Assessment Scoring System The teacher drills the students about agreement and disagreement dialog

Appendix 7 Result of Students’ Pretest 2 No Students’ Code Pronunciation Grammar Vocabulary Fluency Comprehension Total Average R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 1 AA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 64 64 64 2 AH 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 84 76 80 3 AR 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 84 80 82 4 AP 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 72 76 74 5 ARN 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 76 76 76 6 BP 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 60 60 60 7 DS 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 84 80 82 8 ES 4 4 3 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 80 76 78 9 EJ 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 64 64 64 10 FF 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 64 68 66 11 FK 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 72 72 72 12 HA 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 64 68 66 13 IK 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 68 76 72 14 IP 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 68 72 70 15 KH 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 60 60 60 16 MAJ 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 64 68 66 17 MD 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 68 68 68 18 MRH 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 76 76 76 19 MZ 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 64 72 68 20 NL 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 64 68 66 21 RR 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 88 84 86 22 RR 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 64 60 62 23 RA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 64 60 62 24 SP 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 60 64 62 25 WWT 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 68 68 68 26 SRN 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 80 80 80 27 TH 3 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 3 64 60 62 28 TW 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 72 76 74 29 WA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 64 60 62 30 WWT 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 76 72 74 31 WWL 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 68 72 70 32 YA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 64 60 62 Total 460 460 472 408 428 428 464 480 468 460 2232 2236 2234 Appendix 8 Result of Students’ Pretest 3 No Students’ Code Pronunciation Grammar Vocabulary Fluency Comprehension Total Average R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 1 AA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 64 64 64 2 AH 4 5 4 4 4 3 5 5 4 4 84 84 84 3 AR 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 84 80 82 4 AP 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 76 76 76 5 ARN 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 76 76 76 6 BP 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 60 60 60 7 DS 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 84 80 82 8 ES 4 4 3 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 80 76 78 9 EJ 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 64 64 64 10 FF 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 64 68 66 11 FK 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 76 80 78 12 HA 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 64 68 66 13 IK 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 68 76 72 14 IP 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 76 76 76 15 KH 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 60 60 60 16 MAJ 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 64 68 66 17 MD 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 68 68 68 18 MRH 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 80 84 82 19 MZ 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 64 72 68 20 NL 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 64 68 66 21 RR 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 88 84 86 22 RR 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 64 60 62 23 RA 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 72 68 70 24 SP 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 68 72 70 25 SR 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 68 68 68 26 SRN 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 80 80 80 27 TH 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 72 68 70 28 TW 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 80 76 78 29 WA 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 72 68 70 30 WWT 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 76 72 74 31 WWL 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 76 76 76 32 YA 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 68 72 70 Total 484 488 480 416 440 444 484 484 476 480 2304 2312 2308 Appendix 9 Final Result of Students’ Pretest 1 No Students’ Code Pronunciation Grammar Vocabulary Fluency Comprehension Total 1 AA 12 12 14 14 14 66 2 AH 16 12 16 16 16 76 3 AR 16 12 16 16 16 76 4 AP 12 12 12 16 16 68 5 ARN 16 12 16 16 16 76 6 BP 12 8 10 10 12 52 7 DS 18 16 16 16 16 82 8 ES 16 12 16 16 16 76 9 EJ 12 12 14 14 14 66 10 FF 16 12 12 16 14 70 11 FK 14 12 12 16 14 68 12 HA 16 12 12 16 14 70 13 IK 12 12 14 14 14 66 14 IP 12 12 14 14 12 64 15 KH 12 12 14 14 14 66 16 MAJ 12 14 14 16 14 70 17 MD 12 12 14 14 14 66 18 MRH 16 12 16 18 16 78 19 MZ 16 14 12 18 14 74 20 NL 12 12 12 12 14 62 21 RR 18 16 18 18 16 86 22 RR 12 8 12 12 12 56 23 RA 12 12 12 12 14 62 24 SP 12 12 14 14 12 64 25 SRN 12 14 14 16 14 70 26 SRN 12 14 16 16 16 74 27 TH 12 8 12 16 14 62 28 TW 16 12 12 16 14 70 29 WA 12 12 12 12 14 62 30 WWT 16 12 16 16 16 76 31 WWL 12 12 14 14 14 66 32 YA 12 12 12 12 14 62 Total 438 388 440 476 460 2202 Average 13.68 12.12 13.75 24.87 14.37 68.81 Appendix 10 Final Result of Students’ Pretest 2 No Students’ Code Pronunciation Grammar Vocabulary Fluency Comprehension Total 1 AA 12 12 12 14 14 64 2 AH 16 16 14 18 16 80 3 AR 16 16 16 18 16 82 4 AP 14 12 16 16 16 74 5 ARN 16 12 16 16 16 76 6 BP 12 12 12 12 12 60 7 DS 18 16 16 16 16 82 8 ES 16 14 12 18 16 76 9 EJ 14 12 12 14 12 64 10 FF 16 12 12 12 14 66 11 FK 16 12 12 16 16 72 12 HA 16 12 12 12 14 66 13 IK 14 12 16 14 16 72 14 IP 16 12 16 14 12 70 15 KH 12 12 12 12 12 60 16 MAJ 12 12 12 16 14 66 17 MD 12 12 14 16 14 68 18 MRH 16 16 14 16 14 76 19 MZ 16 12 12 14 14 68 20 NL 14 12 12 12 16 66 21 RR 19 16 16 20 16 87 22 RR 12 12 12 12 14 62 23 RA 12 12 12 12 14 62 24 SP 12 12 12 14 12 62 25 WWT 12 14 12 16 14 68 26 SRN 16 16 16 16 16 86 27 TH 12 8 12 16 12 60 28 TW 16 12 14 16 16 74 29 WA 12 12 12 12 14 62 30 WWT 16 14 12 16 16 74 31 WWL 16 12 14 14 14 70 32 YA 12 12 12 12 14 62 Total 461 410 426 472 462 2231 Average 