Data analysis Error Analysis on Transforming Affirmative to Negative and Interrogative Sentences of Simple Presnt Tense (a case study at SMP YAPERA Ciledug)

• What does Diyas seldom wear? It was clearly shown in the table that many students in the population of this study encountered the problem in the use of auxiliary, particularly when they failed to identify in transforming affirmative simple present pattern sentences into negative and interrogative in using “has and have”. There are 109 error sentences categorized as having problems with miselection. P = F x 100 N P = 109 x 100 = 28.91 377

b. Misorder

Misorder usually takes place in the word order of a sentence. The students didn’t know where the elements presented are correct. They need more careful in using auxiliary verb and in spelling the letter. Table 4.9 Table of Misorder Errors Item number SentencePhrase Cause of error Explanation Correction 4 - WHQ She hasdoesn’t English class at ten o’clock today. What doestime she has English class today? The student didn’t have knowledge in using negative sentence. So, it should be revised • She doesn’t have English class today? • What time does she have English class today? 6 - Mirna hasdoesn’t breakfast every morning. The student was careless in using negative sentence. So, it should be revised • Mirna doesn’t have breakfast every morning. 9 - ? Tono doesn’t always sleep for tow hours every afternoon. Does Tono always sleep for tow hours every afternoon? The student was careless in spelling the letter. So, it should be revised • Tono doesn’t always sleep for two hours every afternoon. • Does Tono always sleep for two hours every afternoon? From the table above, the writer suspected that students failed in ordering word. They were influenced by previous form intralingual. There are 8 error sentences categorized as having problems with misorder. P = F x 100 N P = 8 x 100 = 2.12 377

c. Addition

The characteristic of addition is where some element is present which should not be there. The following table shows some words which are classified into addition. Table 4.10 Table of Addition Errors Item number SentencePhrase Cause of error Explanation Correction 3 - Lia doesn’t often loses her money at her class. The student was influenced by the positive form, they didn’t know in negative pattern of sentence is always followed by verb 1 So, it should be revised • Lia doesn’t often lose her money at her class. 5 - ? WHQ My mother doesn’t washes our clothes every day. Does my mother washes our clothes every day? When does my mother washes our clothes? The student was suspected of being influenced by positive form to transforming the verb with suffix ‘es’ to verb 1. So, it should be revised • My mother doesn’t wash our clothes every day. • Does my mother wash our clothes every day? • When does my mother wash our clothes? 7 - ? Laura doesn’t lives in Ciledug. Does Laura lives in Ciledug? The student didn’t know in negative pattern of sentence is always followed by verb 1. So, it should be revised • Laura doesn’t live in Ciledug. • Does Laura live in Ciledug? 10 - ? WHQ Diyas doesn’t seldoming wears shirt. Does Diyas seldoming wears shirt? What does Diyas seldoming wears ? The student was influenced by the previous study of present continuous tense. So, it should be revised • Diyas doesn’t seldom wear shirt. • Does Diyas seldom wear shirt? • What does Diyas seldom wear The table shows that there are actually 58 error sentences with addition. These errors happened because the students wrote carelessly or they had lack of knowledge in English structure. For example, Laura doesn’t lives in Ciledug , the student added ‘s’ in verb “live”. It was absolutely wrong because in negative and interrogative sentences, it doesn’t need adding suffix ‘s’ or ‘es’ in the verb. There are 58 sentences categorized as having problems with addition. P = F x 100 N P = 58 x 100 = 15.38 377

d. Omission

The writer used symbol Ø to indicate the omission. The characteristic of omission is where some element of a word is omitted which should be present. The following table shows some sentences or phrases which are classified into omissions. Table 4.11 Table of Omission Errors Item number SentencePhrase Cause of error Explanation Correction 1 - ? WHQ Lisa doesn’t borrow book from the library. Does Lisa borrow book from the library? Where does Lisa borrow book? The student was suspected of being not taking attention of plural form. So, it should be revised • Lisa doesn’t borrow books from the library . • Does Lisa borrow books from the library? • Where does Lisa borrow book? 3 - ? WHQ Lia doesn’t lose her money at her class. Does Lia lose her money at her class? Where does Lia lose her money? The student was careless by not mentioning word often in the sentences. So, it should be revised • Lia doesn’t often lose her money at her class. • Does Lia often lose her money at her class • Where does Lia often lose her money? 4 WHQ What time does she have English class? The student was careless by not So, it should be revised mentioning word today in the sentences. • What time does she have English class today? 8 - ? WHQ His mother doesn’t always give a new thing when he get ten in the test. Does his mother always give a new thing when he get ten in the test? What does his mother always give when he get ten in the test? The student was assumed of not being taking attention of plural form. So, it should be revised • His mother doesn’t always give a new thing when he gets ten in the test. • Does his mother always give a new thing when he gets ten in the test? • What does his mother always give when he gets ten in the test? From the sentences above, it could be seen that the students missed to write an item that must appear in a well-formed word. These errors happened because of the influence of the students’ mother tongue. They made self perception in transforming the sentence without taking care about the correct rule of previous sentence. The most frequents errors in the students transforming affirmative simple present into negative and interrogative pattern sentences was Omission. There were actually 202 error sentences categorized as having problems with omission. The table can illustrate that 202 out of 377 errors in the students transforming affirmative simple present into negative and interrogative pattern sentences are misselection. P = F x 100 N P = 202 x 100 = 53.58 377

