4 4
I N D I G E N O U S     T R I B A L   P E O P L E S ’   R I G H T S   I N   P R A C T I C E   –  A   G U I D E  T O   I L O   C O N V E N T I O N   N O .  1 6 9
and	Southern	Peoples’	regional	governments	have formed	pastoral	commissions.
In	Burkina	Faso,	the	State	and	territorial	collectives are	mandated	with	the	identiication,	protection	and
conservation	of	areas	where	pastoralism	take	place. 2005 Constitution of Burundi; 2002 Congolese
Constitution;2006 DRC Constitution; Reports of the Working Group of the ACHPR on
indigenous populationscommunities, concerning Ethiopia and Burkina Faso.
Case prepared by Naomi Kipuri
Australia:	Aboriginal	and	Torres	Strait	Islander Social	Justice	Commissioner
In	1992,	the	position	of	the	Aboriginal	and	Torres Strait	Islander	Social	Justice	Commissioner	was
created under the Australian Human Rights Commission,	in	response	to	the	extreme	social
and economic disadvantages faced by indigenous Australians	as	well	as	the	indings	of	the	Royal
Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody and the National Inquiry into Racist Violence.
The Commissioner’s role includes reviewing the	impact	of	laws	and	policies	and	monitoring
the enjoyment and exercise of human rights for indigenous Australians. The Commissioner
produces	an	annual	Social	Justice	and	a	Native Title	Report,	which	are	tabled	in	Parliament	and	he
promotes	understanding	and	respect	for	the	rights of indigenous Australians. He does this by reviewing
legislation,	providing	policy	advice	and	undertaking research on human rights issues including health
, family violence
,	children’s	rights,	cognitive disabilities and the
‘stolen	generation’. http:www.hreoc.gov.ausocial_justiceindex.html
3.6.2.	Combating	discrimination	and	closing	the socio-economic	gaps
Australia: Closing the gap Our challenge for the future is to embrace
a new partnership between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians… [T]he core of
this partnership for the future is closing the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous
Australians on life expectancy, educational achievement and employment opportunities.
This new partnership on closing the gap will set concrete targets for the future: within a
decade to halve the widening gap in literacy, numeracy and employment outcomes and
opportunities for Indigenous children, within a decade to halve the appalling gap in infant
mortality rates between Indigenous and non- Indigenous children and, within a generation,
to close the equally appalling 17-year life gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous
when it comes to overall life expectancy. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Apology to
Australia’s Indigenous Peoples, 13 February 2008
The	life	expectancy	of	indigenous	Australians	is 17	years	lower	than	other	Australians.	While	most
Australian	women	can	expect	to	live	to	an	average age	of	82	years,	indigenous	women	can	expect
to	live	only	64.8	years	and	the	life	expectancy of indigenous men is lower still at 59.4 years. In
response	to	this	alarming	situation,	the	Council	of Australian	Governments	COAG
4
in December 2007	agreed	to	a	partnership	between	all	levels	of
government to work with indigenous communities to achieve	the	target	of	“closing	the	gap”.
In	March	2008,	a	“Close	the	Gap	Statement	of Intent”	on	indigenous	health	was	signed	between
the	Government	and	the	indigenous	peoples see	section	11.2..	Since	the	targets	were
set,	all	Australian	governments	have	been working	together	to	develop	fundamental
reforms	to	address	these	targets,	and	have
4 COAG comprises the Prime Minister, State Premiers, Territory Chief Ministers and the President of the Australian Local Government
Association.
4 5
I I I .  G O V E R N m E N T   R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S
also	acknowledged	that	it	is	“an	extremely signiicant	undertaking	that	will	require	substantial
investment”.	In	2008,	COAG	agreed	to	initiatives for indigenous Australians to the sum of 4.6
billion	across	early	childhood	development,	health, housing,	economic	development	and	remote
service delivery.