14.40 12.81 13.31 14.75 14.43 69.71 Appendix 11 Final Result of Students’ Pretest 3 No Students’ Code Pronunciation Grammar Vocabulary Fluency Comprehension Total 1 AA 12 12 12 14 14 64 2 AH 18 16 14 20 16 84 3 AR 16 16 16 18 16 82 4 AP 16 12 16 16 16 76 5 ARN 16 12 16 16 16 76 6 BP 12 12 12 12 12 60 7 DS 18 16 16 16 16 82 8 ES 16 14 14 18 16 78 9 EJ 14 12 12 14 12 64 10 FF 16 12 12 12 14 66 11 FK 16 14 16 16 16 78 12 HA 16 12 12 12 12 64 13 IK 14 12 16 14 14 70 14 IP 16 12 16 16 14 74 15 KH 12 12 12 12 12 60 16 MAJ 12 12 12 16 14 66 17 MD 12 12 14 16 14 68 18 MRH 18 16 16 16 16 82 19 MZ 16 12 12 14 14 68 20 NL 14 12 12 12 16 66 21 RR 18 16 16 20 16 86 22 RR 12 12 12 12 14 62 23 RA 16 12 14 14 14 70 24 SP 16 12 12 16 14 70 25 WWT 12 14 12 16 14 68 26 SRN 16 16 16 16 16 80 27 TH 16 12 12 16 14 70 28 TW 16 14 16 16 16 78 29 WA 16 12 12 14 16 70 30 WWT 16 14 12 16 16 74 31 WWL 16 12 16 16 16 76 32 YA 16 12 14 12 16 70 Total 486 418 442 484 472 2302 Average 15.18 13.06 13.81 15.12 14.75 71.93 Appendix 12 Frequencies Statistics of Pretest 1 Statistics PRETEST1 N Valid 32 Missing Mean 68.88 Median 69.00 Mode 66 a Std. Deviation 7.290 Variance 53.145 Range 34 Minimum 52 Maximum 86 PRETEST1 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 52 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 56 1 3.1 3.1 6.3 62 5 15.6 15.6 21.9 64 2 6.3 6.3 28.1 66 6 18.8 18.8 46.9 68 1 3.1 3.1 50.0 70 6 18.8 18.8 68.8 74 2 6.3 6.3 75.0 76 5 15.6 15.6 90.6 78 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 82 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 86 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Appendix 13 Frequencies Statistics of Pretest 2 Statistics PRETEST2 N Valid 32 Missing Mean 69.81 Median 68.00 Mode 62 Std. Deviation 7.333 Variance 53.770 Range 26 Minimum 60 Maximum 86 PRETEST2 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 60 2 6.3 6.3 6.3 62 6 18.8 18.8 25.0 64 2 6.3 6.3 31.3 66 4 12.5 12.5 43.8 68 3 9.4 9.4 53.1 70 2 6.3 6.3 59.4 72 2 6.3 6.3 65.6 74 3 9.4 9.4 75.0 76 2 6.3 6.3 81.3 78 1 3.1 3.1 84.4 80 2 6.3 6.3 90.6 82 2 6.3 6.3 96.9 86 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Appendix 14 Frequencies Statistics of Pretest 3 Statistics PRETEST3 N Valid 32 Missing Mean 72.13 Median 70.00 Mode 70 Std. Deviation 7.201 Variance 51.855 Range 26 Minimum 60 Maximum 86 PRETEST3 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 60 2 6.3 6.3 6.3 62 1 3.1 3.1 9.4 64 2 6.3 6.3 15.6 66 4 12.5 12.5 28.1 68 3 9.4 9.4 37.5 70 5 15.6 15.6 53.1 72 1 3.1 3.1 56.3 74 1 3.1 3.1 59.4 76 4 12.5 12.5 71.9 78 3 9.4 9.4 81.3 80 1 3.1 3.1 84.4 82 3 9.4 9.4 93.8 84 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 86 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Appendix 15 Inter – Rater Reliability of Pretest 1 No Students’ Code R1 R2 Rank 1 R1 Rank 2 R2 Rank Difference D 2 1 AA 64 68 23.5 19 4.5 20.25 2 AH 76 76 6.5 6 0.5 0.25 3 AP 72 72 11.5 11.5 4 AR 76 76 6.5 6 0.5 0.25 5 ARN 76 76 6.5 6 0.5 0.25 6 BP 52 52 32 32 7 DS 84 88 1.5 1 0.5 0.25 8 EJ 64 68 23.5 19 4.5 20.25 9 ES 76 76 6.5 6 0.5 0.25 10 FF 68 68 15.5 19 3.5 12.25 11 FK 68 68 15.5 19 3.5 12.25 12 HA 68 68 15.5 19 3.5 12.25 13 IK 64 68 23.5 19 4.5 20.25 14 IP 60 60 30 28 2 4 15 KH 64 68 23.5 19 4.5 20.25 16 MAJ 72 72 11.5 11.5 17 MD 64 68 23.5 19 4.5 20.25 18 MRH 80 76 3 6 3 9 19 MZ 72 72 11.5 11.5 20 NL 64 68 23.5 19 4.5 20.25 21 RA 64 68 23.5 19 4.5 20.25 22 RR 84 80 1.5 2 0.5 