Faktor yang Memengaruhi Penyembuhan Luka Perineum Pada Ibu Pasca Persalinan Normal di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Jeumpa, Gandapura, dan Kuta Blang Kabupaten Bireuen

  Lampiran 3

  A. Data Responden KUESIONER PENELITIAN

FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI PENYEMBUHAN LUKA PERINEUM

PADA IBU PASCA PERSALINAN NORMAL DI WILAYAH KERJA

  

PUSKESMAS JEUMPA, GANDAPURA, DAN KUTA BLANG

DIKABUPATEN BIREUEN TAHUN 2013 Tanggal Penelitian: ________________________ Di isi oleh petugas No Responden : ________________________

  1. Nama : __________________

  2. Pendidikan yang ditamatkan : __________________

  3. Pekerjaan :__________________

  4. Tanggal persalinan : __________________

  5. Jenis robekan : Episiotomi Robek spontan

  6. Alamat : ___________________________________

  B. Umur

  • Berapakah umur ibu sekarang ? 18-25 tahun 26-30 tahun 31-35 tahun 36-45 tahun

C. Kebersihan

  Jawablah pertanyaan dibawah ini dengan memberikan tanda ceklist ( √) pada jawaban yang paling tepat.

NO PERNYATAAN YA TDK

  1 Adakah ibu mandi sehari 2 kali atau lebih, selama luka belum kering dalam masa nifas

  2 Apakah ibu mengganti duk atau kain pembalut 3-4 kali dalam sehari, selama masa nifas 7 hari

  3 Untuk mencuci luka daerah kemaluansampai anus setelah buang air besar (BAB) dan buang air kecil (BAK), apakah ibu ada memakai air dan sabun

  4 Setelah buang air besar (BAB) dan buang air kecil (BAK), apakah ibu membersihkan kotoran/cebok dari arah depan ke belakang

  5 Untuk mengeringkan luka setelah mandi atau cebok, apakah ibu memakai kain kering/handuk yang sudah dipakai

  6 Untuk pengobatan luka perineum (di kemaluan), apakah ibu ada memakai obat tradisional

  7 Apakah ibu membersihkan terlebih dahulu luka dengan air dan sabun, lalu dibilas bersih dengan air sebelum mandi

  8 Untuk pengobatan luka perineum (luka di kemaluan), apakah ibu ada memakai obat betadine atau sejenisnya yang dianjurkan oleh tenaga kesehatan

D. Budaya.

  

1. Apakah keluarga memberikanmakanan khusus untuk penyembuhan luka yang

disiapkan oleh keluarga secara turun-temurun selama nifas.

  a. ya

  b. tidak Bila jawaban Ya, maka sebutkan nama makanannya:

.............................................................................................................................

  

2. Apakahorangtua/keluarga menyuruh ibu untuk minum ramuan rebusan

rempah atau jamu selama masa nifas.

  a. ya

  b. tidak Bilajawaban Ya, maka sebutkan nama ramuan atau jamu tersebut:

.............................................................................................................................

  

3. Apakah ibu melakukan pantangan makanan tertentu selama ibu dalam masa

nifas.

  a. ya

  b. tidak Bila jawaban Ya, maka sebutkan nama makanannya:

.............................................................................................................................

  

4. Apakah orangtua/keluarga menyuruh ibu untuk meletakkan batu panas di

perut dan duduk di atas batu panas.

  a. ya

  b. tidak Bila jawaban Ya, maka sebutkan alasannya:

.............................................................................................................................

E. Dukungan Keluarga

  

1. Apakah suami/keluarga mengajarkan dan memberi informasi-informasi yang

bermanfaat untuk pemulihan luka pada kemaluanibu dalam masa nifas.

  a. ya

  b. tidak

  

2. Apakah suami/keluargaikut membantu perkerjaan rumah selama ibu dalam

masa nifas.

  a. ya

  b. tidak

  

3. Apakah suami/keluarga menyediakan keperluan ibu untuk perawatan luka,

seperti obat-obatan, perban.

  a. ya

  b. tidak F.

   Penyembuhan Luka Perineum.

  1. Luka perineum sudah kering. ya tidak

  2. Luka perineum tertutup. ya tidak

  Lampiran 5 : Tabel M aster

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  2 Baik

  30

  2

  2

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  31

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  14 Baik

  2

  7 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1 Kurang

  1

  1

  5 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  5

  29

  1

  1

  2

  1

  14 Baik

  1

  2 Baik

  3

  7 Baik

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  12 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  5 Baik

  1

  1

  2 Baik

  33

  2

  2

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1 Kurang

  5

  1

  1

  1

  2

  14 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  15 Baik

  1

  1

  1

  1 Kurang

  4

  1

  1

  1

  13 Baik

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1

  4

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1 Kurang

  2

  3

  32

  1 Kurang baik

  1

  1

  2

  2

  5 Baik

  1

  1

  2

  1

  11

  1 Kurang

  1

  2

  2

  2

  7 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  1 Kurang

  10

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1 Kurang baik

  1

  2

  1

  2

  1

  25

  1

  1

  1

  2

  13 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  23

  1 Kurang baik

  1 Kurang

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1

  2

  2

  24

  1 Kurang baik

  1

  1 Kurang

  2

  5

  1

  2

  2

  1 Kurang

  5

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  15 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  1 Kurang baik

  28

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  3

  1 Kurang baik

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  27

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  26

  1 Kurang baik

  1

  1 Kurang

  1

  4

  1

  1

  2

  1 Kurang

  5

  2

  2

  1

  2

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  8 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  2

  14 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  41

  2

  2

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  1

  10

  1 Kurang

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  42

  2 Baik

  1

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2

  1 Kurang

  5

  1

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  2

  2

  40

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  7 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  1

  2

  1

  5 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  2

  13 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  2 Baik

  44

  2

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  5 Baik

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  2

  1

  12 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  4

  2

  1

  1

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1 Kurang

  11

  2

  2

  1

  1 Kurang

  1

  2

  1

  1

  2

  14 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1 Kurang baik

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  43

  12 Baik

  1

  1

  1 Kurang

  2

  1

  2

  2

  14 Baik

  2

  1

  2

  1

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  2

  4

  1

  2

  2

  11

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  3

  36

  2 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1

  1 Kurang

  1

  1

  2

  2

  34

  1 Kurang baik

  10

  2

  2

  1 Kurang

  2

  2

  35

  1 Kurang baik

  1

  1

  4

  1

  1

  2

  1

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  1 Kurang

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  14 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  7 Baik

  2 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  39

  2

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  38

  1

  1

  1 Kurang

  2

  2

  37

  1 Kurang baik

  1

  1

  4

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1 Kurang

  5

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1

  5 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  1

  14 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2

  3

  1

  1

  2

  13 Baik

  2

  1

  2

  2

  7 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  2 Baik

  8

  1

  2

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1 Kurang

  11

  2

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  1 Kurang

  1

  2

  2

  1

  12 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  3

  1

  1

  2

  2

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1

  1

  3

  2

  7

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  5 Baik

  2

  5

  2

  2 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1

  12

  1 Kurang

  2

  2

  2

  2

  8 Baik

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  11

  2 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  9

  1 Kurang baik

  1

  1

  5 Baik

  1

  2

  13 Baik

  1

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  10

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  7 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  6

  1

  1 Kurang

  15 Baik

  1

  2 Baik

  2

  3

  2

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1 Kurang

  1

  1

  2

  2

  3

  2 Baik

  1

  5 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  1

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  4

  1

  2

  3

  1

  1 2 ∑ Kategori

  2 3 ∑ Kateg ori

  1

  3 4 ∑ Kateg ori

  1

  1

  7 8 ∑ Kategori

  6

  5

  4

  3

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  2

  12 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  7 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  2 Baik