COAG	notes	that	“these	new	agreements	represent a	fundamental	response	to	COAG’s	commitment
to	closing	the	gap.	Sustained	improvement	in outcomes	for	Indigenous	people	can	only	be
achieved by systemic change. Through these agreements,	all	governments	will	be	held	publicly
accountable	for	their	performance	in	improving outcomes	in	these	key	areas.”
http:www.coag.gov.aucoag_meeting_ outcomes2008-11-29index.cfmindigenous;
http:www.humanrights.gov.ausocial_justice healthtargetsclosethegappart2_1.html
India:	Afirmative	action	for	schedules	tribes. The	“Scheduled	Tribes”	see	section	1.4.	belong	to
the most socially and economically disadvantaged communities	in	India.	Many	laws	and	programmes
have	been	framed	with	a	view	to	improving	the conditions	of	disadvantaged	groups,	including	the
Scheduled	Tribes.	There	are	certain	provisions	in	the Indian	Constitution	regarding	fundamental	rights,
which	are	framed	speciically	to	protect	their	rights.
5
Some	of	the	provisions	on	afirmative	actions	are: Article	15	4,	which	stipulates	that	the
• Government	should	make	“special	provision
for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or
for…	the	Scheduled	Tribes”. Article	164	and	4A	empowers	the	State
• to	develop	mechanisms	or	schemes
or regulations for the reservation of appointments	or	posts	and	promotions	with
consequential seniority in favour of Scheduled Tribes.
Articles	15	and	16	provide	for	special	measures, including	afirmative	action	to	reserve	jobs	and	seats
in	educational	institutions	for	marginalised	peoples. The	reservation	policy	has	created	opportunities
for the indigenous community to have access to
5 These are in addition to the general provisions, which are applicable to all the Indian citizens
better	education	and	jobs.	However,	the	reservation policy	only	covers	the	public	sector	and	does	not
extend	to	the	private	sector.	Moreover,	the	beneits are	often	monopolised	by	the	better-off	sections
of the communities rather than reaching those who	are	most	in	need.	Further,	there	are	many
indigenous	peoples	who	have	not	been	categorised as	“Scheduled	Tribes”	and	thus	are	denied	these
beneits.
Article	29	of	the	Constitution	empowers	“any •
section of the citizens residing in the territory of	India	or	any	part	thereof	having	a	distinct
language,	script	or	culture	of	its	own”	with	the right to conserve them.
Article	29,	along	with	various	other	constitutional provisions	-	including	the	speciic	provisions	for
different	states	Articles	371A	and	371G	and the	ifth	and	sixth	schedules	of	the	Constitution	-
give	a	wide	scope	and	are	powerful	tools	for	the indigenous	communities	to	establish	institutions,
which	would	include	the	establishment,	preservation and	perpetuation	of	culture	and	customary	practices
over the generations.
There are also other fundamental rights along with the	judicial	interpretations	given	by	the	Supreme
Court through which recourse can be sought to protect	the	basic	rights	of	the	indigenous	peoples.
6
Such	rights	include	equality	before	law,	right	to	life, right to education for all children between the ages
of	six	and	fourteen,	freedom	of	expression	and association,	prohibition	of	human	traficking	and
child labour.
The	Directive	Principles	of	State	Policy	under	the Constitution also ask states to ensure welfare of the
indigenous	people	while	implementing	measures of	governance;	thus	adding	weight	to	judicial
interpretations	in	favour	of	indigenous	peoples.
7
These	provisions,	if	used	effectively,	can	be	valuable in	protecting	the	rights	and	interests	of	indigenous
peoples. Case prepared by: Chonchuirinmayo Luithui.
6 According to Article 141 the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding to all the courts of the land which basically means that it
becomes the law of the land. 7 Article 46 speciically provides that the State shall promote the
educational and economic interest of schedule castes and schedule tribes and other weaker sections of the society.
4 6
I N D I G E N O U S     T R I B A L   P E O P L E S ’   R I G H T S   I N   P R A C T I C E   –  A   G U I D E  T O   I L O   C O N V E N T I O N   N O .  1 6 9
4 7
I I I .  G O V E R N m E N T   R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S
Iv. INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS
4 9
I V.  I N D I G E N O U S   I N S T I T U T I O N S
4.1. RETAINING AND DEVELOPING INDIGENOUS CUSTOmS, TRADITIONS AND