Discussion Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:L:Livestock Production Science:Vol68.Issue1.Jan2001:

A . Tolera, F. Sundstøl Livestock Production Science 68 2001 13 –23 19 Table 5 multiple regressions further increased the coefficient Pearson correlation coefficients of the relationship between esti- of determination to 95, and the addition of L in the mated in sacco DM degradability characteristics of the diet and multiple regression further increased the coefficient feed intake, digestibility and body-weight change in sheep of determination to 96. Dry matter Dry matter Digestible Growth intake digestibility DM intake rate DMD 0.89 0.97 0.97 0.98 24 h

4. Discussion

DMD 0.85 0.95 0.94 0.95 48 h DMD 0.64 0.74 0.73 0.78 72 h NS NS NS The higher washing loss in earlier harvested maize DMD 0.67 0.47 0.55 0.41 96 h A 0.94 0.97 0.98 0.96 stover and in the desmodium hay indicates the B 20.75 20.88 20.85 20.88 presence of more soluble components in these feeds. NS NS A 1 B 20.41 20.58 20.53 20.59 The same explanation holds true for the increased c 0.77 0.92 0.89 0.93 NS NS estimated washing loss at earlier stages of maturity L 0.45 0.59 0.55 0.59 of the stover and with increasing level of desmodium ED 0.87 0.97 0.95 0.97 hay supplementation of the diets. The increased Significance level: NS 5P.0.05; 5P,0.05; 5P,0.01; washing loss observed with increasing level of 5P,0.001; For other abbreviations, see Table 2. supplementation was due to the higher washing loss nation to 96. However, the use of A, B, c or the in desmodium hay and the additive effect of the addition of L in a multiple regression could not stover and desmodium hay in DM degradability. improve the precision of prediction any further. Desmodium hay supplementation also improved the The DMD and ED were the best predictors of estimated DM degradation rate of the diets due to the 24h growth rate followed by the washing loss, DMD , significantly higher degradation rate of the de- 48h degradation rate and the insoluble, but potentially smodium hay than the stovers. Moreover, forage degradable, fraction Table 9. The DMD had the legume supplementation enhances the degradation of 96h lowest precision of predicting growth rate followed the basal roughage by providing readily fermentable by the lag phase, potential degradability and substrates and thereby creating a more favourable DMD . The use of A and B in multiple regressions environment for rumen micro-organisms. According- 72h improved the coefficient of determination by three ly, Ndlovu and Buchanan-Smith 1985 showed that percentage units over the use of the A value alone, to alfalfa supplementation to poor quality roughages 94, whereas the use of A and c or A, B and c in increased rates of disappearance of DM and cell wall Table 6 0.75 Prediction of dry matter intake by sheep y of the total diet g kg W day from DM degradability of the diet 2 Factors Equation R RMSE P DMD y 5 213.611.7DMD 0.78 4.1 ,0.001 24 h 24h DMD y 5 252.512.01DMD 0.72 4.9 ,0.001 48 h 48 h DMD y 5 2177.813.8DMD 0.35 7.1 ,0.05 72 h 72h DMD y 5 2270.314.99DMD 0.39 6.9 ,0.05 96 h 96h A y 59.512.98A 0.87 3.3 ,0.001 B y 5130.621.3B 0.56 6.1 ,0.01 c y 533.91854.8c 0.60 5.9 ,0.01 L y 544.719.6L 0.20 8.2 50.14 A 1 B y 5137.821.1A 1 B 0.17 8.4 50.19 ED y 5 234.612.22ED 0.76 4.5 ,0.001 A B y 5 20.3813.17A10.12B 0.88 3.4 ,0.001 A c y 56.713.55A2225.02c 0.88 3.3 ,0.001 A B c y 5 98.0 1 3.9A 2 1.23B 2 1117.5c 0.91 3.2 ,0.001 A B c L y 5 2 218.2 1 5.8A 1 2.6B 2 104.8c 1 22.14L 0.91 3.4 ,0.001 RMSE 5Root mean square error. For other abbreviations, see Table 2. 