  5

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  1 Kurang

  4

  1

  1

  1

  1

  13 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1

  7 Baik

  2

  1

  2

  1 Kurang

  1 Kurang

  10

  2

  2

  1

  1

  4

  1

  1

  1

  1 Kurang

  9

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  2

  4

  1 Kurang baik

  11

  2

  1

  1

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  2 Baik

  19

  3

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  8 Baik

  5

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  1 Kurang

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  1 Kurang

  11

  1

  2

  2

  1 Kurang baik

  2

  5 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  7 Baik

  2

  1

  1

  2

  14 Baik

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  2 Baik

  2

  1

  2

  2

  13 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  2

  18

  2

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  20

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  1

  2 Baik

  22

  2

  1

  1

  14 Baik

  12 Baik

  1 Kurang

  4

  1

  1

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1

  15 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  1

  2

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  21

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  5 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2

  3

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  2

  13 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  2 Baik

  14

  2

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2 Baik

  7 Baik

  1

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  13

  1

  2

  1

  1

  2

  2

  12

  1 Kurang baik

  1

  5 Baik

  1

  2

  2

  1

  8 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  2

  1

  2

  2

  13 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  1

  2

  2

  2

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  2

  1

  16

  1 Kurang baik

  1

  1

  1 Kurang

  2

  15 Baik

  1

  5 Baik

  2

  2

  17

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  1

  7 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  4

  2

  1

  2

  15

  2 Baik

  1

  1

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  2

  6 Baik

  2

  2

  1

  1

  14 Baik

  2

  1

  1

  12 Baik

  1 Kurang

  5

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  1

  2

  2

  1

  1

  1

  2

  FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI PENYEMBUHAN LUKA PERINEUM PADA IBU PASCA PERSALINAN NORMAL DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS JEUMPA, GANDAPURA DAN KUTABLANG KABUPATEN BIREUEN KEBERSIHAN BUDAYA DUKUNGAN KELUARGA PENYEMBUHAN NO. PENDIDIKA N PEKERJAA N JENIS ROBEKAN UMU R Universitas Sumatera Utara

  Lampiran 6 FREQUENCY Statistics jenisrobekan Umur Kebersihan Budaya Dukungan Penyembuhan N Valid

  44

  44

  44

  44

  44

  44 Missing Percentiles 100

  1.00

  1.00

  1.00

  1.00

  1.00

  1.00 Frequency Table jenisrobekan

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid spontan

  30

  

68.2

  68.2

  68.2 episiotomi

  14

  

31.8

31.8 100.0 Total 44 100.0 100.0

  Umur Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Dini

  25

  56.8

  56.8

  56.8 Madya

  19

  43.2 43.2 100.0 Total

44 100.0 100.0

  Kebersihan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid baik

  32

  72.7

  72.7

  72.7 Kurang baik

  12

  27.3 27.3 100.0 Total 44 100.0 100.0

  Budaya Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik

  32

  72.7

  72.7

  72.7 Kurang Baik

  12

  27.3 27.3 100.0 Total 44 100.0 100.0

  Dukungan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baik

  33

  75.0

  75.0

  75.0 Kurang Baik

  11

  25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 44 100.0 100.0

  Penyembuhan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Baiik

  28

  63.6

  63.6

  63.6 Kurang Baik

  16

  36.4 36.4 100.0 Total 44 100.0 100.0

  Lampiran 7 Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

  Cases Valid Missing Total

  N Percent N Percent N Percent jenisrobekan * Penyembuhan 44 100.0% .0% 44 100.0%

  Umur * Penyembuhan 44 100.0% .0% 44 100.0% Kebersihan * Penyembuhan 44 100.0% .0% 44 100.0% Budaya * Penyembuhan 44 100.0% .0% 44 100.0% Dukungan * Penyembuhan 44 100.0% .0% 44 100.0%

  Jenisrobekan * Penyembuhan

Crosstab

  Penyembuhan Baiik Kurang Baik Total jenisrobekan spontan Count

  22

  8

  30 Expected Count

  19.1

  10.9

  30.0 % within jenisrobekan 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% episiotomi Count

  6

  8

  14 Expected Count

  8.9

  5.1

  14.0 % within jenisrobekan 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

  Total Count

  28

  16

  44 Expected Count

  28.0

  16.0

  44.0 % within jenisrobekan 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%

