Theoretical Framework REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

In the discussion session, the teacher should provide some terms to observe. For example: • The appearance of the performers. Whether they are natural or not. • The way they express their feeling. • Behavior • Problem solving • Diction, accuracy, and fluency. g. Repeating the role play This repetition can be done more than once. The teacher and students may exchange their ideas or suggestion to the role play. h. Expressing experiences The purpose of this step is trying to see the relation between the situation and the students’ experiences in the role play. The advantage of this step is that students can apply the principle of the game and the way to solve problems if it really happens in real life.

B. Theoretical Framework

This section summarizes and synthesizes some theories presented previously and relates those theories to the study. From the theory of interactive language learning, it can be inferred that in learning speaking students need to interact with each other through oral or written discourse to enhance their abilities. According to the theory, the ability to speak will be a good point for anybody in the communicative nuance. In the theory of speaking, students need to know how to articulate sounds appropriately, students need enough vocabulary, and need master syntax. However, the students of the twelfth grade of SMA Stella Duce Bantul are less capable of speaking English. The researcher has noticed this problem and wants to find an immediate solution through conducting a classroom action research. The research problem concerns what the appropriate technique to improve the English speaking ability of the students. The researcher should have some criteria to determine whether the techniques in teaching speaking can improve the students’ English speaking ability or not. The theories in procedures of communicative language teaching and the interactive language teaching will form the basis for determining the success or failure of plans. In which, the teacher has basis in ways to teach speaking in interactive and communicative procedures. Furthermore, speaking is one of the English skills. Therefore, researcher applies techniques in accordance to the curriculum of education for the twelfth grade students to meet the indicators of English speaking. The researcher will improve the students’ English speaking ability through a classroom action research. As the theory of classroom action research, researcher should apply one or more teaching techniques that can be successful in improving students’ English speaking ability. In this action research, the researcher should be creative in designing various materials as well as choosing suitable sources and media. According to theories of teacher’s role and student’s role, students as the subject of study should participate actively in teaching learning process. A good relationship PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI between the teacher and the students will build the students’ motivation, which is very meaningful in solving the problems. The willingness to practice their English speaking both inside and outside the classroom will make them more successful in improving their English speaking ability. The collaboration between the school, the students, and the researcher is essential in conducting classroom action research. Then, the steps in conducting classroom action research and the representation of the cycle can bee seen in the figure below: DIAGNOSING SPECIFYING LEARNING ACTION PLANNING EVALUATING ACTION TAKING a Figure 2.2 The Action Research Cycle Baskerville, 1999: 9 To conduct the first cycle of an action research, there are five steps as follows: Diagnosing: Diagnosing corresponds to the identification of the primary problems that are the underlying causes of the research for change. Diagnosing involves self- interpretation of the complex organizational problem in a holistic fashion. Action Planning: The researcher then acts in the next activity, action planning. This activity plans actions that should relieve the primary problems. The discovery of the planned actions is guided by the theoretical framework, which indicated both some desired result for the participants, and the changes that would be achieved. Action Taking: The researcher implements the planned actions. This step causes change to occur and leads to an improved situation. Evaluating: After the actions are completed, the researcher evaluate the outcomes. Evaluation is used to see whether the actions taken can relieve the problems. Where the change is successful, the evaluation must critically question whether the action undertaken is the sole cause of success. Where the change is unsuccessful, some framework for the next iteration of the action research cycle should be established. Specifying Learning: The success or failure of the actions provides important knowledge to the researcher for dealing with future research settings. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents a discussion of the method used in the research. The discussion includes research method, research participants, research instruments, and data gathering technique, data analysis, and research procedures.

A. Research Method

The research was an action research. According to Elliot 1991: 54 action research is concerned with the everyday problems experienced by teachers, rather than the ‘theoretical problems’ defined by pure researchers within a discipline of knowledge. He also says that “action research combines diagnosis with reflections, focusing on practical issues that have been identified by participants and which are somehow both problematic yet capable of being changed.” It can also be defined that action research is designed to bridge the gap between research and practice. Somekh 1995: 340 explains that “action research should contribute not only to practice but to theory of education and teaching which is accessible to other teachers, making educational practice more reflective.” Mills 2003 explains that action research is any systematic inquiry conducted by teacher researchers to gather information about the ways that their particular school operates how they teach, and how well their students learn. The information is gathered with the goals of gaining insight, developing reflective practice, effecting positive changes in the school environment and on educational practices in 33 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING NEAR-PEER ROLE MODELING (NPRM) ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade of SMPN 3 South Tangerang)

0 32 113

IMPROVING SPEAKING ABILITY USING ROLE PLAY FOR THE STUDENTS OF FIFTH GRADE OF SD NEGERI 02 BRANGKAL Improving Speaking Ability Using Role Play For The Students Of Fifth Grade Of SD Negeri 02 Brangkal Gemolong Sragen In 2010/2011 Academic Year.

0 0 13

An analysis on students` reading strategies of tenth grade in SMA Stella Duce 2 Yogyakarta.

0 0 151

A set of supplementary materials using task-based learning in improving vocabulary for the second grade students of Stella Duce 2 Senior High School Yogyakarta.

0 0 192

Designing a set of online english tenses exercises using hot potatoes software for the tenth grade students of SMA Stella Duce 1 Yogyakarta.

0 1 117

Improving vocabulary mastery of XII IPS 1 students of SMA Stella Duce II Yogyakarta through contextual guessing strategy.

1 1 217

English reading instructional materials based on reciprocal teaching strategy for the tenth grade students of SMA Stella Duce 1 Yogyakarta.

0 1 205

IMPROVING THE SPEAKING ABILITY OF GRADE VIII C STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 3 DEPOK YOGYAKARTA THROUGH THE USE OF VIDEO.

0 1 297

Improving speaking ability of the twelfth grade students of SMA Stella Duce Bantul Yogyakarta - USD Repository

0 0 138

Improving vocabulary mastery of XII IPS 1 students of SMA Stella Duce II Yogyakarta through contextual guessing strategy - USD Repository

0 0 215