41 that the mean was the lowest, followed by median and mode which had the same
numbers. It meant that �̅  M
e
≤ M
o
�̅ = 54.13, M
e
= 57, M
o
=57. The researcher had also calculated the variance of the data and found out the standard deviation
of the variable was 7.084. Graphic  4.1  represents
the  degrees  of  the  students’  self-management ability. From the 60 participants, most of the students were between 55 up to 60
degrees  of  self-management  ability.  In  fact,  there  were  some  students  who  had even more than 60 rating scales. The frequency showed that the self-management
ability  was  done  well  mostly  in  CRW  II  class,  especially  when  they  wrote  an argumentative essay. There was a high frequency of self-management ability even
though there were some students still in the low frequency of handling this ability. There  was  a  statistic,  namely  Pearson  Product  Moment  Correlation  Coefficient
which was applied to find out that there was a strong positive correlation between the  degrees  of  self-management  ability  and  the
students’  ability  on  writing  an argumentative essay. Therefore, in the next analysis, the researcher presented the
students’ first argumentative essay in CRW II class. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
Graphic 4.1 A Histogram of Self-Management Ability
4.1.3. The Students’ Ability on Writing an Argumentative Essay
The researcher  chose  to  analyze  the  students’  first  argumentative  essay
scores to investigate the students’ ability on writing an argumentative essay. The
researcher found out that this was an effective way and it could save more time. The researcher used the
students’ scores in their first argumentative essay as the scale  of  the  students’  ability  on  writing  an  argumentative  essay.  The  students’
scores  in  their  first  argumentative  essay  were obtained  from  CRW’s  lecturers.
Therefore,  the  researcher  constructed  a  group  frequency  distribution  into  seven equal
–  sized  intervals,  starting  from  60  as  the  lower  scale  in  this  study. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43 Afterwards, the researcher analyzed the degrees of the students’ ability by using
SPSS v.16. The details are presented in the table.
Table 4.3 Group Frequency Distribution of Students’ Argumentative Essay Scores
Degrees of Students’ Ability
Frequency Percent
60-64 2
3.3 65-69
6 10.0
70-74 6
10.0 75-79
10 16.7
80-84 17
28.3 85-89
17 28.3
90-94 2
3.3 Total
60 100.0
The table 4.3 presents that there were 2 students 3.3 at the low score on writing an argumentative essay. Then, there were 6 students and 6 students 10;
10 got the moderate nearly score on writing an argumentative essay. The table showed  that  there  were  10  students  16.7  at  the  moderate  up  to  high  score.
Then, the table also showed that there were 2 students 3.3 at the high score on writing  an  argumentative  essay.  By  using  the  software  of  SPSS  v.16,  the
researcher had calculated that the mode was 84 and the mean was 79.97; while the median was 81.50. It showed that most of the students had good ability on writing
an  argumentative  essay.  The  distribution  of  the  data  was  evenly  spread.  By PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI