Syntax Model Pengaruh Stres Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Pos Indonesia (Persero) Jakarta Timur 13000

Lampiran 7. Syntax Model Pengaruh Stres Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Pos Indonesia (Persero) Jakarta Timur 13000

DATE: 6/17/2007 TIME: 14:38

L I S R E L 8.72

BY

Karl G. Jöreskog & Dag Sörbom

This program is published exclusively by Scientific Software International, Inc. 7383 N. Lincoln Avenue, Suite 100 Lincolnwood, IL 60712, U.S.A. Phone: (800)247-6113, (847)675-0720, Fax: (847)675-2140 Copyright by Scientific Software International, Inc., 1981-2005 Use of this program is subject to the terms specified in the Universal Copyright Convention. Website: www.ssicentral.com

The following lines were read from file D:\Restu-FEM\data.LPJ:

TI analisis SEM with Lisrel 8.7 DA NI=9 NO=137 MA=KM LA X1 X2 X3 X4 Y1.1 Y1.2 Y2.1 Y2.2 Y2.3 KM FI='D:\Restu-FEM\data.cor' SY SE 567891234/ MO NX=4 NY=5 NK=1 NE=2 BE=FU GA=FI PS=SY TE=SY,FI TD=SY,FI LE STRESKERJA KINERJA LK STRESOR FR LY(1,1) LY(2,1) LY(3,2) LY(4,2) LY(5,2) LX(1,1) LX(2,1) LX(3,1) LX(4,1) FR BE(1,2) BE(2,1) GA(1,1) FR TE(1,1) TE(2,2) TE(3,3) TE(4,4) TE(5,5) TE(3,2) TE(4,2) TE(5,2) TE(4,3) TE(5,4) FR TD(1,1) TD(2,2) TD(3,3) TD(4,4) TD(2,1) TD(3,1) PD OU ME=ML IT=1000 AD=OFF ALL

TI analisis SEM with Lisrel 8.7

Number of Input Variables 9 Number of Y - Variables 5 Number of X - Variables 4 Number of ETA - Variables 2 Number of KSI - Variables 1 Number of Observations 137

Lanjutan lampiran 7.

TI analisis SEM with Lisrel 8.7

Correlation Matrix

Y1.1 Y1.2 Y2.1 Y2.2 Y2.3 X1 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Y1.1 1.00 Y1.2 0.63 1.00 Y2.1 -0.13 0.02 1.00 Y2.2 -0.16 -0.28 0.46 1.00 Y2.3 -0.02 -0.16 0.48 0.58 1.00

X1 0.32 0.24 -0.12 -0.19 -0.10 1.00 X2 0.51 0.36 -0.25 -0.24 -0.14 0.44 X3 0.58 0.54 -0.25 -0.25 -0.06 0.32 X4 0.50 0.42 -0.18 -0.01 0.00 0.39

Correlation Matrix

X2 X3 X4 -------- -------- -------- X2 1.00 X3 0.55 1.00 X4 0.55 0.56 1.00

TI analisis SEM with Lisrel 8.7

Parameter Specifications

LAMBDA-Y

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

Y1.1 0 0 Y1.2 1 0 Y2.1 0 0 Y2.2 0 2 Y2.3 0 3

LAMBDA-X

STRESOR -------- X1 4 X2 5 X3 6 X4 7

BETA

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

STRESKER 0 8 KINERJA 9 0

Lanjutan lampiran 7.

GAMMA

STRESOR -------- STRESKER 10 KINERJA 0

PSI

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

THETA-EPS

Y1.1 Y1.2 Y2.1 Y2.2 Y2.3 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Y1.1 13 Y1.2 0 14 Y2.1 0 15 16 Y2.2 0 17 18 19 Y2.3 0 20 0 21 22

THETA-DELTA

X1 X2 X3 X4 -------- -------- -------- -------- X1 23 X2 24 25 X3 26 0 27 X4 0 0 0 28

TI analisis SEM with Lisrel 8.7

Initial Estimates (TSLS)

LAMBDA-Y

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

Y1.1 1.00 - - Y1.2 1.00 - - Y2.1 - - 1.00 Y2.2 - - 1.11 Y2.3 - - 1.05

LAMBDA-X

STRESOR -------- X1 0.54 X2 0.81 X3 0.74 X4 0.69

Lanjutan lampiran 7.

BETA

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

STRESKER - - -0.12 KINERJA -0.32 - -

GAMMA

STRESOR -------- STRESKER 0.36 KINERJA - -

Covariance Matrix of ETA and KSI

STRESKER KINERJA STRESOR -------- -------- --------

STRESKER 0.67 KINERJA -0.27 0.56 STRESOR 0.38 -0.12 1.00

PHI

STRESOR -------- 1.00

PSI Note: This matrix is diagonal.

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

Squared Multiple Correlations for Structural Equations

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

Squared Multiple Correlations for Reduced Form

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

Reduced Form

STRESOR -------- STRESKER 0.38

KINERJA -0.12

Lanjutan lampiran 7.

THETA-EPS

Y1.1 Y1.2 Y2.1 Y2.2 Y2.3 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Y1.1 0.37 Y1.2 - - 0.37 Y2.1 - - 0.12 0.55 Y2.2 - - -0.17 -0.04 0.44 Y2.3 - - -0.06 - - 0.05 0.50

THETA-DELTA

X1 X2 X3 X4 -------- -------- -------- -------- X1 0.71 X2 0.00 0.35 X3 -0.08 - - 0.46 X4 - - - - - - 0.52

TI analisis SEM with Lisrel 8.7

Number of Iterations = 33

LISREL Estimates (Maximum Likelihood)

LAMBDA-Y

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

Y1.1 0.85 - -

Y1.2 0.73 - - (0.09) 7.80

Y2.1 - - 1.26

Y2.2 - - 1.03

Y2.3 - - 0.38

Lanjutan lampiran 7.

