THE COMPARISON OF THE WRITING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS BETWEEN SOCIAL AND LANGUAGE CLASSES OF SMA 1 MEJOBO KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20122013 By: ARDHIAN FITRIANA NIM 200832102
THE COMPARISON OF THE WRITING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH
GRADE STUDENTS BETWEEN SOCIAL AND LANGUAGE CLASSES
OF SMA 1 MEJOBO KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013
By:
ARDHIAN FITRIANA
NIM 200832102
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2012
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
THE COMPARISON OF THE WRITING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH
GRADE STUDENTS BETWEEN SOCIAL AND LANGUAGE CLASSES
OF SMA 1 MEJOBO KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013
SKRIPSI
Presented to the University of Muria Kudus
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Completing the Sarjana Program
in English Education
By:
ARDHIAN FITRIANA
NIM 200832102
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2012
iii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
MOTTO AND DEDICATION
MOTTO:
Think BI G, Start SM AL L -Think GL OBAL Y, Act L OCAL Y!
I t is not a big mistake when you make a mistake doing the big job. But, it is a BI G
M I STAKE when you NEVER DO the big job.
This skripsi is dedicated to:
o M y beloved M other and Father.
o M y beloved brothers and sisters.
o All of my best friends who always support me.
o Somebody who taught me what life is
supposed to be.
iv
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ADVISORS’ APPROVAL
This is to certify that the sarjana skripsi of Ardhian Fitriana NIM 2008-32-102 has
been approved by the skripsi advisors for further approval by the Examining
Committee.
Kudus, 21 Sepetember 2012
Advisor I
Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd
NIP. 19570616-198403-1-015
Advisor II
Agung Dwi Nurcahyo, SS, M.Pd
NIS. 0610701000001187
Acknowledged by
The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
Dean,
Drs. Susilo Rahardjo, M.Pd
NIP 19560619-198503-1-002
v
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL
This is to certify that the skripsi of Ardhian Fitriana NIM 2008-32-102 has been
approved by the Examining Committee as a requirement for the Sarjana Degree in
the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language.
Kudus, 29 of September 2012
Skripsi Examining Committee:
Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd
NIP. 19570616-198403-1-015
Chairperson/ Member
Agung Dwi Nurcahyo, SS, M.Pd
NIS. 0610701000001187
Member
Mutohhar, S.Pd, M.Pd
NIS. 0610701000001204
Member
Drs. Muh. Syafei, M.Pd
NIP. 19620413-198803-1-002
Member
Acknowledged by
The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
Dean,
Drs. Susilo Rahardjo, M.Pd
NIP. 19560619-198503-1-002
vi
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Bismillhirrahmanirrahim
Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin, the writer wish to express her high gratitude to
praise to Lord of the world Allah SWT form existence as a human in this world, the
blessing, health, and inspiration in her final project to complete. Allah SWT is the
only Almighty who always loves all His creatures in every situation. Peace and
blessing be upon the prophet Muhammad SAW who guides the people to God’s path.
This final project entitles “The Comparison of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students between Social and Language Classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus
in Academic Year 2012/2013”
In all modestly, the writer would like to extend her deepest appreciation to
the following people:
1.
Drs. Susilo Rahardjo, M.Pd as the Dean of Teacher and Education Faculty
The University of Muria Kudus.
2.
Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd as her first advisor who was giving in valuable
guidance, showing the appropriate references, and helping her in all of the
difficulties. Moreover, for his kindness and helpfulness corrections to this
final project until its completion.
3.
Agung Dwi Nurcahyo, S.S, M.Pd as the second advisor who has read this
final project carefully and given many useful suggestions and also corrections
for its improvement.
4.
Her Father and her Mother, for their support, their prayer which is everything
for the writer and it will never be able to reply.
vii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
5.
Her brothers and sisters, mb Vikha, mas Kiki, Ardhi, Ayuk.
6.
Drs. Kartono, M.Pd as the Headmaster of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus, for his
permission to do the research in that school.
7.
Jamadi, S.Pd as an English teacher of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus, for his kindness
and support during the research.
8.
All lecturers of the English Education Department, Teacher Training and
Education Faculty, Muria Kudus University who have given the lesson and
knowledge as the starlight which is luminous everlasting. The writer can learn
English with you. It will be a precious moment.
