Faktor Risiko Gagal Ginjal Kronis pada Pasien yang Menjalani Terapi Haemodialisa di Rumah Sakit Umum Raden Mattaher Provinsi Jambi Tahun 2013
Lampiran 1
FORMULIR PERSETUJUAN MENJADI PESERTA PENELITIAN
(INFORMED CONSENT)
Nama
: Helena Verawaty Tarigan
Judul Penelitian
:Faktor Risiko Gagal Ginjal Kronis pada Pasien yang
Menjalani Terapi Haemodialisa di RSUD Raden Mattaher Prop.
Jambi
Selamat Pagi/ Siang/ Sore/ Malam,
Saya adalah peneliti dari Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sumatera Utara
(FKM-USU). Saat ini saya sedang melakukan penelitian tentang Faktor Risiko Gagal
Ginjal Kronis pada Pasien yang Menjalani Terapi Haemodialisa di Rumah Sakit
Raden Mattaher Jambi sebagai salah satu syarat untuk menyelesaikan studi S2 FKM
USU.
Saya memohon kesediaan anda meluangkan waktu dan mengharapkan jawaban untuk
mengisi kuesioner ini dengan sebaik-baiknnya dan tanpa dipengaruhi oleh orang lain.
Anda diharapkan untuk mengisi kuesioner ini sesuai dengan keadaan anda yang
sebenarnya, karena tidak ada jawaban benar atau salah. Data dalam kuesioner ini
akan dirahasiakan dan hanya digunakan untuk kepentingan penelitian.
Partisipasi anda dalam penelitian ini bersifat bebas, dan anda bebas untuk ikut atau
menolak tanpa adanya sanksi apapun, jika bersedia menjdi responden penelitian,
silahkan menandatangani formulir ini.
No Responden :
Tanggal
:
(2)
REKAPITULASI JUMLAH PENDERITA GAGAL GINJAL KRONIS MENJALANI HAEMODIALISA
RSUD RADEN MATTAHER PROV. JAMBI
Bulan
JUMLAH PASIEN
2008
JUMLAH PASIEN
2009
JUMLAH PASIEN
2010
JUMLAH PASIEN
2011
JUMLAH PASIEN 2012
AS
K
E
S
JA
MK
E
S
MA
S
JA
M
K
E
S
DA
UM
UM
TO
TA
L
AS
K
E
S
JA
MK
E
S
MA
S
JA
M
K
E
S
DA
UM
UM
TO
TA
L
AS
K
E
S
JA
MK
E
S
MA
S
JA
M
K
E
S
DA
UM
UM
TO
TA
L
AS
K
E
S
JA
MK
E
S
MA
S
JA
M
K
E
S
DA
UM
UM
TO
TA
L
AS
K
E
S
JA
MK
E
S
MA
S
JA
M
K
E
S
DA
UM
UM
TO
TA
L
Januari
12
15
0
2
29
21
8
0
8
37
33
6
0
4
43
31 10
5
1
47
34
7
13
0
54
Pebruari
13
11
0
5
29
21
8
0
6
35
36
8
0
5
49
32 10
6
0
48
36
10
11
1
58
Maret
12
10
0
6
28
22
7
0
2
31
37
8
0
6
51
30
9
4
1
44
36
9
12
0
57
April
10
15
0 10
35
20
8
0
4
32
36
11
0
5
52
31
8
5
1
45
36
7
14
0
57
Mei
10
16
0
9
35
22
5
0
3
30
35
11
0
3
49
31
8
8
2
49
35
8
15
3
61
Juni
11
15
0
6
32
22
5
0
3
30
35
9
0
1
45
33
7
11
3
54
32
7
15
1
55
Juli
12
12
0
7
31
24
6
0
5
35
38
9
0
2
49
31
6
12
3
52
30
9
15
3
57
Agustus
13
15
0
5
33
23
7
0
3
33
35
10
0
3
48
31
6
10
2
49
32
8
13
1
54
September
14
7
0 15
36
28
7
0
4
39
34
9
3
3
49
31
6
15
4
56
33
9
13
3
58
Oktober
15
6
0
9
30
27
5
0
3
35
33
9
5
1
48
34
6
18
4
62
35
9
15
3
62
Nopember
20
4
0
9
33
31
6
0
4
41
36
9
3
2
50
32
6
17
1
56
37
9
18
2
66
Desember
20
5
0
8
33
34
8
0
4
46
34
11
3
1
49
31
7
14
1
53
38
10
18
2
68
Jumlah
16
2
13
1
0 91
38
4
29
5 80
0 49
42
4
42
2
11
0 14 36
58
2
37
8 89
12
5 23
61
5
41
4
10
2
17
2 19
70
7
(3)
Lampiran 6
Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Kadar Ureum Agustus Pre 38 46.40 230.70 1.3919E2 45.49246
Kadar Ureum Agustus post 39 19.80 97.30 51.3692 20.37738
Kadar Ureum September pre 44 29.40 230.00 1.3540E2 48.17088
Kadar ureum september post 35 20.10 204.40 65.7686 46.84561
Kadar kreatinin aggustus pre 43 3.80 18.20 11.0465 3.50716
Kadar kreatinin agustus pos 40 .30 9.70 4.7250 2.13142
kadar kreatinin september pre 43 2.50 23.40 10.5000 4.49614