LAMBDA-X

STRESOR -------- X1 0.47 (0.09) 4.94

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

STRESKER - - 0.14

KINERJA -0.29 - - (0.09) -3.13

GAMMA

STRESOR -------- STRESKER 0.87 (0.10) 8.34

KINERJA - -

Covariance Matrix of ETA and KSI

STRESKER KINERJA STRESOR -------- -------- --------

STRESKER 1.00 KINERJA -0.15 1.00 STRESOR 0.83 -0.24 1.00

Lanjutan lampiran 7.

PHI

STRESOR -------- 1.00

PSI Note: This matrix is diagonal.

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

Squared Multiple Correlations for Structural Equations

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

Squared Multiple Correlations for Reduced Form

STRESKER KINERJA -------- --------

Reduced Form

STRESOR -------- STRESKER 0.83 (0.10) 8.74

KINERJA -0.24 (0.07) -3.28

THETA-EPS

Y1.1 Y1.2 Y2.1 Y2.2 Y2.3 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Y1.1 0.28 (0.08) 3.67

Y1.2 - - 0.46

Y2.1 - - 0.15 -0.60

Lanjutan lampiran 7.

Y2.2 - - -0.15 -0.84 -0.05

(0.07) (1.11) (1.00) -2.30 -0.76 -0.05

Y2.3 - - -0.13 - - 0.19 0.86

(0.07) (0.16) (0.17) -2.03 1.18 5.17

Squared Multiple Correlations for Y - Variables

Y1.1 Y1.2 Y2.1 Y2.2 Y2.3 -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

THETA-DELTA

X1 X2 X3 X4 -------- -------- -------- -------- X1 0.78 (0.11) 7.45

X2 0.11 0.51 (0.07) (0.08)

X3 -0.06 - - 0.33 (0.06) (0.07) -1.01 5.06

X4 - - - - - - 0.49

Squared Multiple Correlations for X - Variables

X1 X2 X3 X4 -------- -------- -------- --------

Lanjutan lampiran 7.

Goodness of Fit Statistics

Degrees of Freedom = 17 Minimum Fit Function Chi-Square = 28.48 (P = 0.040) Normal Theory Weighted Least Squares Chi-Square = 26.21 (P = 0.071) Estimated Non-centrality Parameter (NCP) = 9.21

90 Percent Confidence Interval for NCP = (0.0 ; 27.16)

Minimum Fit Function Value = 0.21 Population Discrepancy Function Value (F0) = 0.068

90 Percent Confidence Interval for F0 = (0.0 ; 0.20) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.063

90 Percent Confidence Interval for RMSEA = (0.0 ; 0.11) P-Value for Test of Close Fit (RMSEA < 0.05) = 0.30

Expected Cross-Validation Index (ECVI) = 0.60 90 Percent Confidence Interval for ECVI = (0.54 ; 0.74)

ECVI for Saturated Model = 0.66 ECVI for Independence Model = 4.77

Chi-Square for Independence Model with 36 Degrees of Freedom = 631.38 Independence AIC = 649.38 Model AIC = 82.21 Saturated AIC = 90.00 Independence CAIC = 684.66 Model CAIC = 191.97 Saturated CAIC = 266.40

Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.95 Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI) = 0.96 Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI) = 0.45 Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.98 Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = 0.98 Relative Fit Index (RFI) = 0.90

Critical N (CN) = 160.52

Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) = 0.041 Standardized RMR = 0.041 Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.96 Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.89

Parsimony Goodness of Fit Index (PGFI) = 0.36

Dokumen yang terkait

Analisis Komparasi Internet Financial Local Government Reporting Pada Website Resmi Kabupaten dan Kota di Jawa Timur The Comparison Analysis of Internet Financial Local Government Reporting on Official Website of Regency and City in East Java

19 819 7

Analisis komparatif rasio finansial ditinjau dari aturan depkop dengan standar akuntansi Indonesia pada laporan keuanagn tahun 1999 pusat koperasi pegawai

15 355 84

Analisis Komposisi Struktur Modal Pada PT Bank Syariah Mandiri (The Analysis of Capital Structure Composition at PT Bank Syariah Mandiri)

23 288 6

Analisis Konsep Peningkatan Standar Mutu Technovation Terhadap Kemampuan Bersaing UD. Kayfa Interior Funiture Jember.

2 215 9

FREKWENSI PESAN PEMELIHARAAN KESEHATAN DALAM IKLAN LAYANAN MASYARAKAT Analisis Isi pada Empat Versi ILM Televisi Tanggap Flu Burung Milik Komnas FBPI

10 189 3

Analisis Sistem Pengendalian Mutu dan Perencanaan Penugasan Audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik. (Suatu Studi Kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Jamaludin, Aria, Sukimto dan Rekan)

136 695 18

Analisis Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Pada Industri Kerajinan Tangan Di Desa Tutul Kecamatan Balung Kabupaten Jember.

7 76 65

Analisis Pertumbuhan Antar Sektor di Wilayah Kabupaten Magetan dan Sekitarnya Tahun 1996-2005

3 59 17

Analisis tentang saksi sebagai pertimbangan hakim dalam penjatuhan putusan dan tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana (Studi kasus Perkara No. 40/Pid/B/1988/PN.SAMPANG)

8 102 57

Analisis terhadap hapusnya hak usaha akibat terlantarnya lahan untuk ditetapkan menjadi obyek landreform (studi kasus di desa Mojomulyo kecamatan Puger Kabupaten Jember

1 88 63