Kuliah

(1)

(2)

Bandi, 2007 2

Purpose

Technical GOAL

RENSTRA RENOPS

Optimism

Pesimism MENINGKATKAN NILAI PERUSAHAAN

objectives


(3)

Bandi, 2007 3 BB Pembantu Tahun t Bukti Bk Jurnal Bk Besar Laporan keuangan Neraca, Laba rugi, perubahan modal, arus kas, dll.

NERACA Tahun t+1

31 Des th t 1 Jan th t+1

Proyeksian

Laba Rugi Pendapatan Rp xx Biaya Rp x


(4)

PENDAHULUAN

!" # $ % # %

#$ & $ '% &

#& ( %)

# & %

* # %+

)

$ , -

) *


(5)

/

CHAPTER 8

Financial Planning and Forecasting Financial Statements

0 !"

1

1 & 2

2 " 3 0 ,*

2 4 5

*24-! " 1 $

6 7 1


(6)

8

STRATEGIC PLANS

& &

,

-9 1

$ $

9 :&

! ' $

9 ; &

! 1 7 &


(7)

OPERATING PLANS

1

&

< '


(8)

=

Financial Planning and

Pro Forma Statements

0 &

!" 1 $

6 6

& 6


(9)

>

THE FINANCIAL PLAN

0 &

) !

) & /

?) /

) /)

8) #


(10)

Steps in Financial Forecasting

1 &

& &

&

,


(11)

2003 Balance Sheet

(Millions of $)

Cash & sec. $ 20 Accts. pay. &

accruals $ 100 Accounts rec. 240 Notes payable 100 Inventories 240 Total CL $ 200 Total CA $ 500 L-T debt 100 Common stk 500 Net fixed

assets

Retained

earnings 200

Total assets $1,000 Total claims $1,000 500


(12)

2003 Income Statement

(Millions of $)

Sales $2,000.00

Less: COGS (60%) 1,200.00

SGA costs 700.00

EBIT $ 100.00

Interest 10.00

EBT $ 90.00

Taxes (40%) 36.00

Net income $ 54.00

Dividends (40%) $21.60


(13)

?

AFN (Additional Funds Needed):

" *

?)

0 & )

@ &

)

, - ? ,A/ BA 5

) C- , - C

)

1 A/


(14)

Definitions of Variables in AFN

*DB:

+

, -)

∆: )

!DB: ,

,4 & B

-77 , -+


(15)

/ Assets Sales 0 1,000 2,000 1,250 2,500

A*/S0 = $1,000/$2,000 = 0.5 = $1,250/$2,500.

∆ ∆∆

Assets =

(A*/S0)∆∆∆∆Sales

= 0.5($500) = $250.


(16)

8

• Aset ditingkatkan sebesar $250 million.

• Berapa AFN, berdasarkan pd persamaan AFN?

AFN = (A*/S0)∆∆∆∆S - (L*/S0)∆∆∆∆S - M(S1)(RR)

= ($1,000/$2,000)($500) - ($100/$2,000)($500)

- 0.0270($2,500)(1 - 0.4) = $184.5 million.


(17)

E 1

6 1 *24)

7 ,

-6 &

*24)

,1

-6 &

*24)

7 *DB:

6 *24)

: &

6 ' *24)

(More…)


(18)

=

Projecting Pro Forma Statements with the Percent of Sales Method

7 &

7 F

6 " 6 "

6 1 3

6 1

6 * 0

6 @

1 F

6 @ ,

-6 " 3 ,

-6


(19)

>

Sources of Financing Needed to Support Asset Requirements

*

6 * 6 :

" 3 0


(20)

Implications of AFN

G *24 $

)

G *24 $

)

6 , -)

6 )


(21)

How to Forecast Interest Expense

)

* & &

, - ) <

6 @

6 @ '

6 7 F '


(22)

Basing Interest Expense

on Debt at End of Year

H F I $

$ G )

9 & & & $ &

$ & &

' & & &

' & &

' & & &)


(23)

?

Basing Interest Expense

on Debt at Beginning of Year

H F I

$

$ 3 & ? )

J & $

& & )


(24)

Basing Interest Expense on Average of

Beginning and Ending Debt

H &&

$

)

$ & & )


(25)

/

A Solution that Balances Accuracy and

Complexity

I )

6 K

6 7 &&

: $

I I


(26)

8

Percent of Sales: Inputs

9;L:B: 8 C 8 C

:L*B: ?/C ?/C

9 B: C C

*&& ) &)B: C C

. )B: C C

4 2*B: /C /C

*1 && )B: /C /C

2003 2004


(27)

Other Inputs

1 & ' /C

L ' $ & , - ) /

. C

0 I C


(28)

=

2004 Forecasted Income Statement

2003 Factor

2004 1st Pass Sales $2,000 g=1.25 $2,500.0 Less: COGS Pct=60% 1,500.0

SGA Pct=35% 875.0

EBIT $125.0

Interest 0.1(Debt03) 20.0

EBT $105.0

Taxes (40%) 42.0

Net. income $63.0

Div. (40%) $25.2


(29)

>

2004 Balance Sheet (Assets)

Forecasted assets are a percent of forecasted sales.

Factor 2004

Cash Pct= 1% $25.0

Accts. rec. Pct=12% 300.0

Pct=12% 300.0

Total CA $625.0

Net FA Pct=25% 625.0

Total assets $1,250.0

2004 Sales = $2,500


(30)

?