kadar kreatininseptember pos 35 2.10 17.40 5.6343 3.44980
(4)
Lampiran 7
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Lama Menderita Penyakit Kronis * Stattud Responden
89 80,9% 21 19,1% 110 100,0%
Lama Menderita Penyakit Kronis * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Lama Menderita Penyakit Kronis
3-4 tahun 15 28 43
5-10 tahun 19 11 30
10-15 tahun 8 2 10
> 15 tahun 5 1 6
Total 47 42 89
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,352 ,090 -3,513 ,001c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,368 ,094 -3,695 ,000c
N of Valid Cases 89
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation.
(5)
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Hubungan Keluarga * Stattud Responden
60 54,5% 50 45,5% 110 100,0%
Riwayat Keluarga
Menderita Penyakit Kronis * Stattud Responden
110 100,0% 0 ,0% 110 100,0%
Hubungan Keluarga * Stattud Responden
Crosstab
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Hubungan Keluarga Ayah 9 9 18
Ibu 7 11 18
Paman/Bibi 0 1 1
Nenek 3 1 4
Lain-lain 6 12 18
12 1 0 1
Total 26 34 60
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,009 ,133 -,068 ,946c
(6)
N of Valid Cases 60 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation.
Riwayat Keluarga Menderita Penyakit Kronis * Stattud Responden
Crosstab
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Riwayat Keluarga Menderita Penyakit Kronis
Ada 25 34 59
Tidak 30 21 51
Total 55 55 110
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,164 ,094 -1,728 ,087c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,164 ,094 -1,728 ,087c
N of Valid Cases 110
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation.
(7)
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jaminan Pemeliharaan Kesehatan * Stattud Responden
109 99,1% 1 ,9% 110 100,0%
Nama JMKM * Stattud Responden
98 89,1% 12 10,9% 110 100,0%
Jaminan Pemeliharaan Kesehatan * Stattud Responden
Crosstab
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Jaminan Pemeliharaan Kesehatan
Ada 55 42 97
Tidak 0 12 12
Total 55 54 109
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,355 ,053 3,928 ,000c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,355 ,053 3,928 ,000c
N of Valid Cases 109
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation.
(8)
Nama JMKM * Stattud Responden
Crosstab
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Nama JMKM Askes 29 23 52
Jamkesda 25 18 43
Jamsostek 1 2 3
Total 55 43 98
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,018 ,102 ,181 ,857c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,006 ,102 ,057 ,955c
N of Valid Cases 98
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation.
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jaminan Pemeliharaan Kesehatan * Stattud Responden
110 100,0% 0 ,0% 110 100,0%
Nama JMKM * Stattud Responden
(9)
Jaminan Pemeliharaan Kesehatan * Stattud Responden
Crosstab
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Jaminan Pemeliharaan Kesehatan
Ada 55 43 98
Tidak 0 12 12
Total 55 55 110
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,350 ,052 3,882 ,000c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,350 ,052 3,882 ,000c
N of Valid Cases 110
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation.
