THE EFFECT OF USING TIMELINE STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY IN RECOUNT TEXT AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS IN HIDAYATUL UMMAH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SURABAYA.

(1)

THE EFFECT OF USING TIMELINE STRATEGY TO

IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY IN

RECOUNT TEXT AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS IN

HIDAYATUL UMMAH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

SURABAYA

THESIS

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris (S.Pd) in teaching English

by

Fiza Intan Naumi

D05211030

ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTEMENT FACULTY OF TARBIYAH AND TEACHERS TRAINING STATE UNIVERSITY FOR ISLAMIC STUDIES SUNAN AMPEL

SURABAYA 2016


(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

ABSTRACT

Naumi, Fiza Intan. (2016). The Effect of Using Timeline Strategy to Improve Students’ Writing Ability in Recount Text at the First Year Students in Hidayatul Ummah Senior High School. A Thesis. English Teacher Education Department, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya. Advisor : Dr. Phol Khoirun Niam S,Ag, Ph. D. Key Words: student teachers, PPL I, ability in facilitating pair and group interaction, pair and group work align with the lesson objectives

In the attempt to learn English, students often find problems dealing with language skills and language components, such as the difficulty in speaking what in their mind and writing their ideas in English. The researcher found that many students were not able to write a good English text. They encountered difficulties in organizing and developing ideas, punctuation, and lack of vocabulary. They got stuck in expressing ideas and put them into right words, phrases and sentence in the target language. It is due to the lack of their knowledge about genres or types of text. The researcher also found that students’ achievement in writing is low especially in recount text. The researcher chooses timeline because it is believed that it seems as an easy media of visual aids in which is use of it often being neglected by English teachers in English learning process. Timeline strategy is the one way to improve the students writing ability in recount text. The strategy of timelines can be used with students in Grades K through 8. Research shows that even young children have an understanding of temporal order of events in history and have the ability to think and try to explain continuity and change over time. The purpose of this study is to know the effect of timeline strategy to improve students’ writing ability in recount text at the first year of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya. The participant of this research consists of 18 students from class x-1 and 18 students from X-2. This study uses quasi experimental as research design. To collect data, Then to solve the problem, pre test and post test was taken to collect the data. The result shows that 12,35 so the t value is higher than t table 2,04. In conclusion, It can be seen that t-value > t table at a significance level of 5%. It was mean that alternative hypothesis (H1) was accepted and approved or rejected the null hypothesis


(7)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE SHEET ... i

ADVISOR APPROVAL SHEET ... ii

APPROVAL SHEET ... iii

MOTTO ... iv

DEDICATION SHEET ... v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... vi

ABSTRACT ...viii

PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN TULISAN ... ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS ... x

LIST OF TABLE ... xii

LIST OF CHART AND FIGURE ... xiv

LIST OF APPENDICES ... xv

CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study... 1

B. Research Questions ... 6

C. Purpose of the study ... 7

D. Research Hypothesis ... 7

E. Significance of the Study ... 9

F. Scope and Limitation ... 9

G. Definition of Key Term ... 9

CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE A. Review of Related Literature ... 11

1. Effectivness ... 11

2. Timeline Strategy ... 12

a. Definition of Timeline... 12

b. The Use of Timeline... 12

c. Kind of Timelines... 14

d. How to Make Timeline In Recount Text ... 17

3. Writing Ability... 18

4. Recount Text ... 20

a. Definition of recount text ... 20

b. Generic concept of recount ... 20

c. Grammatical Features of Recount ... 21

d. Types of Recount... 21


(8)

CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHODS

A. Research Design ... 26

B. Research Hypothesis ... 28

C. Research Variables ... 29

D. Population and Sample ... 30

E. Research Setting and Subject ... 30

F. Research Procedure ... 31

G. Data Collection Technique... 33

H. Research Instruments ... 33

I. Data Analysis ... 35

CHAPTER IV : FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION A. Research Findings ... 40

1. The result pretest of experimental and control group... 40

2. The result posttest of experimental and control group ... 47

3. Analysis of significance ... 55

B. Discussion ... 60

CHAPTER V : CONCLUSION A. Conclusion ... 62

B. Suggestion ... 63

REFERENCES APENDICES


(9)

1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

This chapter presents the general issues related to the present study. These include the background of the study, research question, purposes of the study, significance of the study, scope and limitation of the study and definition of the key terms.

A. Background of Study

In the attempt to learn English, students often find problems dealing with language skills and language components, such as the difficulty in speaking what in their mind and writing their ideas in English. Many of them failed to graduate because of their low English score in National examination in other words cannot achieve the passing grade score. Thus, Indonesian government strives to find the solution of those problems. One of the solutions is changing the curriculum and introducing new approaches of teaching to English teacher. They also have to consider the quality improvement of teacher, students’ interest, motivation, and teaching techniques that play important roles to achieve the standard competition in language learning.

Writing is one of the four language skills: reading, writing, listening and speaking. Writing and speaking are productive skills, which mean they involve in


(10)

2

producing language rather than receiving it.1 For Indonesian students, they have difficulties in expressing productive skill. It is based on the preliminary research; it revealed that most of students are afraid of expressing the idea using English. When teacher gives task for students to write, they get difficulties to write their ideas and start it.

However, in the teaching learning process shows that writing is less developed

by students. Based on the researcher’s experience during the Service Teaching

Program (PPL 2) in SMA Al- Islam, the researcher found that many students were not able to write a good English text. They encountered difficulties in organizing and developing ideas, punctuation, and lack of vocabulary. They got stuck in expressing ideas and put them into right words, phrases and sentence in the target language. It is due to the lack of their knowledge about genres or types of text. The researcher also

found that students’ achievement in writing is low especially in recount text.

According to Hamps-L and Heasley, when we learn a second language, we learn to communicate with other people, with their language. To understand their language, we talk with them, read what they write in their language.2 The fact that people frequently have to communicate with each other in writing is one of the reasons to master English.

Unfortunately many students are not interested in writing based on their answer after interviewing them, they stated that writing is difficult It is same as the theory

1

Mary. Spratt, Alan. Pulverness, and Melanie Williams, The TKT course: teaching knowledge test

(Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005)

2


(11)

3

from Bell and Burnaby’s statement in Nunan that writing is complex process that requires the writer to demonstrate the control of several variables, including the control of format, sentence structure, vocabulary, pronunciation, spelling and letter formation at once.3 No wonder writing is the most difficult of all skills to master, not only for foreign language learners, but also for native speakers. Moreover Elbow and Bellan states that writing is hard because it requires two mental abilities that are different and usually causing conflict with each other, the ability to criticize and discard them.4

The difficulties faced by some students in writing recount text are; they find it difficult to put the exact events and use the right tenses, they put their ideas randomly without arranging the events based on the time happen and the students find it difficult to retell the story based on the chronological order. Because the problems above mentioned that are faced by student mentioned above the researcherwould like to give treatment for them to make timeline when they will write a recount text.

The researcher chooses timeline because it is believed that it seems as an easy media of visual aids in which is use of it often being neglected by English teachers in English learning process. It is supported by Gange who states that visual instructional media is one way to help teaching learning process and will not give other problems.5 It means that visual aids including timeline not only can help students to improve

3

David, Nunan, Language Teaching Methodology, A text book for teachers (London: Prentice Hall Intenational. (UK) Ltd,1999) ,16

4

Peter, Elbow-Pat Bellanof A Community of Writers, A workshop course in Writing (New York: Mc Graw-Nill, Inc, 1989), 152

5


(12)

4

their understanding in recount text, but also avoid the problems in teaching learning process. According to Gerlach and Elly, to select an appropriate media, the teacher must consider the characteristic of the students, which directly related to the learning process such as verbal abilities, visual and audio perception skills.6 From this statement, it can be concluded that teachers are not allowed to choose inappropriate media to teach their students, because of the use of inappropriate media in teaching

will lead them to the teachers’ faults.

This research focuses on writing recount text because after interview some of students SMA Hidayatul Ummah, they get difficulties in writing recount text and placing the appropriate tenses for their text. Timeline strategy is the one way to improve the students writing ability in recount text. The strategy of timelines can be used with students in Grades K through 8. Research shows that even young children have an understanding of temporal order of events in history and have the ability to think and try to explain continuity and change over time.7 For example, see the explanation of world history that Elizabeth dictated to her kindergarten teacher around thanksgiving when the class was learning about the pilgrims. She was clearly thinking about where the pilgrims fit in the sequence of world history. Most upper elementary and middle school students can identify historical developments, especially related to national history, even though they may lack a detailed

6

Gerlach, Vernon. S,and Elly, Donald. P. Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach (New Jesey: Prentice Hall,1980)

7

Lesvtik, Linda S. & Barton Keith C. Researching History Education: Theory, Method and Context, (New York Routledge,2008), 15


(13)

5

understanding of this development.8

It is advisable to use timeline as strategy to gain students idea in one line and use it fairly simple, co-create them with students, and consider alternative chronological representations given the content taught, such as vertical or horizontal timelines, timeline at an angle, timeline that replicate a path taken by people or travelers, or circle.9 Timeline as teaching strategy can help students construct an understanding of historical events over time, even the youngest students. Literature can be used to show, model and help students develop concepts about time, continuity, and change in social studies as a basic for creating timeline.10

Birkerts and Stoll11 note that the digital environment tends to encourage

people to explore many topics extensively, but at a more superficial level. In this

case, students who are brought to learning which is facilitated by digital media will be more interested in and enjoy in receiving the material. Through digital technologies, young people get more new information from the technology they use outside of school than they do from their teacher in the classroom12.

8

Linda Lesvtik, Reseraching History Education… 16 9

Alleman, Janet & Jere Brophy, History is Alive: Teaching Young Children about Changes over Time. (The Social Studies, Volume 94, Issues 3, 2003), 107

10

Pat Hoodles, An Investigation into primary school children developing awareness of time and chronology in story and historical Fiction, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34:2, 2002, 173

11

Birkerts Sven, the Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in Electronic Age (New York: Macmillan,2006),10

12

Meidasari, Venny Eka.,. Teaching English through New Digital Media (University of Indraprasta PGRI and a postgraduate student in State Universit y of Jakarta).


(14)

6

The study is aimed to improve the writing ability of the first year students of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya by using timeline strategy, especially in writing recount text. The strategy is selected since it can guide the students to generate idea into a meaningful composition. Timeline can draw past events and surely help students remember details about people, places and events. In short, they can be powerful sources of text. Besides, a timeline is worth a thousand words because one line can tell the students something even has sequences to study behind it. Based on that reason, the researcher wants to take timeline strategy to improve student ability in writing recount text.

In this study, researcher wants to know the difference of writing ability in recount text for the students who are treated by timeline strategy and those who are not treated by timeline strategy and then researcher wants to know the effect of timeline strategy if it used as method of teaching and learning in recount text.

Based on the descriptive above, if teacher wants to improve teachers’ skill use new media the teachers have to arrange strategies effectively to support English teaching and learning process on classroom to motivate students in learn English language. With giving appropriate strategies the teacher clan plan innovative lessons and creative thinking. Base on those reasons, the researcher interested to

research about “ The Effect of Using Timeline Strategy to Improve Students’

Writing Ability in Recount Text at the First Year Students in Hidayatul Ummah Senior High School


(15)

7

B. Research Question

Based on background of study above, this study will try to find out the answers of the following questions:

 Is there effect of using timeline strategy to improve Students’ writing

ability in recount text at the first year students in Hidayatul mmah Senior High School?

C. Purposes Of The Study

According the statement of the problem, the purpose of this research is:

 To know the effect of timeline strategy strategy to Improve Students’ writing ability in recount text at the first year students in Senior High School.

D. Research Hypothesis

Ary defines hypothesis as tool that is used in the research process, no ends of research.13It means that hypothesis just a tool to predict the result of the research. In this research the hypothesis is to know the effect as research not correlation on variables based on research question.14

Here, the hypothesis: Timeline strategy can improve students’ writing ability in

recount text. There is significant difference between students who are taught using timeline strategy and students are use conventional strategy in recount text. Timeline

13

Ary Donald et.al., Introduction to Research in Education: 8th editin (USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010).82

14


(16)

8

strategy likely improves students’ on writing recount text. The hypothesis used in this

study is two side hypotheses.

The formula of hypothesis is as follows: 1. NULL hypothesis (Ho)

There is no significant improvement in achievement between students who are taught by using timeline strategy than who are not taught by using timeline strategy.

2. Alternative Hypothesis (H1)

There is significant improvement in achievement between students who are taught by using timeline strategy than who are not taught by using timeline strategy.

Explanation:

Ho will be accepted if t-value < t-table H1 will accepted if t-value > t-table

E. Significance of Study

The researcher hopes that the result of this study will be beneficial for: 1. For Teacher

This can motivate the teacher to use timeline method, particularly when they are teaching recount text, and thus to make various technique in teaching. It also helps English teachers plan and conduct a better learning and interesting


(17)

9

process in teaching learning process. So, hopefully the teachers are able to improve student ability in writing recount text use timeline strategy.

2. For Students

This can encourage students to improve their ability, especially in writing skills. It also can inspire students to use timeline strategy in writing especially recount text.

3. For researcher

The result of the study is used to answer the available questions in this final project based on data gotten along the research.

4. For other researcher

The result of the study is hoped to enrich knowledge about learning recount text and the result of this study will be guidance for the next researchers to enhance theory about learning recount text using timeline strategy.

F. Scope and Limitation

This research is focusing on the effect of timeline strategy in writing recount text of the first year students of SMA Hidayatul Ummah. In this research, the researcher takes second year students as respondents of the research. The students will get lesson about the use of timeline strategy in recount text.


(18)

10

G. Definition of Key terms

The researcher writes down the definition of key terms to support the readers to understand this study and in order to have same interpretation.

1. The Effect : effect refers to the intervention’s ability to do more good tham harm for the target population in real world setting15. In this research, the effect was indicated by improvement of writing ability that measured by comparing the mean score of both posttest groups.

2. Timeline strategy : A graphical representation of a period of time, on which important events are marked. 16 Timelines are often used in education to help students and researchers with understanding the order or chronology of historical events and trends for a subject. When showing time on a specific scale on an axis, a timeline can be used to visualize time lapses between events, durations (such as a lifetimes or wars), and the simultaneity or overlap of spans and events.17

3. Recount Text : the purpose in to reconstruct past experienced by retelling events and incidents of the order in which they have occurred.

15

Dean Schillinger, An Introduction to Effectiveness, Dissemination, and Implementation Research (California San Francisco: UCSF CTSI Community Engagement Program,2010),2.

