Perbedaan Sudut MP-SN dengan Ketebalan Dagu Mandibula Pada Pasien Dewasa yang Dirawat di Klinik PPDGS Ortodonsia FKG USU
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1.
Chitra P, Prasanna A. Soft tissue chin thickness in Indian Adult Class II
Division 1 subjects. Int J of Scientific Res. 2014; 3(11): 360-2.
2.
Macari AT, Hanna AE. Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult
patients with various mandibular divergence patterns. Angle Ort J 2014;
84(4): 708-14.
3.
Prendergast PM. Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation Art and Clinical
Practice. 2012: 15-22.
4.
Uppada UK, Sinha R, Reddy SD, Paul D. Soft tissue changes and its
stability as a sequlae to mandibular advancement. AMS Journal 2014; 4(2):
132-7.
5.
Bergman RT, Waschak J, Farahani AB, Murphy NC. Longitudinal study of
cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
Angle Orthod 2014; 84(1): 48-55.
6.
Suminy D, Zen Y. Hubungan antara maloklusi dengan hambatan saluran
pernafasan. Maj Ked Gi. 2007; 22(1): 32-40.
7.
Chen F, Terada K, Wu L, Saito I. Dental arch widths and mandibularmaxillary base width in class III malocclusions with low, average and high
MP-SN angles. Angle Orthodont. 2007; 77(1): 36-41.
8.
Arwelli D, Hardjono S. Pengukuran sudut bidang mandibula pada analisa
sefalometri. Mad Ked Gi. 2008; 15(1): 55-60.
9.
Sidlaukas A, Zilinskaite L, Svalkauskiene V. Mandibular pubertal growth
spurt prediction. Part One: method based on the hand- wrist radiographs.
Stom, Balt Dent and Max J. 2005; 7(1): 16-20.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
10.
Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd ed, New Dehli: Jaypee Brothers
Medical Publishers, 2007: 104-128.
11.
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Franco DJD. Mandibular shape and skeletal
divergency. European Journal of Orthodontist. 1999; 21: 145-153.
12.
Karlsen AT. Craniofacial growth differences between low and high MP-SN
angle males: a longitudinal study. The Angle Orthod 1995; 65(5): 341-50.
13.
Mohode R, Betigiri AV. An establishment of skeletal and soft tissue norms
for Indian Marathi population and relating it with the perception of balanced
profiles by lay persons. Jios: 33-40.
14.
Sharma P, Arora A, Valiathan A. Age changes of jaws and soft tissue
profile. Hindawi Scientific World J 2014: 1-7.
15.
Kamak H, Celikoglu M. Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal
malocclusions: is there a difference?. Korean J Ort 2012: 23-31
16.
Lee BSG. Timing of peak mandibular growth in different facial growth
patterns and resultant mandibular projection. Tesis. Toronto: Degree of
Master of Science Graduate Department of Dentistry University of Toronto,
2010: 10-1.
17.
Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental an facial asymmetries: a
review. Angle Orthod 1994; 64(2): 54-63.
18.
Proffit W. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed, St.Louis: Elsevier, 2013: 7-8.
19.
Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics the art and science. New Dehli: Arya (Medi)
Publishing House, 2003: 63-80.
20.
Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic cephalometry. Greece, Mosby-Wolfe: 48.
21.
Jacobson A. Radiography cephalometry from basic to videoimaging. Carol
Stream: Quintessence Publishing, 1995: 242.
22.
Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 2. Clinical assessment. Dental Update
2008: 159-70.
23.
Cobourne MT, Fleming PS, Dibiase AT, Ahmad S. Clinical cases in
orthodontics. Chichester: Wilay-BlackWell, 2012:13, 77,129-219.
24.
Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Chung B. Soft tissue
cephalometric analysis: Diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial
deformity. Am J of Orthod and Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116(3): 239-53.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
25.
Rakosi T. Cephalometric radiography. Britain: Wolfe Medical Publication,
1982: 62-131.