9.
All of her best friends for their praying, helping, and supporting in finishing
this final projects, especially Cipoet, Iduel, Dedy, Aries and mas Ayib.
The last, there is nothing perfect in this world and this final project is not
exception. The writer relized that there are many weaknesses in this final project.
Therefore, suggestion and criticization are always needed for betterment.
Hopefully, this final project will be useful for all the readers, especially for the
students at English Education Department, Teacher Training and Education
Faculty of Muria Kudus University.
Kudus, September 2012
The writer
Ardhian Fitriana
viii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ABSTRACT
Fitriana, Ardhian. 2012. The Comparison of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students between Social and Language Classes of SMA 1
Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013. Skripsi: English
Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muria
Kudus University. Advisor: (1) Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd. (2) Agung Dwi
Nurcahyo, S.S, M.Pd.
Key words: Writing Ability, Social class, Language class
Writing Ability is deliver from that explain of course we need to practice
or express what idea in our mind in the form of list, letter, essay, reports, or
novels. It is also taught to the eleventh grade students in social and language
classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus. Therefore, the English teachers have to always
help to improve the students’ writing ability.
Social Class is class which has focuses in social subject itself and just
limited in learning English subject. Language Class is class which has focuses in
language subject, especially in English subject.
The objective of this research is to find out the significant difference of the
writing ability of the eleventh grade students between social and language classes
of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in academic year 2012/2013.
The design of this research is ex post facto research. The population of this
research is all of eleventh grade students in social and language classes of SMA 1
Mejobo Kudus. The writer takes two classes as a sample by using cluster random
sampling technique, they are; class XI social 5 and XI language 1. The research
instrument used by the writer is documentation of writing ability score from
English teacher of class XI social 5 and class XI language 1 of SMA 1 Mejobo
Kudus.
The result shows that in level of significance 0.05 and degree of freedom
52, there is a significant difference between writing ability of the eleventh grade
students in social and language classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in academic year
2012/2013. It is shown from the calculation result t-obtained is 4, meanwhile ttable is 2.201. It means that the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative
hypothesis is accepted ( = 4 > t-table = 2.021). The writing ability of eleventh
grade students in social class is good (Mean = 73.74 and SD = 11.65). However, the
writing ability of the eleventh grade students in language class is excellent (Mean
= 76.94 and SD = 11.58).
Based on the fact above, it proves that writing ability between the eleventh grade
students in social and language classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in academic year
2012/2013 is different.
The conclusion is that the writing ability of the eleventh grade students of
language class is better than the writing ability of the eleventh grade students of
social class of SMA1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013.
ix
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
The suggestions are (1) before measuring the students’ writing ability, a
teacher has to know how students interested in English, especially for writing, (2)
the students must be brave to ask to their teacher when they face some difficulties
in writing, (3) the further researcher can compare other ability of social and
language classes.
x
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ABSTRAKSI
Fitriana, Ardhian, 2012. Perbandingan Kemampuan Menulis Antara Siswa Kelas
Sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus yang Belajar di Kelas IPS dan Kelas
Bahasa pada Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013. Skripsi: Program Studi
Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,
Universitas Muria Kudus. Pembimbing (1) Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd.
(2) Agung Dwi Nurcahyo S.S, M.Pd.
Kata Kunci : Kemampuan Menulis, kelas IPS, kelas Bahasa
Kemampuan menulis adalah penyampaian dari penjelasan secara tertulis
yang tentunya membutuhkan praktik atau mengekspresikan ide apa saja yang ada
didalam pikiran kita dalam bentuk daftar, surat, esai, laporan atau novel. Hal itu
sudah diajarkan oleh guru bahasa Inggris pada siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo
Kudus yang belajar di kelas IPS dan Bahasa. Untuk itu, guru bahasa Inggris harus
selalu membantu meningkatkan kemampuan menulis para siswa.
Kelas IPS adalah kelas yang mempelajari pelajaran tentang ilmu sosial itu
sendiri dan hanya mempelajari bahasa Inggris secara terbatas.
Kelas Bahasa adalah kelas yang mempelajari pelajaran tentang bahasa,
khususnya bahasa Inggris.
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan signifikan
antara kemampuan menulis antara siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus
yang belajar di kelas IPS dan Bahasa pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013.
