Pengaruh Resin Komposit Bulk Fill Yang Berbeda Pada Restorasi Klas II MOD Gigi Premolar Maksila Terhadap Ketahanan Fraktur

47

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Vahid NA, Mahjunath MK. Comparation of fracture resistance of maxillary
first premolars with class II mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities restored
with newer resin based composites-an ex vivo study. Int J Current Research
2016; 8(04): 29814-20.
2. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-State of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
3. Valian A, Moravej S, Geramy A, Faramarzi E. Effect of extension and type of
composite-restored class II cavities on biomehanical properties of teeth : a
three dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent 2015; 12(2): 140-9.
4. Frater M, Foster A, Kereszturi M dkk. In Vitro fracture resistance of molar
teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composit material. J Dent 2014:
1143-50.
5. Moosavi H, Zeynali M, Pour ZH. Fracture resistance of premolars
restored by various types and placement techniques of resin composites. Int J
Dent 2012: 1,
6. Patel P, Shah M, Agrawal N, Desai P, Tailor K, Patel K. Comparative
evaluation of microleakage of class II cavities restored with different bulk fill
composite restorative system: An in vitro study. J Res Adv Dent 2016; 5(2):

52-62.
7. Baig M. M et al. Microleakage evaluation in restorations using different resin
composite insertion techniques and liners in preparations with high c-factor –
An in vitro study.King Saud University J Dental Science 2013; 4: 57-64.
8. Mansour K, Sada A, Sinan H. Curing depth of bulk fill composite an in vitro
study. Pak Oral & Dent J 2015; 35(2): 270-5.
9. Kapoor N, Bahuguna N, Anand S. Influence of composite insertion technique
on gap formation. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19(1): 77-81.
10. Ahmad I. Deep resins, while fillings: A new techniwue for composite
restorations. Cosmetic Dent 2013

Universitas Sumatera Utara

48

11. Orlowski M et al. Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental
composite materials: in vitro study. The Scientific World J 2015: 1-8.
12. Abouelleil H et all. Comparison of mechanical properties of a nem fiber
reinforced composite and bulk filling composite. Research Article.
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics 2015: 1-8.

13. EverX PosteriorTM from GC fibre-reinforced composite for dentin
replacement in large cavities. 2013;3-10.
14. Garoushi SK, Hatem M, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK.The effect of short fiber
composite base in microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior
restorations. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2015; 1(1): 6-12.
15. Anusavice , Shen , Rawls. Philip's science of dental materials. 12 th ed:
Elsevier ., 2012: 277-80, 287.
16. Irawan B. Karakteristik komposit resin berkemampuan mengalir.I J Dent
2015; 12(1) : 36-41.
17. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 13th ed.,
Philadelphia: Elsevier., 2012: 36, 100, 164-7, 172-9,181, 332.
18. Garoushi S dkk. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber
reinforced composite. Dental Materials 2013; 29: 835-41.
19. Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. Studevant‟s art and science of
operative dentistry. 6 th ed., Singapore: Elsevier Inc., 2012: 218-22.
20. Nurhapsari A. Perbandingan kebocoran tepi antara restorasi resi komposit
tipe bulk-fill dan tipe packable dengan penggunaan system adhesive total
etch dan self etch. Odonto Dent J 2016; Vol 3(1): 8-13.
21. Garg A, Garg N. Texbook of operative dentistry. 1st ed., New Delhi: Jaype
Brothers., 2010: 3, 84, 125, 147, 240, 250, 257- 61.

22. FiltekTM Bulk-fill Posterior Restorative Technical Product Profile.
23. A dental outlook report. Bulk-fill resin composite update. 2013; 41: 1-6.
24. EverX PosteriorTM from GC fibre-reinforced composite for dentin
replacement in large cavities. 2013;3-10.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

49

25. Chan DCN, Gianni M, Degoes MF. Profisional anterior tooth replacement
using nonimpregnated fiber and fiber reinforced composite resin materials :
A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 344-8.
26. Van Heumen, , van Dijken, J.W.V., Tanner, J., Pikaar, R., Lassila, L.V.J.,
Creugers, N.H.J., Vallittu, P.K. & Kreulen, C.M. 2009. Five-year survival
of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures in the anterior
area.Dental Materials 25: 820-827.
27. Kerr.

A

proven

One

Step

procedure,

now

better

than

ever

http://www.kerrdental.eu/FillingMaterials/Composites/BulkFillComposites/
SonicFill.Diakses pada tanggal 4 maret 2015
28. EverX Posterior the stongest composite sub-structure.
29. Fahad F, Majeed MAR. Fracture resistance of weekened premolars restored

with sonically-activated composite, bulk-filed and incerementally-filled
compositd (a comparative in vitro study). J Bagh College Dentistry 2014;
Vol. 26(4): 22-7.
30. Ibarra ET, Lien W, Casey J dkk. Physical properties of a new sonically
placed composit resin restorative material. J General Dent 2015: 51-6.
31. Hambire UV, Tripathi VK. Experimental Evaluation Of Different Fillers In
Dental Composites In Terms Of Mechanical Properties. J Eng & Appl Sci
2012; 7: 147-51.
32. Pereira JR ,Mc Donald A, BDentSc, Petrie A, Knowles JC. Effect of cavity
design on tooth surface strain. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:369-375.
33. Noronha FD, Scelza MFZ, Silva LE, Carvalho WR. Evaluation of
compressivestrength in the first premolars between young and elderly
people: ex vivo study.Gerodontology 2011; e898-e901.
34. Franca FMG, Worschech CC, Paulillo LAMS, Martins LRM, Lovadino
JR.Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored With Different Filling
Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6: 1-7.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

50

35. Makramani A, Razak A, Yi NM, Ying SY, Sanabani A. Effect of restorative
techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars. J
Stomatol 2013; 3: 379-85
36. Abed YA, Sabry HA, Alrobeigy NA.Degree of conversion and surface
hardness of bulk-fill composite versus incremental-fill composite. Tanta
Dent J 2015; 12: 71-80
37. Woelfel BJ, Scheid RC. Dental anatomy : It’s relevance to Dentistry. 6 th
ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.,2001: 81-2.

Universitas Sumatera Utara