CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

different from one and another. Hence, more web-based learning teaching methods to learn a language are expected to encourage learners and stimulate them to learn more creatively using the materials and creating more opportunities to conduct their own practice in order to optimize their efforts in attaining the objectives of learning process. Nevertheless, it is necessary to note that web-based learning method may have weaknesses dealing with the maintenance of both of the program and the access. As a result, it needs to be anticipated and monitored so that the learning process keeps running well, otherwise it may lead to problems such as influencing students‘ interest to the learning which may lead to reducing the students‘ willingness to learn. Furthermore, it is also important to consider the level of burden through the materials and the assignments given to the students. It certainly requires the proper level of burden, so the students do not feel under pressure during the learning process. Accordingly, it becomes a challenge for teachers to design materials and program using technology which enable to boost their students‘ learning motivation. BIBLIOGRAPHY Beatty, K. 2003. Teaching and Researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning . Edinburg Gate: Pearson Education Ltd. Beatty, K. 2003. Computers in Language Classroom. In David Nunan ed. Practical English Language Teaching . New York:McGraw-Hill. Beatty, K. 2010. Teaching and Researching Computer-assisted Language Learning 2nd ed. London: Pearson Education Limited. Belcher, D. 1999. Authentic Interaction in a Virtual Classroom: Leveling the Playing Field in a Graduate Seminar. Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, 162, 253-267. Biber, S. N. H. 2010. Mixed Methods Research. Spring Street: A Division of Guilford Publications, Inc. Brown, H.D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching 4 th Eds. San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Bryant, S. M., and J. E. Hunton. 2000. The Use of Technology in the Delivery of Instruction: Implications for Accounting Educators and Education Researchers . Issues in Education Vol. 15, No. 1 129-162. Bush, M., and Terry, R. 1997. Technology-Enhanced Language Learning. Lincolnwood, Illinois: National Textbook Company. Cameron, Keith. 1988. Computer Assisted Language Learning : Program Structure and Principles. NJ: ABLEX Publishing Corporation Norwood. Carter, R. 1998. Vocabulary: Applied Linguistic Perspective. London: Routlegde. Carter, R and David Nunan. 2001. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages . New York: Cambridge University Press. Catalan, R. 2003. Sex Differences in L2 Vocabulary Learning Strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 131, 54-77 150 Chapelle, C.A. 2001. Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition Foundation for Teaching, Testing, and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cohen, A. D. 1998. Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. London: Longman Ltd. Connor, M., and Irene F. H. Wong. 2004. Working through PowerPoint: A Global Prism for Local Reflections . Business Communication Quarterly Vol. 67, No. 2 228-231. Cook, D. M. 1998. The Power of PowerPoint. Nurse Educator Vol. 23, No. 4 5. Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2 nd ed. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd. Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research . Boston: Edwards Brothers, Inc. Egbert, J., Chao, C., and Hanson-Smith, E. 1999. CALL environments: Research, Practice and Critical Issues. Virginia: Teaachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. Egbert, J. and Smith, E.H. 1999. CALL Environments: Research, Practice, and Critical Issues. Alexandria: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. Ellis, N.C. 1997. Vocabulary Acquisition: Word Structure, Collocation, Word- Class, and Meaning. In N.Schmitt and Mc. Carthy Eds. Vocabulary, Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition 2nd ed.. New York: Oxford University Press. Esnault, L. 2008. Web-based Education and Pedagogical Technologies. New York: IGI Global. Firek, H. 2003. 10 Easy Ways to Use Technology in the English Classroom. Portsmouth: Heinemann. Gaas, S. 1999. Discussion: Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 21:319-333. Gilbert, J. 2010. Constructivism within The Second Language. Idaho: Boise State University. http:edtech2.boisestate.edugilbertj504synthesis.pdf Retrieved: 20 October, 2014 Graves, M. F. 2000. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction. In E Rothkopf Ed. Review of Research in Education. Washington D.C: American Research Association. Gu, Y., and Johnson, R. K. 1996. Vocabulary Learning Strategies and language Learning Outcomes. Language Learning 46 4, 643 – 79. Hall, R.H, Watkins, S.E, and Eller, V. M. 2003. A Model Based Design for Learning . http:lite.mst.edumediaresearchcteldocumentshandbook_2003_hall.pdf Retrieved: August 14, 2014. Harahap, S.R.A. 2013. Improving Students‟ Vocabulary Achievement by Using Crossword Puzzles. http:download.portalgaruda.orgarticle.php?article=126822val=3893 . Retrieved: August 14, 2014. Harmer, J. 1993. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman. Harrison, A. 1999. Power Up Stimulating your Students with PowerPoint. Learning and Leading With Technology Vol. 26, No. 4 6-9. Hatch, Brown and Cheryl Brown. 1995. Vocabulary, Semantics, and Language Education . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Henriksen, B. 1999. Three Dimension of Vocabulary Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 21:303-317.