Desain penelitian ini adalah penelitian ex post facto. Populasi dari
penelitian ini adalah semua siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus tahun
ajaran 2012/2013. Peneliti mengambil dua kelas sebagai sampel dengan
menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling, kelas tersebut adalah kelas sebelas
IPS 5 dan kelas sebelas Bahasa 1. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan oleh
peneliti adalah dokumentasi hasil nilai kemampuan menulis dari guru bahasa
Inggris yang mengajar di kelas IPS dan Bahasa di SMA Mejobo Kudus.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada tingkat signifikan 0.05 dan
derajat kebebasan 53 ada perbedaan yang signifikan pada kemampuan menulis
antara siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus yang belajar di kelas IPS dan
kelas Bahasa pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013. Hal ini terlihat dari hasil perhitungan
t-obtained adalah 4, sementara itu, t-table adalah 2.021. Itu artinya, hipotesis null
ditolak dan hipotesis alternative diterima. (t-obtained = 4> t-table = 2.021).
Kemampuan menulis siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus yang belajar di
kelas IPS pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013 hasilnya termasuk bagus (Mean = 73.74
dan SD = 11.65). Namun, kemampuan menulis siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1
Mejobo Kudus yang belajar di kelas Bahasa pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013 hasilnya
termasuk memuaskan (Mean = 76.94 dan SD = 11.58).
Berdasarkan hasil di atas, ini membuktikan bahwa kemampuan menulis
antara siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus yang belajar di kelas IPS dan
Bahasa pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013 berbeda.
xi
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
Kesimpulannya adalah kemampuan menulis pada siswa kelas sebelas yang
belajar di kelas bahasa lebih baik daripada kemampuan menulis pada siswa kelas
sebelas yang belajar dikelas IPS di SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus pada tahun ajaran
2012/2013
Saran-saranya adalah (1) sebelum mengukur emampuan menulis para
siswa seorang guru harus mengetahui minat belajar bahasa Inggris pada siswa
terutama pada pelajaran menulis, (2) para siswa harus berani bertanya pada guru
ketika menghadapi kesulitan dalam pelajaran menulis, (3) untuk peneliti
selanjutnya, supaya meneliti kemampuan selain menulis pada siswa yang belajar
di kelas IPS dan bahasa.
xii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
COVER .......................................................................................................... i
LOGO ......................................................................................................... ii
TITLE ........................................................................................................ iii
MOTTO AND DEDICATION .....................................................................iv
ADVISORS’ APROVAL ............................................................................... v
EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL ........................................................................vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................... vii
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ........................................................................... xiii
LIST OF TABLE ........................................................................................ xvi
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................... xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................. xviii
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................1
1.1 Background of the Research ........................................................................1
1.2 Statement of the Problem ............................................................................4
1.3 Objective of the Research............................................................................5
1.4 Significance of the Research .......................................................................5
1.5 Limitation of the Research ..........................................................................5
1.6 Operational Definition ................................................................................6
CHAPTER II: REVIEW TO RELATED LITERATURE AND
HYPOTHESIS ................................................................................................7
2.1 Teaching English in SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus ................................................7
2.2 Curriculum in SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus .........................................................8
2.3 The Material of Teaching English in SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus ......................8
2.4 Writing .......................................................................................................9
2.4.1 The Importance of Writing ......................................................................11
2.4.2 Characteristic of Witten Language ...........................................................11
xiii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
2.4.3 Writing Process ........................................................................................14
2.4.4 Teaching Writing in Social Class..............................................................15
2.4.5 Teaching Writing in Language Class ........................................................15
2.5 Previous Research ......................................................................................16
2.6 Theoretical Framework .............................................................................16
2.7 Hypothesis .................................................................................................17
CHAPTER III: METHOD OF THE RESEARCH ........................................18
3.1 Design of the Research................................................................................18
3.2 Population and Sample ................................................................................19
3.3 Instrument of the Research ..........................................................................21
3.4 Method of Collecting Data ..........................................................................23
3.5 Data Analysis ............................................................................................24
CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDINGS ......................................................31
4.1 Research Finding ........................................................................................31
4.1.1 The Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students in Social Class of
SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013 ................................31
4.1.2 The Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students in Language Class
of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013 ...........................33
4.2 Hypothesis Testing ......................................................................................36
CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION ..........................................................................38
5.1 Discussion....................................................................................................38
CHAPTER VI: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ..................................42
6.1 Conclusion ...................................................................................................42
xiv
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
6.2 Suggestion ...................................................................................................43
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................44
APPENDICES ..................................................................................................46
CURRICULUM VITAE… ............................................................................ 65
xv
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table
3.1
The Population of the Research …………………………………..
