The role of teachers

opinions about the form of materials used in the video are represented by the quotations below. No textbook at all. A299P1 Realia that they mostly use . A2102P1. Or maybe they will use textbook in other meetings but from the video, there is no use of textbook. A2100P3 …there are a lot of realia or things used in this lesson, through pictures, through their own belongings. When they learn about „my pencil‟, they know that the pencil is one because they see the real thing. When they learn about towel, they know that it‟s towel because they see from the picture. So, young learners learn well from something that can be seen, touched, or heard. I think these teachers know that. That‟s why they use such things in the lesson. A2105P1 Meanwhile, related to the third factor, all participants agreed that the materials served as the major source of input. Furthermore, the participants claimed that since there was no textbook used, the materials from the teachers were obtained by the learners through teachers‟ presentations, instructions, and examples. In addition, the participants also insisted that the main inputs in the classroom came from the materials which were designed and presented by the teachers since the teachers in the video did not really provide the opportunities for communicative interactions. Besides, the participants also expressed that the examples of other learners also served as the source of input but very limited. The opinions about the relation of the materials with other input are represented through the following quotations. I think the input is so limited because there is limited interaction. The interaction is not really complex, so the teachers do not want or expect the students to acquire English through interaction. A315P3 Most sources, like what Eli said, through the examples from the teachers, examples from their peers, drilling. Through drilling, the students get the examples from their peers. Yes, only from those two sources, no dialogue or communicative activity, no authentic or natural activity. A360P1 In summary, there were three factors discussed by the participants related to the materials, which consisted of the primary goal of the materials, the form of materials, and the relation of the materials with other input Based on the discussion of the three factors above, the participants identified two roles of the materials. First, the materials served as the main source of input. Second, the materials were the tools to introduce and practice the vocabulary and grammar of the target language. After discussing about the role of learners, teachers, and materials, the participants identified nine beliefs of the teachers in the video about teaching young learners. First, the teachers believed that young learners were good imitators and receivers of knowledge in learning language. Second, the teachers believed that young learners needed models in acquiring language. Third, the teachers believed that young learners were not ready to produce the language yet. Fourth, the teachers believed that teaching young learners was a teacher-centred process. Fifth, the teachers believed that teaching young learners was knowledge transmission. Sixth, the teachers believed that teaching young learners was management of learning. Seventh, the teachers believed that the language itself was a set of habits and the learners could get the input from the habit formation from drilling or repetition all the time. Eighth, the teachers believed that young learners needed simple instructions rather than complicated instructions. The last, the teachers believed that the scaffolding of materials was important in teaching PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI young learners. The beliefs identified were represented through the following comments. … the teachers in this video believe that learners are good imitators in learning language … A224P1 Here the teachers believe on teacher-centred. The teachers only transmit the knowledge and the students only follow, receive the knowledge. A215P4 Just like what we have talked about, the teachers here are really the centre of the class. I can say that it‟s mostly teacher-centred class. A235P1 … what the teachers believe is that the language itself is a set of habits and the students can get the input or the language from the habit formation, I mean like from drilling or repetitions all the time. A226P2 At a glance, I can see that both teachers, like what Eli said, use simple words for the students. Probably because they believe that for that age of learners, simple instruction is needed, not the complicated instruction. A249P1 Yes, but I think the teachers in the video, they have the same beliefs or same opinion that only use the simple instruction. A247P2 I also want to add something. About the teachers‟ beliefs in teaching, I think they scaffold the students before they present the structure, I think they have introduced the vocabulary first. Vocab first then they move to the higher level. A324P3

2. Teaching Activity

The second element of classroom practice discussed by the participants was teaching activity. The discussions of this element consisted of three parts, namely lesson structure, teaching technique, and classroom management. The opinions and arguments of the participants related to this element are presented respectively in the following paragraphs. In addition, the teachers‟ beliefs identified by the participants related to this element are presented after the discussion.

a. Lesson structure

In discussing about lesson structure, the participants put their attention on four dimensions of structuring. The four dimensions consisted of opening, sequencing, pacing, and closure. Furthermore, the discussion of each dimension covered the discussions about the selection of the activity for each dimension, the purpose of using such activity, and also the relation with the whole lesson structure. Related to the first dimension opening, the participants agreed that opening of the lesson in the video were singing activities. According to the participants, the singing activities were also combined with movements which led by the teachers. Furthermore, the participants claimed that the purpose of the singing activities as the opening was only to create the fun atmosphere for the young learners in the classroom. However, the participants insisted that the opening of the lesson in the video was not really appropriate because of three reasons. First, the songs are too many and make teachers exhausted. Second, there is no relation between the songs and the topics of the lesson. Third, there is no elicitation to know the students‟ prior knowledge. The opinions of the participants about the inappropriateness of the opening of the lesson were represented through the quotations below. And then sing, sing many songs. Actually, for the opening, it’s a common thing to provide like the warm-up activities. Maybe all of us here also noticed that many songs provided in the beginning of the activity and like what we discussed, they are too much. Although it can build students‟ motivation to the learning process but if it’s too exceeded, of course it will be tiring or exhausting for the teachers . …Usually in the opening, we introduce the students with the topic that we will teach but there is no relation between the songs and the topic. A2120P2