Theoretical Framework REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

25 extent to which the values of the two variables or factors are related or changed in an identifiable pattern. The researcher also conducted a survey study to gather data. Survey study would like to ask the large numbers of people questions about their behaviors, attitudes and opinions Marczyk, DeMatteo, and Festinger, 2005. Survey study attempted to find relationships between the characteristics of respondents and their reported behaviors and opinions. One of the characteristics of respondents here was to write an argumentative essay. The reported behavior here was the use of self- management ability to accomplish the writing of an argumentative essay. The data were taken by using the questionnaires and also the scores they achieved when writing an argumentative essay. These instruments would help the researcher to answer the research problem and calculate the data correctly.

3.2. Research Setting

This research was conducted in CRW II class of English Language Education Study Program in Sanata Dharma University. The researcher chose CRW II class because the students had been familiar with an essay which was introduced in CRW I class. These classes also provided the information that the researcher needed to complete the research. The researcher wanted to know the relationship of self-management ability and the students ’ ability on writing an argumentative essay which is offered in CRW II class. 26

3.3. Research Population and Sample

In conducting a correlational research, the researcher used a population to be involved in the survey. Population is the entire group of people that the researcher desires to learn about Stangor, 2007. According to Singh 2007, population is a group of individuals, objects, or items from among which samples are taken for measurement. The population of this research was the students of English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University batch 2014. It meant that all of the students of English Language Education Study Program who were taking CRW II class had an opportunity to be the participants of this research. In this study, the researcher only investigated CRW II class because the researcher used simple random sampling. According to Cohen et al 2007 simple rando m sampling is as “a sample which each member of the population under study has an equal chance of being selected and the probability of a member of the population being selected is unaffected by the selection of other members of the population p. 110. The researcher chose simple random sampling because the researcher wanted to generalize the result of this research. The researcher also wanted to say that the data found in this research were valid when the respondents in this survey were more than 30 of the population in English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University batch 2014. The classes had the possibility to be investigated and answer the research problem. In this research, there were two variables. Those variables were dependent and independent variables. The independent variable was the degree of self- PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 27 management ability that might be related to the dependent variable, which referred to students’ score on writing an argumentative essay. These variables helped the researcher to analyze and hypothesize the data effectively.

3.4. Generalization of the Result of Study

This research used quantitative research to generalize the result of study. Quantitative research is “a means for testing objective theories by examining the relationship among variables ” Creswell, 2009, p. 4. In this study, the researcher used inferential statistic to find out the correlation between the degrees of self- management ability and the students’ ability on writing an argumentative essay. The data would be analyzed by using Pearson Product Moment Correlation. The result of Pearson Product Moment Correlation coefficient r was used to test the significance between the degrees of self- management ability and the students’ ability on writing an argumentative essay. The result of sample in this research would be used to generalize the CRW II class that self-management ability was significant to enhance the students’ ability on writing an argumentative essay. Drawing the generalization of research was the key of quantitative research. If the p-value were less than 0.05, the data were called “statistically significant” and it was a good thing for the conclusion for this study Vickers, 2010. The more random sample is, the data taken were able to be generalized and considered as valid. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 28

3.5. Data Gathering Technique

Gathering the data would help the researcher to answer the research problem. The researcher used the questionnaires and the students’ CRW scores on writing an argumentative essay. The researcher asked the students’ CRW scores on writing an argumentative essay to the lecturers as the confidential document. The scores would be used to identify the students’ ability on writing an argumentative essay. The questionnaires were designed to assess the students’ motivation based on the indexes of motivation by Schunk et al. and time management based on the time management matrix by Covey as the strategies used to measure self- management ability. The complete questions would be provided in the appendix. The instrument would be collaborated with some appropriate statements to make it clearer to the respondents. The questionnaires in this research consisted of 15 questions related to the students’ experience while performing the task on writing an argumentative essay. There were some steps of gathering data technique that were done by the researcher. First, the researcher asked the permission to the lecturer to conduct a survey research in the class. The permission was in the form of formal or informal. Then, the researcher also asked the permission to the students of conducting a research. The researcher announced to the students that they were free to choose whether they wanted to be the participant in this research or not. The next step was distributing the questionnaires to the students and asking them to complete the questionnaires. Based on the data, the researcher would be able to define the degrees PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI