Conclusion CONLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

Therefore, instead of only focusing on seeing interruption as a violation, analyzing its cooperative function as well will result better findings. 2. To other researchers The approach used in this research is Sociolinguistics. It is used to show interruption in mixed-sex conversations which focuses on gender differences. Therefore, to enrich the investigated areas, other researchers are suggested to analyze interruption by focusing on different issues. As an example, they can analyze interruption that occurs in speakers of different ages or different cultures. In addition, TV series becomes the object of analysis of this research. In relation to this, the future researchers may use different objects to broaden the analysis of interruption within society, such as movies, TV sitcoms, advertisements, and many others. 3. To readers in general This research gives information and knowledge on the types and functions of interruption which occur in mixed-sex conversations in a TV series. It is expected that by reading this study, the readers will understand more about interruption and they can use it appropriately in daily conversation. 70 REFERENCES A. Printed Sources Beattie, G. W. 1982. “Turn-Taking and Interruption in Political Interviews: Margaret Thatcher and Jim Cal laghan Compared and Constrasted” in Semiotica, 39-12, pp. 93-114. Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers. Beaumont, S. L., V. C. B. Vasconcelos, and M. Ruggeri. 2001. “Similarities and Differences in Mother-daughter and Mother-son Conversations during Preadolescence and Adolescence”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 4,pp. 419-444. Bischoping, K. 1993. “Gender Differences in Conversation Topics, 1922-1990” in Sex Roles, Vol. 28, Nos. 12, 1993. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Chaika, E. 1982. Language The Social Miror. Massachussetts: Newburry House Publishers, Inc. Denscombe, M. 2009. The Good Research Guide. London: Open University Press. Hancock, B., E. Ockleford, and K. Windridge. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. National Institute for Health Research. Heigham, J and R. A. Crocker. 2009. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. James, D. and S. Clarke. 1993. “Women, Men and Interruption: A Critical Review” in Deborah Tannen Ed.. Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. Lakoff, R. 1 973. “Language and Woman’s Place” in Language in Society, Vol. 2, No. 1 Apr., 1973, pp. 45-80. London: Cambridge University Press. Larasati, C. K. 2014. A Conversation Analysis of Interruptions in Modern Family Season 1 Series. Thesis. Unpublished. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Marche, T. A. and C. Peterson. 1993. “The Development and Sex-Related Use of Interruption Behavior”. Human Communication Research, 19, 03,pp. 388- 408. Newman, M. L. et al. 2008. Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14.000 Text Samples. Taylor and Francis Group: Routledge. Pearson, J. C. 1985. Gender and Communication. Lowa: WMC Brown Publishers Dubuque, Lowa. Poynton, C. 1989.Language and Gender: Making the Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ritchie, J, and J. Lewis. 2003. Qualitative Research Practice: a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications. Strenstrom, A. B. 2014. An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. New York: Routledge. Tannen, D. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand. New York: Ballantine Books. _________ 1994. Gender and Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press. _________ 2005. Conversational Style. New York: Oxford University Press. Vanderstoep, S. W. and D. D. Johnston. 2009. Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass. Wardaugh, R. 2006. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Fifth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Wiersma, W. 1995. Research Methods in Education: An Introduction 6th ed.. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Xu, Y. 2009. “Gender Differences in Mixed-Sex Conversations: A Study of Interruptions” In Elective Course: Language and Gender. Kristianstad: Kristianstad University. Xiaoquan, Z. and W. Gantz . 2003. “Disruptive and Cooperative Interruptions in Prime- Time Television Fiction: The Role of Gender, Status and Topic” in Journal of Communication, June 2003. Pennsylvania: International Communication Association. Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press. Zimmerman, D. H. and C. West. 1975. “Sex Roles, interruptions and silences in conversations” in B. Thorne N. Henley Ed.. Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. __________ 1983. “Small insults: A study of interruption in cross-sex conversation between unacquainted persons” in Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae, Nancy Henley Ed.. Language, Gender Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. _________ 1987. “Doing Gender” in Gender and Society, Vol. 1, No. 2. Jun., 1987, pp. 125-151. Sage Publications.