Nama JMKM * Stattud Responden
Crosstab
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Nama JMKM Askes 29 23 52
Jamkesda 25 18 43
Jamsostek 1 2 3
Total 55 43 98
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std.
Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,018 ,102 ,181 ,857c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,006 ,102 ,057 ,955c
(10)
Crosstab
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Nama JMKM Askes 29 23 52
Jamkesda 25 18 43
Jamsostek 1 2 3
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation.
(11)
Lampiran 8
Hasil Analisis Bivariat Variabel Kontrol dan Variabel Kasus
Terhadap Kejadian GGK
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Seks * Stattud Responden 110 100,0% 0 ,0% 110 100,0%
Seks * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Seks Laki-laki Count 32 32 64
% within Stattud Responden 58,2% 58,2% 58,2%
% of Total 29,1% 29,1% 58,2%
Perempuan Count 23 23 46
% within Stattud Responden 41,8% 41,8% 41,8%
% of Total 20,9% 20,9% 41,8%
Total Count 55 55 110
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,000a 1 1,000
Continuity Correctionb ,000 1 1,000
Likelihood Ratio ,000 1 1,000
Fisher's Exact Test 1,000 ,577
(12)
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23,00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Seks (Laki-laki / Perempuan)
1,000 ,469 2,133
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kasus 1,000 ,685 1,461
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol 1,000 ,685 1,461
N of Valid Cases 110
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Umur Responden * Stattud Responden
110 100,0% 0 ,0% 110 100,0%
Umur Responden * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Umur Responden
Risiko Count 36 36 72
% within Stattud Responden 65,5% 65,5% 65,5%
% of Total 32,7% 32,7% 65,5%
Tidak Risiko Count 19 19 38
(13)
% of Total 17,3% 17,3% 34,5%
Total Count 55 55 110
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,000a 1 1,000
Continuity Correctionb ,000 1 1,000
Likelihood Ratio ,000 1 1,000
Fisher's Exact Test 1,000 ,579
Linear-by-Linear Association ,000 1 1,000
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Umur Responden (Resiko / Tidak Resiko)
1,000 ,456 2,195
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kasus
1,000 ,675 1,481
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol
1,000 ,675 1,481
N of Valid Cases 110
Case Processing Summary
(14)
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Indeks Massa Tubuh * Stattud Responden
110 100,0% 0 ,0% 110 100,0%
Indeks Massa Tubuh * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden Total
Kasus Kontrol
Indeks Massa Tubuh Obesitas Count 5 16 21
% within Stattud Responden 9,1% 29,1% 19,1%
% of Total 4,5% 14,5% 19,1%
Tidak Obesitas Count 50 39 89
% within Stattud Responden 90,9% 70,9% 80,9%
% of Total 45,5% 35,5% 80,9%
(15)
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7,121a 1 ,008
Continuity Correctionb 5,886 1 ,015
Likelihood Ratio 7,422 1 ,006
Fisher's Exact Test ,014 ,007
Linear-by-Linear Association 7,057 1 ,008
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Indeks Massa Tubuh (Obesitas / Tidak Obesitas)
,244 ,082 ,724
For cohort Stattud
Responden = Kasus
,424 ,193 ,931
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol
1,739 1,243 2,432
N of Valid Cases 110
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Tingkat stress responden * Stattud Responden
110 100,0% 0 ,0% 110 100,0%
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
(16)
Tingkat stress responden * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Tingkat stress responden Tidak Normal Count 48 31 79
% within Stattud Responden 87,3% 56,4% 71,8%
% of Total 43,6% 28,2% 71,8%
Normal Count 7 24 31