  

Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 3.831 1 .050

  b

  Continuity Correction 2.627 1 .105 Likelihood Ratio 3.766 1 .052 Fisher's Exact Test

  .091 .054 Linear-by-Linear

  3.744 1 .053 Association

  b

  N of Valid Cases

  44 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.09.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .283 .050 N of Valid Cases

  44 Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval

  Value Lower Upper Odds Ratio for jenisrobekan

  3.667 .967 13.897 (spontan / episiotomi) For cohort Penyembuhan =

  1.711 .900 3.252 Baiik For cohort Penyembuhan =

  .467 .221 .985 Kurang Baik N of Valid Cases

  44

  Umur * Penyembuhan Crosstab

  a

  16.0

  44.0 % within Umur 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%

  

Chi-Square Tests

  Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)

  Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)

  Pearson Chi-Square .003

  1 .954 Continuity Correction

  44 Expected Count

  b

  .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .003 1 .954 Fisher's Exact Test

  1.000 .600 Linear-by-Linear Association

  .003 1 .955 N of Valid Cases

  b

  44 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.91.

  28.0

  16

  Penyembuhan Total Baiik Kurang Baik

  25.0 % within Umur 64.0% 36.0% 100.0%

  Umur Dini Count

  16

  9

  25 Expected Count

  15.9

  9.1

  Madya Count

  28

  12

  7

  19 Expected Count

  12.1

  6.9

  19.0 % within Umur 63.2% 36.8% 100.0%

  Total Count

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .009 .954 N of Valid Cases

  44 Risk Estimate Value

  95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

  Odds Ratio for Umur (Dini / Madya)

  1.037 .300 3.581 For cohort Penyembuhan = Baiik

  1.013 .645 1.593 For cohort Penyembuhan = Kurang Baik

  .977 .445 2.147 N of Valid Cases

44 Kebersihan * Penyembuhan

  Penyembuhan Total Baiik Kurang Baik

  7.6

  44.0 % within Kebersihan 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%

  16.0

  28.0

  44 Expected Count

  16

  28

  Total Count

  12.0 % within Kebersihan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

  4.4

  12 Expected Count

  Kebersihan baik Count

  9

  3

  Kurang baik Count

  

Crosstab

  11.6

  20.4

  32 Expected Count

  7

  25

  32.0 % within Kebersihan 78.1% 21.9% 100.0%

  

Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 10.644 1 .001

  b

  Continuity Correction 8.472 1 .004 Likelihood Ratio 10.566 1 .001 Fisher's Exact Test

  .003 .002 Linear-by-Linear

  10.402 1 .001 Association

  b

  N of Valid Cases

  44 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.36.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .441 .001 N of Valid Cases

  44 Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval

  Value Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Kebersihan

  10.714 2.269 50.598 (baik / Kurang baik) For cohort Penyembuhan =

  3.125 1.153 8.469 Baiik For cohort Penyembuhan =

  .292 .140 .606 Kurang Baik N of Valid Cases

  44

  Budaya * Penyembuhan Crosstab

  a

  16.0

  44.0 % within Budaya 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%

  

Chi-Square Tests

  Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)

  Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)

  Pearson Chi-Square 10.644

  1 .001 Continuity Correction

  44 Expected Count

  b

  8.472 1 .004 Likelihood Ratio 10.566 1 .001 Fisher's Exact Test

  .003 .002 Linear-by-Linear Association

  10.402 1 .001 N of Valid Cases

  b

  44 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.36.

  28.0

  16

  Penyembuhan Total Baiik Kurang Baik

  32.0 % within Budaya 78.1% 21.9% 100.0%

  Budaya Baik Count

  25

  7

  32 Expected Count

  20.4

  11.6

  Kurang Baik Count

  28

  3

  9

  12 Expected Count

  7.6

  4.4

  12.0 % within Budaya 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

  Total Count

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .441 .001 N of Valid Cases

  44 Risk Estimate Value

  95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper

  Odds Ratio for Budaya (Baik / Kurang Baik)

  10.714 2.269 50.598 For cohort Penyembuhan = Baiik

  3.125 1.153 8.469 For cohort Penyembuhan = Kurang Baik

  .292 .140 .606 N of Valid Cases

44 Dukungan * Penyembuhan

  Penyembuhan Total Baiik Kurang Baik

  7.0

  44.0 % within Dukungan 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%

  16.0

  28.0

  44 Expected Count

  16

  28

  Total Count

  11.0 % within Dukungan 18.2% 81.8% 100.0%

  4.0

  11 Expected Count

  Dukungan Baik Count

  9

  2

  Kurang Baik Count

  

Crosstab

  12.0

  21.0

  33 Expected Count

  7

  26

  33.0 % within Dukungan 78.8% 21.2% 100.0%

  

Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 13.095 1 .000

  b

  Continuity Correction 10.607 1 .001 Likelihood Ratio 13.146 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test

  .001 .001 Linear-by-Linear

  12.798 1 .000 Association

  b

  N of Valid Cases

  44 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.00.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency .479 .000

  Coefficient N of Valid Cases

  44 Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval

  Value Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Dukungan (Baik

  16.714 2.920 95.679 / Kurang Baik) For cohort Penyembuhan =

  4.333 1.222 15.369 Baiik For cohort Penyembuhan =

  .259 .127 .530 Kurang Baik N of Valid Cases

  44

  Lampiran 8 Crosstab Penyembuhan Luka Spontan Umur * Penyembuhan1 Crosstab

  Penyembuhan1 baik kurang baik Total umur dini Count

  11

  3

  14 Expected Count

  10.3

  3.7

  14.0 % within umur 78.6% 21.4% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 50.0% 37.5% 46.7% % of Total 36.7% 10.0% 46.7% madya Count

  11

  5

  16 Expected Count

  11.7

  4.3

  16.0 % within umur 68.8% 31.2% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 50.0% 62.5% 53.3% % of Total 36.7% 16.7% 53.3%

  Total Count

  22

  8

  30 Expected Count

  22.0

  8.0

  30.0 % within umur 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. (1- Value Df (2-sided) (2-sided) sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square .368 1 .544

  b

  Continuity Correction .037 1 .847 Likelihood Ratio .372 1 .542 Fisher's Exact Test

  .689 .426 Linear-by-Linear Association .356 1 .551

  b

  N of Valid Cases

  30 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.73.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .110 .544 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Kebersihan * Penyembuhan1 Crosstab

  Penyembuhan1 kurang baik baik Total kebersihan Baik Count

  19

  3

  22 Expected Count

  16.1

  5.9

  22.0 % within kebersihan 86.4% 13.6% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 86.4% 37.5% 73.3% % of Total 63.3% 10.0% 73.3% kurangbaik Count

  3

  5

  8 Expected Count

  5.9

  2.1

  8.0 % within kebersihan 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 13.6% 62.5% 26.7% % of Total 10.0% 16.7% 26.7%

  Total Count

  22

  8

  30 Expected Count

  22.0

  8.0

  30.0 % within kebersihan 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value Df (2-sided) sided) sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 7.163 1 .007

  b

  Continuity Correction 4.882 1 .027 Likelihood Ratio 6.684 1 .010 Fisher's Exact Test

  .016 .016 Linear-by-Linear

  6.924 1 .009 Association

  b

  N of Valid Cases

  30 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.13.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .439 .007 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Budaya * Penyembuhan1 Crosstab

  Penyembuhan1 kurang baik baik Total

  Budaya Baik Count

  20

  4

  24 Expected Count

  17.6

  6.4

  24.0 % within Budaya 83.3% 16.7% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 90.9% 50.0% 80.0% % of Total 66.7% 13.3% 80.0% kurang baik Count

  2

  4

  6 Expected Count

  4.4

  1.6

  6.0 % within Budaya 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 9.1% 50.0% 20.0% % of Total 6.7% 13.3% 20.0%

  Total Count

  22

  8

  30 Expected Count

  22.0

  8.0

  30.0 % within Budaya 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

  Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 6.136 1 .013

  b

  Continuity Correction 3.846 1 .050 Likelihood Ratio 5.530 1 .019 Fisher's Exact Test

  .029 .029 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.932 1 .015

  b

  N of Valid Cases

  30 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.60.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .412 .013 N of Valid Cases

  30

  Dukungan * Penyembuhan1 Crosstab

  Penyembuhan1 kurang baik baik Total

  Dukungan Baik Count

  20

  4

  24 Expected Count

  17.6

  6.4

  24.0 % within Dukungan 83.3% 16.7% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 90.9% 50.0% 80.0% % of Total 66.7% 13.3% 80.0% kurang baik Count

  2

  4

  6 Expected Count

  4.4

  1.6

  6.0 % within Dukungan 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 9.1% 50.0% 20.0% % of Total 6.7% 13.3% 20.0%

  Total Count

  22

  8

  30 Expected Count

  22.0

  8.0

  30.0 % within Dukungan 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 6.136 1 .013

  b

  Continuity Correction 3.846 1 .050 Likelihood Ratio 5.530 1 .019 Fisher's Exact Test

  .029 .029 Linear-by-Linear

  5.932 1 .015 Association

  b

  N of Valid Cases

  30 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.60.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .412 .013 N of Valid Cases

  30 Crosstab Penyembuhan Luka Episiotomi

  Umur * Penyembuhan2 Crosstab

  Penyembuhan2 baik kurang baik Total umur dini Count

  5

  6

  11 Expected Count

  4.7

  6.3

  11.0 % within umur 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan2 83.3% 75.0% 78.6% % of Total 35.7% 42.9% 78.6% madya Count

  1

  2

  3 Expected Count

  1.3

  1.7

  3.0 % within umur 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan2 16.7% 25.0% 21.4% % of Total 7.1% 14.3% 21.4%

  Total Count

  6

  8

  14 Expected Count

  6.0

  8.0

  14.0 % within umur 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Penyembuhan2 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square .141 1 .707

  b

Dokumen yang terkait

TINJAUAN PUSTAKA Profil Kabupaten Batubara

0 0 10

1. Visi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sumatera Utara - Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Pada Bagian Kepegawaian Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sumatera Utara

0 0 16

6 Cara kerja pemeriksaan IVA sederhana 7 Pelaksanaan pemeriksaan IVA lama diketahui hasilnya 8 Bila tidak melakukan pemeriksaan IVA maka kemungkinan tidak diketahui kanker serviks sangat tinggi 9 Pemeriksaan dini (IVA) yang dilakukan dengan teratur akan m

0 0 21

BAB 3 METODE PENELITIAN 3.1 Jenis Penelitian - Pengaruh Persepsi Dan Motivasi Wanita Usia Subur Terhadap Keikutsertaan Skrining Kanker Serviks Metode Inspeksi Visual dengan Asam Asetat (IVA) Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Sidangkal Kecamatan Padangsidimpuan S

1 1 42

BAB 2 TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1 Kanker Serviks - Pengaruh Persepsi Dan Motivasi Wanita Usia Subur Terhadap Keikutsertaan Skrining Kanker Serviks Metode Inspeksi Visual dengan Asam Asetat (IVA) Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Sidangkal Kecamatan Padangsidimpuan Sela

1 1 31

BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang - Pengaruh Persepsi Dan Motivasi Wanita Usia Subur Terhadap Keikutsertaan Skrining Kanker Serviks Metode Inspeksi Visual dengan Asam Asetat (IVA) Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Sidangkal Kecamatan Padangsidimpuan Selatan T

0 0 11

BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1 Perataan Laba - Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perataan Laba Pada Perusahaan Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia

0 1 30

BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang Masalah - Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perataan Laba Pada Perusahaan Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia

0 1 8

Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perataan Laba Pada Perusahaan Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia

0 0 12

Faktor yang Memengaruhi Penyembuhan Luka Perineum Pada Ibu Pasca Persalinan Normal di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Jeumpa, Gandapura, dan Kuta Blang Kabupaten Bireuen

0 1 40