Pre-test Score Description of the Data

Experimental Class Control Class No Student Score No Students Score 25 25 85 25 25 85 26 26 90 26 26 85 27 27 80 27 27 95 28 28 70 28 28 70 29 29 80 29 29 80 30 30 90 30 30 75 31 31 80 31 31 85 32 32 85 32 32 85 33 33 75 33 33 60 34 34 85 34 34 75 35 35 75 35 35 70 36 36 80 36 36 65 37 37 85 37 37 65 38 38 75 38 38 60 39 39 80 39 39 75 ∑ 3085 ∑ 2880 Mean 79.10 Mean 73.85 According to Table 4.2, in the experimental class, the highest pre-test score was 90 while the lowest pre-test score was 55. On the other hand, in the control class, the highest pre-test score was 95 while the lowest pre-test score was 45. Moreover, in the experimental class, the average score or mean was 79.10, the mode is 80, and the median was 80.00. On the other hand, in the control class, the average score or mean was 73.85, the mode was 70, and the median was 75.00 From the students’ post-test score mean, median, and mode, it can be concluded that students from the experimental class gained an improvement in their test score due to Jigsaw technique. To know the significance of the improvement, t-test was conducted and reported in the data analysis.

3. Gain Score

Gain score is a score that is calculated by subtracting the post-test score with the pre-test score. Therefore, to get gain score students from the experimental group and the control group must follow the pre-test and post-test. These are the description: Table 4.3 The Gain Score of Experimental class and Control Class Experimental Class Control Class No Student Score No Students Score 1 1 -5 1 1 2 2 5 2 2 5 3 3 10 3 3 4 4 30 4 4 10 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 -35 7 7 7 7 5 8 8 10 8 8 9 9 5 9 9 -5 10 10 -5 10 10 15 11 11 11 11 -10 12 12 10 12 12 5 13 13 10 13 13 20 14 14 -5 14 14 15 15 15 20 15 15 10 16 16 16 16 10 17 17 -5 17 17 10 18 18 18 18 5 19 19 -20 19 19 15 20 20 20 20 20 -5 21 21 5 21 21 5 22 22 -5 22 22 5 23 23 -10 23 23 10 24 24 20 24 24 40 25 25 15 25 25 10 26 26 15 26 26 15 27 27 5 27 27 5 28 28 10 28 28 29 29 15 29 29 -5 31 31 35 31 31 32 32 -5 32 32 5 33 33 5 33 33 5 34 34 5 34 34 5 35 35 35 35 Experimental Class Control Class No Student Score No Students Score 36 36 -5 36 36 -5 37 37 37 37 15 38 38 38 38 -5 39 39 39 39 -15 ∑ 185 ∑ 165 Mean 4.74 Mean 4.23 On Table 4.2, we can see that highest gain score from the experimental class was 35 and the lowest score was -20. Later on, from the control class the highest gain score was 40 and the lowest score was -35. This calculation result indicates that some students, both in experimental class and control class, performed better in their post-test than in their pre-test. But, in the other hand, some students performed worst in their post-test than in their pre-test. In addition, based on the data on the Table 4.2, the average gain score for experimental class was 4.74, while the mode was 0, and the median was 0. Meanwhile, the average gain score for experimental class was 4.23, while the mode was 5, and the median was 5.

4. Data Testing

In this research, the test of normality distribution and homogeneity variances taken from students’ pre-test and post-test scores was performed before the calculation of t test value. It was done to determine if the data set was well- modeled by a normal distribution and to compute how likely it is for a random variable underlying the data set to be normally distributed.

a. Normality of the Pre-test

The test of normality distribution of the pre-test data was analyzed by the use of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in IBM SPSS Statistics 20. The result of the test can be seen as follows:

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness of Pictures in Text in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eight Grade Students of MTsN 13 Jakarta).

0 18 178

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The effectiveness of using mind mapping technique on students’ reading of narrative text: a quasi-experimental study at the second grade of MAN 19 Jakarta

0 4 181

The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw Technique to Develop Students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text; A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 63 Jakarta Selatan

0 6 139

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The Effectiveness of Jigsaw Technique in Teacihing Reading Conprehension : An Experimental Study at the Second Grade of MAN 2 Bekasi

0 6 61

The Effectiveness of Using Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) in Teaching Reading of Narrative Text, (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Year Students of SMPN I Pakuhaji)

0 10 0

The Effectiveness of Teaching Verbs by Using Cooperative Learning (A-Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Year Students of SMPN 169 Jakarta)

0 4 158

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION AT SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN1 KRUI

0 21 58

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING RECOUNT TEXT (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 KALIMANAH IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 11