20
3.2
The Criteria of Scoring Writing Ability…………………………..
25
3.3
Criteria Category of Writing Ability……………………………...
27
4.1
The Eleventh Grade Students’ Score on Writing Ability of Social
Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013
32
4.2
4.3
4.4
The Frequency Distribution of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students of Social Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in
Academic Year 2012/2013………………………………………..
32
The Eleventh Grade Students’ Score on Writing Ability of
Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013…………………………………………………………
34
The Frequency Distribution of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students of Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in
Academic Year 2012/2013…………………………………....
35
xvi
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
4.1
4.2
Page
The Graph of Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students of
Social Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013....................................................................................
33
The Graph of Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students
of Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic
Year 2012/2013………………………………………………..
35
xvii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Page
The Criteria of Scoring Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students of Social and Language Classes of SMA 1
Mejobo
Kudus
in
Academic
Year
2012/2013.............................................................................
46
The Documentation of Writing Ability Score of the
Eleventh Grade Students in Language Class of SMA 1
Mejobo
Kudus
in
Academic
Year
2012/2013.............................................................................
49
The Documentation of Writing Ability Score of the
Eleventh Grade Students in Social Class of SMA 1
Mejobo
Kudus
in
Academic
Year
2012/2013.............................................................................
50
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of the
Writing Ability Score of the Eleventh Grade Students in
Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic
Year 2012/2013....................................................................
51
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of the
Writing Ability Score of the Eleventh Grade Students in
Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic
Year 2012/2013……………………………………………
53
The T-test Calculation of Mean of the Writing Ability of
the Eleventh Grade Students in Social and Language
Classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013………………………………………………….
55
The T-Table for Two Tail and One Tail…………………...
58
xviii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
GRADE STUDENTS BETWEEN SOCIAL AND LANGUAGE CLASSES
OF SMA 1 MEJOBO KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013
By:
ARDHIAN FITRIANA
NIM 200832102
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2012
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
THE COMPARISON OF THE WRITING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH
GRADE STUDENTS BETWEEN SOCIAL AND LANGUAGE CLASSES
OF SMA 1 MEJOBO KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013
SKRIPSI
Presented to the University of Muria Kudus
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Completing the Sarjana Program
in English Education
By:
ARDHIAN FITRIANA
NIM 200832102
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2012
iii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
MOTTO AND DEDICATION
MOTTO:
Think BI G, Start SM AL L -Think GL OBAL Y, Act L OCAL Y!
I t is not a big mistake when you make a mistake doing the big job. But, it is a BI G
M I STAKE when you NEVER DO the big job.
This skripsi is dedicated to:
o M y beloved M other and Father.
o M y beloved brothers and sisters.
o All of my best friends who always support me.
o Somebody who taught me what life is
supposed to be.
iv
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ADVISORS’ APPROVAL
This is to certify that the sarjana skripsi of Ardhian Fitriana NIM 2008-32-102 has
been approved by the skripsi advisors for further approval by the Examining
Committee.
Kudus, 21 Sepetember 2012
Advisor I
Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd
NIP. 19570616-198403-1-015
Advisor II
Agung Dwi Nurcahyo, SS, M.Pd
NIS. 0610701000001187
Acknowledged by
The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
Dean,
Drs. Susilo Rahardjo, M.Pd
NIP 19560619-198503-1-002
v
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL
This is to certify that the skripsi of Ardhian Fitriana NIM 2008-32-102 has been
approved by the Examining Committee as a requirement for the Sarjana Degree in
the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language.