20 A . Tolera, F. Sundstøl Livestock Production Science 68 2001 13 –23 Table 7 0.75 Prediction of digestible dry matter intake by sheep y of the total diet g kg W day from DM degradability of the diet 2 Factors Equation R RMSE P DMD y 5 284.712.7DMD 0.93 3.4 ,0.001 24 h 24h DMD y 5 2149.913.3DMD 0.88 4.8 ,0.001 48 h 48 h DMD y 5 2367.316.4DMD 0.49 9.2 ,0.01 72 h 72h DMD y 5 2366.916.04DMD 0.23 11.4 50.066 96 h 96h A y 5 2 44.8 1 4.6A 0.95 2.9 ,0.001 B y 5 151.1 2 2.1B 0.72 7.2 ,0.001 c y 5 2 11.2 1 1447.97c 0.79 6.3 ,0.001 L y 5 5.7 1 17.1L 0.30 11.4 50.066 A 1 B y 5 182.0 2 2.03A 1 B 0.28 11.5 50.077 ED y 5 298.313.1ED 0.90 3.6 ,0.001 A B y 5 2 17.02 1 4.1A 2 0.33B 0.96 2.9 ,0.001 A c y 5 2 42.05 1 4.03A 1 221.12c 0.96 2.9 ,0.001 A B c y 5 2 2.1 1 4.2A 2 0.54B 2 169.3c 0.96 3.0 ,0.001 A B c L y 5 2 168.2 1 5.2A 1 1.5B 1 362.7c 1 11.6L 0.91 3.2 ,0.001 RMSE 5Root mean square error. For other abbreviations, see Table 2. Table 8 Prediction of dry matter digestibility by sheep y of the total diet from DM degradability of the diet 2 Factors Equation R RMSE P DMD y 5 291.213.4DMD 0.94 3.7 ,0.001 24 h 24h DMD y 5 2173.514.0DMD 0.91 5.0 ,0.001 48 h 48 h DMD y 5 2437.017.8DMD 0.50 11.1 ,0.01 72 h 72h DMD y 5 2365.516.3DMD 0.14 14.5 50.123 96 h 96h A y 5 2 40.7 1 5.5A 0.93 4.3 ,0.001 B y 5 201.2 2 2.6B 0.77 7.8 ,0.001 c y 5 2 2.85 1 1821.2c 0.84 6.5 ,0.001 L y 5 16.7 1 22.5L 0.35 13.3 50.043 A 1 B y 5 252.7 2 2.7A 1 B 0.34 13.4 50.046 ED y 5 2138.614.5ED 0.94 3.9 ,0.001 A B y 5 23.7 1 4.29A 2 0.8B 0.95 3.7 ,0.001 A c y 5 2 33.1 1 3.95A 1 619.3c 0.96 3.6 ,0.001 A B c y 5 2 16.4 1 4.0A 2 0.2B 1 456.3c 0.96 3.9 ,0.001 A B c L y 5 2 182.2 1 5.0A 1 1.8B 1 987.1c 1 11.6L 0.96 4.1 ,0.001 RMSE 5Root mean square error, For other abbreviations, see Table 2. from nylon bags. Similarly, Kabatange and Shayo these parameters. The poor correlation of potential 1991 reported that supplementation of Leucaena degradability with DMI is consistent with the find- leucocephala hay to maize stover resulted in in- ings of Carro et al. 1991. The A value, ED, creased DM disappearance from nylon bags at DMD , DMD and the c value were the best 24h 48h different incubation times and in improved degra- predictors of DMI, DMD, DDMI and growth rate in dation characteristics. a simple linear regression equation. In contrast, the The DMD , DMD , A, ED and c values lag phase, potential degradability, DMD and 24h 48h 96h showed strong positive correlation whereas the B DMD were relatively poor predictors of feed 72h value showed a negative correlation with DMI, intake, digestibility and growth rate. DMD, DDMI and growth rate. On the other hand, The A value represents the readily soluble materi- the DMD , potential degradability and the lag als that could affect cell-wall degradation rates 96h phase generally showed very low correlation with through their effects on the rumen’s microbial popu- A . Tolera, F. Sundstøl Livestock Production Science 68 2001 13 –23 21 Table 9 Prediction of growth rate y of sheep g day from DM degradability of the diet 2 Factors Equation R RMSE P DMD y 5 2271.216.7DMD 0.95 7.0 ,0.001 24 h 24h DMD y 5 2434.318.0DMD 0.91 9.9 ,0.001 48 h 48 h DMD y 5 21008.4116.3DMD 0.57 20.6 ,0.01 72 h 72h DMD y 5 2717.3111.1DMD 0.09 29.8 50.18 96 h 96h A y 5 2 168.5 1 10.8A 