CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. CONCLUSION
Based on the data described in the previous chapter, the writer could draw a conclusion that the most common errors of grammatical aspects that the second
grade students of SMP YAPERA Ciledug, Tangerang on transforming affirmative to negative and interrogative sentences of simple present tense are Verb tense,
Auxiliary verb, Question word, and Punctuation. There were 377 frequencies of errors that made by the students on transforming affirmative to negative and
interrogative sentences of simple present tense. The most common error of the grammatical aspect is Verb tense with the total errors 104 or 49.52 . Most of the
students made errors in verb tense. They failed to change the verb with suffix ‘-s’ and ‘-es’ form to the Verb without suffix ‘-s’ and ‘-es’ form.
The writer also classified the types of errors committed by second grade of SMP YAPERA students. The highest frequency of the students’ error was
omission which was 202 errors or 53.58 . It happened where some element of a word is omitted which should be present. The frequency of the students’ error in
miselection was 109 errors or 28.91 , it happened where the wrong item has been chosen in place of the right one. The frequency of the students’ error in
addition was 58 errors or 15.38 , it happened where some element is present which should not be there. The lowest frequency of the students’ error was
misorder which was 8 errors or 2.12 , it happened where the elements presented are correct but wrongly sequenced.
B. SUGGESTION
By knowing the students’ frequency of errors and to avoid the same errors in the future, the writer would like to give some suggestions:
1. It is necessary for the students to do more exercises in transforming affirmative simple present pattern sentences into negative and interrogative
pattern sentences by paying attention in the important rules in it, especially in using verb tense in negative and interrogative sentences.
2. Based on the data was mentioned above, the highest error was using verb tense. It means the teacher should pay more attention about students’ ability in
using it. On other hand, students need to have more practice in using tenses correctly.
3. The teacher should deliver materials clearly and he also should pay attention to the student’s activity while teaching learning process. In addition, the
teacher should more creative in using the suitable technique which can motivate students to study about grammar.
4. For the further researchers who interested in analyzing about transforming affirmative to negative and interrogative sentences, they had better expand the
study to the use of other tenses.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aprilianto, Eko Wahyu, Analyzing the Students Grammatical errors on Transforming The Simple Present Tense Into Negative and Interrogative
Sentences , Jakarta: FITK UIN, 2012.
Azar, Betty S., Understanding and Using English Grammar,
New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989.
Brown, Douglas,H., Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, San Francisco: Pearson Education, 2007.
Corder, S. P. Error Analysis and Interlanguage,, New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
DEPDIKBUD RI GBPP Bahasa Inggris SMP., Jakarta: DEPDIKBUD RI, 1994.
Dulay, Heidi, Marina Burt, and Stephen Krashen, Language Two, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Ellis, Rod, the Study of Second Language Acquisition, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Gorbet, Frances, To Err Is Human; Error Analysis and Child Language Acquisition
, London: Oxford University Press, 1979. Hornby, AS. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English, New
York: Oxford Universty Press, 1974. http:abisamra03.tripod.comnadalanguageacq-erroranalysis.htmltheo
, on
November 15, 2011. Http:www.Perfect Your English.comgrammarSimple Present Tense.. html.
James, Carl, Error in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis, New York: Wesley Longman, 1998.
Lailatussaidah, The analysis of Students’ Errors in Transforming Simple Present, Present Progressive and Simple Past Tense From Affirmative Into
Negative and Interrogative Form , Jakarta: FITK UIN, 2011.
Oshima, Alice, Ann Houge, Introduction to Academic Writing, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1988.
Richards, J. C. Error Analysis: Perspective on Second Language Acquisition, London: Longman, 1973.
Richards, Jack C. and Theodore S. Rodger, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching
, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. Sakoda, Namiko. Error Analysis within Newspaper Reporting Written by
Japanese Secondary
School Students.
広島経済⼤学研究論集 Departmental Bulletin Paper
2004. Purwanto, M. Ngalim, Psikologi Pendidikan, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya,
2011. Ur, Penny. Grammar Practice Activities, Cambridge : Cambridge University
Press, 1988. Richards, Jack C. A Non-Contrastive Approach to Error Analysis, Department of
Linguistics, Quebec: Laval University, 1971.
Kategori