Kudus, 29 of September 2012
Skripsi Examining Committee:
Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd
NIP. 19570616-198403-1-015
Chairperson/ Member
Agung Dwi Nurcahyo, SS, M.Pd
NIS. 0610701000001187
Member
Mutohhar, S.Pd, M.Pd
NIS. 0610701000001204
Member
Drs. Muh. Syafei, M.Pd
NIP. 19620413-198803-1-002
Member
Acknowledged by
The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
Dean,
Drs. Susilo Rahardjo, M.Pd
NIP. 19560619-198503-1-002
vi
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Bismillhirrahmanirrahim
Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin, the writer wish to express her high gratitude to
praise to Lord of the world Allah SWT form existence as a human in this world, the
blessing, health, and inspiration in her final project to complete. Allah SWT is the
only Almighty who always loves all His creatures in every situation. Peace and
blessing be upon the prophet Muhammad SAW who guides the people to God’s path.
This final project entitles “The Comparison of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students between Social and Language Classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus
in Academic Year 2012/2013”
In all modestly, the writer would like to extend her deepest appreciation to
the following people:
1.
Drs. Susilo Rahardjo, M.Pd as the Dean of Teacher and Education Faculty
The University of Muria Kudus.
2.
Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd as her first advisor who was giving in valuable
guidance, showing the appropriate references, and helping her in all of the
difficulties. Moreover, for his kindness and helpfulness corrections to this
final project until its completion.
3.
Agung Dwi Nurcahyo, S.S, M.Pd as the second advisor who has read this
final project carefully and given many useful suggestions and also corrections
for its improvement.
4.
Her Father and her Mother, for their support, their prayer which is everything
for the writer and it will never be able to reply.
vii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
5.
Her brothers and sisters, mb Vikha, mas Kiki, Ardhi, Ayuk.
6.
Drs. Kartono, M.Pd as the Headmaster of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus, for his
permission to do the research in that school.
7.
Jamadi, S.Pd as an English teacher of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus, for his kindness
and support during the research.
8.
All lecturers of the English Education Department, Teacher Training and
Education Faculty, Muria Kudus University who have given the lesson and
knowledge as the starlight which is luminous everlasting. The writer can learn
English with you. It will be a precious moment.
9.
All of her best friends for their praying, helping, and supporting in finishing
this final projects, especially Cipoet, Iduel, Dedy, Aries and mas Ayib.
The last, there is nothing perfect in this world and this final project is not
exception. The writer relized that there are many weaknesses in this final project.
Therefore, suggestion and criticization are always needed for betterment.
Hopefully, this final project will be useful for all the readers, especially for the
students at English Education Department, Teacher Training and Education
Faculty of Muria Kudus University.
Kudus, September 2012
The writer
Ardhian Fitriana
viii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ABSTRACT
Fitriana, Ardhian. 2012. The Comparison of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students between Social and Language Classes of SMA 1
Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013. Skripsi: English
Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muria
Kudus University. Advisor: (1) Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd. (2) Agung Dwi
Nurcahyo, S.S, M.Pd.
Key words: Writing Ability, Social class, Language class
Writing Ability is deliver from that explain of course we need to practice
or express what idea in our mind in the form of list, letter, essay, reports, or
novels. It is also taught to the eleventh grade students in social and language
classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus. Therefore, the English teachers have to always
help to improve the students’ writing ability.
Social Class is class which has focuses in social subject itself and just
limited in learning English subject. Language Class is class which has focuses in
language subject, especially in English subject.
The objective of this research is to find out the significant difference of the
writing ability of the eleventh grade students between social and language classes
of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in academic year 2012/2013.
The design of this research is ex post facto research. The population of this
research is all of eleventh grade students in social and language classes of SMA 1
Mejobo Kudus. The writer takes two classes as a sample by using cluster random
sampling technique, they are; class XI social 5 and XI language 1. The research
instrument used by the writer is documentation of writing ability score from
English teacher of class XI social 5 and class XI language 1 of SMA 1 Mejobo
Kudus.
The result shows that in level of significance 0.05 and degree of freedom
52, there is a significant difference between writing ability of the eleventh grade
students in social and language classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in academic year
2012/2013. It is shown from the calculation result t-obtained is 4, meanwhile ttable is 2.201. It means that the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative
hypothesis is accepted ( = 4 > t-table = 2.021). The writing ability of eleventh
grade students in social class is good (Mean = 73.74 and SD = 11.65). However, the
writing ability of the eleventh grade students in language class is excellent (Mean
= 76.94 and SD = 11.58).
Based on the fact above, it proves that writing ability between the eleventh grade
students in social and language classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in academic year
2012/2013 is different.