2004 Preliminary Balance Sheet (Claims)

*From forecasted income statement.

2003 Factor Without AFN

AP/accruals Pct=5% $125.0

Notes payable 100 100.0

Total CL $225.0

L-T debt 100 100.0

Common stk. 500 500.0

Ret. earnings 200 +37.8* 237.8

Total claims $1,062.8

2004 2004 Sales = $2,500


(31)

?

7 ( 5

A / )

: & $ & $ $ ) 5

A 8 )=

2 & *24 5 A

= )

What are the additional funds needed (AFN)?

NWC must have the assets to make forecasted sales, and so it needs an

equal amount of financing. So, we must secure another $187.2 of financing.


(32)

?

Assumptions about How AFN Will Be Raised

4 ' & & '

)

* I $ '

/ C


(33)

?? How will the AFN be financed?

Additional notes payable =

0.5 ($187.2) = $93.6. Additional L-T debt =


(34)

? 2004 Balance Sheet (Claims)

w/o AFN AFN With AFN AP/accruals $ 125.0 $ 125.0 Notes payable 100.0 +93.6 193.6

Total CL $ 225.0 $ 318.6 L-T debt 100.0 +93.6 193.6 Common stk. 500.0 500.0 Ret. earnings 237.8 237.8 Total claims $1,071.0 $1,250.0


(35)

?/ Equation method assumes a

constant profit margin.

Pro forma method is more flexible. More important, it allows different items to grow at different rates.

Equation AFN = $184.5 vs.

Pro Forma AFN = $187.2. Why are they different?


(36)

?8 Forecasted Ratios

2003 2004(E) Industry

Profit Margin

2.70%

2.52%

4.00%

ROE

7.71%

8.54%

15.60%

DSO (days)

43.80

43.80

32.00

Inv. turnover

8.33x

8.33x

11.00x

FA turnover

4.00x

4.00x

5.00x

Debt ratio

30.00% 40.98%

36.00%

TIE

10.00x

6.25x

9.40x


(37)

?

What are the forecasted

free cash flow and ROIC?

?

,K-4 H9 A A/

,9* F *1 &&

-0 & A> A /

,4 ) H9 M

2*-4;1*0 ,K .0I, F0-- A8 A /

! . ) ) & A /

2 & $ ' FA /


(38)

?=

Proposed Improvements

3:; , - ?)= ? )

*&& ) &)B: ) C =) C

. =)??I ) I

. B: ) C >) >C

:L*B: ?/) C ??) C


(39)

?>

Impact of Improvements

(see

Ch 8 Mini Case.xls

for details)

*24 A = ) A /)

2 & $ ' FA / ) A??)/

7;.9 ,4;1*0B9 - 8) C )=C

7;K ) C )?C


(40)

Suppose in 2003 fixed assets had been operated at only 75% of capacity.

With the existing fixed assets, sales could be $2,667. Since sales are

forecasted at only $2,500, no new fixed assets are needed.

Capacity sales = Actual sales % of capacity

= = $2,667.$2,000 0.75


(41)

How would the excess capacity

situation affect the 2004 AFN?

0 & &

$ I ' A /)

: & ' $ I '

*24 ' $ A /


(42)

Assets

Sales 0

1,100 1,000

2,000 2,500

Declining A/S Ratio

$1,000/$2,000 = 0.5; $1,100/$2,500 = 0.44. Declining ratio shows economies of scale. Going from S = $0 to S = $2,000 requires $1,000 of assets. Next $500 of sales requires only $100 of assets.

Base Stock

}


(43)

?

Assets

Sales

1,000 2,000

500

A/S changes if assets are lumpy. Generally will have excess capacity, but eventually a small ∆∆∆∆S leads to a

large ∆∆∆∆A.

500 1,000 1,500


(44)

Summary: How different factors affect the AFN forecast

.

KI& & & ' *24)

K& $ & F

F & )

! &

*24 ( & I&


(1)

?>

Impact of Improvements

(see

Ch 8 Mini Case.xls

for details)

*24

A = )

A /)

2

&

$ '

FA / )

A??)/

7;.9 ,4;1*0B9

- 8) C

)=C

7;K

) C

)?C


(2)

Suppose in 2003 fixed assets had been

operated at only 75% of capacity.

With the existing fixed assets, sales

could be $2,667. Since sales are

forecasted at only $2,500, no new

fixed assets are needed.

Capacity sales =

Actual sales

% of capacity

= = $2,667.

$2,000

0.75


(3)

How would the excess capacity

situation affect the 2004 AFN?

0

&

&

$ I

'

A

/)

: &

' $ I

'

*24 '

$

A

/


(4)

Assets

Sales 0

1,100 1,000

2,000 2,500

Declining A/S Ratio

$1,000/$2,000 = 0.5; $1,100/$2,500 = 0.44. Declining ratio shows economies of scale. Going from S = $0 to S = $2,000 requires $1,000 of assets. Next $500 of sales requires only $100 of assets.

Base Stock

}


(5)

?

Assets

Sales

1,000 2,000

500

A/S changes if assets are lumpy. Generally will have

excess capacity, but eventually a small ∆∆∆∆S leads to a

large ∆∆∆∆A.

500 1,000 1,500


(6)

Summary: How different factors affect

the AFN forecast

.

KI&

&

&

'

*24)

K&

$ &

F

F

&

)

!

&

*24

(

&

I&