Test of Significance Difference of Average Scores Mean between the Experimental and the

39

4.2 Test of Significance

To examine whether the difference between the means of the control and experimental group is statistically significant, the t-value obtained should be consulted with the critical value in the t-table. I used the 5 0.05 level of significance. The number of subjects from both groups was 70, so the degree of freedom was 68, which was obtained from the formula: 2 − Σ + Σ y x N N . For five percent alpha level and 68 degree of freedom, there was no definite critical value in the t- table. It is necessary to find the definite value using interpolation. t-table for: 60 = 1.67 120 = 1.66 68 =? 120 60 68 60 66 . 1 67 . 1 67 . 1 − − = − − t 60 8 01 . 167 − − = − t 0013 . 67 . 1 = − t 6687 . 1 = t The t-table was 1.6687. The obtained t-value was 2.589 so the t-value was higher than the critical value 2.5891.6687. From the result, it can be concluded that the difference was statistically significant. 40

4.3 Difference of Average Scores Mean between the Experimental and the

Control Class The experimental class and the control one were used to see to what extent Beauty and the Beast illustrated version as a medium to teach reading was more effective than Beauty and the Beast without illustrated version or text version only. Considering the result of the test gained by two classes, we can see which class got better achievement. The average of the control group on Pre-Test C C c N X M Σ = 35 2678 = C M 51 . 76 = C M The average of the control group on Post- test C C C N X M Σ = 35 2972 = C M 91 . 84 = C M The rise of the average scores: 84.91-76.51=8.4 For the control group, the average after the treatment increased only 8.4 point. 41 The average of the experimental group on Pre-test E E E N X M Σ = 35 2663 = E M 09 . 76 = E M The average of the experimental group on Post –test E E E N X M Σ = 35 3182 = E M 91 . 90 = E M The rise of the average score: 90.91-76.09=14.82 For the experimental group, the average after the treatment increased 14.82 point. Considering the different increase on the average on the average scores of the control group and experimental group, it was clear that there was different improvement achieved by the two groups. The experimental class got better development, the average increased 14.82 point from 76.09 to 90.91, whereas the control class only increased 8.4 point from 76.51 to 84.91.

4.4 Findings

Dokumen yang terkait

ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PISA KONTEN SHAPE AND SPACE BERDASARKAN MODEL RASCH

69 778 11

Analisis Komparasi Internet Financial Local Government Reporting Pada Website Resmi Kabupaten dan Kota di Jawa Timur The Comparison Analysis of Internet Financial Local Government Reporting on Official Website of Regency and City in East Java

19 819 7

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 06 DAU MALANG

44 306 18

FENOMENA INDUSTRI JASA (JASA SEKS) TERHADAP PERUBAHAN PERILAKU SOSIAL ( Study Pada Masyarakat Gang Dolly Surabaya)

63 375 2

PEMAKNAAN MAHASISWA TENTANG DAKWAH USTADZ FELIX SIAUW MELALUI TWITTER ( Studi Resepsi Pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Tarbiyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Angkatan 2011)

59 326 21

STRATEGI PUBLIC RELATIONS DALAM MENANGANI KELUHAN PELANGGAN SPEEDY ( Studi Pada Public Relations PT Telkom Madiun)

32 284 52

FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENYEBAB ORANG TUA MENIKAHKAN ANAK PEREMPUANYA PADA USIA DINI ( Studi Deskriptif di Desa Tempurejo, Kecamatan Tempurejo, Kabupaten Jember)

12 105 72

Improving the Eighth Year Students' Tense Achievement and Active Participation by Giving Positive Reinforcement at SMPN 1 Silo in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

7 202 3

INTENSIFIKASI PEMUNGUTAN PAJAK HOTEL SEBAGAI UPAYA PENINGKATAN PENDAPATAN ASLI DAERAH ( DI KABUPATEN BANYUWANGI

16 118 18

JUMLAH DANA DAN KREDIT DARI BANK TABUNGAN MENJADI BANK UMUM PADA PT. BANK TABUNGAN NEGARA ( PERSERO ) CABANG DENPASAR

3 91 12