Uji Means, Uji VArians (ANOVA) dan Uji Chi-Square

Lampiran 6. Uji Means, Uji VArians (ANOVA) dan Uji Chi-Square

Tingkat Stresor, Stres Kerja dan Kinerja Keseluruhan (Uji Mean)

Descriptive Statistics

Std. Deviation STRESOR

,72522 Valid N (listwise)

Descriptive Statistics

Std. Deviation STRESKRJ

,70710 Valid N (listwise)

Descriptive Statistics

Std. Deviation KINERJA

,75946 Valid N (listwise)

Uji ANOVA u/ melihat Ada/tdknya Perbedaan Stres Kerja dan Kinerja berdasarkan Karakteristik Karyawan.

Tingkat Stres Kerja berdasarkan Bagian

Descriptives

STRESKRJ

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Minimum Maximum 1,00

N Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

F Sig. Between Groups

df Mean Square

,282 Within Groups

Total

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

Tingkat Stres Kerja Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin

Descriptives

STRESKRJ

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximum 1,00

N Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Tingkat Stres Kerja berdasarkan Lama Kerja

Descriptives

STRESKRJ

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximu N

Std. Error

Bound

Upper Bound Minimum

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Total

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

Tingkat Stres Kerja Berdasarkan Umur Descriptives

STRESKRJ

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximum 1,00

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Tingkat Stres Kerja Berdasarkan Pendidikan

Descriptives

STRESKRJ

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximum 1,00

N Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Total

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

Tingkat Stres Kerja Berdasarkan Gaji Descriptives

STRESKRJ

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximum 1,00

N Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Tingkat Kinerja Berdasarkan Bagian Descriptives

KINERJA

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximum 1,00

N Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Total

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

Tingkat Kinerja Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Descriptives

KINERJA

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximum 1,00

N Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Tingkat Kinerja Berdasarkan Umur Descriptives

KINERJA

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximum 1,00

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Total

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

Tingkat Kinerja Berdasarkan Pendidikan Descriptives

KINERJA

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximum 1,00

N Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Tingkat Kinerja Berdasarkan Lama Kerja Descriptives

KINERJA

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Maximum 1,00

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Total

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

Tingkat Kinerja Berdasarkan Gaji Descriptives

KINERJA

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum 1,00

Sum of Squares

df Mean Square

F Sig.

Between Groups

Within Groups

Uji Chi Square (Hubungan/keterkaitan)

Stres kerja & Bagian Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

25,894(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a 49 cells (90,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,35.

Symmetric Measures

Value

Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal

Contingency Coefficient

N of Valid Cases

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

STRESKRJ * J.KEL

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

19,237(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a 43 cells (79,6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,10.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

Value

,826 N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

STRESKRJ * UMUR

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

76,310(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Association N of Valid Cases

a 107 cells (99,1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,06.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

N of Valid Cases

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

STRESKRJ * PNDDIKAN

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

95,603(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a 103 cells (95,4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,06.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

Value

,223 N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

STRESKRJ * LM.KRJ

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

35,111(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a 79 cells (97,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,15.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

Value

Contingency Coefficient

,956 N of Valid Cases

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

STRESKRJ * GAJI

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

61,917(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a 77 cells (95,1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,19.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

N of Valid Cases

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Kinerja’ Bagian

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

15,348(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Association N of Valid Cases

a 29 cells (76,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,35.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

N of Valid Cases

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

KINERJA * J.KEL

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

13,403(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a 25 cells (65,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,10.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

Value

Contingency Coefficient

,767 N of Valid Cases

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis

KINERJA * UMUR

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

45,396(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a 71 cells (93,4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,06.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

Value

Contingency Coefficient

,791 N of Valid Cases

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

KINERJA * PNDDIKAN

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

51,560(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a 68 cells (89,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,06.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

N of Valid Cases

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

KINERJA * LM.KRJ

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

30,119(a)

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a 51 cells (89,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,15.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

Value

,622 N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Lanjutan lampiran 6.

KINERJA * GAJI

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.

Value

df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

38,281(a)

36 ,366

Likelihood Ratio

42,261

36 ,219

Linear-by-Linear Association

,076

1 ,782

N of Valid Cases

137

a 49 cells (86,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,19.

Symmetric Measures

Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal

Value

,374 N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

,467

137

a Not assuming the null hypothesis. b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis

Dokumen yang terkait

Analisis Komparasi Internet Financial Local Government Reporting Pada Website Resmi Kabupaten dan Kota di Jawa Timur The Comparison Analysis of Internet Financial Local Government Reporting on Official Website of Regency and City in East Java

19 819 7

Analisis komparatif rasio finansial ditinjau dari aturan depkop dengan standar akuntansi Indonesia pada laporan keuanagn tahun 1999 pusat koperasi pegawai

15 355 84

Analisis Komposisi Struktur Modal Pada PT Bank Syariah Mandiri (The Analysis of Capital Structure Composition at PT Bank Syariah Mandiri)

23 288 6

Analisis Konsep Peningkatan Standar Mutu Technovation Terhadap Kemampuan Bersaing UD. Kayfa Interior Funiture Jember.

2 215 9

FREKWENSI PESAN PEMELIHARAAN KESEHATAN DALAM IKLAN LAYANAN MASYARAKAT Analisis Isi pada Empat Versi ILM Televisi Tanggap Flu Burung Milik Komnas FBPI

10 189 3

Analisis Sistem Pengendalian Mutu dan Perencanaan Penugasan Audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik. (Suatu Studi Kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Jamaludin, Aria, Sukimto dan Rekan)

136 695 18

Analisis Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Pada Industri Kerajinan Tangan Di Desa Tutul Kecamatan Balung Kabupaten Jember.

7 76 65

Analisis Pertumbuhan Antar Sektor di Wilayah Kabupaten Magetan dan Sekitarnya Tahun 1996-2005

3 59 17

Analisis tentang saksi sebagai pertimbangan hakim dalam penjatuhan putusan dan tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana (Studi kasus Perkara No. 40/Pid/B/1988/PN.SAMPANG)

8 102 57

Analisis terhadap hapusnya hak usaha akibat terlantarnya lahan untuk ditetapkan menjadi obyek landreform (studi kasus di desa Mojomulyo kecamatan Puger Kabupaten Jember

1 88 63