The conclusion is that the writing ability of the eleventh grade students of
language class is better than the writing ability of the eleventh grade students of
social class of SMA1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013.
ix
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
The suggestions are (1) before measuring the students’ writing ability, a
teacher has to know how students interested in English, especially for writing, (2)
the students must be brave to ask to their teacher when they face some difficulties
in writing, (3) the further researcher can compare other ability of social and
language classes.
x
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
ABSTRAKSI
Fitriana, Ardhian, 2012. Perbandingan Kemampuan Menulis Antara Siswa Kelas
Sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus yang Belajar di Kelas IPS dan Kelas
Bahasa pada Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013. Skripsi: Program Studi
Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,
Universitas Muria Kudus. Pembimbing (1) Drs. Suprihadi, M.Pd.
(2) Agung Dwi Nurcahyo S.S, M.Pd.
Kata Kunci : Kemampuan Menulis, kelas IPS, kelas Bahasa
Kemampuan menulis adalah penyampaian dari penjelasan secara tertulis
yang tentunya membutuhkan praktik atau mengekspresikan ide apa saja yang ada
didalam pikiran kita dalam bentuk daftar, surat, esai, laporan atau novel. Hal itu
sudah diajarkan oleh guru bahasa Inggris pada siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo
Kudus yang belajar di kelas IPS dan Bahasa. Untuk itu, guru bahasa Inggris harus
selalu membantu meningkatkan kemampuan menulis para siswa.
Kelas IPS adalah kelas yang mempelajari pelajaran tentang ilmu sosial itu
sendiri dan hanya mempelajari bahasa Inggris secara terbatas.
Kelas Bahasa adalah kelas yang mempelajari pelajaran tentang bahasa,
khususnya bahasa Inggris.
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan signifikan
antara kemampuan menulis antara siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus
yang belajar di kelas IPS dan Bahasa pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013.
Desain penelitian ini adalah penelitian ex post facto. Populasi dari
penelitian ini adalah semua siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus tahun
ajaran 2012/2013. Peneliti mengambil dua kelas sebagai sampel dengan
menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling, kelas tersebut adalah kelas sebelas
IPS 5 dan kelas sebelas Bahasa 1. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan oleh
peneliti adalah dokumentasi hasil nilai kemampuan menulis dari guru bahasa
Inggris yang mengajar di kelas IPS dan Bahasa di SMA Mejobo Kudus.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada tingkat signifikan 0.05 dan
derajat kebebasan 53 ada perbedaan yang signifikan pada kemampuan menulis
antara siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus yang belajar di kelas IPS dan
kelas Bahasa pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013. Hal ini terlihat dari hasil perhitungan
t-obtained adalah 4, sementara itu, t-table adalah 2.021. Itu artinya, hipotesis null
ditolak dan hipotesis alternative diterima. (t-obtained = 4> t-table = 2.021).
Kemampuan menulis siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus yang belajar di
kelas IPS pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013 hasilnya termasuk bagus (Mean = 73.74
dan SD = 11.65). Namun, kemampuan menulis siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1
Mejobo Kudus yang belajar di kelas Bahasa pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013 hasilnya
termasuk memuaskan (Mean = 76.94 dan SD = 11.58).
Berdasarkan hasil di atas, ini membuktikan bahwa kemampuan menulis
antara siswa kelas sebelas SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus yang belajar di kelas IPS dan
Bahasa pada tahun ajaran 2012/2013 berbeda.
xi
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
Kesimpulannya adalah kemampuan menulis pada siswa kelas sebelas yang
belajar di kelas bahasa lebih baik daripada kemampuan menulis pada siswa kelas
sebelas yang belajar dikelas IPS di SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus pada tahun ajaran
2012/2013
Saran-saranya adalah (1) sebelum mengukur emampuan menulis para
siswa seorang guru harus mengetahui minat belajar bahasa Inggris pada siswa
terutama pada pelajaran menulis, (2) para siswa harus berani bertanya pada guru
ketika menghadapi kesulitan dalam pelajaran menulis, (3) untuk peneliti
selanjutnya, supaya meneliti kemampuan selain menulis pada siswa yang belajar
di kelas IPS dan bahasa.