16

Jonny Ingham in Timeline in EFL (https://eflrecipes.com/2014/06/21/timelines/) acces at December 2015

17


(19)

11

CHAPTER II

Review of Related Literature

In this chapter, the researcher focuses on review of related literatures that used as the theoretical background and previous studies which related to the research. The review of related literatures is described as follows;

A. Review of Related Literature 1. Timeline Strategy

a. Definition of Timeline Strategy

Timelines are diagrams that illustrate the reference of time made by given a piece of language. They are used to show how a particular language item (often a verb in a particular tense and aspect) places particular events or situations in time and in relation to other events.18

According to Carole Cox timelines are graphic representations of the chronology of events in time. While they are often used a way to display information in visual form in textbooks as an alternative to written narrative, students can also become more actively engaged in learning the sequences of events in history by constructing timelines themselves.19

18

http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/timelines acces at December 30 2015

19


(20)

12

b. The Use of Timelines

According Gareth Rees in British council there are some usefulness of timeline strategy, they are:20

Time line strategy can simplify linguistic explanation, this strategy facilitates student to identify the use of right tenses. Besides, it is an easy way for students to reinforce the understanding of a concept in a text. The students can have Illustrate the differences between verb forms and other language items

Each student has different learning styles, such as auditory, visual, and kinesthetic and others. Timeline strategy can help students with visual learning style. Moreover, timeline strategy provides a reference point for students and encourages the awareness of how language refers to time in different ways.

A timeline icon was chosen to represent recount because it is a simple, clear indicator of chronological order (using left  right as an indicator of time passing), and visually easy to remember. 21

The benefits of timeline strategy based on National Literacy Strategy are: 22

20Teaching English….. 21

Palmer Sue, How to Teach Writing Across The Curriculum: Ages 6-8, Routledge, New York, 2011. Pg. 9


(21)

13

1) An opportunity to sort out the main events, and their sequences, without the added effort putting on them into sentences

2) An overview of all the events, in clear chronological order, so the author knows exactly how much he or she has to cover (and doesn’t get stuck on the bus)

3) An opportunity to consider how to divide the information into paragraph before beginning to write

4) An opportunity to decide whether to follow a linear chronological structure or to adapt the time sequences for effect, e.g : starting with a key event in a biography

c. Kind of Timelines

There are no set rules for the appearance of timelines; rather, there is a common sense convention which will be described below.

The basics a horizontal line represents the basic line of time. The left end of the line is the first point in time. The right end is the final point in time. Thus, time is deemed to move forwards as the line moves from the left to right. This line is usually marked with a point that represents now. Thus, the timeline is divided into the past and the future.23

22

National Literacy Strategy., National Literacy Strategy. Grammar 3, Grammar 3, (S.l.: s.n., 2002).


(22)

14

To emphasize the direction of time the line maybe capped with an arrowhead. Gareth like represent the present with triangle, as below:

This simple template can be added to in order to show everything from the difference between the words after and before and the meaning of future perfect continuous!

Symbol

The following is a summary of the common symbols used in timelines A single action or events

A repeated action or habit A permanent state or situation

A temporary state, situation or repeated continous action

Exact time of event unknown A point in time A period time


(23)

15

Examples of using symbol of timelines:

Last night, I was walking home and when I slipped on the icy path

I have been learning Japanese for 3 years

I have been to Taiwan, Hongkong and New Zealand

I get up at seven o’clock everyday

There are several types of timelines a teacher can choose, depending on the grade, area of study in social studies and needs of students.24

Horizontal: from left to right

24


(24)

16

Vertical: from bottom to top  Illustrated: pictures added

Table top timelines: add objects, artifacts, photographs in frames, etc. to a timeline on a table or counter in a classroom  Circles: this could be a clock or represent a journey that

ended where it began

Computer generated: use Word, Excel, or PowerPoint, adding information to create a personal or historical timeline  Meandering: a timeline could represent a journey or

migration that did not follow a linear path

Map: put a timeline directly on a map to show both distance, place, and time on a Journey

Parallel timelines: put a student's life on the left and world events on the right

Living timelines: construct a large timeline that uses the walls or floor of the room using lengths of butcher paper; students can learn about and dress to represent historical events and then tell other member of the class, or an audience of other classes, about the period


(25)

17

According to Palmer timeline was chosen to represent recount because it is a simple, clear indicator of chronological order (using left

 right as an indicator of time passing), and visually easy to remember.25

2. Writing Ability

The importance of writing skills is growing in tandem with increasing international interactions/transactions and opportunities in real life. Writing is a productive skill that’s supported by receptive skill. When students want to formulate the ideas, the students should have some resources that help critical thinking. From receptive skills whether reading or listening are able to help students of producing language in

25

Pal er….. Inrtroduction 5 W+1 H

Conclusion

Paragraph 1 Paragraph 3

Paragraph 2

Paragraph 5


(26)

18

written because writing can stimulate and support critical thinking skills while showing what students do not understand.26

Students have to notice five components as evaluating of writing in exploring their thought and ideas: composing style, word, formation, usage and mechanics mentioned by self (n.d)27 because of evaluation should be done to measure or to know the students ability in writing especially in recount text. The effect of a learning process of writing skill can be measured through an evaluation activity. Here are some aspects

evaluated for each category that’s taken by self (n.d)28

1. Composing

The composing related to the content and organization which the composing of writing focuses on central ideas with organized and elaborated text.

2. Style

It’s about how to choose vocabulary, sentence variety,

information and voice to affect reader. 3. Sentence Formation

Sentence formation is related to grammar. Grammar is an important convention that makes communication (both oral

26

Jennifer lyn Craig, Integrating Writing Strategies in EFL/ESL University Context (New York and London: Routledge, 2013),115

27O’Malley J. Michael and Lorraine Pierce Valdez, Authentic Asses ents for English Language

Learners: Practical Approaches for Teachers (USA: Longman,1996),145

28


(27)

19

and written).29 It’s about how to write an essay with grammatical correctly including in standard word order, no enjambment (run on sentences), completeness (No sentence fragments), standard modifier and coordinators, and effective transitions.

4. Usage

The usage related to standard inflections (e.g., plural, possessives, -ed, -ing with verbs, and –ly with adverb), subject-verb agreement (we, we is vs we are), and standard word meaning.

5. Mechanics

It’s about effective use of capitalization, punctuation,

speeling, and formatting (paragraphs noted by indenting).

3. Recount Text

a. Definition of recount text

According to Hyland, recount is a kind of genre that has social function to retell event for the purpose of informing or entertaining. The tense that used in recount text is past tense. Social purpose of recount is to reconstruct past experiences by retelling events in

29


(28)

20

original sequence. We can look at the sample of recount in personal letters, police report, insurance claims, and incident reports.30

b. Generic Concepts of Recount

There are three generic structure of recount. They are:

1) Orientation: provides the setting and produces participants. It

provides information about :“who, where, and when”.

2) Record of Events: tell what happened, present event in temporal sequence. It is usually recounted in chronological order. Personal comments and/ or evaluative remarks, which are interspersed throughout the record of events.

3) Re-orientation: optional-closure of events. It is rounds off the sequence of events.

c. Grammatical Features of Recount

The common grammatical features of recount text are:31

1. Use of nouns and pronouns to identify people, animals, things involved

2. Use of actions verbs to refer to events

3. Use of past tense to locate events in relation to speaker’s or writer’s time

30

Hyland Ken, Genre and Second Language writing (New York, Michingan Press, 2004),29

31


(29)

21

4. Use of conjunctions and time connectives to sequence of events

5. Use of adverb and adverbial phrase to indicate place and time

6. Use of adjective to describe nouns

d. Types of Recount

There are three types of recount:

1. Personal recount: retelling of an activity that the writer or speaker has been personally involved in (e.g. oral anecdote, diary entry).

2. Factual recount: recording the particulars of an accident (e.g. report of a science experiment, police report, news report, historical account).

3. Imaginative recount: taking on a imaginary role and giving details of

events (e.g. a day in the life of a roman slave; how I invented). Here the example of recount text:

Our Trip to the Blue Mountain

Orientation On Friday we went to the Blue Mountains. We stayed at David and della’s house. It has a big garden with lots of colorful flowers and a tennis court.