0.25 23 RR 56 56 31 31 24 SP 64 64 23.5 25 1.5 2.25 25 SRN 76 76 6.5 6 0.5 0.25 26 TH 64 60 23.5 28 4.5 20.25 27 TW 68 68 15.5 19 3.5 12.25 28 WA 64 60 23.5 28 4.5 20.25 29 WWL 64 60 23,5 28 4.5 20.25 30 WWT 76 76 6.5 6 0.5 0.25 31 WWT 72 72 11.5 11.5 32 YA 64 60 23.5 28 4.5 20.25 Total 289 Reliability of Pretest 1 The statistical formula for counting the reliability is as follow: R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – 0,052969 R = 0.94 A very high reliability Where: R : Reliability N : Number of Students D : The different of rank Correlation mean score from rater1R1-rater2R2 1-6 : Constant Number Nitko, 1983: 395 Appendix 16 Inter – Rater Reliability of Pretest 2 No Students’ Code R1 R2 Rank 1 R1 Rank 2 R2 Rank Difference D 2 1 AA 64 68 23.5 19.5 4 16 2 AH 84 80 3 3 3 AP 72 76 11 8 3 9 4 AR 84 80 3 3 5 ARN 76 76 8 8 6 BP 60 60 31 29 2 4 7 DS 84 80 3 3 8 EJ 64 68 23.5 19.5 4 16 9 ES 80 76 5.5 8 2.5 6.25 10 FF 64 68 23.5 19.5 4 16 11 FK 72 76 11 8 3 9 12 HA 64 68 23.5 19.5 4 16 13 IK 68 72 19.4 14 5.4 29.16 14 IP 68 72 19.4 14 5.4 29.16 15 KH 60 60 31 29 2 4 16 MAJ 64 68 23.5 19.5 4 16 17 MD 68 72 19.4 14 5.4 29.16 18 MRH 76 76 8 8 19 MZ 64 64 23.5 24 0.5 0.25 20 NL 64 64 23.5 24 0.5 0.25 21 RA 64 60 23.5 29 5.5 30.25 22 RR 88 84 1 1 23 RR 64 64 23.5 24 0.5 0.25 24 SP 60 60 31 29 2 4 25 SRN 80 76 5.5 8 2.5 6.25 26 TH 64 60 23.5 29 5.5 30.25 27 TW 72 72 11 14 3 9 28 WA 64 60 23.5 29 5.5 30.25 29 WWL 68 72 19.4 14 5.4 29.16 30 WWT 76 76 8 8 31 WWT 68 68 19.4 19.5 0.1 0.01 32 YA 64 60 23.5 29 5.5 30.25 Total 369.9 Reliability of Pretest 2 The statistical formula for counting the reliability is as follow: R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – 0,067797 R = 0,93 A very high reliability Where: R : Reliability N : Number of Students D : The different of rank Correlation 1-6 : Constant Number Nitko, 1983: 395 Appendix 17 Inter – Rater Reliability of Pretest 3 No Students’ Code R1 R2 Rank 1 R1 Rank 2 R2 Rank Difference D 2 1 AA 64 68 26.5 23 3.5 12.25 2 AH 84 84 3 2 1 1 3 AP 76 76 11.5 11 0.5 0.25 4 AR 84 84 3 2 1 1 5 ARN 76 76 11.5 11 0.5 0.25 6 BP 60 60 31.5 31 0.5 0.25 7 DS 84 80 3 5.5 2.5 6.25 8 EJ 64 68 26.5 23 3.5 12.25 9 ES 80 80 6.5 5.5 1 1 10 FF 64 68 26.5 23 3.5 12.25 11 FK 76 76 11.5 11 0.5 0.25 12 HA 64 68 26.5 23 3.5 12.25 13 IK 68 72 20 16.5 3.5 12.25 14 IP 76 76 11.5 11 0.5 0.25 15 KH 60 60 31.5 31 0.5 0.25 16 MAJ 64 68 26.5 23 3.5 12.25 17 MD 68 68 20 23 3 9 18 MRH 80 80 6.5 5.5 1 1 19 MZ 64 64 26.5 28.5 2 4 20 NL 64 64 26.5 28.5 2 4 21 RA 72 72 16 16.5 0.5 0.25 22 RR 88 84 1 2 1 1 23 RR 64 60 26.5 31 4.5 20.25 24 SP 68 68 20 23 3 9 25 SRN 80 80 6.5 5.5 1 1 26 TH 72 72 16 16.5 0.5 0.25 27 TW 80 76 6.5 11 4.5 20.25 28 WA 72 72 16 16.5 0.5 0.25 29 WWL 76 76 11.5 11 0.5 0.25 30 WWT 76 76 11,5 11 0.5 0.25 31 WWT 68 68 20 23 3 9 32 YA 68 68 20 23 3 9 Total 173 Reliability of Pretest 3 The statistical formula for counting the reliability is as follow: R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – R = 1 – 0.031708 R = 0.96 A very high reliability Where: R : Reliability N : Number of Students D : The different of rank Correlation 1-6 : Constant Number Nitko, 1983: 395 Appendix 18 LESSON PLAN 4 Unit of Education : Senior High School SMA Subject : English Class Semester : XI 1 Focusing Skill : Speaking Material : Agreement and Disagreement Topic : Shopping in the Market Genre : Conversation Dialog Time Allocation : 2 x 45 Minutes

