Findings ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

50

4.2 Findings

The writer gave the student two tests, pre test and post test to know there are enhancement scores or not when the writer gave the student pre test before knowing the student’s preference of learning style and gave the student post test when the writer alr eady knew the student’s preference of learning style from the result of VARK questionnaire. There are 40 questions between pre test and post test. The result from pre test was, the amount of correct answers are 32 from 40 answers and then the amount of false answers are 8 from 40 answers. And the total scores from pre test is 80 has shown a good comprehension with grade B. The result from post test was, the amount of correct answers are 34 from 40 answers and then the amount of false answers are 6 from 40 answers. And the total scores from post test is 85 has shown an excellent comprehension with grade A. From the two tests, pre test and post test that the writer was done and the result of research showed that VARK questionnaire is applicable because from the result both of the tests show that there are enhancement scores after the writer gave the student pre test and post test. This shows that VARK questionnaire helps the teacher to build and improve the scores of the student. Universitas Sumatera Utara 51

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusions

Based on the analysis of the teaching methods and techniques applied on the writer’s private course student during the teaching-learning process, the writer could draw some conclusions of the analysis. The conclusions are answered the problems from the previous chapter. The first question is about the result of student’s VARK questionnaire is kinesthetic. From VARK questionnaire, the writer found the total number of Visual has circled by student are 2, total number of AuralAuditory has circled by student are 2, total number of Readwrite has circled are 2 and then total number of Kinesthetic has circled are 10. So, from this result of the data, the writer concludes that the preference of student’s learning style is Kinesthetic. The second question is about the most suitable teaching method related student’s learning style is approaching with kinesthetic learning style are Community Language Learning and Communicative Approach because these two methods are clearly suitable and match to the kind of kinesthetic learning style in which learn from the experience of doing something, go to lab, take field trips, use trial and error methods, listen to real life examples, use hands-on approach and they value their own background of experiences and less so, the experiences of others. When studying, examples in note summaries, use pictures and photos to illustrate, write practice answers and make the role-play situation during teaching-learning process. Those are included the parts of the methods and techniques in Community Language Learning and Communicative Approach that the techniques are included tape recording Universitas Sumatera Utara