Perbandingan Hasil Perawatan Maloklusi Klas I Dengan Pencabutan dan Tanpa Pencabutan Menggunakan Grading System ABO

DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Foster TD. Buku ajar ortodonsi edisi III. Jakarta: EGC. 1993;32-39.
2. Rahardjo P. Ortodonti dasar. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press,
2009; 198-204.
3. Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd ed., New Delhi: Jaypee,
2007; 65, 94-5, 100-9, 112-5, 119-20, 160, 163, 170-2, 648-653,
655-8.
4. Dewanto H. Aspek-aspek epidemiologi maloklusi. Yogyakarta:
Gadjah Mada University Press, 1993; 135-50,167-75.
5. Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontics: current principles and
techniques. 3rd ed., Missouri: Mosby, 2000; 4, 7, 17-9.
6. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics the art and science. 3rd ed., New Delhi:
Arya (MEDI) Pubhishing House, 2003; 63, 66-9, 115, 143-4, 151-7,
239, 242-3, 245-6.
7. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th Ed., Mosby
Inc., St. Louis, 2000; 5-16,151-8, 218–20, 282–3.
8. Bishara

SE.

Textbook

of

orthodontics.USA:W.B

Saunders

Company,2001;103-4
9. Sayin MO, Turkkahraman H. Malocclusion and crowding in an
orthodontically referred Turkish population. Angle Orthodontist,
2004; 74(5): 635-9.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

10. Matya M, Brudvik P, AstrØm AN. Prevalence of malocclusion and
its relationship with socio-demographic factors, dental caries, and
oral hygiene in 12 to 14 year old Tanzanian schoolchildren. Euro J
of Orthod, 2009 (31): 467-76.
11. Aldrees AM. Pattern of skeletal and dental malocclusions in Saudi
orthodontic patients. Saudi Med J, 2012 33(3): 315-20.

12. Wahab R, Idris H, Yacob H. Cephalometric and malocclusion
analysis of Kadazan Dusun Ethnic orthodontic patients. Sains
Malaysiana, 2013; 42(1): 25-32.
13. Farhadiani N, Miresmaeili AF, Soltani MK. Comparison of
extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment using the
Objective Grading System .Tehran Dent J, 2005;2(3): 91-5.
14. Al-Duliamy MJ. Orthodontic treatment of Class I malocclusion
with severe crowding without extraction of any sound erupted tooth
- A case report. General Med, 2015 3(2): 1-4.
15. Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL. Maxwell R.The decision to
extraction: part 1. interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofac
Orthop, 1996 109(3):297-309.
16. Gianelly AA. Arch width after extraction & nonextraction treatment.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2003123(1):25-8.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

17. Ismail SF, Moss JP, Hennessy R. Three dimensional assessment of
the effects of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on
the face. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2002 121(3):244-56.

18. Firestone AR, Hsler RU, Ingervall B. Treatment results in dental
school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993, Angle Orthod ,
1997;69(1): 19-26.
19. Soltani M, Saedi B, Mohammadi Z. Outcome of MBT and standard
Edgewise techniques in Treating Class I malocclusion. American J
Dent Res, 2012; 4(2):61-5.
20. Kattner PF, Schneider BJ. Comparison of Roth appliance and
standard Edgewise appliance treatment results. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop, 1993;103:24-32.
21. Dyken, RA, Sadowsky P.L, Hurst D. Orthodontics outcomes
assessment using the peer assessment rating index. Angle Orthod,
2001;71(3):164-9.
22. Shaw WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD. The use of occlusal indices: a
European perspective. Am J Orthod. Dentofac Orthop, 1995; 107
(1):1-10.
23. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R,
Stephens CD, et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer
Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Euro J of Orthod
1992;14:125-39.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

24. The American Board of Orthodontics. ABO objective grading
system

for

dental

casts

and

panoramic

radiographs.

. (25 Oktober 2015).
25. Wirtz BR. ABO objective grading system based on clinical
photography.

. (25
oktober 2015)
26. Fox NA, Daniels C, Gilgrass T. A Comparison of The Index of
Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) with The Peer Assessment
Rating (PAR) and The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need
(IOTN). Br Dent J 2002; 193 :225-30.
27. Premkumar S. Orthodontics prep manual for undergraduates. New
Delhi: Elsevier, 2008; 436-40.
28. Firestone AR, Beck M, Beglin F, Vig KWL. Evaluation of The Peer
Assessment Rating (PAR) Index as an Index of Orthodontic
treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2002;122:463-9.
29. Europian Federation of Orthodontic Specialists. Orthodontic
treatment

complexity,

need

and

outcome.

<

.(25 Oktober
2015).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

30. Anthoupoulou C, Konstantonis D, Makou M. Treatment outcomes
after retraction and non retraction treatment evaluated with the
American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J
Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 20014 146 (6):717-23.
31. Mislik B, Konstantonis D, Katsadouris A, Eliades T. University
clinic and private oractice treatment outcomes in Class I extraction
and nonextraction patients: a comparative study with the American
Board of Orthosontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop, 20016 149 (2):253-8.
32. Campbell CL, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, Qi R. Treatment
outcomes in a graduateorthodontic clinic for cases defined by the

American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories. Am J
Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007132:822-9.
33. Pinskaya YB, Hsieh TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK. Comprehensive
clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate
orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2004 126:53343
34. Yang-Powers LC, Sadowsky C, Rosenstein S, BeGole EA.
Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the
American Board of Orthodontics grading system. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop 2002 122:451-5.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

35. Xu TM, Liu Y, Yang MZ, Huang W. Comparison of extraction
versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline
Chinese patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006 129:672-7.

Universitas Sumatera Utara