12. Standard Competence

c. Expressing meaning at short simple transactional and interpersonal conversation and sustained in daily life context. d. Comprehend the short functional text and essay conversation dialog in daily life and to access science.

13. Basic Competence

c. Expressing meaning at short simple transactional to get things done and interpersonal to socialize conversation by using spoken language accurately, fluently, and acceptable to interact and involve spoken language accurately in daily life to access knowledge. d. Responding the meaning and the procedure of written text conversation dialog accurately in daily life to access knowledge.

14. Indicators

d. Students are able to present their own dialog according to the topic in front of the class Shopping in the market. e. Students are able to communicate with their pair well about their conversation dialog.. f. Students are able to understand the information given by their pair.

15. Learning Objectives

Students are able to: f. Understand the procedure of making dialog by using the expressions of agree and disagreement with the topic shopping in the market g. Understand the structure and the content of the topic in their dialog. h. Present their dialog according to the topic in front of the class. i. Communicate with their pair well in the dialog that they deliver. j. Understand the information given by their pair.

16. Learning Material

The example of coversation dialog.

17. Time Allocation : 2 x 45 Minutes

18. Learning Methods

Conversation

19. Teaching and Learning Activities c. Pre Activities

5. The teacher opens the class with greeting, and then checks the students‟ attendance list in order to make sure that all students are present in the class. 6. The teacher tells the students what they are going to learn. 7. The teacher shows the students an example of conversation Dialogue. 8. The teacher warms up the students by giving several questions related to the topic. It is aimed to brainstorming the students‟ background knowledge. The questions are as follows: 12. Do you have a shopping experience? 13. What happen in your shopping experience? 14. What is your impression of your shopping experience?

d. While Activities

1. The teacher drills the students about agreement and disagreement dialog Repetition of each line by the language learners in chorus is the next step. Each sentences may be repeated a half dozens of times, depending on its length and on the alertness of the language learner. If the teacher detects an error, the offending learner corrects and repeats the sentence. 2. The students are asked to form into pair consists of two 2 students in each pair and they are asked to make dialogue according to the topic that are chossen by the teacher. 3. Each student is asked to present their dialogue in front of the class.

e. Post Activities

1. All of the students‟ speech performance in each pair is recorded by the researcher. 2. The students‟ dialogue in each pair is also assessed by two 2 raters, where the first rater R1 is the researcher and the second rater R2 is the English teacher of MAN 1 Bandar Lampung based on the rating scale of Harris 1974 which concerns on five 5 aspects namely: Pronunciation, Grammar, Vocabulary, Fluency, and Comprehension.

20. Learning Resources

c. Look Ahead Book 1 an English Course for Senior High School Students Year XI, Publisher Erlangga. d. Dictionary

21. Assessment

Speaking test in oral form

22. Scoring System

The analytical scoring is used and the aspect of speaking proposed by Harris 1974 is used to assess the students‟ speaking skill. The lowest rating score is 1, and the higher rating score is 5, in which the each score is accumulated as follow: No Student’s Code Pronuciation Grammar Vocabulary Fluency Comprehension Total Score R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 10. The Criteria for each Column: 20 : Excellent 15 : Very Good 10 : Good 5 : Need Help Total score = 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 = 100 Here is the identification of the scores. If the student gets 5, so the score is 5 x 4 = 20 4, so the score is 4 x 4 = 16 3, so the score is 3 x 4 = 12 2, so the score is 2 x 4 = 8 1, so the score is 1 x 4 = 4 For example: A student get 3 in pronunciation, 2 in grammar, 4 in vocabulary, 4 in fluency, and 4 in comprehension. Therefore, the student‟s total score is: Pronunciation 3 x 4 = 12 Grammar 2x 4 = 8 Vocabulary 4 x 4 = 16 Fluency 4 x 4 = 16 Comprehension 4 x 4 = 16 Total Score : 68 It means that the student gets 68 for speaking. The score of speaking is based on the five 5 components in which is compared in the percentage. Appendix 19 LESSON PLAN 5 Unit of Education : Senior High School SMA Subject : English Class Semester : XI 1 Focusing Skill : Speaking Material : Agreement and Disagreement Topic : Watching Film in The Cinema Genre : Conversation Dialog Time Allocation : 2 x 45 Minutes

1. Standard Competence