% within Stattud Responden 12,7% 43,6% 28,2%
% of Total 6,4% 21,8% 28,2%
Total Count 55 55 110
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 12,981a 1 ,000
Continuity Correctionb 11,499 1 ,001
Likelihood Ratio 13,544 1 ,000
Fisher's Exact Test ,001 ,000
Linear-by-Linear Association
12,863 1 ,000
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15,50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
(17)
Odds Ratio for Tingkat stress responden (Tidak Normal / Normal)
5,309 2,042 13,801
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kasus
2,691 1,369 5,287
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol
,507 ,363 ,708
N of Valid Cases 110
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Pola Diet * Stattud Responden
110 100,0% 0 ,0% 110 100,0%
Pola Diet * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Pola Diet Tidak Baik Count 32 8 40
% within Stattud Responden 58,2% 14,5% 36,4%
% of Total 29,1% 7,3% 36,4%
Baik Count 23 47 70
% within Stattud Responden 41,8% 85,5% 63,6%
% of Total 20,9% 42,7% 63,6%
Total Count 55 55 110
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
(18)
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 22,629a 1 ,000
Continuity Correctionb 20,782 1 ,000
Likelihood Ratio 23,817 1 ,000
Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000
Linear-by-Linear Association 22,423 1 ,000
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20,00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Pola Diet (Tidak Baik / Baik)
8,174 3,253 20,539
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kasus
2,435 1,683 3,521
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol
,298 ,157 ,566
N of Valid Cases 110
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Riwayat Penyakit * Stattud Responden
(19)
Riwayat Penyakit * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Riwayat Penyakit Riwayat DM/
Hipertensi
Count 43 28 71
% within Stattud Responden 78,2% 50,9% 64,5%
% of Total 39,1% 25,5% 64,5%
Tidak Riwayat DM/ Hipertensi
Count 12 27 39
% within Stattud Responden 21,8% 49,1% 35,5%
% of Total 10,9% 24,5% 35,5%
Total Count 55 55 110
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8,938a 1 ,003
Continuity Correctionb 7,786 1 ,005
Likelihood Ratio 9,114 1 ,003
Fisher's Exact Test ,005 ,002
Linear-by-Linear Association 8,857 1 ,003
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
(20)
Odds Ratio for Riwayat Penyakit (Riwayat DM/HT / Tidak Riwat DM/HT)
3,455 1,507 7,924
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kasus
1,968 1,186 3,267
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol
,570 ,399 ,813
N of Valid Cases 110
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Aktivitas Fisik * Stattud Responden
110 100,0% 0 ,0% 110 100,0%
Aktivitas Fisik * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Aktivitas Fisik Tidak Baik Count 19 35 54
% within Stattud Responden 34,5% 63,6% 49,1%
% of Total 17,3% 31,8% 49,1%
Baik Count 36 20 56
% within Stattud Responden 65,5% 36,4% 50,9%
% of Total 32,7% 18,2% 50,9%
Total Count 55 55 110
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
(21)
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9,312a 1 ,002
Continuity Correctionb 8,185 1 ,004
Likelihood Ratio 9,448 1 ,002
Fisher's Exact Test ,004 ,002
Linear-by-Linear Association 9,228 1 ,002
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27,00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Aktivitas Fisik (Tidak Baik / Baik)
,302 ,138 ,659
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kasus
,547 ,363 ,826
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol
1,815 1,213 2,714
N of Valid Cases 110
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Penggunaan zat * Stattud Responden
