42
E.  Data Analysis Technique
The  data  was  collected  from  the  interviews,  observation  checklist,  field notes,  and  video  recording.  Having  collected  the  data,  the  writer  analyzed  the
data. The writer used two techniques in analyzing the data, which were coding and triangulation.
1.  Coding
According to Wiersma 1995, “Coding is a process of organizing data and obtaining  data  reduction.  In  essence,  it  is  the  process  by  which  qualitative
researchers ‘see what they have in data’ p. 217.” The coding process dealt with the result of the interviews, observation checklist, field notes, and video recording.
There  were  several  coding  categories  under  the  research  as  what  is described  by  Bogdan  1982.  There  were  setting  codes  general  statements  to
describe  the  subject,  the  setting,  and  how  the  setting  fitted  in  the  community, perspectives  of  the  learners  ways  of  thinking  that  the  students  shared  that
indicated the orientation of particular aspects, process codes sequence of events, changes  over  time,  and  passages  from  one  kind  of  status  to  another,  activity
codes  occurring  behavior,  and  strategy  codes  techniques  employed  in  the teaching and learning process p. 156.
In  this  study,  the  first  process  of  coding  dealt  with  the  results  of observation checklist and field notes. It was done to describe the results of those
two  instruments.  It  was  done  to  make  the  gathered  data  organized  and  to  select whether the data were valuable to be used or not. In this coding process, the writer
referred to the types of scaffolding as depicted by Roehler and Cantlon 1997 and
43
students’  feedback  or  responses  towards  the  implementation  of  the  scaffolding teaching  technique  and  its  types.  The  types  of  scaffolding  helped  the  writer  to
make  the  categorization  and  reduction  of  the  data  gathered  from  the  observation checklist and field notes.
The  second  coding  process  dealt  with  the  result  of  the  video  recording. The writer watched the video recording many times. Meanwhile, the transcription
of the video recording was made. The video recorded all the activities happened in the class thoroughly to complete the missing data that might occur during the use
of other instruments. Through the video recording, the writer could gather data to answer the research problems. Since the recording captured the whole situation of
the  class,  the  writer  could  analyze  what  types  of  scaffolding  occurred  in  the English  conversation  class,  when  they  occurred,  by  using  the  transcription  to
show the detail occurrences of the types of scaffolding, and the writer could code the advantaged of using scaffolding and its types.
The third step of coding dealt with the result of interview. It was similar to the  coding  process  of  observation  checklist  and  field  notes.  The  coding  process
was  based  on  the  answer  of  the  participants.  The  participants’  opinions  were coded to draw the conclusion of the advantages of implementing scaffolding and
its types in English conversation class.
2.  Triangulation