Lampiran 1 KUESIONER PENELITIAN Hubungan Kondisi Fisik Rumah dan Pekerjaan Dengan Kejadian TB Paru di Kelurahan Bandar Khalipah Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan Tahun 2015
Lampiran 1
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
Hubungan Kondisi Fisik Rumah dan Pekerjaan Dengan Kejadian TB Parudi Kelurahan Bandar Khalipah Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan Tahun 2015
No Responden : Tanggal Wawancara : A. Data Responden
a. Nama Responden :
b. Status Responden : a. Kasus
b. Kontrol
c. Jenis Kelamin :
d. Umur : ................ tahun
e. Alamat :
f. Jumlah Anggota Keluarga :
B. Sosial Ekonomi Responden
a. Pekerjaan :
1. Tidak bekerja
2. Bekerja
b. Masa kerja...............tahun
C. Kondisi Fisik Rumah
1. Kepadatan hunian rumah .........................................................m²/orang
2. Luas Ventilasi rumah................................................................. m²
3. Pencahayaan ruang tamu
1. Tidak 2. Ya
4. Berapa kelembaban udara .............................................................%
5. Apakah kondisi Lantai....................................................tdk kedap air/
kedap airNo NR SR JK Umur Pekerjaan Kepadatan Ventilasi Cahaya Kelembaban Lantai
1
1
1
2
16 Nani
1
2
48
1
1
1
2
2
1
17 Mardan
1
1
44
1
1
1
1
1
1
18 Linda
2
1
2
2
1
1
13 Tio
1
1
35
1
1
1
1
1
14 Misna
43
1
2
63
2
1
1
2
1
2
15 M Syafii
1
1
1
40
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
22 Rudi H
1
1
47
1
1
1
2
1
2
23 Boymin
1
1
40
1
1
1
1
1
42
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
19 Mahadi
1
1
23
2
1
1
21 Soekardi
1
2
20 Wika
1
2
25
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1 Dermawan
1
1
2
28
2
1
1
2
1
2
5 Mala
1
22
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
6 Pratiwi
1
2
20
2
2
4 Dewi
1
1
17
1
1
68
1
1
1
1
1
1 2 wiwik
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3 Bahari
1
1
45
1
1
1
2
1
1
11 Maimunah
2
10 Rani
1
2
47
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
62
2
1
2
1
1
2
12 Surianto
1
1
52
1
1
2
1
7 Ratih
1
2
26
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Sarman
1
2
75
1
1
2
2
1
2
9 Aris S
1
1
20
2
1 Universitas Sumatera Utara
24 Ramadani
2
28
1
2
1
1
2
2
40 Dermawan
2
1
68
1
2
2
2
2
1
41 Abdul L
2
1
26
1
2
2
2
2
1
39 Jemakun
42 Yunita
2
50
1
2
1
2
2
2
37 Sinta
2
2
31
2
1
1
2
1
2
38 Mahmud
2
1
50
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
32
2
2
1
2
2
2
46 Rusli
2
1
42
1
1
2
2
1
1
47 M Rifai
2
1
25
2
2
1
2
1
2
45 Tia
2
2
21
2
2
2
1
1
2
43 Agustina
2
2
45
1
2
1
2
1
2
44 Sulis
2
2
51
1
2
2
2
2
1
36 Rawawi
1
1
1
36
1
1
1
1
2
2
28 Eriyadi
1
1
47
2
27 Zainal
1
1
1
2
29 Junaidi
1
1
45
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
28
1
1
1
1
1
1
25 Tari L
1
2
20
1
1
1
1
2
2
26 Yusni
1
2
40
2
1
2
1
1
30 Saprizal
1
2
25
2
2
1
2
1
1
34 Hayati
2
2
20
2
1
2
1
2
2
35 Susan
2
2
28
2
2
2
2
2
2
33 Mariani
1
2
1
32
1
2
1
1
1
2
31 Iyet
2
2
40
2
2
2
2
1
1
32 Maysarah
2
2
39
2
2
2
1
1
2 Universitas Sumatera Utara
48 Paimun
1
1
2
17
1
2
57 Rusli
1
1
2
2
2
1
55
2
2
56 Saipul A
1
2
1
1
2
1
59
2
2
55 Asmuni
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
42
1
2
60 Zulkifli
1
2
2
1
1
2
41
1
2
59 Junardi
1
2
2
2
2
2
19
1
2
58 M Yugo
1
2
2
2
51 Rina
2
2
1
2
1
1
59
2
2
50 Yani
1
1
2
2
2
2
75
2
2
49 Sakinah
1
2
2
1
2
1
52
1
2
20
1
53 Marina
75
2
2
54 Mona
1
1
2
2
2
1
50
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
44
2
2
52 Wati
2
2
2
2
2
2 Universitas Sumatera Utara Lampiran 3 Output Penelitian Pekerjaan Responden * Status Responden Crosstabulation
Status Responden Kasus Kontrol Total Pekerjaan Tidak bekerja Count
18
17
35 Responden Expected Count 17,5 17,5 35,0 % within Pekerjaan 51,4% 48,6% 100,0% Responden % within Status 60,0% 56,7% 58,3% Responden % of Total 30,0% 28,3% 58,3% Bekerja Count
12
13
25 Expected Count 12,5 12,5 25,0 % within Pekerjaan 48,0% 52,0% 100,0% Responden % within Status 40,0% 43,3% 41,7% Responden % of Total 20,0% 21,7% 41,7%
Total Count
30
30
60 Expected Count 30,0 30,0 60,0 % within Pekerjaan 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Responden % within Status 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Responden % of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided) a Pearson Chi-Square ,069 b 1 ,793 Continuity Correction ,000
1 1,000 Likelihood Ratio ,069 1 ,793 Fisher's Exact Test
1,000 ,500 Linear-by-Linear ,067 1 ,795 Association
N of Valid Cases
60 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan 1,147 ,411 3,204 Responden (Tidak bekerja / Bekerja) For cohort Status 1,071 ,637 1,802 Responden = Kasus For cohort Status ,934 ,562 1,552 Responden = Kontrol N of Valid Cases
60
Kepadatan Hunian Responden * Status Responden Crosstabulation Status Responden
Kasus Kontrol Total Kepadatan Hunian Tidak memenuhi Count
24
4
28 Responden syarat Expected Count 14,0 14,0 28,0 % within Kepadatan 85,7% 14,3% 100,0% Hunian Responden % within Status 80,0% 13,3% 46,7%
Responden
% of Total 40,0% 6,7% 46,7% Memenuhi syarat Count6
26
32 Expected Count 16,0 16,0 32,0 % within Kepadatan 18,8% 81,3% 100,0% Hunian Responden % within Status 20,0% 86,7% 53,3%
Responden
% of Total 10,0% 43,3% 53,3%Total Count
30
30
60 Expected Count 30,0 30,0 60,0 % within Kepadatan 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Hunian Responden % within Status 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Responden
% of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided) a Pearson Chi-Square 26,786 b 1 ,000 Continuity Correction 24,174
1 ,000 Likelihood Ratio 29,326 1 ,000 Fisher's Exact Test
,000 ,000 Linear-by-Linear 26,339 1 ,000 Association
N of Valid Cases
60 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kepadatan 26,000 6,532 103,498 Hunian Responden (Tidak memenuhi syarat / Memenuhi syarat) For cohort Status 4,571 2,188 9,552 Responden = Kasus For cohort Status ,176 ,070 ,442 Responden = Kontrol N of Valid Cases
60
Luas Ventilasi Rumah Responden * Status Responden Crosstabulation Status Responden
Kasus Kontrol Total Luas Ventilasi Rumah Tidak memenuhi Count
23
11
34 Responden syarat Expected Count 17,0 17,0 34,0 % within Luas 67,6% 32,4% 100,0% Ventilasi Rumah
Responden
% within Status 76,7% 36,7% 56,7%Responden
% of Total 38,3% 18,3% 56,7%Memenuhi syarat Count
7
19
26 Expected Count 13,0 13,0 26,0 % within Luas 26,9% 73,1% 100,0% Ventilasi Rumah
Responden
% within Status 23,3% 63,3% 43,3%Responden
% of Total 11,7% 31,7% 43,3% Total Count30
30
60 Expected Count 30,0 30,0 60,0 % within Luas 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Ventilasi Rumah
Responden
% within Status 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%Responden
% of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided) a Pearson Chi-Square 9,774 b 1 ,002 Continuity Correction 8,213
1 ,004 Likelihood Ratio 10,082 1 ,001 Fisher's Exact Test
,004 ,002 Linear-by-Linear 9,611 1 ,002 Association
N of Valid Cases
60 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kepadatan 26,000 6,532 103,498 Hunian Responden (Tidak memenuhi syarat / Memenuhi syarat) For cohort Status 4,571 2,188 9,552 Responden = Kasus For cohort Status ,176 ,070 ,442 Responden = Kontrol N of Valid Cases
60
Pencahayaan * Status Responden Crosstabulation Status Responden Kasus Kontrol Total
Pencahayaa Tidak memenuhi Count
23
7
30 n syarat Expected Count 15,0 15,0 30,0 % within Pencahayaan 76,7% 23,3% 100,0% % within Status 76,7% 23,3% 50,0% Responden % of Total 38,3% 11,7% 50,0% Memenuhi syarat Count