xii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
COVER .......................................................................................................... i
LOGO ......................................................................................................... ii
TITLE ........................................................................................................ iii
MOTTO AND DEDICATION .....................................................................iv
ADVISORS’ APROVAL ............................................................................... v
EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL ........................................................................vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................... vii
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ........................................................................... xiii
LIST OF TABLE ........................................................................................ xvi
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................... xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................. xviii
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................1
1.1 Background of the Research ........................................................................1
1.2 Statement of the Problem ............................................................................4
1.3 Objective of the Research............................................................................5
1.4 Significance of the Research .......................................................................5
1.5 Limitation of the Research ..........................................................................5
1.6 Operational Definition ................................................................................6
CHAPTER II: REVIEW TO RELATED LITERATURE AND
HYPOTHESIS ................................................................................................7
2.1 Teaching English in SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus ................................................7
2.2 Curriculum in SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus .........................................................8
2.3 The Material of Teaching English in SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus ......................8
2.4 Writing .......................................................................................................9
2.4.1 The Importance of Writing ......................................................................11
2.4.2 Characteristic of Witten Language ...........................................................11
xiii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
2.4.3 Writing Process ........................................................................................14
2.4.4 Teaching Writing in Social Class..............................................................15
2.4.5 Teaching Writing in Language Class ........................................................15
2.5 Previous Research ......................................................................................16
2.6 Theoretical Framework .............................................................................16
2.7 Hypothesis .................................................................................................17
CHAPTER III: METHOD OF THE RESEARCH ........................................18
3.1 Design of the Research................................................................................18
3.2 Population and Sample ................................................................................19
3.3 Instrument of the Research ..........................................................................21
3.4 Method of Collecting Data ..........................................................................23
3.5 Data Analysis ............................................................................................24
CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDINGS ......................................................31
4.1 Research Finding ........................................................................................31
4.1.1 The Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students in Social Class of
SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013 ................................31
4.1.2 The Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students in Language Class
of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013 ...........................33
4.2 Hypothesis Testing ......................................................................................36
CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION ..........................................................................38
5.1 Discussion....................................................................................................38
CHAPTER VI: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ..................................42
6.1 Conclusion ...................................................................................................42
xiv
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
6.2 Suggestion ...................................................................................................43
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................44
APPENDICES ..................................................................................................46
CURRICULUM VITAE… ............................................................................ 65
xv
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table
3.1
The Population of the Research …………………………………..
20
3.2
The Criteria of Scoring Writing Ability…………………………..
25
3.3
Criteria Category of Writing Ability……………………………...
27
4.1
The Eleventh Grade Students’ Score on Writing Ability of Social
Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year 2012/2013
32
4.2
4.3
4.4
The Frequency Distribution of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students of Social Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in
Academic Year 2012/2013………………………………………..
32
The Eleventh Grade Students’ Score on Writing Ability of
Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013…………………………………………………………
34
The Frequency Distribution of the Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students of Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in
Academic Year 2012/2013…………………………………....
35
xvi
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
4.1
4.2
Page
The Graph of Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students of
Social Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013....................................................................................
33
The Graph of Writing Ability of the Eleventh Grade Students
of Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic
Year 2012/2013………………………………………………..
35
xvii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Page
The Criteria of Scoring Writing Ability of the Eleventh
Grade Students of Social and Language Classes of SMA 1
Mejobo
Kudus
in
Academic
Year
2012/2013.............................................................................
46
The Documentation of Writing Ability Score of the
Eleventh Grade Students in Language Class of SMA 1
Mejobo
Kudus
in
Academic
Year
2012/2013.............................................................................
49
The Documentation of Writing Ability Score of the
Eleventh Grade Students in Social Class of SMA 1
Mejobo
Kudus
in
Academic
Year
2012/2013.............................................................................
50
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of the
Writing Ability Score of the Eleventh Grade Students in
Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in the Academic
Year 2012/2013....................................................................
51
The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of the
Writing Ability Score of the Eleventh Grade Students in
Language Class of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic
Year 2012/2013……………………………………………
53
The T-test Calculation of Mean of the Writing Ability of
the Eleventh Grade Students in Social and Language
Classes of SMA 1 Mejobo Kudus in Academic Year
2012/2013………………………………………………….
55
The T-Table for Two Tail and One Tail…………………...
58
xviii
Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/)