II. DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA 1. Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar 2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda NO ITEM PERTANYAAN

  Lampiran 2

KUESIONER

PENGARUH DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA TERHADAP

AKSEPTABILITAS DAN PEMANFAATAN PUSAT INFORMASI

  

KONSELING REMAJA (PIK REMAJA) PADA SISWA

SMU NEGRI 2 KOTA TANJUNG BALAI

TAHUN 2015

  I. KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN 1. : Usia 2. : Jenis Kelamin

  3. YA TIDAK Apakah anda memiliki teman sekelompok :

  II. DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA 1.

  Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar

2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan

  sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda NO

ITEM PERTANYAAN YA TIDAK

  1. Seluruh teman dalam kelompok saya memiliki jenis kelamin yang sama dengan saya

  2. Saya dan teman kelompok memiliki hobi yang sama

  3. Saya berbagi cerita, informasi dan pengalaman pribadi dengan teman kelompok saya

  4. Saya selalu meluangkan waktu untuk teman kelompok saya

  5. Teman kelompok tidak pernah memanfaatkan layanan konseling remaja di sekolah

  6. Semua anggota di kelompok teman saya sudah memiliki pacar

  7. Memiliki kelompok teman sebaya merupakan hal yang membanggakan bagi saya

  8. Saya lebih senang mendengarkan nasihat teman kelompok bila dibandingkan dengan guru dan orang tua

  9. Perilaku saya dipengaruhi oleh teman kelompok

  10. Semakin banyak teman semakin besar pengaruhnya terhadap perilaku saya

  11. Guru di sekolah sangat baik terhadap saya

  12. Setiap selesai memberikan pelajaran, guru selalu meyarankan kami agar mengikuti kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh PIK remaja

  13. Guru ikut mendukung kegiatan yang dibuat oleh konselor di PIK remaja

  14. Guru ikut membantu untuk mengkoordinir siswa setiap mengikuti kegiatan sosialisasi PIK remaja

  15. Guru selalu dilibatkan oleh pihak sekolah dalam membantu siswa untuk mendapatkan informasi tentang kesehatan reproduksi

  16. Sebaiknya guru yang menjadi konselor di sekolah 17. semua guru selalu mendukung kegiatan PIK remaja

18. Saya dekat dengan semua guru

  19. Ada seorang guru yang menjadi tempat curhat saya 20. saya lebih senang curhat dengan guru atau dengan konselor dari PIK remaja

III. AKSEPTABILITAS TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH 1.

  Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar 2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda.

  NO

ITEM PERTANYAAN YA TIDAK

  1. Ruangan layanan PIK remaja disekolah seharusnya tertutup agar tidak diketahui orang lain.

  2. Ruangan layanan PIK REMAJA disekolah sebaiknya ditata dengan bersih dan nyaman

  3. Ruangan untuk konsultasi sebaiknya dibuat tersendiri agar tidak didengar orang lain.

  4. Pemberi pelayanan konsultasi sebaiknya teman sebaya (peer group)

  5. Saya merasa malu untuk datang ke PIK REMAJA

  6. Saya merasa takut menjadi bahan ejekan teman atau orang lain yang saya kenal, apabila saya meminta pelayanan kesehatan reproduksi di sekolah

  7. Saya lebih senang jika petugas pemberi layanan berjenis kelamin sama dengan saya

  8. Petugas pemberi layanan sebaiknya seorang guru

  9. Petugas sebaiknya mendengarkan dengan penuh perhatian saat saya menyampaikan masalah yang saya hadapi.

10. Waktu dalam konsultasi sebaiknya tidak dibatasi

IV. PEMANFAATAN TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH 1.

  Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar 2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda.

  NO

ITEM PERTANYAAN YA TIDAK

  1. Apakah anda mengetahui bahwa di sekolah anda memiliki PIK REMAJA?

  2. Pernahkah anda berkunjung dan berkonsultasi pada petugas di PIK REMAJA?

  3. Apakah anda membutuhkan pelayanan konseling kesehatan reproduksi?

  4. Apakah keberadaan PIK REMAJA di sekolah dapat membantu siswa dalam memberikan informasi kesehatan reproduksi?

  5. Apakah pelayanan yang anda terima dari petugas PIK REMAJA sudah baik?

  6. Apakah semua materi tentang kesehatan reproduksi yang siswa butuhkan dapat diberikan oleh petugas PIK REMAJA?

  7. Apakah terdapat masalah pada saat anda melakukan konsultasi pada petugas di PIK REMAJA?

8. Apakah tempat melakukan konseling nyaman?

  9. Apakah PIK REMAJA juga memberikan informas itentang kesehatan reproduksi melalui media cetak (brosur, leaflet, booklet, buku

• – buku bacaan)?

