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
101
McNeill, K.L., dkk. (2004). Supporting students’ construction of scientific
explanations using scaffolded curriculum materials and assessments. San
Diego: American Educational Research Association.
Mc.Millan, J.H. & Schumacher, S. (2000). Research in education: a conceptual
introduction. (Penelitian dalam pendidikan: pengantar konsep). New
York & London: Longman.
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Muslichah, Asy’ari. (2006). Penerapan pendekatan sains teknologi masyarakat
dalam pembelajaran sains di sd. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
National Research Council. (2004). How people learn: bridging research and
practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ozkan, G. & Selcuk, G.Z. (2015). Effect of technology enhanced conceptual
change texts on students’ understanding of buoyant force. Universal
Journal of Educational Research, 13(12), hlm. 981-988.
PIRLS. (2011). International report: performance at the pirls 2011. International
Benchmarks TIMMS & PIRL Report International Studi Center (IEA):
Lynch School Boston College.
Prabowo, E. (2012). Populasi dan sampel. Jakarta: Gramedia Putaka Utama.
Prima & Kaniawati. (2011). Penerapan model pembelajaran problem based
learning dengan pendekatan inkuiri untuk meningkatkan keterampilan
proses sains dan penguasaan konsep elastisitas pada siswa sma. Jurnal
Pengajaran MIPA, 16(1), hlm. 179-184.
Priyatno. (2011). Analisis statistik data. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Putra, R.A., dkk. (2014). The analysis of concepts mastery and critical thinking
skills on invertebrate zoology course. International Journal of Science and
Research (IJSR), 3(3), hlm. 498-502.
Putra, R.A. & Sudargo, F. (2014). The effect of program laboratory inquiry
practicum based (ppzi-bil) to mastering invertebrate zoology concept.
Journal of Education and Practice, 5(36), hlm. 121-125.
Purwadarminta, WJS. (2006). Kamus besar bahasa indonesia. Jakarta: Balai
Pustaka.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
102
Purwanto. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif untuk psikologi dan
pendidikan.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rezaee, A.A., & Azizi, A. (2012). The role of zone of proximal development in
the students’ learning of english adverbs. Journal of Language Teaching
and Research, 3(2), hlm. 51-57.
Riyanto, Y. (2010). Paradigma baru pembelajaran (sebagai referensi bagi
pendidikan dalam implementasi pembelajaran yang efektif). Jakarta:
Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Rusman. (2010). Model-model pembelajaran mengembangkan profesionalisme
guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Rustaman. (2005). Pengembangan konsep. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Samatowa, U. (2010). Pembelajaran ipa sd. Jakarta: Indeks.
Santrock, J. W. (2009). Educational psychology (4th Ed). NewYork: McGraw-Hill
companies.
Shabani, dkk. (2010). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: instructional
implications and teachers' professional development. English Language
Teaching: ProQuest Publishing.
Shaman, S. (2014). Scaffolding: re-framing the construct in its original context.
Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 2(1), hlm. 132-139.
Sidek, H.M. (2011). Zpd, scaffolding, and syntax development. International
Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(6), hlm. 163-176.
Siyepu, S. (2013). The zone of proximal development in the learning
ofmathematics. South African Journal of Education,33(2), hlm. 1-13.
Slavin, R.E. (1994). Educational psychology theori into practices fourt edition.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publishers.
Smagorinsky, P. (1995). The social construction of data: methodological problems
of investigating learning in the zone of proximal development. Review of
Educational Research, 65(3), hlm. 191-212.
Smit, J., dkk. (2012). A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British
Educational Research Journal, 12(1), hlm. 1-18.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
103
Solovieva, Y. & Quintanar, L. (2015). The role of zone of proximate development
in interactive assessment of intellectual development. British Journal of
Education, Society &Behavioural Science, 14(1), hlm. 1-11.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sulistyanto, H., dkk. (2008). Ilmu pengetahuan alam. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan
Depdiknas.
Sukmadinata, N.S. (2012). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Sulistyorini, S. (2007). Model pembelajaran ipa sekolah dasar dan penerapannya
dalam ktsp. Semarang: Tiara Wacana.
Syafi’i, dkk. (2011). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan penguasaan konsep siswa
melalui model problem based learning (pbl) dalam pembelajaran biologi
kelas XI IPA SMAN 2 pekanbaru tahun ajaran 2010/2011. Jurnal
Biogenesis, 8(1).
Tappan, M.B. 1998. Moral education in the zone of proximal development.
Journal of Moral Education, 27(2), hlm. 141-160.
Teaching & Learning Research Program (TLRP). (2006). Science education in
schools issues, evidence and proposals. The Association for Science
Education.
Thomson, I. (2013). The mediation of learning in the zone of proximal
development through a co-constructed writing activity. Research in the
Teaching of English, 47(3), hlm. 247-276.
Toharudin, U., dkk. (2011). Membangun literasi sains peserta didik. Bandung:
Humaniora.
Trianto. (2007). Model-model pembelajaran inovatifberorientasi konstruktivistik.
Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.
Trianto. (2010). Pengantar penelitian bagi pengembangan profesi pendidikan dan
tenaga kependidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Ultay, N., dkk. (2014). Evaluation of the effectiveness of conceptual change texts
in reactstrategy. Giresun University Scientific Research Projects Unit:
Chemistry Education Research and Practice.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
104
Veeramuthu, A., dkk. (2011). The effect of scaffolding technique in journal
writing among the second language learners. Journal of Language
Teaching and Research, 2(4), hlm. 934-940..
Vosniadou, S. & Skopeliti, I. (2014). Conceptual change from the framework
theory side of the fence. SpringerPublishing, 23(7).
Vygotsky. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological
processes. London: Harvard University Press.
Wahyudin. (2006). Evaluasi pembelajaran sd. UPI Press.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for english language learners: a
conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education
and Bilingualism, 9(2), hlm. 159-180.
Wambugu, P.W. & Changeiywo, J.M. (2007). Effects of mastery learning
approach on secondary school students’ physics achievement. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), hlm. 293302.
Wilson, K. & Devereuk, L. (2014). Scaffolding theory: high challenge, high
support in academic language and learning (all) contexts. Journal of
Academic Language & Learning, 8(3), hlm. 91-100.
Yulianti. (2010). Penerapan model poe (predict-observe-explain) untuk
meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa
pada sub konsep pencemaran air. (Tesis). Bandung: SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia.
Zeuli, J.S. (1986). The use of zone of proximal development in everyday and
school contexts: a vygotskian critique. The Institute for Research on
Teaching 252 Erickson Hall Michigan State University, Michigan.
Zuckerman, G. (2007). Child–adult interaction that creates a zone of proximal
development. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 45(3),
hlm. 43-69.
Cucun Sutinah, 2016
PENGARUHPEMBELAJARAN IPA BERBASIS ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT PADA MATERI
DAUR AIR TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SISWA
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu