Theory of Character and Characterization
                                                                                since reality is the result of naming ‘the real’ by language and can thus be thought and talked about Fink, 1956: 25.
In those phases, there are some parties who are included. They are mother and father. In this point, Lacan presented a different definition and understanding
of  terms  ‘mother’  and  ‘father’.  According  to  Freud’s  thought,  ‘mother’  and ‘father’  are  defined  as biological  parents  that  a  person  has. Differently,  Lacan
erased  the  sense  of  ‘biological’  in  his  own  definition  of  those  terms.  To  Lacan, what to emphasize more is the function of ‘mother’ and ‘father’. Therefore, they
might be anything. As mentioned  briefly  earlier,  mother  is  the  first  individual  from  whom  a
baby separated a self. Based on this statement, term ‘mother’ might be understood as  the  person  who  gave  a  birth  to  the  baby.  However,  in  some  cases  Lacan  also
called  a  ‘babysitter’  as  a  mother.  Essentially,  ‘mother’  is  the  person  who intensively takes care of the baby. “The mother manifests herself in the real as the
primary caretaker of the infant” Evans, 1996: 121. Lacan’s ‘father’ appears in more various forms. Playing a role as a father
in  Lacan’s  thought  means  separating  the  baby  from  the  mother  and  teaching languages. Teaching  languages  in  this  context  means showing how  a  reality
speaks and then teaching the way to respond it. Thus, Evans also mentioned that a father ‘makes possible an entry into social existence” 1996: 62. While the term
‘mother’ is commonly used in many contexts without being different in meaning, Lacan’s concept about ‘father’ includes three terms: the real father, the imaginary
father,  and  the  symbolic  father.  In An  Introductory  Dictionary  to  Lacanian Psychoanalysis,  the  real  father  is the  man  who  is said  to  be subject’s  biological
father Evans, 1996: 63. The imaginary father could be defined as the ideal figure of  father  that  a  subject  has.  This  figure  is  commonly omnipotent  and  an  all-
powerful  protector  1996:  63.  “The  symbolic  father  is  not  a  real  being  but  a position, a function, and hence is synonymous with the term ‘paternal function’”
1996: 63. This paternal function is what has been explained before about father’s role. In other term, the symbolic father is also called ‘the name of the father’.
In  relation  to  mother,  father  is  the  one  who  runs  the  function  of  giving other versions of reality  to be seen by the subject out of subject’s own mother’s
version of reality. Therefore, father usually does an action of repression in order to make the subject able to comprehend the reality. Father needs to teach the subject
to  repress  subject’s  desire  which usually  is  related  to  a  bond  to  the  mother  by setting a condition for a subject to do something before gaining pleasure from it.
A common example of it is the requirement to get parents’ appreciation by leading education as high as possible.
                