7
23
30 Expected Count 15,0 15,0 30,0 % within Pencahayaan 23,3% 76,7% 100,0% % within Status 23,3% 76,7% 50,0% Responden % of Total 11,7% 38,3% 50,0% Total Count
30
30
60 Expected Count 30,0 30,0 60,0 % within Pencahayaan 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% % within Status 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Responden % of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided) a Pearson Chi-Square 17,067 b 1 ,000 Continuity Correction 15,000
1 ,000 Likelihood Ratio 17,985 1 ,000 Fisher's Exact Test
,000 ,000 Linear-by-Linear 16,782 1 ,000 Association
N of Valid Cases
60 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for 10,796 3,263 35,718 Pencahayaan (Tidak memenuhi syarat / Memenuhi syarat) For cohort Status 3,286 1,668 6,473 Responden = Kasus For cohort Status ,304 ,154 ,600 Responden = Kontrol N of Valid Cases
60
Kelembaban Udara * Status Responden Crosstabulation Status Responden Kasus Kontrol Total
Kelembaban Tidak memenuhi Count
27
14
41 Udara syarat Expected Count 20,5 20,5 41,0 % within Kelembaban 65,9% 34,1% 100,0% Udara % within Status 90,0% 46,7% 68,3% Responden % of Total 45,0% 23,3% 68,3% Memenuhi syarat Count
3
16
19 Expected Count 9,5 9,5 19,0 % within Kelembaban 15,8% 84,2% 100,0% Udara % within Status 10,0% 53,3% 31,7% Responden % of Total 5,0% 26,7% 31,7%
Total Count
30
30
60 Expected Count 30,0 30,0 60,0 % within Kelembaban 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Udara % within Status 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Responden % of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided) a Pearson Chi-Square 13,017 b 1 ,000 Continuity Correction 11,091
1 ,001 Likelihood Ratio 13,959 1 ,000 Fisher's Exact Test
,001 ,000 Linear-by-Linear 12,800 1 ,000 Association
N of Valid Cases
60 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kelembaban 10,286 2,557 41,372 Udara (Tidak memenuhi syarat / Memenuhi syarat) For cohort Status 4,171 1,443 12,057 Responden = Kasus For cohort Status ,405 ,254 ,647 Responden = Kontrol N of Valid Cases
60 Kondisi Lantai * Status Responden Crosstabulation Status Responden Kasus Kontrol Total Kondisi Lantai Tidak kedap air Count
10
15
25 Expected Count 12,5 12,5 25,0 % within Kondisi Lantai 40,0% 60,0% 100,0% % within Status 33,3% 50,0% 41,7% Responden % of Total 16,7% 25,0% 41,7% Kedap air Count
20
15
35 Expected Count 17,5 17,5 35,0 % within Kondisi Lantai 57,1% 42,9% 100,0% % within Status 66,7% 50,0% 58,3% Responden % of Total 33,3% 25,0% 58,3% Total Count
30
30
60 Expected Count 30,0 30,0 60,0 % within Kondisi Lantai 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% % within Status 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Responden % of Total 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided) a Pearson Chi-Square 1,714 b 1 ,190 Continuity Correction 1,097
1 ,295 Likelihood Ratio 1,724 1 ,189 Fisher's Exact Test
,295 ,147 Linear-by-Linear 1,686 1 ,194 Association
N of Valid Cases
60 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kondisi ,500 ,176 1,419 Lantai (Tidak kedap air / Kedap air) For cohort Status ,700 ,400 1,225 Responden = Kasus For cohort Status 1,400 ,850 2,305 Responden = Kontrol N of Valid Cases
60 Lampiran 4 Dokumentasi Penelitian
Gambar 1. Kondisi rumah responden
Gambar 2. Kondisi rumah responden Gambar 3. Peneliti melakukan pengukuran ventilasi
Gambar Lampiran 3. Kondisi fisik rumah Gambar Lampiran 4. Peneliti bersama responden Gambar 5. Alat pengukuran kelembaban dan ventilasi yaitu hygrometer dan meteran Lampiran 5
Surat Izin Penelitian Lampiran 6 Surat Selesai Penelitian