  10. Apakah PIK REMAJA memberikan informasi juga melalui diskusi kelompok (peer group)?

  Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Reliability Dukungan Guru Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid

  30 100.0 Excluded a

  

.0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .891

  10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N g1 .77 .430

  30 g2 .80 .407 30 g3 .77 .430 30 g4 .70 .466 30 g5 .70 .466 30 g6 .70 .466 30 g7 .77 .430 30 g8 .83 .379 30 g9 .67 .479 30 g10 .70 .466

  30

  Item-Total Statistics Corrected Item- Cronbach's Scale Mean if Scale Variance Total Alpha if Item

  Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted g1 6.63 8.171 .629 .880 g2 6.60 8.662 .449 .892 g3 6.63 8.171 .629 .880 g4 6.70 7.941 .664 .878 g5 6.70 7.941 .664 .878 g6 6.70 8.010 .635 .880 g7 6.63 8.171 .629 .880 g8 6.57 8.323 .657 .879 g9 6.73 7.582 .792 .868 g10 6.70 8.217 .550 .886

  Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 7.40 9.903 3.147

  10 Reliability Dukungan Teman Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .843

  10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N t1 .73 .450

  30 t2 .37 .490 30 t3 .33 .479 30 t4 .07 .254 30 t5 .20 .407 30 t6 .27 .450 30 t7 .53 .507 30 t8 .43 .504 30 t9 .40 .498 30 t10 .40 .498

  30 Item-Total Statistics Cronbach's Scale Mean if Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Alpha if Item

  Item Deleted Item Deleted Total Correlation Deleted t1 3.00 7.172 .573 .825 t2 3.37 7.137 .526 .830 t3 3.40 6.731 .721 .810 t4 3.67 8.092 .414 .840 t5 3.53 7.499 .489 .833 t6 3.47 7.430 .458 .836 t7 3.20 6.648 .706 .811 t8 3.30 7.252 .460 .837 t9 3.33 7.126 .518 .831 t10 3.33 7.057 .547 .828

  Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 3.73 8.754 2.959

  10 Reliability Akseptabilitas Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .817

  10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N a1 .27 .450

  

30

a2 .33 .479

30

a3 .10 .305

30

a4 .30 .466

30

a5 .10 .305

30

a6 .23 .430

30

a7 .27 .450

30

a8 .23 .430

30

a9 .30 .466

30

a10 .40 .498

  

30

  Item-Total Statistics Corrected Item- Cronbach's Scale Mean if Scale Variance Total Alpha if Item

  Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted a1 2.27 5.720 .541 .796 a2 2.20 5.407 .650 .783 a3 2.43 6.323 .436 .808 a4 2.23 5.702 .524 .798 a5 2.43 6.323 .436 .808 a6 2.30 5.734 .566 .794 a7 2.27 5.995 .403 .811 a8 2.30 5.872 .493 .802 a9 2.23 5.633 .558 .794 a10 2.13 5.844 .412 .812

  Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 2.53 7.085 2.662

  10 Reliability Pemanfaatan Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0 a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .863

  10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N p1 .50 .509

  30 p2 .33 .479 30 p3 .77 .430 30 p4 .43 .504 30 p5 .43 .504 30 p6 .13 .346 30 p7 .10 .305 30 p8 .07 .254 30 p9 .10 .305 30 p10 .07 .254

  30 Item-Total Statistics Cronbach's Scale Mean if Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Alpha if Item

  Item Deleted Item Deleted Total Correlation Deleted p1 2.43 5.840 .463 .864 p2 2.60 5.766 .539 .855 p3 2.17 6.075 .461 .860 p4 2.50 5.362 .694 .839 p5 2.50 5.431 .661 .843 p6 2.80 5.890 .732 .839 p7 2.83 6.213 .612 .849 p8 2.87 6.464 .549 .855 p9 2.83 6.075 .711 .843 p10 2.87 6.395 .606 .852