C. Data Interpretation

In this step, the writer would like to investigate the findings from the analyzed data after analyzing the items of tested area and explaining the frequency and percentage the errors in each item. The following table bellow shows the tested area of grammatical errors. Table 4.12 Percentage of Test Area No Category Frequency of error Percentage of error 1 Verb tense 104 49.52 2 Auxiliary verb 43 20.48 3 Punctuation 48 22.86 4 Question word 15 7.14 Total N = 210 100 the writer would like to talk more about the highest frequency of errors in tested area that made the students’ transforming affirmative simple present pattern sentences into negative and interrogative pattern sentences and of course their causes. The highest error frequency of error is Verb tense that reaches 104 errors or 49.52. Each student made errors in verb tense; they didn’t know in negative and interrogative pattern of sentences doesn’t need adding suffix ‘s’ or ‘es’ in the verb. These errors happened because of the influence of the second language. They were distracted of positive form, so they applied the rule of positive form into negative and interrogative sentences. The second high rate of the error was punctuation, which reaches 48 errors or 22.86 . Their knowledge about punctuation was limited. They didn’t know in make interrogative and WH Question sentences must be added question mark. They ignore the question mark in the end of sentence. The following table shows the types of errors that had classified into omission, miselection, addition, and misorder. Table 4.13 Percentage of Types of Errors No Types of Errors Frequency Percentage 1 Omission 202 53.58 2 Miselection 109 28.91 3 Addition 58 15.38 4 Misorder 8 2.12 Total 377 100 Diagram 4.1 Error Frequency and Its Percentage 53,58 28,91 15,38 2,12 0,00 10,00 20,00 30,00 40,00 50,00 60,00 Omission Miselection Addition Misorder Chart of Types of Errors frequency From the table and chart above, the writer interpreted from the table that 377 errors found from 20 students’ transforming affirmative simple present pattern sentences into negative and interrogative pattern sentences. Those 377 errors are divided into four types of errors; omission, misselection, addition, and misorder . The highest frequency of the students’ error was omission which was 202 errors or 53.58 . Omission was the most common error that student made, the student made errors in where some element of a word is omitted which should be present. The frequency of the students’ error in miselection was 109 errors or 28.91 , it happened where the wrong item has been chosen in place of the right one. The frequency of the students’ error in addition was 58 errors or 15.38 , it happened where some element is present which should not be there. The lowest frequency of the students’ error was misorder which was 8 errors or 2.12 , it happened where the elements presented are correct but wrongly sequenced.

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. CONCLUSION

Based on the data described in the previous chapter, the writer could draw a conclusion that the most common errors of grammatical aspects that the second grade students of SMP YAPERA Ciledug, Tangerang on transforming affirmative to negative and interrogative sentences of simple present tense are Verb tense, Auxiliary verb, Question word, and Punctuation. There were 377 frequencies of errors that made by the students on transforming affirmative to negative and interrogative sentences of simple present tense. The most common error of the grammatical aspect is Verb tense with the total errors 104 or 49.52 . Most of the students made errors in verb tense. They failed to change the verb with suffix ‘-s’ and ‘-es’ form to the Verb without suffix ‘-s’ and ‘-es’ form. The writer also classified the types of errors committed by second grade of SMP YAPERA students. The highest frequency of the students’ error was omission which was 202 errors or 53.58 . It happened where some element of a word is omitted which should be present. The frequency of the students’ error in miselection was 109 errors or 28.91 , it happened where the wrong item has been chosen in place of the right one. The frequency of the students’ error in addition was 58 errors or 15.38 , it happened where some element is present which should not be there. The lowest frequency of the students’ error was misorder which was 8 errors or 2.12 , it happened where the elements presented are correct but wrongly sequenced.

Dokumen yang terkait

The analaysis of students' errors in transforming simple present, present progressive and simple past tense form affirmative form (A case study at second year of MTs al-khairiyah jakarta)

0 3 562

Error Analysis in the students writing narrative paragraph at MtsN Pajajaran Pamulang

0 3 45

Presented to the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher’s Training in a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of S.Pd. (Bachelor of Art) in English Language Education

1 12 102

Analyzing the students' grammatical errors on transforming affirmative simple present pattern sentences into negative and interrogative pattern sentences (a case study at the students second years on MTsN Model Babakan Labaksiu-Tegal)

0 7 46

An error analysis on the use of present perfect and present perfect continous tense: a case study at the third grade student of SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat

0 6 126

An Error Analysis on the Use of Simple Past Tense in Students' Narrative Writing (A Case Study at First Grade Students of SMA Dua Mei Ciputat)

4 51 109

An error analysis on students' simple past tense mastery in their narrative text (a case study at the eleventh grade students of SMAN 4 Bekasi)

1 13 0

An Analysis on Students’ Errors on the Use of Passive Voice in Simple Past Tense, (A Case Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Islam Plus Baitul Maal

2 5 107

An Error Analysis on the Use of Present Perfect Tense and Present Perfect Continous Tense” (A Case study at third grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat Timur

0 6 126

An Error Analysis on Students' in Transforming Voice of Simple Past Tense

0 6 111