1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Acting Observing Cycle II a. Planning

Student passing KKM In this cycle, the students get better score, there were 25 students had reached KKM, the mean also improved from 74 to 84. The students were braver in showing up in the class; they actively asked and answered in English language even grammatically it was an error sentence. Students also could recall almost all of the words that the writer gave including knowing the Indonesian translation and synonim for some words, in addition, they could make the sentences by using the words given, especially in narrative sentences. When the writer asked the students to make conversation by using the words that she had given, she found that students could use the words correctly. In this cycle also, the time was more efficient than before, since, the time was not wasted by preparing the word cards, then, the writer 14 65 15 75 16 85 17 90 18 70 19 80 20 80 21 75 22 80 23 85 24 85 25 80 26 72 27 80 28 77.5 29 80 Mean 84 could maximize the time and complete the material, that was, the writer decided to stop the cycle.

C. The Discussion of the Data after CAR 1. The Result of Post Interview

After doing CAR, the writer conducted a post interview to the students, it was unstructured interview, she gave some questions related to the vocabulary mastery, they said that getting new vocabulary by using word cards was a nice activity, it also helped them in enriching their vocabulary, they could take their cards on their pocket and could open them every time they wanted. In addition, the games that the writer gave related to word cards were very nice and did not make students get bored; they could actively participate in the class. The teacher also said that, students could make the sentence or narrative paragraph because they have amount vocabularies that support that ability; they knew how to apply the words into sentence correctly, even though there were still some errors, the teacher could repair it by herself.

2. The Result of Post test

In this part, the writer compares and gives the result of pre test, post test 1, and 2. Students ’ Number Pre test Post test 1 score Post test 2 score 1 74 75 80 2 72 97.5 100 3 72 80 90 4 72 85 90 5 76 97.5 100 6 72 90 97.5

Dokumen yang terkait

Teaching the present perfect tense by using the game (FIND Someone WHO); a classroom action resarch at VIII grade students of MTs Soebono Mantofani Jombang Ciputat

0 4 96

Improving student's pronunciation by using minimal pair drill ( a classroom action research at grade VII.3 SMPN 66 Jakarta)

1 6 104

Improving students' understanding of narrative text by using cooperative learning ( a classroom action research at the second grade of MTs Manaratul Islam)

2 15 94

Enriching students vocabulary by using word cards ( a classroom action research at second grade of marketing program class XI.2 SMK Nusantara, Ciputat South Tangerang

12 142 101

Increasing students mastery in the simple past tense by using information-GAP activity ( A Classroom action research at the second grade of SMP IT Annajiah Cibinong)

1 9 93

Improving the seventh grade students reading skill by using collaborative learning: (A classroom action research at SMPIT darul muttaqien parung bogor)

0 6 122

Retaining students' memory on action verbs by using total physical reponse (TPR); a classroom action research at first grade studens of MTS jam imyatul kahir Ciputat

0 7 133

Improving students' understanding of simple past tense by using folktales (a classroom action research at the second grade of marketing major class 2.3 SMK Nusantara, Ciputat, South Tangerang)

1 6 240

The use of role play to anhance students speaking skill (a classroom action research at second grade of SMP Darul Ma'arif Fatmawati)

0 6 105

Applying mind mapping strategy to improve students writing ability in descriptive text: a classroom action research at the second grade of SMP Al-Mizan Pandeglang-Banten

0 17 132