Sangat Berat Count
1 3
4 Expected Count
.2 1.5
1.8 .6
4.0 within BebanKerjaI
.0 25.0
75.0 .0
100.0 within KelelahanKerjaI
.0 5.6
14.3 .0
8.3 of Total
.0 2.1
6.2 .0
8.3 Total
Count 2
18 21
7 48
Expected Count 2.0
18.0 21.0
7.0 48.0
within BebanKerjaI 4.2
37.5 43.8
14.6 100.0
within KelelahanKerjaI 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
of Total 4.2
37.5 43.8
14.6 100.0
Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std. Error
a
Approx. T
b
Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal
Phi .682
.034 Cramers V
.394 .034
Contingency Coefficient .563
.034 Interval by Interval
Pearsons R -.137
.174 -.940
.352
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation
-.127 .161
-.871 .388
c
N of Valid Cases 48
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
14. Hubungan Beban Kerja Fisik pada Shift II dengan Kelelahan Kerja Umum pada Shift II
15. Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid
Missing Total
N Percent
N Percent
N Percent
BebanKerjaII KelelahanKerjaII 48
100.0 .0
48 100.0
BebanKerjaII KelelahanKerjaII Crosstabulation
KelelahanKerjaII Total
Ringan Sedang
Berat BebanKerjaII
Sedang Count
3 3
6 Expected Count
1.0 1.8
3.2 6.0
within BebanKerjaII .0
50.0 50.0
100.0 within KelelahanKerjaII
.0 21.4
11.5 12.5
of Total .0
6.2 6.2
12.5 Berat
Count 7
8 15
Expected Count 2.5
4.4 8.1
15.0 within BebanKerjaII
.0 46.7
53.3 100.0
within KelelahanKerjaII .0
50.0 30.8
31.2 of Total
.0 14.6
16.7 31.2
Sangat Berat Count
8 4
15 27
Expected Count 4.5
7.9 14.6
27.0 within BebanKerjaII
29.6 14.8
55.6 100.0
within KelelahanKerjaII 100.0
28.6 57.7
56.2 of Total
16.7 8.3
31.2 56.2
Total Count
8 14
26 48
Expected Count 8.0
14.0 26.0
48.0 within BebanKerjaII
16.7 29.2
54.2 100.0
within KelelahanKerjaII 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 of Total
16.7 29.2
54.2 100.0
Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std. Error
a
Approx. T
b
Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal
Phi .471
.031 Cramers V
.333 .031
Contingency Coefficient .426
.031 Interval by Interval
Pearsons R -.152
.120 -1.044
.302
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation
-.097 .141
-.659 .513
c
N of Valid Cases 48
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
15. Hubungan Beban Kerja Fisik pada Shift III dengan Kelelahan Kerja Umum pada Shift III
16. Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid
Missing Total
N Percent
N Percent
N Percent
BebanKerjaIII KelelahanKerjaIII
48 100.0
.0 48
100.0
BebanKerjaIII KelelahanKerjaIII Crosstabulation
KelelahanKerjaIII Total
Normal Ringan
Sedang Berat
BebanKerjaIII Normal
Count 5
5 2
12 Expected Count
2.0 6.2
3.0 .8
12.0 within BebanKerjaIII
41.7 41.7
16.7 .0
100.0 within KelelahanKerjaIII
62.5 20.0
16.7 .0
25.0 of Total
10.4 10.4
4.2 .0
25.0 Ringan
Count 1
8 8
17 Expected Count
2.8 8.9
4.2 1.1
17.0 within BebanKerjaIII
5.9 47.1
47.1 .0
100.0 within KelelahanKerjaIII
12.5 32.0
66.7 .0
35.4 of Total
2.1 16.7
16.7 .0
35.4 Sedang
Count 1
8 1
10 Expected Count
1.7 5.2
2.5 .6
10.0 within BebanKerjaIII
10.0 80.0
.0 10.0
100.0 within KelelahanKerjaIII
12.5 32.0
.0 33.3
20.8 of Total
2.1 16.7
.0 2.1
20.8 Berat
Count 1
4 2
2 9
Expected Count 1.5
4.7 2.2
.6 9.0
within BebanKerjaIII 11.1
44.4 22.2
22.2 100.0
within KelelahanKerjaIII 12.5
16.0 16.7
66.7 18.8
of Total 2.1
8.3 4.2
4.2 18.8
Total Count
8 25
12 3
48 Expected Count
8.0 25.0
12.0 3.0
48.0 within BebanKerjaIII
16.7 52.1
25.0 6.2
100.0 within KelelahanKerjaIII
100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0 of Total
16.7 52.1
25.0 6.2
100.0
Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std. Error
a
Approx. T
b
Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal
Phi .644
.018 Cramers V
.372 .018
Contingency Coefficient .542
.018 Interval by Interval
Pearsons R .269
.144 1.892
.065
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation
.230 .151
1.604 .115
c
N of Valid Cases 48
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
16. Perbedaan Beban Kerja Fisik antara Shift I, Shift II, Shift III
