Materials and methods Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:P:PlantScience:PlantScience_Elsevier:Vol150.Issue2.2000:

tially understood. The lack of knowledge is due, in part, to the complexity of peroxidase isozymes expressed within a given plant tissue. Cloning of plant peroxidase genes could help in elucidating the physiological role of individual peroxidase iso- forms during plant normal development and in response to various environmental factors. Under- standing the expression pattern of individual per- oxidase isozymes may lead to understanding their function. Without gene-specific probes, separation of the expression patterns of closely related perox- idases may be difficult due to similarity in se- quence and transcript size. Cloning of plant peroxidase genes also could open the possibility of transgenic studies and in vitro site-mutagenesis analysis of various peroxidase isoforms. In this report, we described the isolation and characteri- zation of four closely related peroxidase cDNAs, the development of four sets of gene-specific per- oxidase primers, and the expression of GmEPa 1 as a fusion protein in Escherichia coli and its in vitro folding to yield an active enzyme.

2. Materials and methods

2 . 1 . cDNA library construction and screening Total RNA was extracted from soybean Glycine max cul. Resnik seedbuds 21 days after flowering as previously described [7]. PolyA-en- riched RNA was prepared from total RNA using PolyATract Promega and the cDNA library was constructed in the unidirectional vector Uni-ZAP XR Stratagene. A plant peroxidase specific primer PSP was designed from a plant peroxidase conserved amino acid region distal heme ligand, HFHDCFV 5 CACTTTTCCACTGACTTGCTTTC TGT 3 [8]. The plant peroxidase-specific probe was generated using the 3 RACE system with soybean seed bud total RNA and PSP as described by the manufacturer GIBCOBRL except that hot-start PCR was performed. The PCR-RACE products were cloned into pCR™ II plasmid In- vitrogen. DNA from 20 clones was purified and digested with EcoRI, fractionated by electrophore- sis on a 1 agarose gel, and blotted on a nylon membrane and probed with [g- 32 P]dATP-end-la- beled PSP. A single positive clone was random- prime-labeled with [a- 32 P]dCTP and used for primary screening of the cDNA library. Prehy- bridization was conducted in 6 × SSPE, 5 × Den- hardt’s, 0.5 wv SDS, 100 mgml denatured salmon sperm DNA, and 50 vv formamide at 42°C for 2 h. Hybridizations were done overnight and the conditions were the same as those in prehybridization, except that 1 × Denhardt’s solu- tion was used. Membranes were washed three times for 30 min each with 0.1 × SSPE and 0.1 wv SDS at 65°C. PCR using PSP and the vector primer T 7 was used to purify single phage clones. Phage particles were eluted by incubating primary picks andor single plagues in 500 ml of SM buffer 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgSO 4 , 0.01 wv gelatin in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5 at room temperature for 2 h. The PCR cycling parameters were 94°C for 4 min followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 57°C, and 1 min at 72°C, and then followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR reaction conditions were 1 × reaction buffer 500 mM KCl, 100 mM Tris – HCl, pH 9.0 and 1.0 vv Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 200 mM each dNTP, two units of Taq DNA polymerase, 1 mM each primer and 2 ml of phage particle elution in 50 ml total volume. 2 . 2 . DNA sequencing and analysis DNA sequencing of both strands was performed using Sequenase Kit 2.0 USB and SK and KS primers. Synthetic primers corresponding to inter- nal sequences of cDNA were made to complete sequencing. Sequences were optimally aligned us- ing the PILEUP program of the Wisconsin GCG software package, and the DISTANCES program was used to determine the similarity percentage. The dendrogram was generated using the cluster- ing algorithm in PILEUP, which aligns the most similar sequences prior to alignment with more distantly related sequences. 2 . 3 . Re6erse transcription PCR RT-PCR cDNA specific primers designed from 3 un- translated regions of each peroxidase cDNA and PSP were used in reverse transcript PCR RT- PCR to study expression patterns. For GmEpa 1 , GmEpa 2 , GmEpb 1 , and GmEpb 2 the primers were 5 AAATTAACTCAGCTGTGGG 3, 5 GGAACCCACTTATTCCATCG 3, 5 CC- CAAGACATGCTTGAGAT 3, and 5 AAGTTCATACTTCTAAC 3, respectively. A total of 5 mg of total RNA from different soybean tissues was used for synthesizing the first strand of cDNA using SUPERSCRIPT™ II Rnase H − REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE as sug- gested by the manufacturer GIBCOBRL. RT- PCR conditions were the same as those in 3 RACE except that the annealing temperature for GmEpb 2 was 45°C. A total of 20 ml of PCR products was electrophoresed on a 1 wv agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide. 2 . 4 . In 6itro folding of bacterially expressed GmEPa 1 and GmEPb 1 proteins The open reading frames including the 5 leader sequences of GmEPa 1 and GmEPb 1 were PCR- amplified and cloned into the pET-34b + expres- sion vector Novagen. The primers complementary to the lower strands were designed with a BamH I site at the 5 ends and the primers complementary to the upper strands with a Xho I site GmEPa 1 : 5 GACGGATCCATGGGAAG- CAACTTGAGGTTTTTG 3, 5 GACCTC- GAGTTAGCTATTTATAAATGCACAATG 3; GmEPb 1 : 5 GACGGATCCATGGCTGT- CATGGGTGCATTCTTG 3, 5 ACCTCGAG- TAATTCTGCAGCCCTTCTTTCCTCCTG 3. PCR products were digested with BamH I and Xho I and ligated to pET-34b + digested with the same two enzymes. The constructs were then transformed into BL21 DE3 competent E. coli cells. An overnight culture of 5 ml of BL21 was inoculated into a 100-ml culture containing 50 m gml kanamycin. The inoculated culture was grown at 37°C with vigorous shaking until an OD 600 of 1.0. The 100-ml culture was then split into 2 × 50-ml cultures. IPTG was added to one of the 50-ml cultures to a final concentration of 1 mM. The other culture was used as an uninduced control. The 2 × 50-ml cultures were further grown for 5 h after IPTG induction. Different temperatures and media additives were used dur- ing the bacterial growth. Isolation of total cell proteins, inclusion bodies and cellulose binding domain CBD fused peroxidase were performed according to the manufacturer Novagen. Inclu- sion bodies were washed twice with buffer 200 mM Tris – Cl pH 8.0, 100 mM EDTA, 100 mM DTT, 10 vv Triton X-100 before being fully solubilized in 10 vol. of 6 M urea, 1 mM DTT in 50 mM Tris – Cl pH 8.0. A single-step dilution was used for the dena- tured protein refolding. A total of 10 mg 1mgml of the inclusion body prep was slowly diluted in 190 ml of PBS, which once diluted, contained 2 M urea, 5 mM CaCl 2 , 10 mM hemin and 0.1 mM DTT PBS: 137 mM NaCl, 1.47 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 8.10 mM Na 2 HPO 4 , and 2.68 mM KCl, pH 8.0. After overnight incubation at room temperature, 20-ml aliquots of the folding mixtures were trans- ferred to the wells of a microtiter plate, and perox- idase activity was monitored using substrate tetramethylbenzadine as described by Vierling and Wilcox [9].

3. Results