Pengaruh Umur, Paritas, Efek Samping dan Dukungan Suami terhadap Kelangsungan Pemakaian Alat Kontrasepsi dalam Rahim di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kabanjahe Tahun 2013
82 KUESIONER PENELITIAN
PENGARUH UMUR, PARITAS, EFEK SAMPING DAN DUKUNGAN
SUAMI TERHADAP KELANGSUNGAN PEMAKAIAN ALAT
KONTRASEPSI DALAM RAHIM DI WILAYAH
KERJA PUSKESMAS KABANJAHE
TAHUN 2013
I. Sosial Demografi
1. Umur : ...............( tahun )
2. Paritas Ibu : 1. primipara 2. secundipara 3. multipara
3. Efek Samping 1.
Apakah ibu mengalami perubahan siklus haid sewaktu menggunakan AKDR? a.
Tidak b.
Ya 2. Apakah ibu mengalami haid lebih lama dan banyak saat menggunakan AKDR? a.
Tidak b. Ya 3.
Apakah ibu mengalami rasa nyeri haid setelah pemasangan AKDR? a.
Tidak b. Ya 4.
Apakah Ibu mengalami komplikasi perdarahan berat pada waktu haid? a.
Tidak b. Ya 5.
Apakah AKDR menimbulkan rasa tidak nyaman pada saat digunakan? a.
Tidak b. Ya
II. Dukungan Suami 1.
Apakah suami memiliki pandangan yang baik mengenai alat kontrasepsi tentang penggunaan AKDR? a.
Tidak b. Ya 2.
Apakah Suami pernah menganjurkan Ibu untuk melepaskan alat kontrasepsi AKDR? a.
Tidak b. Ya 3.
Apakah Suami memperbolehkan Ibu untuk menggunakan alat kontrasepsi AKDR? a.
Tidak b. Ya 4.
Apakah suami Ibu mendampingi ibu saat konsling tentang pemilihan AKDR? a.
Tidak b. Ya 5. Apakah suami Ibu pernah mendapat informasi mengenai penggunaan AKDR a.
Tidak b. Ya 6.
Apakah suami Ibu pernah menyarankan untuk menggunaakn alat kontrasepsi lain selain AKDR? a.
Tidak b. Ya 7.
Apakah suami Ibu pernah memberitahukan tentang pentingnya berkonsultasi tentang AKDR dengan petugas kesehatan sesuai denagn kesehatan ibu a.
Tidak b. Ya 8.
Apakah suami pernah mengingatkan tanggal agar ibu mengetahui jadwal Mengunjungi fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan ? a.
Tidak b. Ya 9.
Apakah suami Ibu pernah memberiakan uang saat ibu melakukan konsling AKDR ke fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan ? a.
Tidak b. Ya
10. Apakah suami Ibu pernah memberitahukan informasi tentang AKDR ?
1. Tidak
2. Ya
III. Pemakaian AKDR Apakah ibu sampai saat ini masih menggunakan AKDR? a.
Tidak b.
Ya , mulai kapan anda menggunakan AKDR Jika Tidak Kapan mulai menggunakan AKDR? Bulan...........tahun.........
Kapan berhenti menggunakan AKDR? Bulan...........tahun......... Kenapa mulai menggunakan AKDR? ...........................
85 Master Data
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
7 Rosna br Barus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1 Tipotan Pinem
1
1
8 Bella
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
10 Santi br Ginting
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
7 Anna Sitepu
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1 Santi br Siregar
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
7 Tetty
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1 Fauzi
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
7 Lulu Tobing
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Wati
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
8 Sinta
1
3
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Rini
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
1 Rina H
1
1
Nama Paritas E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 ETOT EKAT D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 DTOT DKAT AKDR Herlina
1
2
1
1
1
6 Teti br Barus
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
7 Irma br Sembiring
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
8 Ani Sitepu
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 Hartalina
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
8 Nova br Ginting
1
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 Rosmawati
8 Kartini br Karo
1
7 Memey
1
1
1
2
7 Renita
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
2
6 Adelina
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
8 Lien
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1 Satika Tarigan
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
8 Elen
1
1
1 Nova br Sembiring
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
6 Universitas Sumatera Utara Siska br
2
1
1
1
8 Juli
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
6 Cici
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 Cindy
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
1 Britney
5
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
7 Rika
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1 Vivi
4
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
8 Risda
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9 Perawati
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
5 Enni
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
8 Poppy
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
4
8 Nana
1 Debora
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
3
1 Sri
1
1
1
1
1
2
10 Elmi
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
8 Netty
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1 Julietta
1 Novara Harahap
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1 Lamsihar br Ginting
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1 Maria
1 Agnes br Karo-karo
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
10 Siska
1
5 Desi
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
7 Christina
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1 Melti
6
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
6 Riahna
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
6 Ella
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
2
1 Sinta
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
8 Sondang
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
8 Mega
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
6 Universitas Sumatera Utara
Univariat Umur Katagori Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 21-39 TAHUN
60
98.4
98.4
98.4 <=20 DAN >=40 TAHUN
1
1.6 1.6 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Paritas Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid non-primipara
46
75.4
75.4
75.4 primipara
15
24.6
24.6 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0Efek samping 1 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid ya
45
73.8
73.8
73.8 tidak
16
26.2 26.2 100.0 Total
61 100.0 100.0
Efek samping 2 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid ya
33
54.1
54.1
54.1 tidak
28
45.9 45.9 100.0 Total
61 100.0 100.0
Efek samping 3 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid ya
21
34.4
34.4
34.4 tidak
40
65.6 65.6 100.0 Total
61 100.0 100.0
Efek samping 4 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid ya
55
31.1
31.1 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0Dukungan suami 1 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak
6
9.8
9.8
9.8 ya
90.2 90.2 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
68.9 ada keluhan
Dukungan suami 2
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid ya26
42.6
42.6
42.6 tidak
35
19
68.9
4
12
6.6
6.6
6.6 tidak
57
93.4 93.4 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Efek samping 5 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid ya
19.7
68.9
19.7
19.7 tidak
49
80.3 80.3 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Efek samping katagori Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid tidak ada keluhan
42
57.4 57.4 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Dukungan suami 3
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak4
6.6
6.6
6.6 ya
57
93.4 93.4 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Dukungan suami 4
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak28
45.9
45.9
45.9 ya
33
54.1 54.1 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Dukungan suami 5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak16
26.2
26.2
26.2 ya
45
73.8 73.8 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Dukungan suami 6 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid ya
40
65.6
65.6
65.6 tidak
21
34.4 34.4 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Dukungan suami 7 Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak
21
34.4
34.4
34.4 ya
40
65.6 65.6 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Dukungan suami 8
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak12
Dukungan suami katagori Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid mendukung
49
80.3
80.3
80.3 tidak mendukung
19.7 19.7 100.0 Total
61 100.0 100.0
29
Kelangsungan AKDR Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak droup out
49
80.3
80.3
80.3 droup out
12
47.5 47.5 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
52.5 ya
28
11
45.9
45.9
45.9 ya
33
54.1 54.1 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Dukungan suami 9
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak18.0
52.5
18.0
18.0 ya
50
82.0 82.0 100.0 Total 61 100.0 100.0
Dukungan suami 10
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak32
52.5
19.7 19.7 100.0 Total
61 100.0 100.0
Crosstabs Umur Katagori * Penggunaan AKDR
Crosstab
Kelangsungan AKDR Tidak droup out droup out Total Umur Katagori 21-39 TAHUN Count
49
11
60 % within Umur Katagori 81.7% 18.3% 100.0% % within Kelangsungan 100.0% 91.7% 98.4% AKDR % of Total 80.3% 18.0% 98.4%
<=20 DAN >=40 Count
1
1 TAHUN % within Umur Katagori .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Kelangsungan .0% 8.3% 1.6% AKDR % of Total .0% 1.6% 1.6%
Total Count
49
12
61 % within Umur Katagori 80.3% 19.7% 100.0% % within Kelangsungan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% AKDR % of Total 80.3% 19.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided) aPearson Chi-Square 4.151 1 .042 b
Continuity Correction .592 1 .442 Likelihood Ratio
3.321 1 .068 Fisher's Exact Test .197 .197 Linear-by-Linear Association 4.083
1 .043 b
N of Valid Cases
61 a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .20.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Paritas * Penggunaan AKDR Crosstab Kelangsungan AKDR Tidak droup out droup out Total
Paritas non-primipara Count
41
5
46 % within Paritas 89.1% 10.9% 100.0% % within Kelangsungan 83.7% 41.7% 75.4% AKDR % of Total 67.2% 8.2% 75.4% primipara Count
8
7
15 % within Paritas 53.3% 46.7% 100.0% % within Kelangsungan 16.3% 58.3% 24.6% AKDR % of Total 13.1% 11.5% 24.6%
Total Count
49
12