  Scale Statistics Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 2.93 7.237 2.690

  10 Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat Karakteristik Responden usia

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 16

  65

  33.5

  33.5

  33.5 17 121

  62.4

  62.4

  95.9

  18

  8

  4.1 4.1 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 sex

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Laki-laki

  72

  37.1

  37.1

  37.1 Perempuan 122

  62.9 62.9 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 T_kelompok

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak

  76

  39.2

  39.2

  39.2 Ya 118

  60.8 60.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  Dukungan Guru Frequency Table g1 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 127

  44.8 Ya 107

  44.8

  44.8

  87

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  34.5 34.5 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 g4

  67

  65.5 Ya

  65.5

  65.5

  59.8 59.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 g3

  Percent Valid Tidak 119

  40.2 Ya 116

  40.2

  40.2

  78

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  38.7 38.7 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 g2

  75

  61.3 Ya

  61.3

  61.3

  55.2 55.2 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g5 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  44.3 Ya 108

  44.3

  44.3

  86

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  65.5 65.5 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 g8

  34.5 Ya 127

  34.5

  34.5

  67

  61.9 61.9 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 g7

  Percent Valid Tidak 111

  38.1 Ya 120

  38.1

  38.1

  74

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  42.8 42.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 g6

  83

  57.2 Ya

  57.2

  57.2

  55.7 55.7 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g9 Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid Tidak

  80

  41.2

  41.2

  41.2 Ya 114

  58.8 58.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 g10

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak

  95

  49.0

  49.0

  49.0 Ya

  99

  51.0 51.0 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 Kat_guru

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Kurang 106

  54.6

  54.6

  54.6 Baik

  88

  45.4 45.4 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 Dukungan Teman Frequency Table t1

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak

  61

  31.4

  31.4

  31.4 Ya 133

  68.6 68.6 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  t2 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 118

  93

  52.1 Ya

  52.1

  52.1

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 101

  39.2 39.2 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 t5

  76

  60.8 Ya

  60.8

  60.8

  50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 t4

  Percent Valid Tidak 110

  97

  50.0 Ya

  50.0

  50.0

  97

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  43.3 43.3 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 t3

  84

  56.7 Ya

  56.7

  56.7

  47.9 47.9 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  t6 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 123

  66

  66.0 Ya

  66.0

  66.0

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 128

  36.6 36.6 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 t9

  71

  63.4 Ya

  63.4

  63.4

  41.2 41.2 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 t8

  Percent Valid Tidak 126

  80

  58.8 Ya

  58.8

  58.8

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 114

  35.1 35.1 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 t7

  68

  64.9 Ya

  64.9

  64.9

  34.0 34.0 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  t10 Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid Tidak 132

  68.0

  68.0

  68.0 Ya

  62

  32.0 32.0 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 Kat_teman

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Kurang 133

  68.6

  68.6

  68.6 Baik

  61

  31.4 31.4 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 Akseptabilitas Frequency Table a1

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak

  49

  25.3

  25.3

  25.3 Ya 145

  74.7 74.7 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 a2

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 109

  56.2

  56.2

  56.2 Ya

  85

  43.8 43.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  a3 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  65

  66.5 Ya

  66.5

  66.5

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 129

  54.6 54.6 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 a6

  45.4 Ya 106

  45.4

  45.4

  88

  52.6 52.6 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 a5

  Percent Valid Tidak

  47.4 Ya 102

  47.4

  47.4

  92

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  75.3 75.3 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 a4

  24.7 Ya 146

  24.7

  24.7

  48

  33.5 33.5 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  a7 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 145

  48

  75.3 Ya

  75.3

  75.3

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 146

  25.3 25.3 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 a10

  49

  74.7 Ya

  74.7

  74.7

  26.8 26.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 a9

  Percent Valid Tidak 141

  52

  73.2 Ya

  73.2

  73.2

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 142

  27.3 27.3 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 a8

  53

  72.7 Ya

  72.7

  72.7

  24.7 24.7 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  akseptabilitas Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid Tidak menerima 132

  68.0

  68.0

  68.0 Menerima

  62

  32.0 32.0 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 Pemanfaatan Frequency Table p1

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak

  81

  41.8

  41.8

  41.8 Ya 113

  58.2 58.2 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 p2

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak

  98

  50.5

  50.5

  50.5 Ya

  96

  49.5 49.5 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 p3

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak

  95

  49.0

  49.0

  49.0 Ya

  99

  51.0 51.0 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  p4 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 109

  94

  51.5 Ya

  51.5

  51.5

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 100

  43.8 43.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 p7

  85

  56.2 Ya

  56.2

  56.2

  58.8 58.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 p6

  Percent Valid Tidak

  41.2 Ya 114

  41.2

  41.2

  80

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  52.1 52.1 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 p5

  47.9 Ya 101

  47.9

  47.9

  93

  48.5 48.5 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  p8 Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid Tidak

  84

  43.3

  43.3

  43.3 Ya 110

  56.7 56.7 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 p9

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 104

  53.6

  53.6

  53.6 Ya

  90

  46.4 46.4 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0 p10

  Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Tidak

  87

  44.8

  44.8

  44.8 Ya 107

  55.2 55.2 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

pemanfaatan

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Tidak memanfaatkan 104

  53.6

  53.6

  53.6 Memanfaatkan

  

90

  46.4 46.4 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat Crosstabs Kat_teman * akseptabilitas

Crosstab

akseptabilitas Total Tidak menerima Menerima

  Kat_teman Kurang Count

  91 42 133 % within Kat_teman 68.4% 31.6% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 68.9% 67.7% 68.6% % of Total 46.9% 21.6% 68.6%

  Baik Count

  41

  20

  61 % within Kat_teman 67.2% 32.8% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 31.1% 32.3% 31.4% % of Total 21.1% 10.3% 31.4%

  Total Count 132 62 194 % within Kat_teman 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig.

  (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .028 a

  1 .867 Continuity Correction b

  .000 1 .999 Likelihood Ratio .028 1 .867 Fisher's Exact Test

  .870 .496 Linear-by-Linear Association .028

  1 .867 N of Valid Cases b

  194 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,49.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Kat_guru * akseptabilitas

Crosstab

akseptabilitas Total Tidak menerima Menerima

  Kat_guru Kurang Count

  82 24 106 % within Kat_guru 77.4% 22.6% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 62.1% 38.7% 54.6% % of Total 42.3% 12.4% 54.6%

  Baik Count

  50

  38

  88 % within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 37.9% 61.3% 45.4% % of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4%

  Total Count 132 62 194 % within Kat_guru 68.0% 32.0% 100.0% % within akseptabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig.

  (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.329 a

  1 .002 Continuity Correction b

  8.408 1 .004 Likelihood Ratio 9.352 1 .002 Fisher's Exact Test

  .003 .002 Linear-by-Linear Association 9.281

  1 .002 N of Valid Cases b

  194 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,12.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Kat_teman * pemanfaatan

Crosstab

pemanfaatan Total

  Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Kat_teman Kurang Count

  78 55 133 % within Kat_teman 58.6% 41.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 75.0% 61.1% 68.6% % of Total 40.2% 28.4% 68.6%

  Baik Count

  26

  35

  61 % within Kat_teman 42.6% 57.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 25.0% 38.9% 31.4% % of Total 13.4% 18.0% 31.4%

  Total Count 104 90 194 % within Kat_teman 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig.

  (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.317 a

  1 .038 Continuity Correction b

  3.697 1 .055 Likelihood Ratio 4.319 1 .038 Fisher's Exact Test

  .044 .027 Linear-by-Linear Association 4.295

  1 .038 N of Valid Cases b

  194 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,30.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Kat_guru * pemanfaatan

Crosstab

pemanfaatan Total

  (2-sided) Exact Sig.

  194 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 40,82.

  1 .415 N of Valid Cases b

  .470 .251 Linear-by-Linear Association .664

  .452 1 .501 Likelihood Ratio .668 1 .414 Fisher's Exact Test

  1 .414 Continuity Correction b

  (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square .667 a

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig.

  Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan Kat_guru Kurang Count

  Total Count 104 90 194 % within Kat_guru 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%

  88 % within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 48.1% 42.2% 45.4% % of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4%

  38

  50

  Baik Count

  54 52 106 % within Kat_guru 50.9% 49.1% 100.0% % within pemanfaatan 51.9% 57.8% 54.6% % of Total 27.8% 26.8% 54.6%

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Correlations Correlations gtot ttot atot ptot

• gtot Pearson Correlation

  1 .060 .299 -.007 Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .000 .922 N 194 194 194 194

• ttot Pearson Correlation .060

  1 -.037 .335 Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .609 .000 N 194 194 194 194

• atot Pearson Correlation .299 -.037

  1 -.029 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .609 .688 N 194 194 194 194

• ptot Pearson Correlation -.007 .335 -.029

  1 Sig. (2-tailed) .922 .000 .688 N 194 194 194 194

• . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

  Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat Uji Normalitas Data NPar Tests One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test ttot gtot atot ptot N

  194 194 194 194 a

  Normal Parameters Mean

  4.23

  5.23

  4.39

  5.22 Std. Deviation 2.508 2.238 2.348 2.934 Most Extreme Absolute .086 .088 .089 .092 Differences Positive .086 .088 .086 .081

  Negative -.075 -.088 -.089 -.092 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.196 1.224 1.243 1.279 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .114 .100 .091 .076 a. Test distribution is Normal.

  Multivariat Regression b Variables Entered/Removed Variables Variables Model Entered Removed Method a

  1 ttot, gtot . Enter a. All requested variables entered.

  b. Dependent Variable: atot Model Summary

  Adjusted R Std. Error of Model R R Square Square the Estimate a

  1 .304 .093 .083 2.248

  a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

  b ANOVA Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. a

  1 Regression 98.579 2 49.289 9.751 .000 Residual 965.427 191 5.055 Total 1064.005 193

  a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

  b. Dependent Variable: atot a

  

Coefficients

Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

  Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 2.943 .482 6.110 .000

gtot .318 .072 .303 4.384 .000 ttot -.052 .065 -.055 -.798 .426

  a. Dependent Variable: atot Regression b Variables Entered/Removed

  Variables Variables Model Entered Removed Method a

  1 ttot, gtot . Enter a. All requested variables entered.

  b. Dependent Variable: ptot Model Summary

  Adjusted R Std. Error of Model R R Square Square the Estimate a

  1 .336 .113 .104 2.777

  a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

  ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

  1 Regression 188.055 2 94.027 12.189 .000 a

  Residual 1473.414 191 7.714 Total 1661.469 193 a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

  b. Dependent Variable: ptot

Coefficients

a

  Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 3.742 .595 6.289 .000

gtot -.036 .089 -.027 -.399 .690 ttot .394 .080 .337 4.936 .000 a. Dependent Variable: ptot

  Lampiran 7 : Kanonik Manova

• The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial design s. A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 178 cases accepted. 0 cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values. 16 cases rejected because of missing data.

  1 non-empty cell. 1 design will be processed.

• Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal atot ptot atot 2,26647 ptot -,00373 2,86264
• Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations Log(Determinant) = -,00001 Bartlett test of sphericity = ,00242 with 1 D. F. Significance = ,961 F(max) criterion = 1,59527 with (2;175) D. F.
• Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances atot ptot atot 5,13687 ptot -,02421 8,19468
• Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot ptot atot 898,95265 ptot -4,23707 1434,06901

• A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot ptot atot 28,03611 ptot -19,11125 66,13324
• Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 2, M = -1/2, N = 86 ) Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F Pillais ,07371 3,34842 4,00 350,00 ,010 Hotellings ,07718 3,33798 4,00 346,00 ,011 Wilks ,92736 3,34328 4,00 348,00 ,011 Roys ,05381

  Note.. F statistic for WILKS' Lambda is exact.

• Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor. Sq. Cor 1 ,05687 73,68685 73,68685 ,23197 ,05381 2 ,02031 26,31315 100,00000 ,14108 ,01990
• Dimension Reduction Analysis Roots Wilks L. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F

  1 TO 2 ,92736 3,34328 4,00 348,00 ,011

  2 TO 2 ,98010 3,55393 1,00 175,00 ,061

• EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (2;175) D. F. Variable Sq. Mul. R Adj. Rsq. Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F atot ,03024 ,01916 14,01806 5,13687 2,72891 ,068 ptot ,04408 ,03316 33,06662 8,19468 4,03513 ,019

  Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable 1 2 atot -,23410 ,36907 ptot ,28642 ,18972

• Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Variable 1 2 atot -,53573 ,84462 ptot ,83385 ,55235
• Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Function No. Variable 1 2 atot -,55224 ,83369 ptot ,84446 ,53562
• Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV 1 50,90371 50,90371 2,73915 2,73915 2 49,09629 100,00000 ,97721 3,71636
• Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES Function No. COVARIATE 1 2 gtot -,14889 ,43896 ttot ,40973 ,16271
• Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES CAN. VAR. COVARIATE 1 2 gtot -,32162 ,94824

ttot ,93061 ,36957

• Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables CAN. VAR. Covariate 1 2 gtot -,36909 ,92939 ttot ,94701 ,32121
• Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV 1 2,77945 2,77945 51,65262 51,65262 2 ,96230 3,74175 48,34738 100,00000
• Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term
• Individual Univariate ,9500 confidence intervals Dependent variable .. atot COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t Lower -95% CL-Upper gtot 1618031416 ,1527312558 ,07897 2,04904 ,042 ,00596 ,31765 ttot -,0763193958 -,0757455506 ,07510 -1,01620 ,311 -,22454 ,07190 Dependent variable .. ptot COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t ower -95% CL- Upper gtot ,0116611736 ,0086525788 ,09974 ,11692 ,907 -,18518 ,20850 ttot ,2694603936 ,2102226336 ,09486 2,84068 ,005 ,08225 ,45667
>A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * EFFECT .. CONSTANT Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products atot ptot atot 234,56343 ptot 239,67718 244,90242
• Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 0, N = 86 )

  Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F Pillais ,30230 37,69586 2,00 174,00 ,000 Hotellings ,43329 37,69586 2,00 174,00 ,000 Wilks ,69770 37,69586 2,00 174,00 ,000 Roys ,30230 Note.. F statistics are exact.

• Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor. 1 ,43329 100,00000 100,00000 ,54982
• EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (1;175) D. F. Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F atot 234,56343 898,95265 234,56343 5,13687 45,66269 ,000 ptot 244,90242 1434,06901 244,90242 8,19468 29,88554 ,000
• EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Raw discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable 1 atot ,34343 ptot ,22032
• Standardized discriminant function coefficients Function No. Variable 1 atot ,77838 ptot ,63071
• Estimates of effects for canonical variables Canonical Variable Parameter 1

  1 2,18056

• Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables Canonical Variable Variable 1 atot ,77602 ptot ,62780

  Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Reliability Dukungan Guru Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .891

  10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N g1 .77 .430

  30 g2 .80 .407 30 g3 .77 .430 30 g4 .70 .466 30 g5 .70 .466 30 g6 .70 .466 30 g7 .77 .430 30 g8 .83 .379 30 g9 .67 .479 30 g10 .70 .466

  30 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Scale Variance if Corrected Item-Total Cronbach's Alpha if

  Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Item Deleted g1 6.63 8.171 .629 .880 g2 6.60 8.662 .449 .892 g3 6.63 8.171 .629 .880 g4 6.70 7.941 .664 .878 g5 6.70 7.941 .664 .878 g6 6.70 8.010 .635 .880 g7 6.63 8.171 .629 .880 g8 6.57 8.323 .657 .879 g9 6.73 7.582 .792 .868 g10 6.70 8.217 .550 .886

  Scale Statistics

  Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 7.40 9.903 3.147

  10 Reliability Dukungan Teman

  Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .843

  10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N t1 .73 .450

  30 t2 .37 .490 30 t3 .33 .479 30 t4 .07 .254 30 t5 .20 .407 30 t6 .27 .450 30 t7 .53 .507 30 t8 .43 .504 30 t9 .40 .498 30 t10 .40 .498

  30

  Item-Total Statistics

  Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .817

  Reliability Statistics

  .0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  a

  Excluded

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  10 Reliability Akseptabilitas

  Scale Mean if Item Deleted

  Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 3.73 8.754 2.959

  Scale Statistics

  3.00 7.172 .573 .825 t2 3.37 7.137 .526 .830 t3 3.40 6.731 .721 .810 t4 3.67 8.092 .414 .840 t5 3.53 7.499 .489 .833 t6 3.47 7.430 .458 .836 t7 3.20 6.648 .706 .811 t8 3.30 7.252 .460 .837 t9 3.33 7.126 .518 .831 t10 3.33 7.057 .547 .828

  Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted t1

  Corrected Item-Total Correlation

  Scale Variance if Item Deleted

  10

  Item Statistics

  Mean Std. Deviation N a1 .27 .450 30 a2 .33 .479 30 a3 .10 .305 30 a4 .30 .466 30 a5 .10 .305 30 a6 .23 .430 30 a7 .27 .450 30 a8 .23 .430 30 a9 .30 .466 30 a10 .40 .498

  30 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Scale Variance if Corrected Item-Total Cronbach's Alpha if

  Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Item Deleted a1 2.27 5.720 .541 .796 a2 2.20 5.407 .650 .783 a3 2.43 6.323 .436 .808 a4 2.23 5.702 .524 .798 a5 2.43 6.323 .436 .808 a6 2.30 5.734 .566 .794 a7 2.27 5.995 .403 .811 a8 2.30 5.872 .493 .802 a9 2.23 5.633 .558 .794 a10 2.13 5.844 .412 .812

  Scale Statistics

  Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 2.53 7.085 2.662

  10 Reliability Pemanfaatan

  Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .863

  10 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N p1 .50 .509

  30 p2 .33 .479 30 p3 .77 .430 30 p4 .43 .504 30 p5 .43 .504 30 p6 .13 .346 30 p7 .10 .305 30 p8 .07 .254 30 p9 .10 .305 30 p10 .07 .254

  30 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Scale Variance if Corrected Item-Total Cronbach's Alpha if

  Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Item Deleted p1 2.43 5.840 .463 .864 p2 2.60 5.766 .539 .855 p3 2.17 6.075 .461 .860 p4 2.50 5.362 .694 .839 p5 2.50 5.431 .661 .843 p6 2.80 5.890 .732 .839 p7 2.83 6.213 .612 .849 p8 2.87 6.464 .549 .855 p9 2.83 6.075 .711 .843 p10 2.87 6.395 .606 .852

  Scale Statistics

  Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 2.93 7.237 2.690

  10

  Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat Karakteristik Responden usia

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid

  16

  65

  33.5

  33.5

  33.5 17 121

  62.4

  62.4

  95.9

  18

  8

  4.1 4.1 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  sex

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Laki-laki

  72

  37.1

  37.1

  37.1 Perempuan 122

  62.9 62.9 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  T_kelompok

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  76

  39.2

  39.2

  39.2 Ya 118

  60.8 60.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  Dukungan Guru Frequency Table g1

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 119

  61.3

  61.3

  61.3 Ya

  75

  38.7 38.7 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g2

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  78

  40.2

  40.2

  40.2 Ya 116

  59.8 59.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g3

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 127

  65.5

  65.5

  65.5 Ya

  67

  34.5 34.5 100.0

  g2

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  78

  40.2

  40.2

  40.2 Ya 116

  59.8 59.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g4

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  87

  44.8

  44.8

  44.8 Ya 107

  55.2 55.2 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g5

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 111

  57.2

  57.2

  57.2 Ya

  83

  42.8 42.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g6

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  74

  38.1

  38.1

  38.1 Ya 120

  61.9 61.9 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g7

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  67

  34.5

  34.5

  34.5 Ya 127

  65.5 65.5 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g8

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  86

  44.3

  44.3

  44.3 Ya 108

  55.7 55.7 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g9

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  80

  41.2

  41.2

  41.2 Ya 114

  58.8 58.8 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  g10

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  95

  49.0

  49.0

  49.0 Ya

  99

  51.0 51.0 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  Kat_guru

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Kurang 106

  54.6

  54.6

  54.6 Baik

  88

  45.4 45.4 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  Dukungan Teman Frequency Table t1

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  61

  31.4

  31.4

  31.4 Ya 133

  68.6 68.6 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  t2

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 110

  56.7

  56.7

  56.7 Ya

  84

  43.3 43.3 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  t3

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak

  97

  50.0

  50.0

  50.0 Ya

  97

  50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  t4

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 118

  60.8

  60.8

  60.8 Ya

  76

  39.2 39.2 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  t5

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 101

  52.1

  52.1

  52.1 Ya

  93

  47.9 47.9 100.0 Total 194 100.0 100.0

  t6

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak 126

  64.9

  64.9