(30)

22

On Saturday we saw the Three Sisters and went on the scenic railway. It was scary. Then, Mummy and I went shopping with Della. We went to some antique shops and I tried on some old hats.

Event 2

On Sunday we went on the Scenic Skyway and it rocked. We saw cockatoos having a shower.

Reorientation In the afternoon we went home.

B. Previous Studies

There are five previous studies related to this study. The first study is done by Farid Helmy entitled Improving Students Skills in Writing Recount Text by Using Personal Letter. The objective of the study is to describe the improvement of personal letter in writing recount text to the tenth grade of MASS Proto Pekalongan in the Academic Year 2011/2012. The writer conducts a classroom action research to know the effectiveness of personal letter in

improving students’ skills in writing recount text. The result of the test shows

that the students’ score in the pre-cycle test was 55.5, the students’ score in the


(31)

23

achievement of the test shows that the treatment was successful because the result of the cycle II test was higher than the cycle I test.32

The second study was done by Christian D. Manurung entitled

Improving Students’ Achievement in Writing Recount Text by Using Transitions – Actions – Details (TAD) Strategy”. The objective of the study is to know the effectiveness of TAD Strategy in writing Recount Text. The writer conducted classroom action research. The subject of this research were the second year students of SMP Immanuel, Medan, class VIII-A which consisted of 36 students. This research is conducts in two cycles. Each cycle was organized in four steps, namely Planning, Action, Observation, and Reflection. Cycle II was the improvement of Cycle I. The result of this study shows that

students’ score improved from Test I to Test III. Based on the data analysis,

Students’ mean in Test I was 44.33, in Test II was 61.13, and Test III was

82.66. The conclusion is that the Transitions – Actions – Details (TAD)

Strategy can improve students’ achievement in writing recount text.33

The third study is done by Eviana Yuni Afriana with the tittle ” The Use of Blog to Teach Recount Text to Improve Students’ Writing Skill ”A Case Study of the Year Eight Students of SMPN 5 Semarang in Academic Year 2011/2012”. This research finds out whether teaching writing recount by using

32

Farid Helmy, Bachelor Thesis: Improving Students Skills in Writing Recount Text by Using Personal Letter

(Semarang: IAIN WALISONGO, 2012)

33

Christian D. Manurung, Bachelor Thesis: I provi g “tude ts’ A hieve e t i Writi g Re ou t Te t Usi g


(32)

24

a blog as the medium is effective to improve students’ ability of writing recount text and to find out whether there is any improvement of students’ ability of

writing recount text after being taught using blog. The result of this study

shows that there was a significant improvement of students‟ ability of writing

recount text after being taught using blog. While from the result of the observation checklist and questionnaire, the students gave good responses after being taught using blog. It can be concluded that a blog was a helpful medium in teaching writing recount text.34

The fourth study is done by Doni Ramli under the title “An Analysis on Students’ Error In Writing Recount Text” This research discusses the errors in

writing recount text of the tenth Grade Student of SMAN I Siantan in Academic Year 2012/2013. The writer conducts a descriptive research where the researcher explained the result of research by describing the data gained. The techniques used for collecting data are measurement technique and direct observation technique. The tool of collecting data is written test. The result of this research shows that there are 275 errors made by the students in writing recount text. The error are 95 or 34.54% errors at writing content of the text, 21 or 7.63% errors at vocabulary, 123 or 44.74% errors grammar and 36 or 13.9% errors at mechanics.35

34

Eviana Yuni Afriana, Bachelor Thesis: The Use of Blog to Teach Recount Text to Improve “tude ts’ Writi g “kill

A Case “tud of the Year Eight “tude ts of “MPN 5 “e ara g i A ade i Year / (Semarang: Universitas Semarang, 2012)

14

Doni Ramli, Bachelor Thesis: A A al sis o “tude ts’ Error I Writi g Re ou t Te t (Pontianak: Tanjungpura University 2013)


(33)

25

The fifth study is done by Ellanari Karanani under the title “Area of Problem in Writing Recount Text” .this research discusses the area of a problem occurs when students write recount text. The writer uses descriptive method in order to gain the data needed. The data were gained by using writing as test instrument. The result of this research on the students ability in writing recount text based on the five writing aspects was classified as fair, but most of them still encountered with some serious problem.36

However there are the differences between the first, second and third studies they various strategies applied such as personal letters, TAD and blog as media to teach writing recount text. The fourth and fifth studies are an analysis of writing recount text. What is the different from this research and research above mentioned is that this research use timeline strategy to improve students writing in recount text.

36

Ellanari Karanani, Bachelor Thesis: An Area of Problem in Writing Recount Text (Palangkaraya: Palangkaraya University, 2014)


(34)

26

CHAPTER III

Research Method

This research aims to find out the strategic that is used to measure the effect of timeline strategy in writing recounts text. Because of those problems, this chapter presents research design, the location, subject, research instrument, data collection techniques and data analysis.

A. Research Design

In this research, the researcher wants to get information about the effect of timeline strategy to improve Students’ writing ability in recount text at the Second year students in Hidayatul Ummah senior high school. In this research, the researcher will use the quasi experimental. According to Trochim research design provides the glue that holds the research project together. A design was used to structure this research, to show how all the major parts of the research project-sample of group, measures, treatments or program, and methods of work-assignment together to address the rental research question.37

This study was quantitative research. Quantitative research can be interpreted as research method which is based on positivism and philosophy, used in certain population and sample, uses data collection and research instrument, in data analysis

37

William. M.K. Trochim, The research Method Knowledge Base, 2nd Editon (Itacha, NY: Cornell Cusmtom Publishing, 1999), 71


(35)

27

uses quantitative/statistic characteristic, in purpose to testing the hypothesis that had been settle.38 As this research aim to know the effect of timeline strategy in students writing recount text ability, this quantitative method matches the purpose of this research.

Quasi experimental design was applied in this research. Experimental research was the way to find a causal relationship between two factors that are deliberately caused by the researcher by reducing or setting aside other factors that interfere. Experiments are always done with the intent to see a treatment.39 A quasi experimental design is one that looks a bit like an experimental design but lacks the key ingredient-random assignment. 40

The design which is used in this research has some characteristics. The first characteristic is that the researcher conducted the research in two classrooms. Those two classrooms will divide into one experimental group and one control group. The second characteristic is that the researcher measured both groups twice. The first measurement serve as the pretest to find out their homogeneity before the treatment, and the second one served as the post-test to find out the effectiveness of technique employ. Then, the researcher manipulated the experimental group by using a particular treatment which is the use of timeline strategy, while the control group will not use it. Finally, the researcher measures the dependent variables’ effect after the treatments

38

Sugiyono, Statistika untuk Penelitian (Bandung: Alfabeta Bandung, 2010)8

39

Suharismi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Suatu Praktek (Jakarta: Bina AKsara,1987),3

40

William. M.K. Trochim, The research Method Knowledge Base, 2nd Editon (Itacha, NY: Cornell Cusmtom Publishing, 1999), 215


(36)

28

are completely given by using statistical analysis. There is one stage used in the process of analyzing the data. This is concerned with the descriptive statistics of which purpose was to reveal the characteristics of the data, like maximum score, minimum score, and mean score.

Table 3.1

The design of Experimental Research

Groups Random Pre test Treatment Post test

Experimental group

Control group

R

R

O1

O3

X O2

O4

In which :

R : Random Sampling

O1 : Pre Test of experimental group

O2 : Post Test of experimental group

O3: Pre test of Control group

O4 : Post Test of control group

X : the treatment that given by the researcher to the experimental group by using timeline strategy

B. Research Hypothesis


(37)

29

Ha : There is a significant difference in students’ English writing recount text taught by timeline strategy and traditional technique at the first year of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya.