61 % within Paritas 80.3% 19.7% 100.0% % within Kelangsungan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% AKDR % of Total 80.3% 19.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided) a
Pearson Chi-Square 9.173 1 .002 b
Continuity Correction 7.047 1 .008 Likelihood Ratio 8.135 1 .004 Fisher's Exact Test
.006 .006 Linear-by-Linear Association 9.022 1 .003 b
N of Valid Cases
61 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.95.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Efek samping katagori * Penggunaan AKDR Crosstab Kelangsungan AKDR Tidak droup out droup out Total Efek samping katagori tidak ada keluhan Count
38
4
42 % within Efek samping 90.5% 9.5% 100.0% katagori
% within Kelangsungan 77.6% 33.3% 68.9% AKDR % of Total 62.3% 6.6% 68.9% ada keluhan Count
11
8
19 % within Efek samping 57.9% 42.1% 100.0% katagori
% within Kelangsungan 22.4% 66.7% 31.1% AKDR % of Total 18.0% 13.1% 31.1%
Total Count
49
12
61 % within Efek samping 80.3% 19.7% 100.0% katagori
% within Kelangsungan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% AKDR % of Total 80.3% 19.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided) aPearson Chi-Square 8.788 1 .003 b
Continuity Correction 6.847 1 .009 Likelihood Ratio 8.209 1 .004 Fisher's Exact Test
.006 .006 Linear-by-Linear Association 8.644 1 .003 b
N of Valid Cases
61 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.74.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Dukungan suami katagori * Penggunaan AKDR
Crosstab
Kelangsungan AKDR Tidak droup out droup out Total Dukungan suami katagori mendukung Count
41
8
49
% within Dukungan
83.7% 16.3% 100.0% suami katagori
% within Kelangsungan
83.7% 66.7% 80.3% AKDR % of Total 67.2% 13.1% 80.3% tidak mendukung Count8
4
12
% within Dukungan
66.7% 33.3% 100.0% suami katagori
% within Kelangsungan
16.3% 33.3% 19.7% AKDR % of Total 13.1% 6.6% 19.7%Total Count
49
12
61
% within Dukungan
80.3% 19.7% 100.0% suami katagori
% within Kelangsungan
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% AKDR % of Total 80.3% 19.7% 100.0%Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided) a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.764 1 .184 b
Continuity Correction .852 1 .356 Likelihood Ratio 1.600 1 .206 Fisher's Exact Test
.229 .176 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.735 1 .188 b
N of Valid Cases
61 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.36.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Logistic Regression Case Processing Summary a
Unweighted Cases N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 61 100.0 Missing Cases .0
Total 61 100.0 Unselected Cases .0 Total
61 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Internal Value Tidak droup out droup out
1 Block 0: Beginning Block
a,b
Classification Table
Predicted Kelangsungan AKDR Observed Tidak droup out droup out Percentage Correct Step 0 Kelangsungan AKDR Tidak droup out
49 100.0 droup out 12 .0 Overall Percentage
80.3 a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant -1.407 .322 19.080
1 .000 .245 Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables Umur 4.151 1 .042 Paritas 9.173 1 .002 EKAT 8.788 1 .003 DKAT 1.764 1 .184 Overall Statistics 19.968 4 .001
Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Wald) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 19.443
4 .001
Block 19.4434 .001
Model 19.4434 .001
aStep 2 Step -3.289
1 .070
Block 16.1533 .001
Model 16.1533 .001
aStep 3 Step -.395
1 .530
Block 15.7592 .000
Model 15.7592 .000
a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased from the previous step.
Model Summary Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square a
1 41.048 .273 .434 b
2 44.337 .233 .370 b
3 44.732 .228 .362
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.
b. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001. a
Classification Table
Predicted Kelangsungan AKDRObserved Tidak droup out droup out Percentage Correct Step 1 Kelangsungan AKDR Tidak droup out
47
2
95.9 droup out
7
5
41.7 Overall Percentage
85.2 Step 2 Kelangsungan AKDR Tidak droup out
47
2
95.9 droup out
8
4
33.3 Overall Percentage
83.6 Step 3 Kelangsungan AKDR Tidak droup out
47
2
95.9 droup out
8
4
33.3 Overall Percentage
83.6
a. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) a
Step 1 Umur 22.862 4.019E4 .000 1 1.000 8.486E9 Paritas 2.356 .838 7.910 1 .005 10.546 EKAT 1.665 .841 3.921 1 .048 5.286 DKAT .865 .924 .877 1 .349 2.376 Constant -3.324 .793 17.585 1 .000 .036 a
Step 2 Paritas 2.133 .805 7.022 1 .008 8.439 EKAT 1.922 .812 5.596 1 .018 6.833 DKAT .562 .887 .402 1 .526 1.755 Constant -3.145 .742 17.986 1 .000 .043 a
Step 3 Paritas 2.093 .796 6.922 1 .009 8.109 EKAT 2.049 .788 6.766 1 .009 7.764 Constant -3.047 .712 18.332 1 .000 .048 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Umur, Paritas, EKAT, DKAT.
Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig. a
Step 2 Variables Umur 3.709 1 .054 Overall Statistics 3.709 1 .054 b
Step 3 Variables Umur 2.899 1 .089 DKAT .406 1 .524 Overall Statistics 3.746 2 .154 a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: Umur.