0.91 9.6 ,0.001 B y 5 310.8 2 5.2B 0.77 15.5 ,0.001 c y 5 2 96.0 1 3651.9c 0.86 12.3 ,0.001 L y 5 2 55.6 1 44.5L 0.35 26.5 50.045 A 1 B y 5 419.15 2 5.5A 1 B 0.35 26.3 50.042 ED y 5 2360.218.8ED 0.95 7.3 ,0.001 A B y 5 2 26.97 1 8.2A 2 1.7B 0.94 8.4 ,0.001 A c y 5 2 149.9 1 7.0A 1 1509.8c 0.95 7.8 ,0.001 A B c y 5 2 221.6 1 6.8A 1 0.96B 1 2211.0c 0.95 8.2 ,0.001 A B c L y 5 2405.8 2 9.0A 2 31.1B 2 6202.9c 2 184.0L 0.96 7.9 ,0.001 RMSE 5Root mean square error. For other abbreviations, see Table 2. lation and its enzyme systems, because they are a rate. According to Yalc¸in et al. 1998, the potential degradability of cereal straws was not related to source of nutrients for the rumen’s micro-organisms growth rate and was poorly related to DM intake. Carro et al., 1991. Thus, it is logical that the A and Fonseca et al. 1998 also reported that the potential c values of the feed have a relatively high precision degradability had the lowest precision of predicting of predicting feed intake, digestibility and growth DMI, DDMI and live weight change. The potential rate. Ferri et al. 1998 also showed that both the A degradability represents the fraction that would be and c values had high positive correlation with DMI, degraded if samples were incubated in the rumen for DDMI and DMD. Carro et al. 1991 found signifi- a prolonged period and is not the same as the in vivo cant relationships between voluntary feed intake and situation. Roughages with similar potential de- the soluble fraction of the DM, the rate of degra- gradabilities could have different rumen retention dation of DM and the rate of degradation of NDF. times and, consequently, different in vivo digestibili- However, the best fit was obtained when both the ty and voluntary intake Carro et al., 1991. soluble fraction and the rate of degradation of the The highly significant relationship of ED with feed DM were included in a multiple regression. On the intake, digestibility and growth rate, found in the other hand, contrary to what would normally be present study, is in conformity with the findings of expected, Chermiti et al. 1996 could not find any Stensig et al. 1994a who showed a significant correlation between DMI and the degradation rate of 2 hays and straws. linear relationship R 50.77 between ED and in Reports in the literature are inconsistent regarding vivo ruminal digestibility of NDF. The calculation of the precision of potential degradability in predicting ED takes into account the assumed fractional feed intake, digestibility and growth rate. For in- outflow rate in addition to the different degradation stance, contrary to the results of the current study, parameters. In this respect, the use of ED in the Hovell et al. 1986 reported a strong linear correla- prediction of feed intake and digestibility appears to tion between the DMI and potential degradability of be more appropriate compared to the other degra- some hays. Ørskov et al. 1988b also showed that dation parameters. According to Stensig et al. the potential degradability of cereal straws was 1994b and Madsen et al. 1997, the use of positively correlated with DMI, DDMI and growth individual degradation parameters for prediction of rate. On the other hand, Kibon and Ørskov 1993 feed intake has the limitation that some feeds do not found that the potential degradability was not a fit the degradation model and that the prediction only reliable predictor of