Ho :There is no significant difference in students’ English writing recount text taught by timeline strategy and traditional technique at the first year of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya.

Explanations:

Ha will be accepted if t-value < t-table Ho will be accepted if t-value > t-table

T-table is the score gotten from t distribution, while t-value is the score gotten from calculation using the formula of t-test.

C. Research Variables

In the experiment research, there are two variables that will be manipulated by the researcher. They are independent variable (X) and dependent variable (Y). Independent variable is a factor which is manipulated by the writer to determine the relationship between the phenomena observed. While dependent variable is a factor which is observed and measured to determine the effect of independent variable.

1. Independent Variable


(38)

30

recount text in the first year students of SMA Hidayatul Ummah.academic year 2015/2016.

2. Dependent Variable

The dependent variable is (Y) is student’s ability in writing recount text in the first year students of SMA Hidayatul Ummah academic year 2015/2016

D. Population and Sample

This study addresses the population of first year students of SMA Hidayatul Ummah, since this is a quasi experimental research, cluster sampling was assigned and results two classes of first year. The sample will be taken in first year of SMA. It will take 2 classes as experiment class. The first class will become the experimental and control group. There are 2 classes consist of 18 students in class X-1 and class X-2 consist of 18 students. X-1 will become the control class and X-2 will become the experimental class. it will take the second semester of first year of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya.

E.Research Setting and Subject

The subject and setting of this study is the first grade of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya. SMA Hidayatul Ummah was located in Jl. Mulyorejo No.92 Surabaya. The students from first year of senior high school were selected as the subject of this study because they get a specific learning based on their class. Especially writing recount text.


(39)

31

F. Research Procedure

The procedure of this study covered the following steps, namely: pretest, treatment 1, treatment 2 and posttest. To answer the research question of this study, pretest and posttest was collected. Pretest was conducted before treatment while posttest was conducted after treatment. Before the treatment was given to the experimental group, the researcher has been given some information to the teacher about timeline strategy and how to teach using timeline strategy because the researcher becomes an observer in the learning process. The English teacher of SMA Hidayatul Ummah has been taught the students in the experimental group using timeline strategy. There were some activities conducted to both groups to see the differences on achievement between experimental and control group. The research schedule is figured out in the text following table:

Table 3.2

The Research Procedure

No. Experimental Group Control Group

Date Theme/ material Date Theme/material

1. 14th March Pretest 14th March Pretest

2. 15th March Treatment 1 teaching recount

14th March Teaching recount text


(40)

32

text using timeline strategy Material : Unforgettable

moment

with conventional

technique Material : Unforgettable

moment 3. 21st March Treatment 2

teaching recount text using timeline

strategy Material : Last holiday

21st March Teaching recount text

with conventional

technique Material : Last holiday

4. 28th March Post test 28th March Post Test

The researcher prepared the teaching process before administering the activities above. It was undertaken two steps: First, the researcher prepared a appropriate materials for teaching process. Second, the researcher organized teaching procedure in the control and experimental group.


(41)

33

G. Data Collection Technique

In conducting a research, it is necessary to collect the data required. Data collecting can be done in many setting, various source and various means.41 It also known that research was a system attempt to provide answer to problem or a question. Then to solve the problem, pre test and post test was taken to collect the data.

1. Pretest

The data was collect through the pretest in both classes in order to know is the experimental group and control group having similar ability or not before the implementation of timeline strategy. Pretest was administered to both classes to measure the students’ English writing ability before the treatment. The pretest conducted on March 15 2016.

2. Posttest

After timeline strategy implemented, then the posttest was given. Posttest was given to know students ability result after the treatment. The result of the test was scored and calculated. It was conducted on March 28 2016.

H. Research Instrument

In quantitative research, instrument was applied to collect the data. The instrument of this research to measurable variable value that was accurate. In this research, test and observation used to collect the data. The test was the

41


(42)

34

main instrument to give the researcher data about the students’ writing ability. The test was in form of essay writing.

In grading and scoring the researcher used analytic scales with explicit and detailed scoring adapted from Self (n.d) to get the more validity and reliable grading of the test. (Appendix 1) the rubric is a set of characteristic that used to evaluate writing, with rubric researcher can access and give the score of writing.

There were five components assessed on writing ability in recount text: they are composing style, word formation, usage and mechanism.42 Each component of five aspects have maximal score and minimum score. The maximal score of all aspects are 4, and 1 for the minimum score. The score was based on the degree of control the students’ paper exhibits for that component.

4 = consistent control 3 = reasonable control 2 = inconsistent control 1 = little or no control 1. Pretest

In this research, the pretest was used to find the students’ English writing ability in recount text. It was conducted to all class X in SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya. They were selected because their schedule subject of second semester was similar.

42


(43)

35

2. Posttest

Afterward the posttest was conducted to measure the effect of timeline strategy used after the application treatment in experimental group. The use of posttest also determines whether was effective of not by comparing the achievement of post test in both classes, those are control and experimental group.

I. Data Analysis Technique

In this research, there was only one question with one data. The data of the question about the significant different of increasing writing achievement between who taught using guiding question technique and who was not taught without using guiding question technique. The data was collected from observation class activity and students’ test.

After collecting the data of pre-test and pos-test from the experimental group and control group, the researcher tried to find out the difference between the achievement of the experimental group and the control group. Then, the data was analyzed using statistical calculation of t-test to find out whether the differences of the score between the experiment class and the control class are significant or not. T-test is used to measure and compare the differences of means score between experimental group and control group. 43

43

A E.Bartz,Basic Statistical Concepts in Education and the Behavior Sciances (Minneapous:Burgess Pub,Co, 1976), p.293


(44)

36

To know is there any advantages in use of guiding question technique or not in teaching writing, t-test was applied in this research. Before that, the researcher was did normality test and homogeneities test. The normality test was used to check whether the posttest score of experimental group and control group were normally distribution or not. While homogeneity test was used to calculate the homogeneity of variance of both experimental and control group posttest score.44

1. Analysis of T-test

The data analyzed applying t-test formula to find out the influence of timeline strategy on improving students’ writing skill.

�� =

the mean of the control group

��

= the mean of the experimental group

Sse: sum of quadrate deviation of the experimental group

Ssc: sum of quadrate deviation of the control group

Ne: the number of experimental group

44


(45)

37

Nc: the number of control group13

Before calculating the t-test the researcher calculates mean, variance, and strandard deviation

a) Mean

Mean is computed by using the formula:

Where:

�= mean

�= sum of scores �=number of scores b) Variance

The variance of a group of scores is computed by using the following formula:

Where: S2: variance

X: individual score


(46)

38

c) Standard Deviation

The standard deviation of a group of scpres was computed by using the following formula:

Where:

S: standard deviation Xe: individual score

N: number of scores in group

After calculating the t-test, it shows the difference mean and standard deviation scores between students who are taught with timeline strategy and without timeline strategy. After that, comparing t-test with t-table.

1) If the value of t-test > from the t table it shows there is significance effect of timeline strategy on improving students’ writing skill.

2) If the value of t-test < from the t table it shows there is no significance effect of timeline strategy on improving students writing skill.

2. Testing hypothesis

This research has two hypothesis, null hypothesis (Ho) and alternative hypothesis (Ha) that should be proved. The conclusion


(47)

39

based on the significant value and t-test calculated based on hypotheses as follows:

a. Since significant value (to) > from the critical value (t), then null hypothesis (Ho) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted.

b. Since significance value (to) < from the critical value (t), then null hypothesis (Ho) accepted and alternative hypothesis (Ha) rejected.


(48)

41

components from writing aspect taken from Self at, al.: Composing (C), Style (S), Sentence Formation (SF), Usage (U), and Mechanism (M). The researcher calculated the result of the pretest and mean of both groups to evidence that samples had same ability. To know the total score of first test, the researcher multiplied each component by 5 C (5)+ S (5) + SF (S)+ U(5) + M (5) and then all scores from five components number of students were added to be a total score.

a. The Result of Pretest of Control Group Table 4.1

The Result of Pretest of Control Group

No. Score Criteria Score

C S S F U M

1. 10 5 15 10 10 50

2. 10 10 10 15 10 55

3. 15 10 15 10 10 60

4. 10 10 10 15 15 60

5. 15 5 15 10 10 55

6. 10 10 10 10 10 50


(49)

42

8. 15 5 15 10 10 55

9. 10 10 15 10 10 55

10. 10 10 15 15 10 60

11. 15 10 10 15 15 65

12. 10 10 15 15 15 65

13. 10 15 10 10 10 55

14. 15 5 10 15 10 55

15. 10 15 15 15 15 70

16. 10 5 15 10 10 50

17. 15 15 15 15 10 70

18. 10 15 10 15 10 60

∑ 210 175 235 225 200 1045

Mean 11.7 9.7 13.1 12.5 11.1 58.1

The table showed that the sum of the pretest scores of control group was 1045. While the mean of pretest scores of the control group was 58,1. The mean was gotten from five components (Components, Style, Sentence Formation, Usage, Mechanism) and divided by number of students (18).


(50)

43

b. The result of Pretest of Experimental Group Table 4.2

The Result of Pretest of Experimental Group

No. Score Criteria Score

C S SF U M

1. 10 15 10 10 10 55

2. 10 10 15 10 15 60

3. 10 10 15 10 15 60

4. 10 10 10 15 10 55

5. 10 10 15 15 15 65

6. 15 15 15 10 10 65

7. 10 15 15 15 15 70

8. 15 15 10 10 15 65

9. 10 15 15 10 10 60

10. 15 10 15 15 10 65

11. 15 10 10 15 10 60

12. 10 5 15 15 10 55

13. 15 10 10 10 10 55

14. 15 15 10 15 10 65

15. 10 5 10 10 10 45

16. 15 15 10 10 10 60

17. 10 10 10 10 10 50

18. 10 10 10 10 10 50

∑ 215 205 220 215 205 1060


(51)

44

The table showed that the sum of the pretest scores of experimental group was 1060. While the mean of pretest scores of the control group was 58,9. The mean was gotten from five components (Components, Style, Sentence Formation, Usage, and Mechanism) and divided by number of students (18).

1.1 Analysis of Pretest

Pretest in the experimental and control group is given in the first meeting before conducting the treatment. It is attended by 18 students in each class. data is collected through pretest in both groups in order to find out their writing ability in both groups are homogeneous or not. It is given before the treatment.

Table 4.3

The result of pretest can be seen in the following table:

Group N Total Score Mean

Control Group 18 1045 58,1

Experimental Group 18 1060 58,9


(52)

45

1035 1040 1045 1050 1055 1060 1065

Control group Experimental group

Chart Total Score of prestest

Experimental and Control Group

Series 1 Column1 Column2

0 20 40 60

Chart Mean Pretest of Control and

Experimental Group

Series 1 Series 2 Series 3

The result would be described through the following figure.

Chart 4.1

Chart total score of pretest experimental and control group

Chart 4.2

Chart Mean of pretest control group and experimental group 58,1 58,9


(53)

46

1.2 The Treatment

The treatments of this study were the use of timeline strategy for the experimental group. Timeline strategy would be a help for the students in investigating the question and it would direct students in order to choose, find and create the ideas of writing and then developing students’ ideas into understand. The process of timeline strategy is very useful to help the students to generate and organize ideas into a good composition of writing. So, the product of writing can easier understand by the reader.

a) First Treatment

The first treatment was held on 16th March, 2016. In this time the students was taught used timeline strategy. The theme of this meeting was about

“Unforgettable moment” The teacher ask the students to write their story be

related to their experience and use timeline strategy.

The first treatment was started with the greeting and shared the purpose of the study. Then the teacher ordered the students to open the book and gave some explanation based on the subject. Teacher introduces the timeline strategy and starts explain how to use the timeline. Teacher gives picture kind of timeline strategy, then she explain the steps how to make a timeline. After the teacher gave the example, she asks students to write down their own timeline in the book. Then she give the students home work to do the recount text based on timeline strategies that have been make before.


(54)

47

b) Second Treatment

The second treatment was held on 21st March 2016. In this time the students was taught to use timeline strategy. The theme of this meeting was

about “Last holiday”. Teacher asked the students to write about their last holiday and use timeline.

The second treatment was started with the greeting and shared the purpose of the study. Before teacher explains the second material she asks students to submit their home work. Then teacher asks the students to open the book and explains them about generic structure of recount text. After that, the teacher asks the students to write story about their last holiday and do they spent the holiday. In the end, students make story about their last holiday use timeline strategy and submit their work to the teacher. Then teacher asks one of their students to explain how to write and generating their ideas.

2. The Result of Posttest of Experimental and Control Group

After giving pretest, the teacher taught writing to the experimental and control groups. For the experimental group, the researcher presented the material of writing by using timeline strategy and for control group taught without using timeline strategy and directly taught and explained about recount text. The posttest was given to the 36 students. There were 18 students in control group and 18 students in experimental group. After giving pretest, the researcher gives treatment to the experimental and control groups twice. The


(55)

48

experimental group was given timeline strategy and the control group was taught use traditional method.

The posttest was conducted in 28th of March 2016. Posttest in experimental and control group was conducted on the third and fourth meeting, while the control and experimental group was given the posttest in the third and fourth

meeting. Posttest was conducted to know the students’ English writing ability

of recount text after the implementation of timeline strategy.

a. The result of posttest in control group

Posttest was also given to the class X-1 at SMA Hidayatul Ummah as a control group. The control group was not given the treatment by timeline strategy. The teacher was taught students use traditional technique. In traditional technique teacher gives material to students besides on explanation and book. The posttest was attended by 18 students at the third and fourth meeting on 21st and 28th March 2016. The data of posttest of control group was analyzed based on the five components: Components, Style, Sentence Formation, Usage, and Mechanism. The result of posttest of control group can be seen in the following table.


(56)

49

Table 4.4

The Result of Posttest in Control Group

No. C S SF U M Score

1. 10 10 10 15 15 60

2. 10 10 10 10 15 55

3. 10 15 10 15 10 60

4. 10 15 15 10 15 65

5. 10 15 15 15 10 65

6. 10 15 10 15 15 65

7. 10 15 10 15 10 60

8. 10 15 10 10 15 60

9. 10 15 10 10 15 60

10. 10 15 10 10 15 60

11. 10 15 10 10 20 65

12. 10 10 15 15 10 60

13. 15 10 10 15 10 60

14. 15 15 15 10 15 70

15. 10 20 10 10 10 60


(57)

50

On the contrary, the posttest of control had not improved significantly as the experimental group. From the table above it can be

seen that the students’ mean in their English writing score of pretest

group was 61,1.

b. The Result of Posttest in Experimental Group

The data was gotten by giving posttest after implementation of timeline strategy in experimental group. Posttest on the experimental group was held on third and fourth meeting 28th of March. Before posttest was given, the treatments were done twice on 15th March and 21st March

2016. The first treatment used “Unforgettable moment” and “Last Holiday”.

The score of control group which was showed in five components: Composing (C), Style (S), Sentence Formation (SF), Usage (U), and Mechanism (M), then the score of posttest of control group was assessed based on ESL Composition. Score can be seen in the following table:

17. 10 10 10 15 15 60

18. 10 10 15 10 15 60

∑ 190 245 205 220 240 1100


(58)

51

Table 4.5

Result of Posttest Experimental Group

No. Score Critetria Score

1 2 3 4 5

1. 15 15 15 15 15 70

2. 15 15 15 15 15 75

3. 15 15 10 15 15 70

4. 10 20 20 15 15 80

5. 15 10 15 15 15 70

6. 15 15 15 15 15 75

7. 15 20 15 20 10 80

8. 15 15 15 15 15 75

9. 15 15 15 15 15 75

10. 15 10 15 15 20 75

11. 15 20 15 15 15 80

12. 20 15 15 15 15 80

13. 15 20 15 15 15 80

14. 15 15 15 15 15 75

15. 15 15 15 15 15 75


(59)

52

17. 20 15 10 15 15 75

18. 15 15 15 15 15 75

∑ 275 280 265 280 270 1365

Mean 15.3 15.6 14.7 15.6 15.0 75.8

Based on the table above, it can be conclude that scores of posttest in experimental group got some improvement. The mean of posttest of experimental group was 75,8. It means that mean score of experimental group increase about 14,7 points.

c. Analysis of posttest

Posttest is conducted to both of experimental and control groups in the same week after receiving the treatment. The purpose of posttest is

to know whether there is improvement in the students’ achievement of

experimental group. The result of the posttest score and mean of the experimental and control groups are presented in following table:

Table 4.6

The Result of Total Score and Mean of Experimental And Control Group

Group N Total Score Mean

Experimental Group 18 1365 75,8


(60)

53

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

Experimental Group

Control Group

Series 1 Column1 Column2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Experimental Group Control Group

Series 1 Series 2 Series 3

Chart 4.3

Chart total score posttest of experimental and control group

Chart 4.4


(61)

54

0 20 40 60 80 100

Experimental Control Group

Pretest Posttest Improvement

The chart shows that the sum of the posttest is 1365 for experimental groups and 1100 for control groups. While the mean of posttest score of the experimental group is 75,8 and the control group is 61,1.

From the result of pretest and posttest scores of experimental group, we could see that the posttest score is higher than pretest. It would be compared with pretest to find out the improvement. The improvement can be seen through the following:

Table 4.7

The improvement of Experimental and control Group

Group Mean

Pretest Posttest Improvement Experimental

Group

58,9 75,8 16,9

Control Group 58,1 61,1 3


(62)

55

From the table above, it shows that the mean difference of experimental class is higher than control class. The score of experimental group mean difference is 16,9, whereas in control group is mean difference is 3. It can be concluded that the treatment given by timeline strategy has more influence than traditional technique.

Overall improvement between pretest and posttest score of experimental group is higher than the control group. Then the researcher calculates the two mean posttest score by using t-test formula to know whether the improvement is significant or not.

d. Analysis of Significance

After the researcher gives the pretest, treatments and posttest then the researcher calculates the different mean of pretest and posttest score between experimental and control groups to know whether the result of timeline strategy is significant or not between both of groups. Then the result is analyzed using t-test formula. Before it is done, the standard deviation of the two groups is calculated first.

1.1 Standard Deviation and variance of Experimental and Control Group

a. Experimental group

 Variance

2 = (��−� )2 ��−1


(63)

56

=212,52 17 =12,50

 Standard Deviation

= 12,5

=3,53 b. Control group

 Variance ��2= (��−� )

2

��−1

=227,78 17

=13,40

 Standard Deviation � = 13,40

=3,66

Table 4.8

The result of calculation is presented in this table:

Group N Mean Variance

Experimental Group 18 3,53 12,50

Control Group 18 3,66 13,40


(64)

57

After the researcher knows the different between mean and variance from both groups then, the researcher calculates the t-test.

= � � − � �

��−1 �2+ �−1 �2 ��+�−2

1 ��+

1 ��

= 75,8−61,1

18−1 12,50+18−113,40

18+18−2

1 18+

1 18

= 14,7

212,5+227,834 2 18

= 14,7

440,3 34

2 18

= 14,7

12,95 0,11 =14,7

1,19

= 12,35

� � > �� (� 2) 12,35 > 2,04


(65)

58

α = 0,05

1.4After all data calculates, the number of degree of freedom calculates. The formula is:

df = (N1+N2)-2 = (18+18)-2 = 36-2 = 34

From the calculation of the data above, it was found that standard deviation of the experimental group was 3,53 While the control group was 3,66. T-value is comparing with t-table distribution with significant 0.05 and degree of freedom (34). It was found that t-table was 2,04 While the result of t-value was 12,35.

So it was clear that there was significant different between the

students’ English writing achievement who were taught by timeline strategy and who were taught by timeline strategy. In other words, the effect of timeline strategy to improve students; writing ability in recount text at first year of SMA Hidayatul Ummah in experimental group was effected that the control group who were not taught by timeline strategy.


(66)

59

To check whether or not the difference between two means of the experimental group and the control group is statuscially significant, the obtained t-value should be consulted with the critical value in the t-table.

The hypothesis of this research states that :

Ha :There is a significant difference in students’ English writing recount text taught by timeline strategy and traditional technique at the first year of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya.

Ho : There is no significant difference in students’ English writing recount text taught by timeline strategy and traditional technique at the first year of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya.

Before the experiment is conducted, the level of significance should have been decided first, so the decision making would not be influenced by the result of the experiment.

In this experiment, there are 18 students as experimental group and 18 students as control group. The number of the both groups is 36 students.

From the number we can know that degree of freedom is 34, which is obtained from the formula n1+n2-2=34. Then the score of db was assessed on table by significance level 5%. T-table score was 2.00.

It can be seen that t-value < t table at a significance level of 5%. It was mean that alternative hypothesis was accepted and approved or


(67)

60

rejected the null hypothesis. So, there was improvement English writing achievement between experimental group was taught by timeline strategy and control group who was taught by traditional technique. The obtain t value is 12,35 so the t value is higher than t table 2,04. It is concluded that

“there is significance effect of timeline strategy on improving students’ writing skill in recount text”.

C. Discussion

This section is intended to discuss the research findings. All data collected from the research instrument provides information about the object in this research. This research was about the effect of timeline strategy to improve students’ writing ability.

Timeline strategy is one of the ways to improve students’ writing ability in recount text. Sue Palmer stated that timeline was chosen to represent recount because it is simple, clear indicator of chronological order (using left right) as an indicator of time passing), and visually to remember.45 Timeline strategy is also able to re-organize student event in one line, it easier to understand and to write into a piece of writing text. While teaching through timeline strategy, the teacher let students to write their ideas in one line, it helps students to brainstorm their ideas then develop their ideas into their own writing.

45


(68)

62

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

This chapter is discusses the final conclusion of the research which was conducted in the first year students of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya. The researcher gave result of the research to answer the problem for questions in the first chapter and also to give some suggestions that maybe useful for English teacher and for the next researcher when they use timeline strategy as media teaching recount text in the first year students of senior high school.

A.Conclusion

In this study, the researcher applied timeline strategy in teaching writing recount text for first year students of senior high school at SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya. In this research, the researcher used two classes as experimental and control group. Experimental group was taught by using timeline strategy to improve students; writing ability. Timeline strategy was never applied in that school before, especially in writing recount text. Firstly, the researcher gave the pretest for both groups to make sure that both of classes had same ability. The next step, the researcher compared the result score of the pretest between experimental and control group, to know that both of groups had relatively same ability.

For knowing the effect of timeline strategy, the researcher compared the posttest score and means score between experimental and control group. The result


(69)

63

described that group who was taught by using timeline strategy had higher achievement than who was not taught by using timeline strategy. Then the researcher tested independent sample t-test.. Based on the result of normality test explained that the final score described that timeline strategy was effective for teaching writing recount text, because the significant value was lower than critical value, while the value t-test was higher than t-table.

From the result above, the researcher could prove that timeline strategy can motivate students in learning writing recount text and also can help English teacher to use timeline strategy as a good media in teaching recount text.

B.Suggestion

1. For teacher

The researcher suggest for teacher to use appropriate media related to material to motivate students and catch students’ interest in accepting material, and also to anticipate students; boredom in learning process. So, the students can be active and creative in developing their ideas.

2. For the next researcher

The researcher suggests for the next researcher who want to use this teaching media, it is better for them to conduct their research on the implementation of timeline strategy which is not only in recount text but also in other genre text and other skills. The researcher also suggest for making the study in different subjects and location on order to strength the previous research.


(70)

64

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Afriana, Eviana Yuni. Bachelor Thesis: The Use of Blog to Teach Recount Text to Improve Students’ Writing Skill ”A Case Study of the Year Eight Students of SMPN 5 Semarang in Academic Year 2011/2012 , Semarang: Universitas Semarang, 2012.

Arikunto, Suharismi. Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Suatu Praktek , Jakarta: Bina AKsara,1987.

Arifin, Zaenal. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Suranaya: Lentera Cendikia, 2009.

Bartz, A E. Basic Statistical Concepts in Education and the Behavior Sciances, Minneapous:Burgess Pub,Co, 1976.

Carole, Cox. Literature-Based Teaching in the Content Areas, Sage Publications, Inc, 2011.

Craig, Jennifer lyn. Integrating Writing Strategies in EFL/ESL University Context, New York and London: Routledge, 2013.

Donald, Ary et.al. Introduction to Research in Education: 8th edition USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010.

Elbow, Peter -Pat Bellanof. A Community of Writers, A workshop course in Writing New York: Mc Graw-Nill, Inc, 1989.

Hamps , Lyons – Heasley. Study writing, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000.


(1)

62

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

This chapter is discusses the final conclusion of the research which was conducted in the first year students of SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya. The researcher gave result of the research to answer the problem for questions in the first chapter and also to give some suggestions that maybe useful for English teacher and for the next researcher when they use timeline strategy as media teaching recount text in the first year students of senior high school.

A.Conclusion

In this study, the researcher applied timeline strategy in teaching writing recount text for first year students of senior high school at SMA Hidayatul Ummah Surabaya. In this research, the researcher used two classes as experimental and control group. Experimental group was taught by using timeline strategy to improve students; writing ability. Timeline strategy was never applied in that school before, especially in writing recount text. Firstly, the researcher gave the pretest for both groups to make sure that both of classes had same ability. The next step, the researcher compared the result score of the pretest between experimental and control group, to know that both of groups had relatively same ability.

For knowing the effect of timeline strategy, the researcher compared the posttest score and means score between experimental and control group. The result


(2)

63

described that group who was taught by using timeline strategy had higher achievement than who was not taught by using timeline strategy. Then the researcher tested independent sample t-test.. Based on the result of normality test explained that the final score described that timeline strategy was effective for teaching writing recount text, because the significant value was lower than critical value, while the value t-test was higher than t-table.

From the result above, the researcher could prove that timeline strategy can motivate students in learning writing recount text and also can help English teacher to use timeline strategy as a good media in teaching recount text.

B.Suggestion

1. For teacher

The researcher suggest for teacher to use appropriate media related to material

to motivate students and catch students’ interest in accepting material, and also to

anticipate students; boredom in learning process. So, the students can be active and creative in developing their ideas.

2. For the next researcher

The researcher suggests for the next researcher who want to use this teaching media, it is better for them to conduct their research on the implementation of timeline strategy which is not only in recount text but also in other genre text and other skills. The researcher also suggest for making the study in different subjects and location on order to strength the previous research.


(3)

64

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Afriana, Eviana Yuni. Bachelor Thesis: The Use of Blog to Teach Recount Text to Improve Students’ Writing Skill ”A Case Study of the Year Eight Students of SMPN 5 Semarang in Academic Year 2011/2012 , Semarang: Universitas Semarang, 2012.

Arikunto, Suharismi. Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Suatu Praktek , Jakarta: Bina AKsara,1987.

Arifin, Zaenal. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Suranaya: Lentera Cendikia, 2009.

Bartz, A E. Basic Statistical Concepts in Education and the Behavior Sciances, Minneapous:Burgess Pub,Co, 1976.

Carole, Cox. Literature-Based Teaching in the Content Areas, Sage Publications, Inc, 2011.

Craig, Jennifer lyn. Integrating Writing Strategies in EFL/ESL University Context, New York and London: Routledge, 2013.

Donald, Ary et.al. Introduction to Research in Education: 8th edition USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010.

Elbow, Peter -Pat Bellanof. A Community of Writers, A workshop course in Writing

New York: Mc Graw-Nill, Inc, 1989.

Hamps , Lyons – Heasley. Study writing, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000.


(4)

65

Hoodles, Pat. An Investigation into primary school children developing awareness of time and chronology in story and historical Fiction, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34:2, 2002.

Helmy, Farid. Bachelor Thesis: “Improving Students Skills in Writing Recount Text by Using Personal Letter” (Semarang: IAIN WALISONGO, 2012.

http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/timelines acces at December 30 2015.

Jonny Ingham in Timeline in EFL (https://eflrecipes.com/2014/06/21/timelines/) acces at December 12, 2015.

J. Michael, O’Malley - Lorraine Pierce Valdez, Authentic Assesments for English

Language Learners: Practical Approaches for Teachers, USA:

Longman,1996.

Janet, Alleman, - Jere Brophy,. History is Alive: Teaching Young Children about Changes over Time. The Social Studies, Volume 94, Issues 3, 2003.

Ken, Hyland. Genre and Second Language writing, New York, Michingan Press, 2004.

Karanani, Ellanari Bachelor Thesis: An Area of Problem in Writing Recount Text

(Palangkaraya: Palangkaraya University, 2014.

Linda, Lesvtik, S. - Barton Keith C. Researching History Education: Theory, Method and Context, (New York Routledge, 2008.


(5)

66

Manurung, Christian D. Bachelor Thesis: Improving Students’ Achievement in Writing Recount Text by Using Transitions – Actions – Details (TAD) Strategy , Medan:, 2013.

Nunan, David. Language Teaching Methodology, A text book for teachers (London: Prentice Hall Intenational. (UK) Ltd, 1999.

National Literacy Strategy., National Literacy Strategy. Grammar 3, Grammar 3,

S.l.: s.n., 2002.

Ramli, Doni. Bachelor Thesis: An Analysis on Students’ Error In Writing Recount Text, Pontianak: Tanjungpura University 2013.

Spratt, Mary.- Alan Pulverness and Melanie Williams. The TKT course: Teaching Knowledge Test Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian, Bandung, Alfabeta, 2013

Sven Birkerts. The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in Electronic Age, New York: Macmillan,2006

Sue, Palmer. How to Teach Writing Across The Curriculum: Ages 6-8, Routledge, New York, 2011.

Segal, Margaret Keenan – Cheryl Pavlik, Interaction 2 Writing, Singapore: Megraw Hill, 2007

Schillinger, Dean. An Introduction to Effectiveness, Dissemination, and

Implementation Research, California San Francisco: UCSF CTSI


(6)

67

Trochim, William. M.K. The Research Method Knowledge Base, 2nd Editon, Itacha, NY: Cornell Cusmtom Publishing, 1999

Vernon, Gerlach,. S,- Elly, Donald. P. Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach

New Jesey: Prentice Hall,1980.

Venny Eka, Meidasari, Teaching English through New Digital Media , University of Indraprasta PGRI and a postgraduate student in State Universit y of Jakarta).