26.
Alavi S, Okhravi SM, Mamavi T. Evaluation of facial soft tissue profile in
6-15 years old children with normal occlusion in Isfahan. Res J of Med
Science 2013; 7(3): 80-5.
27.
Premkumar S. Textbook of craniofacial growth. St.Louis: Jaypee Brothers
Medical Publishers, 2011: 221-37
28.
Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber TM. Orthodontic diagnosis. New York: Thieme
Medical Publishers, 1993: 213.
29.
Meneghini F. Clinical facial analysis. Germany: Springer, 2005: 110.
30.
Naini FB, Donaldson AN, Mcdonald F, Cobourne MT. Influence of chin
height on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, layperson, and
clinician. Angle Orthodontist 2012; 82(1): 88-95
31.
Naini
FB,
Moss
Jp,
Gill
DS.
The
enigma
of
facial
beauty:
esthetics,proportions, deformity, and controversy. Am J Orthod Dentofac
Orthop 2006; 130: 277-82.
32.
Heryumani JCP. Proporsi sagital wajah laki-laki dan perempuan dewasa
etnik jawa. M.I. Kedokteran Gigi 2007; 22: 22-7.
33.
Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontics about face: The re-emergence of
the esthetic paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000; 575-6.
34.
Wigati C, Andhini KR, Natalia D. Hubungan lebar mesiodistal gigi
permanen terhadap kecembungan profil jaringan lunak wajah pada pasien
maloklusi kelas I Angle di Malang. Majalah Kesehatan FKUB 2012: 1-5.
35.
Nalbandyan M, Ter-Poghosyan H, Shastri M, Avetyan G. Soft tissue profil
analysis and its diagnostic reliability in patients with malocclusion. The
New Armen Med J. 2012; 6(1): 50-5.
36.
Uysal T, Baysal A, Yagcia A, Singler LM, Jr Mcnamara JA.
Ethnic
differences in the soft tissue profiles of Turkish and European-American
young adult with normal occlussions and well-balanced faces. European J of
Ort 2011: 1-6.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
1.
Chitra P, Prasanna A. Soft tissue chin thickness in Indian Adult Class II
Division 1 subjects. Int J of Scientific Res. 2014; 3(11): 360-2.
2.
Macari AT, Hanna AE. Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult
patients with various mandibular divergence patterns. Angle Ort J 2014;
84(4): 708-14.
3.
Prendergast PM. Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation Art and Clinical
Practice. 2012: 15-22.
4.
Uppada UK, Sinha R, Reddy SD, Paul D. Soft tissue changes and its
stability as a sequlae to mandibular advancement. AMS Journal 2014; 4(2):
132-7.
5.
Bergman RT, Waschak J, Farahani AB, Murphy NC. Longitudinal study of
cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
Angle Orthod 2014; 84(1): 48-55.
6.
Suminy D, Zen Y. Hubungan antara maloklusi dengan hambatan saluran
pernafasan. Maj Ked Gi. 2007; 22(1): 32-40.
7.
Chen F, Terada K, Wu L, Saito I. Dental arch widths and mandibularmaxillary base width in class III malocclusions with low, average and high
MP-SN angles. Angle Orthodont. 2007; 77(1): 36-41.
8.
Arwelli D, Hardjono S. Pengukuran sudut bidang mandibula pada analisa
sefalometri. Mad Ked Gi. 2008; 15(1): 55-60.
9.
Sidlaukas A, Zilinskaite L, Svalkauskiene V. Mandibular pubertal growth
spurt prediction. Part One: method based on the hand- wrist radiographs.
Stom, Balt Dent and Max J. 2005; 7(1): 16-20.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
10.
Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd ed, New Dehli: Jaypee Brothers
Medical Publishers, 2007: 104-128.
11.
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Franco DJD. Mandibular shape and skeletal
divergency. European Journal of Orthodontist. 1999; 21: 145-153.
12.
Karlsen AT. Craniofacial growth differences between low and high MP-SN
angle males: a longitudinal study. The Angle Orthod 1995; 65(5): 341-50.
13.
Mohode R, Betigiri AV. An establishment of skeletal and soft tissue norms
for Indian Marathi population and relating it with the perception of balanced
profiles by lay persons. Jios: 33-40.
14.
Sharma P, Arora A, Valiathan A. Age changes of jaws and soft tissue
profile. Hindawi Scientific World J 2014: 1-7.
15.
Kamak H, Celikoglu M. Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal
malocclusions: is there a difference?. Korean J Ort 2012: 23-31
16.
Lee BSG. Timing of peak mandibular growth in different facial growth
patterns and resultant mandibular projection. Tesis. Toronto: Degree of
Master of Science Graduate Department of Dentistry University of Toronto,
2010: 10-1.
17.
Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental an facial asymmetries: a
review. Angle Orthod 1994; 64(2): 54-63.
18.
Proffit W. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed, St.Louis: Elsevier, 2013: 7-8.
19.
Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics the art and science. New Dehli: Arya (Medi)
Publishing House, 2003: 63-80.
20.
Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic cephalometry. Greece, Mosby-Wolfe: 48.
21.
Jacobson A. Radiography cephalometry from basic to videoimaging. Carol
Stream: Quintessence Publishing, 1995: 242.
22.
Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 2. Clinical assessment. Dental Update
2008: 159-70.
23.
Cobourne MT, Fleming PS, Dibiase AT, Ahmad S. Clinical cases in
orthodontics. Chichester: Wilay-BlackWell, 2012:13, 77,129-219.
24.
Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Chung B. Soft tissue
cephalometric analysis: Diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial
deformity. Am J of Orthod and Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116(3): 239-53.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
25.
Rakosi T. Cephalometric radiography. Britain: Wolfe Medical Publication,
1982: 62-131.
26.
Alavi S, Okhravi SM, Mamavi T. Evaluation of facial soft tissue profile in
6-15 years old children with normal occlusion in Isfahan. Res J of Med
Science 2013; 7(3): 80-5.
27.
Premkumar S. Textbook of craniofacial growth. St.Louis: Jaypee Brothers
Medical Publishers, 2011: 221-37
28.
Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber TM. Orthodontic diagnosis. New York: Thieme
Medical Publishers, 1993: 213.
29.
Meneghini F. Clinical facial analysis. Germany: Springer, 2005: 110.
30.
Naini FB, Donaldson AN, Mcdonald F, Cobourne MT. Influence of chin
height on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, layperson, and
clinician. Angle Orthodontist 2012; 82(1): 88-95
31.
Naini
FB,
Moss
Jp,
Gill
DS.
The
enigma
of
facial
beauty:
esthetics,proportions, deformity, and controversy. Am J Orthod Dentofac
Orthop 2006; 130: 277-82.
32.
Heryumani JCP. Proporsi sagital wajah laki-laki dan perempuan dewasa
etnik jawa. M.I. Kedokteran Gigi 2007; 22: 22-7.
33.
Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontics about face: The re-emergence of
the esthetic paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000; 575-6.
34.
Wigati C, Andhini KR, Natalia D. Hubungan lebar mesiodistal gigi
permanen terhadap kecembungan profil jaringan lunak wajah pada pasien
maloklusi kelas I Angle di Malang. Majalah Kesehatan FKUB 2012: 1-5.
35.
Nalbandyan M, Ter-Poghosyan H, Shastri M, Avetyan G. Soft tissue profil
analysis and its diagnostic reliability in patients with malocclusion. The
New Armen Med J. 2012; 6(1): 50-5.
36.
Uysal T, Baysal A, Yagcia A, Singler LM, Jr Mcnamara JA.
Ethnic
differences in the soft tissue profiles of Turkish and European-American
young adult with normal occlussions and well-balanced faces. European J of
Ort 2011: 1-6.
Universitas Sumatera Utara