(22)
Penggunaan zat * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Penggunaan zat Tidak baik Count 32 15 47
% within Stattud Responden 58,2% 27,3% 42,7%
% of Total 29,1% 13,6% 42,7%
Baik Count 23 40 63
% within Stattud Responden 41,8% 72,7% 57,3%
% of Total 20,9% 36,4% 57,3%
Total Count 55 55 110
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10,736a 1 ,001
Continuity Correctionb 9,510 1 ,002
Likelihood Ratio 10,935 1 ,001
Fisher's Exact Test ,002 ,001
Linear-by-Linear Association 10,639 1 ,001
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23,50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Penggunaan zat (Tidak baik / Baik)
3,710 1,668 8,253
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kasus
(23)
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol
,503 ,318 ,794
N of Valid Cases 110
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Pekerjaan * Stattud Responden
110 100,0% 0 ,0% 110 100,0%
Pekerjaan * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Pekerjaan Tidak Bekerja Count 33 41 74
% within Stattud Responden 60,0% 74,5% 67,3%
% of Total 30,0% 37,3% 67,3%
Bekerja Count 22 14 36
% within Stattud Responden 40,0% 25,5% 32,7%
% of Total 20,0% 12,7% 32,7%
Total Count 55 55 110
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
(24)
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2,643a 1 ,104
Continuity Correctionb 2,023 1 ,155
Likelihood Ratio 2,659 1 ,103
Fisher's Exact Test ,154 ,077
Linear-by-Linear Association 2,619 1 ,106
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18,00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan (Tidak Bekerja / Bekerja)
,512 ,227 1,154
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kasus
,730 ,507 1,050
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol
1,425 ,901 2,252
N of Valid Cases 110
Tingkat Pendidikan * Stattud Responden Crosstabulation
Stattud Responden
Total
Kasus Kontrol
Tingkat Pendidikan rendah Count 11 17 28
% within Stattud Responden 20,0% 30,9% 25,5%
% of Total 10,0% 15,5% 25,5%
tinggi Count 44 38 82
% within Stattud Responden 80,0% 69,1% 74,5%
% of Total 40,0% 34,5% 74,5%
(25)
% within Stattud Responden 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1,725a 1 ,189
Continuity Correctionb 1,198 1 ,274
Likelihood Ratio 1,735 1 ,188
Fisher's Exact Test ,274 ,137
Linear-by-Linear Association
1,709 1 ,191
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Tingkat Pendidikan (< 10 Tahun / >/ 10 Tahun)
,559 ,233 1,339
For cohort Stattud
Responden = Kasus
,732 ,443 1,210
For cohort Stattud Responden = Kontrol
1,310 ,898 1,912
(26)
Lampiran 9
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 110 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 110 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 110 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original
Value Internal Value
Kontrol 0
Kasus 1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Table
a,bObserved
Predicted
Status Responden
Percentage Correct
Kontrol Kasus
Step 0 Status Responden Kontrol 0 55 .0
Kasus 0 55 100.0
Overall Percentage 50.0
(27)
Classification Table
a,bObserved
Predicted
Status Responden
Percentage Correct
Kontrol Kasus
Step 0 Status Responden Kontrol 0 55 .0
Kasus 0 55 100.0
Overall Percentage 50.0
b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Step 0 Constant .000 .191 .000 1 1.000 1.000
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables stres0 12.981 1 .000
umur0 3.793 1 .051
imt0 7.121 1 .008
p_kosumsi0 22.629 1 .000
riwayatpen0 8.938 1 .003
didik0 1.725 1 .189
kerja0 2.643 1 .104
aktivitas0 9.312 1 .002
p_zat0 10.736 1 .001
Overall Statistics 52.830 9 .000
(28)
Step -2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R
Square Nagelkerke R Square
1 128.675a .195 .260
2 115.499b .286 .381
3 106.013b .345 .459
4 98.433b .388 .518
5 92.221b .422 .562
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
b. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Classification Tablea
Observed
Predicted
Status Responden
Percentage Correct
Kontrol Kasus
Step 1 Status Responden Kontrol 47 8 85.5
Kasus 23 32 58.2
Overall Percentage 71.8
Step 2 Status Responden Kontrol 47 8 85.5
Kasus 23 32 58.2
Overall Percentage 71.8
Step 3 Status Responden Kontrol 34 21 61.8
Kasus 7 48 87.3
Overall Percentage 74.5
Step 4 Status Responden Kontrol 40 15 72.7
Kasus 14 41 74.5
Overall Percentage 73.6
Step 5 Status Responden Kontrol 42 13 76.4
Kasus 12 43 78.2
(29)
Block 1: Method = Back
ward Stepwise (Wald)
Block 1: Method = Back
ward Stepwise (Wald)
a. The cut value is .500Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 6.212 1 .013
Block 60.271 5 .000
Model 60.271 5 .000
Step 2 Step 7.580 1 .006
Block 54.059 4 .000
Model 54.059 4 .000
Step 3 Step 9.486 1 .002
Block 46.479 3 .000
Model 46.479 3 .000
Step 4 Step 13.176 1 .000
Block 36.993 2 .000
Model 36.993 2 .000
Step 5 Step 23.817 1 .000
Block 23.817 1 .000
Model 23.817 1 .000
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower Upper
Step 1a p_kosumsi0 2.101 .470 19.972 1 .000 8.174 3.253 20.539
Constant -.715 .254 7.887 1 .005 .489
Step 2b stres0 1.888 .571 10.935 1 .001 6.604 2.157 20.217
p_kosumsi0 2.264 .525 18.622 1 .000 9.621 3.441 26.900
Constant -2.162 .556 15.114 1 .000 .115
Step 3c stres0 1.962 .606 10.480 1 .001 7.110 2.168 23.315
p_kosumsi0 2.452 .565 18.830 1 .000 11.616 3.837 35.164
riwayatpen0 1.561 .538 8.416 1 .004 4.763 1.659 13.675
Constant -3.320 .757 19.216 1 .000 .036
Step 4d stres0 1.773 .629 7.938 1 .005 5.887 1.715 20.205
p_kosumsi0 2.593 .596 18.935 1 .000 13.371 4.158 42.995
riwayatpen0 1.672 .559 8.944 1 .003 5.320 1.779 15.911
aktivitas0 -1.377 .518 7.058 1 .008 .252 .091 .697
Constant -2.622 .789 11.043 1 .001 .073
Step 5e stres0 1.946 .656 8.799 1 .003 7.003 1.935 25.341
(30)
riwayatpen0 1.693 .584 8.407 1 .004 5.438 1.731 17.084
aktivitas0 -1.343 .538 6.236 1 .013 .261 .091 .749
p_zat0 1.314 .545 5.810 1 .016 3.722 1.278 10.837
Constant -3.305 .888 13.853 1 .000 .037
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: p_kosumsi0. b. Variable(s) entered on step 2: stres0. c. Variable(s) entered on step 3: riwayatpen0. d. Variable(s) entered on step 4: aktivitas0. e. Variable(s) entered on step 5: p_zat0.
(31)
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig.
Step 1 Variables stres0 12.417 1 .000
umur0 2.033 1 .154
imt0 3.237 1 .072
riwayatpen0 9.622 1 .002
didik0 .540 1 .462
kerja0 4.225 1 .040
aktivitas0 9.602 1 .002
p_zat0 7.459 1 .006
Overall Statistics 37.785 8 .000
Step 2 Variables umur0 3.039 1 .081
imt0 3.416 1 .065
riwayatpen0 9.175 1 .002
didik0 1.876 1 .171
kerja0 1.858 1 .173
aktivitas0 6.864 1 .009
p_zat0 7.668 1 .006
Overall Statistics 29.922 7 .000
Step 3 Variables umur0 1.775 1 .183
imt0 4.730 1 .030
didik0 2.132 1 .144
kerja0 2.105 1 .147
aktivitas0 7.510 1 .006
p_zat0 7.073 1 .008
Overall Statistics 21.553 6 .001
Step 4 Variables umur0 2.852 1 .091
imt0 3.968 1 .046
didik0 1.859 1 .173
kerja0 1.725 1 .189
p_zat0 6.183 1 .013
Overall Statistics 15.061 5 .010
(32)
imt0 3.251 1 .071
didik0 1.727 1 .189
kerja0 2.549 1 .110
(1)
Classification Table
a,bObserved
Predicted
Status Responden
Percentage Correct Kontrol Kasus
Step 0 Status Responden Kontrol 0 55 .0
Kasus 0 55 100.0
Overall Percentage 50.0
b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant .000 .191 .000 1 1.000 1.000
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig. Step 0 Variables stres0 12.981 1 .000