intake, digestibility and growth holds true for the feeds used to predict the relation- 22 A . Tolera, F. Sundstøl Livestock Production Science 68 2001 13 –23 ship. Thus, Madsen et al. 1994 and Stensig et al. References 1994b developed a method where the rate of Carro, M.D., Lopez, S., Gonzales, J.S., Ovejero, F.J., 1991. The degradation in the rumen is combined with the rate use of the rumen degradation characteristics of hay as predic- of outflow to give an estimate of the physical fill of tors of its voluntary intake by sheep. Anim. Prod. 52, 133–139. the feed. Furthermore, Madsen et al. 1997 rec- Chen, X.B., 1995. Neway Excel: An Excel Application Program ommended a system based on the physical fill of for Processing Feed Degradability Data. International Feed feed in the rumen to be an appropriate system for Resources Unit, Rowett Research Institute. Chermiti, A., Nefzaoui, A., Teller, E., Vanbelle, M., Ferchichi, H., evaluation of tropical feeds for ruminants as the Rokbani, N., 1996. Prediction of the voluntary intake of low dominant limitation for intake is physical fill of quality roughages by sheep from chemical composition and partly digested plant fibres in the rumen. ruminal degradation characteristics. Anim. Sci. 62, 57–62. The higher precision of DMD and DMD Dhanoa, M.S., 1988. On the analysis of dacron bag data for low 24h 48h than DMD and DMD in predicting DMI, degradability feeds. Grass Forage Sci. 43, 441–444. 96h 72h Ferri, C.M., Jouve, V.V., Stritzler, N.P., Petruzzi, H.J., 1998. observed in the present study, is consistent with the Estimation of intake and apparent digestibility of kleingrass findings of Yalc¸in et al. 1998. In contrast, Fonseca from in situ parameters measured in sheep. Anim. Sci. 67, et al. 1998 reported that DMD and DMD 96h 72h 535–540. were the best predictors of in vivo organic-matter Fonseca, A.J.M., Dias-da-Silva, A.A., Orskov, E.R., 1998. In digestibility. The use of the A value together with the sacco degradation characteristics as predictors of digestibility and voluntary intake of roughages by mature ewes. Anim. Feed B and or c value in a multiple linear regression Sci. Technol. 72, 205–219. further improved the precision of prediction of feed Hovell, F.D.Deb., Ngambi, J.W.W., Barber, W.P., Kyle, D.J., 1986. intake, digestibility and growth rate over the use of The voluntary intake of hay by sheep in relation to its the A value alone. However, further inclusion of the degradability in the rumen as measured in nylon bags. Anim. lag phase in the multiple regression equation did not Prod. 42, 111–118. Kabatange, M.A., Shayo, C.M., 1991. Rumen degradation of have an advantage. Previous studies Ørskov and maize stover as influenced by Leucaena hay supplementation. Ryle, 1990; Khazaal et al., 1993; Kibon and Ørskov, Livest. Res. Rural Develop. 32, 3 pp. 1993; Shem et al., 1995 also showed that the Khazaal, K., Dentinho, M.T., Ribeiro, J.M., Ørskov, E.R., 1993. A separate use of A, B and c values in multiple comparison of gas production during incubation with rumen regression resulted in high precision of predicting contents in vitro and nylon bag degradability as predictors of the apparent digestibility in vivo and the voluntary intake of feed intake, digestibility and growth rate. hays. Anim. Prod. 57, 105–112. Kibon, A., Ørskov, E.R., 1993. The use of degradation charac- teristics of browse plants to predict intake and digestibility by

5. Conclusion