umur0 3.793 1 .051 imt0 7.121 1 .008 p_kosumsi0 22.629 1 .000 riwayatpen0 8.938 1 .003 didik0 1.725 1 .189 kerja0 2.643 1 .104 aktivitas0 9.312 1 .002 p_zat0 10.736 1 .001 Overall Statistics 52.830 9 .000
(2)
Step -2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R
Square Nagelkerke R Square 1 128.675a .195 .260
2 115.499b .286 .381 3 106.013b .345 .459 4 98.433b .388 .518 5 92.221b .422 .562
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
b. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Classification Tablea
Observed
Predicted
Status Responden
Percentage Correct Kontrol Kasus
Step 1 Status Responden Kontrol 47 8 85.5
Kasus 23 32 58.2
Overall Percentage 71.8
Step 2 Status Responden Kontrol 47 8 85.5
Kasus 23 32 58.2
Overall Percentage 71.8
Step 3 Status Responden Kontrol 34 21 61.8
Kasus 7 48 87.3
Overall Percentage 74.5
Step 4 Status Responden Kontrol 40 15 72.7
Kasus 14 41 74.5
Overall Percentage 73.6
Step 5 Status Responden Kontrol 42 13 76.4
Kasus 12 43 78.2
(3)
Block 1: Method = Back
ward Stepwise (Wald)
Block 1: Method = Back
ward Stepwise (Wald)
a. The cut value is .500
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square df Sig. Step 1 Step 6.212 1 .013
Block 60.271 5 .000 Model 60.271 5 .000 Step 2 Step 7.580 1 .006 Block 54.059 4 .000 Model 54.059 4 .000 Step 3 Step 9.486 1 .002 Block 46.479 3 .000 Model 46.479 3 .000 Step 4 Step 13.176 1 .000 Block 36.993 2 .000 Model 36.993 2 .000 Step 5 Step 23.817 1 .000 Block 23.817 1 .000 Model 23.817 1 .000
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) Lower Upper Step 1a p_kosumsi0 2.101 .470 19.972 1 .000 8.174 3.253 20.539
Constant -.715 .254 7.887 1 .005 .489
Step 2b stres0 1.888 .571 10.935 1 .001 6.604 2.157 20.217 p_kosumsi0 2.264 .525 18.622 1 .000 9.621 3.441 26.900 Constant -2.162 .556 15.114 1 .000 .115
Step 3c stres0 1.962 .606 10.480 1 .001 7.110 2.168 23.315 p_kosumsi0 2.452 .565 18.830 1 .000 11.616 3.837 35.164 riwayatpen0 1.561 .538 8.416 1 .004 4.763 1.659 13.675 Constant -3.320 .757 19.216 1 .000 .036
Step 4d stres0 1.773 .629 7.938 1 .005 5.887 1.715 20.205 p_kosumsi0 2.593 .596 18.935 1 .000 13.371 4.158 42.995 riwayatpen0 1.672 .559 8.944 1 .003 5.320 1.779 15.911 aktivitas0 -1.377 .518 7.058 1 .008 .252 .091 .697 Constant -2.622 .789 11.043 1 .001 .073
Step 5e stres0 1.946 .656 8.799 1 .003 7.003 1.935 25.341 p_kosumsi0 2.572 .621 17.139 1 .000 13.087 3.873 44.217
(4)
riwayatpen0 1.693 .584 8.407 1 .004 5.438 1.731 17.084 aktivitas0 -1.343 .538 6.236 1 .013 .261 .091 .749 p_zat0 1.314 .545 5.810 1 .016 3.722 1.278 10.837 Constant -3.305 .888 13.853 1 .000 .037
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: p_kosumsi0. b. Variable(s) entered on step 2: stres0. c. Variable(s) entered on step 3: riwayatpen0. d. Variable(s) entered on step 4: aktivitas0. e. Variable(s) entered on step 5: p_zat0.
(5)
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig. Step 1 Variables stres0 12.417 1 .000
umur0 2.033 1 .154 imt0 3.237 1 .072 riwayatpen0 9.622 1 .002 didik0 .540 1 .462 kerja0 4.225 1 .040 aktivitas0 9.602 1 .002 p_zat0 7.459 1 .006 Overall Statistics 37.785 8 .000 Step 2 Variables umur0 3.039 1 .081 imt0 3.416 1 .065 riwayatpen0 9.175 1 .002 didik0 1.876 1 .171 kerja0 1.858 1 .173 aktivitas0 6.864 1 .009 p_zat0 7.668 1 .006 Overall Statistics 29.922 7 .000 Step 3 Variables umur0 1.775 1 .183 imt0 4.730 1 .030 didik0 2.132 1 .144 kerja0 2.105 1 .147 aktivitas0 7.510 1 .006 p_zat0 7.073 1 .008 Overall Statistics 21.553 6 .001 Step 4 Variables umur0 2.852 1 .091 imt0 3.968 1 .046 didik0 1.859 1 .173 kerja0 1.725 1 .189 p_zat0 6.183 1 .013 Overall Statistics 15.061 5 .010 Step 5 Variables umur0 2.311 1 .128
(6)
imt0 3.251 1 .071 didik0 1.727 1 .189 kerja0 2.549 1 .110 Overall Statistics 10.428 4 .034